Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


0 Neutral
  1. One theory holds: Predestined in that all outcomes occur, i.e. the wavefunction collapse reality we observe is only one of an infinite outcomes that are actualized. What's not predestined is the reality we observe. So if one outcome leads to death, and one outcome leads to ......, does the path our consciousness takes random, or the path that does not lead to death?
  2. Wow, an intelligent response to a post. Thank you for that. I haven't posted here in a while because I only got dunder-headed responses from a poster here at tti. Let's see if I can remember that chowder-head's name,....... Rainman. Here's another quote on time: There is no difference between the past and the future in the 4-dimensional space-time-world. The present is only an illusion.
  3. That's right. Time is an artifact of the mechanics of our perception of reality. It's like saying a reel of film has time. When in fact there are events captured as images, some events happen in one direction of a reference image and some events happen in the other direction. There is no "now," only individual events captured as a sequence of images. One can travel from one image to another image out of sequence, but not using a film projector. A film projector requires one to view the individual images in a specific sequence. But one can unroll the film, look at one image, then move to another section of the film and look at another image. To someone who only knows the film by way of a film projector, you could say that person is "film traveling."
  4. Re: It's all there....Let's see what happens The quatrain does not imply that a comet will hit the earth. It predicts something bad happening after Mabus dies and a comet passes.
  5. It's all there....Let's see what happens Mabus (Sadam?) will soon die, then will come, A horrible undoing of people and animals, At once one will see vengeance, One-hundred, hands, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16474386/
  6. You don't have to interpret what Darby said. Here is what he said: I say with regard to the above statement Darby does not know what he is talking about.
  7. I have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect you don't either.
  8. Right. They are racking in the $$$$$. The movie, the book, the action figures......cover of Time Magazine.... all the way to the bank.
  9. MEM


    That's one theory. Another theory is that there is no such thing as time. That time is an artifact of the way our consciousness perceives reality. That the future and the past are no different than the present. So future time travel is possible. And that past time travel is possible but only to a different time/world line.
  10. Good. RMT did no belong on this board. It takes an open mind and a willingness to discuss theories that does not necessarily fit your view of the world. RMT was way-too-rigid in his thinking. I guess that's just what happens to your brain as you get old.
  11. Re: A Model for John Titor's 'Parallel Universes.\" Are you able to reject the concept of mwi of quantum physics? If so, I'd like to hear your reasoning behind it. tia.
  • Create New...