Jump to content

Peter_Novak

Members
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peter_Novak

  1. Here's a curiosity. Another curiosity to add to the list. Way back in March 2005 when Zeshua was just starting to post online, she posted here at TTI first, and then a few days later at TTF (Time Travel Forum). At that time no one knew that the TTF was soon going to go off line for an extended period of many years. At that time it seemed just as likely to stay up and running as TTI. But Sara wrote in her second post at TTF, way back then in March 2005, in the very beginning of it all, "(The Following was accomplished at www.timetravelinstitute.com) Here is what we, and now only myself, were able to accomplish. Over 200 threads and thousands of correspondence stretching from February 22nd 2005-March 1st 2009." Now, at the time no one asked why she specified that all this was accomplished at TTI only, and not also at TTF too, especially given that she seemed at the time to be starting a similar dialogue in both forums. But she was clear about it, saying that the vast majority of her correspondence and threads were going to be on TTI and not TTF. It was very much as if she knew in advance that TTF was not going to be up and running for long.
  2. The news, in Summer 2011, is now full of stories with headlines like "If The U.S. Government Loses Its AAA Rating It Could Potentially Unleash Financial Hell Across The United States". That's pretty much exactly what Zeshua predicted would happen. And it's even happening WHEN she said it would happen : 2011
  3. Q. What does history say about the Middle East during this decade? Zeshua's answer: That Muhammad was a prophet, that Allah was Great, that the mere freedoms we all took for granted in the U.S. were the very things the Arabs in the Middle East were despondent against. The Arab Spring, the pro-democracy movement sweeping thru the Middle East in 2011, is a fight for US-style liberty and freedom. The above prediction was posted in 2005, and it was to describe the Middle East over the following decade, i.e., 2005-2015. IOW, Zeshua predicted in 2005 that a conflict over US-style liberty and freedom would occur within the Middle East between 2005-2015. And with the arrival of the Arab Spring, so it has.
  4. The Great Recession arrived just a few months after Zeshua posted the above post and started this thread in June 2007. 2007 was the first of her four predicted years to arrive, and she predicted two years earlier, in 2005, that the world economic crisis would begin in 2007. It did, in the twelfth month of 2007. How many times did she post in 2007? Twelve. How many threads did she begin in 2007? Just this one.
  5. The numbers have been right so far. We'll see if they continue to be, but she got the first one correct, predicting in 2005 that an economic crisis would hit in 2007. The Great Recession has officially been recorded in history as having begun in December 2007, even though the events of 2008 were more dramatic. So Zeshua was right about that after all. Now, she indicated that 2007-2011 would be a particular stretch of time that would go down in history for its economic crisis, and then 2012-2015 would go down in history as being a time when a WWIII scorched half the globe. She gave us four dates : 2007, 2011, 2012, and 2015, and said that each of these years would bring a certain change. And she got the first one in the sequence correct.
  6. Way back as far as 2005, Zeshua insisted that the 2011-2012 period was when TSHTF. Now we see it beginning right on schedule with the Arab Spring and the US debt default crisis.
  7. Darby would have us believe that nothing is any different in the Middle East than usual. Perhaps he should go to Egypt, Libya, Syria, or Pakistan and ask the locals if they have noticed any changes. The truth is that the area has fallen into chaos, exactly as Zeshua predicted. Prior to this year, Sudan was the only Arab country to have successfully overthrown dictatorial regimes. But over the last few months, demonstrations have resulted in the overthrow of two heads of state: Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali fled to Saudi Arabia on 14 January following the Tunisian revolution protests, and in Egypt, President Hosni Mubarak resigned on 11 February 2011, ending his 30-year presidency. During this period of regional unrest, several leaders announced their intentions to step down at the end of their current terms. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir announced that he would not seek re-election in 2015, as did Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. Protests in Jordan have also caused the resignation of the government resulting in former Prime Minister and Ambassador to Israel Marouf al-Bakhit being appointed prime minister by King Abdullah and tasked with forming a new government. Another leader, President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen, announced on 23 April that he would step down within 30 days in exchange for immunity. And of course, Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi has refused to step down, causing a civil war between his loyalists and rebels based in Benghazi. The current wave of protests is not an entirely new phenomenon, but the escalation of protests is unprecedented in the region. The catalyst for the current escalation of protests was the self-immolation of individuals such as Mohamed Bouazizi, which brought together various groups dissatisfied with the existing system, including many unemployed, political and human rights activists, labor, trade unionists, students, professors, lawyers, and others. These groups have become an unprecedented movement that has built sufficient momentum to engender the current scope of events. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_spring
  8. Big words from someone who has demonstrated that he doesn't even know the definition of the term "Middle East".
  9. You are wrong, Darby. Wrong, wrong, wrong. According to Wikipedia, Egypt is in the Middle East. According to the US State Department, Egypt is in the Middle East. According to Darby, Egypt is NOT in the Middle East. "The first official use of the term "Middle East" by the United States government was in the 1957 Eisenhower Doctrine, which pertained to the Suez Crisis. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles defined the Middle East as "the area lying between and including Libya on the west and Pakistan on the east, Syria and Iraq on the North and the Arabian peninsula to the south, plus the Sudan and Ethiopia." In 1958, the State Department explained that the terms "Near East" and "Middle East" were interchangeable, and defined the region as including only Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar." With the exception of Darby himself, I feel confident that all readers here will accept either Wikipedia and/or the US State Department as higher authorities than Darby on this subject. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_east http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_east#Traditional_definition_of_the_Middle_East
  10. PARIS – Israel's defense minister said Tuesday that despite the upheaval in the Arab world from pro-democracy uprisings, Israel should push forward with negotiations. Ehud Barak was in Paris Tuesday for talks with the French foreign and defense ministers. In an interview with The Associated Press he emphasized the importance of restarting the long-stalled peace talks, despite some misgivings by other members of his own government. "We are looking at an area which is under a political turmoil, something we have not witnessed for maybe 90 years since the collapse of the Ottoman empire, he said. http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110621/ap_on_re_eu/israel_palestinians IOW, Zeshua right again. She even got the year right.
  11. First, let's all note that, even after it was pointed out, Darby did not admit his error in insisting that Egypt is not part of the Middle East. Apparently the US State Department is not a sufficient authority for him on this matter. And while Darby is correct that the Middle East has regularly seen unrest over the last century, nothing on the scale of the Arab Spring has been seen since the fall of the Ottoman Empire. It is NOT "business as usual" over there right now, despite what Darby would suggest. The Arab Spring is a regional development of historic significance, and Zeshua not only predicted it years in advance, but even defined when it would arrive (2011-2012): "Seven to eleven Cards collapse Thy dollar not firm Twelve to fifteen Half the world burned." Exactly as predicted, the recession began in 2007 and lasted until 2011. In 2011, massive unrest swept thru the Middle East on a scale not seen since the fall of the Ottoman Empire, raising the specter of a regional Civil War occurring in the Middle East. In some places this Civil War has already begun (Egypt, Libya). In other places it is on the verge of occurring (Syria, Pakistan, etc.) Zeshua's words (seven to eleven, twelve to fifteen) indicate that a fundamental change occurs between 2011-2012, in which the predominant crisis shifts from an economic one (symbolized by the dollar) that lasts five years, to a war (symbolized by the world burning) that lasts four years. This all ties in with her many other predictions of a coming worldwide Civil War occurring.
  12. Darby is correct. Libya and Tunisia are not in the Middle East, and no one writing from ten years in the future would make the mistake of suggesting they were. Nonetheless, "The protests of the Arab Spring have shaken much of the Middle East" according to the Associated Press ([http://news.yahoo.com/jordan-navigates-warily-turmoil-arab-spring-162254512.html). The entire area is under political turmoil, something we have not witnessed since the collapse of the Ottoman empire 90 years ago. The Arab Spring is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests that has been taking place in the Arab world since 18 December 2010. Prior to this period, Sudan was the only Arab country to have successfully overthrown dictatorial regimes, in 1964 and again in 1985. But over the last year, there have been revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt; a civil war in Libya; civil uprisings in Bahrain, Syria, and Yemen; major protests in Algeria, Iraq, Jordan, Morocco, and Oman, as well as on the borders of Israel; and minor protests in Kuwait, Lebanon, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Western Sahara. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring) Yemen is in the Middle East. Mass protests demanding an end to President Ali Abdullah Saleh's 33-year rule are still paralysing Yemen after six months, and Yemen's southern province of Abyan has descended into violence and anarchy. Syria is in the Middle East, and it has also been engulfed in violence during more than three months of anti-government discontent, in which the government shelled protesting towns and neighborhoods. More than 1,400 Syrians have been killed in the crackdown, and 10,000 have been detained, and many fear that Syria is on the verge of Civil War. Iraq and Afghanistan are in the Middle East, and they have been chaotic for years. Pakistan is in the Middle East, and heavy fighting has also been going on there lately as well, with militants using rocket-propelled grenades, hand grenades and AK-47 assault rifles. Bahrain is in the Middle East, and it was wracked by a violent uprising earlier this year, and Saudi Arabia became involved in repressing that struggle. Jordan is in the Middle East, and it has been embroiled in protests and demonstrations for over six months. Oman and Lebanon are in the Middle East, and the Arab Spring brought protests and uprisings to their lands as well. So let's sum up, shall we? We find that in 2011, Yemen, Syria, Jordan, Bahrain, Oman, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia have all been embroiled in chaos, unrest, and/or uprisings. That's chaos in ten Middle Eastern nations! Ten! The Middle East has officially "erupted in chaos", just as Zeshua predicted. Is "all out war" far behind? P.S. Is Darby correct after all? According to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East Egypt IS traditionally considered a part of "the Middle East"; in fact, the US State Department defined the region in 1958 as including Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar. There is also an area known as "the Greater Middle East" that also includes Libya and Tunisia. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Middle_East So then we find that in 2011, not ten but THIRTEEN nations in the Middle East have erupted in violence and chaos. Just as Zeshua predicted.
  13. Looks like it is starting now. In Tunesia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen...
  14. All these mysterious reports of dead birds and fish all over the planet are consistent with a rash of methane gas releases. Methane is very deadly to birds and fish.
  15. Re: Experiment with Time, your assistance is reque "More than 100 American cities could go bust next year as the debt crisis that has taken down banks and countries threatens next to spark a municipal meltdown, a leading analyst has warned. Meredith Whitney, the US research analyst who correctly predicted the global credit crunch, described local and state debt as the biggest problem facing the US economy, and one that could derail its recovery. "Next to housing this is the single most important issue in the US and certainly the biggest threat to the US economy," Whitney told the CBS 60 Minutes programme on Sunday night." http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/municipal-meltdown-ahead.html
  16. Zeshua seems to have predicted the advent of WikiLeaks in her TTI post "Blast From The Past" on 11/15/06. The WikiLeaks website first appeared on the Internet two weeks later, in December 2006.
  17. Zeshua right again! In 2005, Zeshua warned that a great international incident would occur which she called "the twist". This was the event, she said, that would ultimately propeld the world into World War III in 2011-2012. She refused to say exactly what this event was, but she did say about it that "You will feel as though you've just been through a movie in which the last 5 minutes changed the entire first 2 hours of the movie". This "twist" was going to cause the downfall of all sorts of dominoes, world leaders, and nations, according to Zeshua. Your history has arrived, folks.
  18. Zeshua's "twist" may be the upcoming Wikileaks dump On the Twist, Zeshua said, "The Civil War, which is more of a Global Civil War, is the same all over the globe. It is truly a David versus Goliath scenario and this is one thing JT never said, this is a worldwide phenomenon. It just happens to be Focused on the United States. You will feel as though you've just been through a movie in which the last 5 minutes changed the entire first 2 hours of the movie, the Twist, as it were, which Cannot be guessed (we are sure, you have Tried, every single time), and cannot be revealed, is very "Unexpected". Once the initial panic is over, the confusion sets in, this is the time Big Brother steps in and you no longer have that cushy 100% freedom you treasure so Dearly. Well, get Used to it. [...] Imagine if you will all of these large domino's being setup, all over the world. Interlinking countries, Dictators, Rulers, Presidents, Leaders. Arafat, Terri Schiavo, The Pope, are exactly like this, stand them up carefully and watch them all fall in succession. I Might add, the thing about Domino's is, you find it almost impossible to stop them once the chain reaction of events has started. All it needs is One Catalyst, One starting point, something to set it off. Or what I refer to as "The Twist"." This TWIST starts the civil war, according to Zeshua. She calls the strange event that starts the war the "TWIST", and mysteriously declares that it will make us feel as though we've just been through a movie in which the last 5 minutes changes the entire first 2 hours of the movie. That could very well occur with this new Wikileaks dump. This unexpected occurrence will take everyone by surprise, and when it happens, all our lives will be indelibly altered and permanently changed. This Twist is not religious, political, archaeological, or astronomical in nature, Zeshua says, but PSYCHOLOGICAL. Similarly, the coming Wikileaks dump is slated to have a huge psychological impact. Zeshua says that this Twist will be a psychological change or transformation that will "permanently change" and "indelibly alter" all our lives . Zeshua says that the whole Civil War starts because of this one strange and mysterious event, and also that this conflict is almost like a Global Civil War. This Twist, Zeshua says, is not so much catastrophic as it is cataclysmic. The difference between these terms? One is associated with a disastrous ending, while the other is just a great upheaval that "washes through". This change is not the end of the world, life goes on, people are still surviving and getting by, but patience and cautiousness become necessary. The way she describes this worldwide psychological transformation suggests just such a 'washing through" : Catastrophic : a sudden and widespread disaster. A disastrous finish or conclusion. Any misfortune, mishap, or failure. A sudden violent disturbance. Cataclysmic :any violent upheaval, esp. of a social or political nature. A sudden or violent physical action producing changes in the earth's surface. A flood, deluge. Cata =down, through, against. Klysmos=a washing. Cataclysm = a washing through. The Wikileaks dump could well be described as a 'washing thru'. It will sweep thru the world's awareness, transforming everyone's concept of the USA, and it will be seen as 'cleaning' or 'washing' away the lies that have concealed the truth.
  19. Well, he was right about 2008. He said, "The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over" and "By 2008, I would say the civil conflict is pretty much at everyone's doorstep." As it turned out, 2008 was a huge turning point for the world. It brought the worldwide economic collapse and it brought the Obama election. Both of these events left millions of Americans feeling just what Titor said they would, that the world they thought they were living in was over. He said that the civil conflict was pretty much at everyone's doorstep by 2008. 2008 was when millions of Americans lost their jobs and became homeless, and all those massive homeless camps started rising up on the outskirts of America's cities. For millions of Americans, the civil conflict not only arrived on their doorsteps, but took away those doorsteps, along with the rest of the houses they were attached to. Many have interpreted Titor's phrase of "civil conflict" as meaning violence and open warfare, and such interpretations are not consistent with 2008's developments. However, the millions who lost their jobs and homes in 2008 might feel that they indeed were the victims of a different sort of civil conflict that did start in 2008. In any case, the bottom line is that Titor highlighted the year 2008 as a pivotal year. He referred to it again and again. He did not say anything about 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, or 2010, but he mentioned 2008 three separate times. And then 2008 came and went, and boy, was it ever pivotal! The worst economic downturn since the Great Depression arrived then, and America elected its first Black President. If that's not pivotal, I don't know what is.
  20. On Titor's civil war According to Titor, the Civil war in this country was supposed to begin a long time ago. Titor himself defined exactly when it started : 2004 - 2005. Now, when 2004 and 2005 came and went without any 1861-type civil war taking place, the air pretty much went out of the Titor story. People concluded that he had been wrong about that, and therefore that he was just bullshit thru and thru. The problem with this was that many of Titor's other predictions did seem to have come true, like the space shuttle, the Middle East war, and so on. But the big one, the civil war prediction, seemed to carry so much weight that the whole story was pretty much "case closed" for alot of people. But then something funny happened : Titor's 2008 prediction was dead-on-accurate. The statements he made about 2008 were completely consistent with the worldwide economic collapse in 2008 and the Obama election. So people started feeling uncomfortable about him again. What was the deal? Why were half of his predictions coming true and the other half not coming true? The apparent hits of the space shuttle, the Middle East war, and now the 2008 economic collapse started to look like one coincidence too many to ignore. So that redirected people's attention back to that 2004 prediction that he seemed to get SO wrong - that a civil war was supposed to start then. What was the deal with that? Was that prediction wrong or not? And people started looking at 2004 and 2005 a little closer. And the first thing that pops out is that Titor first showed up in 2000, during a very abnormal and controversial election that alot of people were very upset about. And right at the height of that drama, is when he shows up and starts posting online. Now that alone is a little peculiar, because the Titor story was very sophisticated and complex, and if it was a hoax, alot of time and planning and prep work had to go into it in advance. So we're supposed to believe that whole process ended just coincidentally at the same time that this historically unique and controversial election occurs? That would be quite a coincidence. But anyway, he shows up then, and discusses that controversial election a bit, and then says that America is going to have another civil war, and, coincidentally, he says it is going to start at the very same time the next election occurs - in 2004. 2004 may have been when the Republicans first used the electronic voting boxes to steal the US Presidency, an act which would amount to a hostile takeover of the government, an act which would qualify as the beginning of a Civil War in any historian's eyes. It would be a real overthrow of the government. The fact that they used computers instead of guns to wrest control of the government away from the citizens and put that control in the hands of a small group is irrelevant. It would be a silent coup, orchestrated under the noses of the citizenry without their consent. One curiosity about this prediction is that Titor gave us two different answers about when the civil war started - in 2004 and in 2005. This would make sense if he was viewing that election being the start of the civil war, because while the election itself took place in 2004, its results wouldn't come into effect until 2005. An election did occur then. And it really may have been stolen. That election was the first time that exit polls were extremely off-base for a US Presidential Election. They had previously been very accurate and reliable, but in 2004 they seemed to fail completely : the polls and the news stations were reporting that it looked like Kerry had it in the bag, but then the official numbers published by the government said that Bush had won instead. There were widespread serious accusations of vote fraud, but it all got kind of swept under the rug. We can probably never know for sure if the American government was stolen that year. And that means we can probably never know if a civil war actually started via coup in 2004 - 2005. But what we DO know is that the violence normally associated with a civil war did NOT begin in 2004 - 2005. But then, Titor never said it would. In fact, he indicated that even though the civil war started in 2004 - 2005, the violence wasn't going to show up until 2011. While he insisted that the US Civil War would begin in 2004/2005, he made many statements indicating that this conflict would not turn violent until 2011 ("I keep saying her tune will change in about ten years [2011] and she'll be cleaning shotguns in her sleep" and "outright open fighting was common by 2011"). But can a war start without violence? When does a war start? Does it start when the violence begins, or when the cause of the violence arrives? I honestly don't know, but these sound like definition questions best left to historians ...which Titor claimed to be. He predicted that during the civil war, the US would see "a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse", and today the major story in the news is about all the thousands of families getting forcefully thrown out of their homes, which is exactly what the government was trying to do at Waco. Although he maintained that the US Civil War officially started in 2004/2005, he added that the conflict would not really get going until much later : "The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012", which is a timeline very consistent with today's economic crisis and foreclosure rush. He said that the civil war in the US would be between the "haves" and the have-nots". In other words, it was supposed to be an economically-based conflict. And what do we have going on today in America? A pitched battle between the banks and the common people. Over the next few weeks, we've seen in the news lately, somewhere around five million Americans are going to become "99'ers", that is, they are going to run out of money - their unemployment will run out. And then 2011 arrives -- the year Titor specified, ten years ago now, as "THE TIME" when the [censored] actually does hit the fan. So to people who don't think that a civil war occurs when the cause of the violence arrives, and only think the civil war would have officially "started" when the violence itself begins, Titor seems to be saying, "2011 is when it starts". It's not like we haven't been warned. Ten years ago, Titor came right out and said that 2011 was the year. While Titor stated that the US Civil War would technically begin in 2004/2005, he made many statements indicating that this domestic conflict would not actually turn violent until 2011 ("I keep saying her tune will change in about ten years [he posted this in 2001, and ten years later = 2011] and she'll be cleaning shotguns in her sleep" and "outright open fighting was common by 2011"). He predicted the US would see "a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse", and today the major story in the news is about all the thousands of families getting forcefully thrown out of their homes, which is exactly what the government was trying to do at Waco. Although he maintained that the US Civil War officially started in 2004/2005, he added that the conflict would not really get going until much later : "The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012", which is a timeline very consistent with today's economic crisis and foreclosure rush. His 2008 prediction was dead-on-the-mark accurate. Writing in 2000, he somehow totally nailed the 2008 turning point; he predicted "The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over." This prediction proved all too correct when (A) the world economy crashed in 2008 and we entered the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and (B) Obama won the Presidency. He predicted we would have an "overheating problem with our space plane", and then the Columbia Explosion occurred three years later because of, yes indeed, an overheating problem. He predicted "degrading US foreign policy and consistency", and under Obama the US has been far less friendly to Israel and far more to Muslim nations, which certainly qualifies as an inconsistency. He predicted the "the demise of "Homo Materia", an apparent reference to a worldwide economic collapse. The masses of Americans living in tent cities today are certainly less "materialistic" than they were in 2000, and that is all but certain to get alot worse in the next few years. He predicted a revival of States Rights as a major national issue, and this came to pass lately with the advent of the State Sovereignty movement. He predicted that "The West will become very unstable,". He totally nailed that one too. This prediction has already come true, as we have seen in the news stories covering the riots and chaos in Greece, France, England, Ireland, and elsewhere. He predicted that China would become very aggressive and expansionistic, and it would "forcefully annex Taiwan, Japan and Korea" before 2015, and the news has carried stories lately suggesting that China is laying the groundwork for such expansion, with its recent huge military buildup, its naval fleet expansion, and its latest move to boost its naval presence in disputed waters. Titor said that during the coming war, the greatest number of deaths would be via starvation, and the news has carried numerous stories about severe food shortages around the world over the last two years.
  21. Regarding Titor: ALL of Titor's predictions came true (or are increasing in likelihood of coming true) with the exception of the "no official Olympics after 2004" prediction. He predicted that the Civil War would begin in 2004. 2004 was, as it turned out, when the Republicans first used the electronic voting boxes to steal the US Presidency, which amounts to a hostile takeover of the government, an act which would qualify as the beginning of a Civil War in any historian's eyes. He predicted "The year 2008 was a general date by which time everyone will realize the world they thought they were living in was over." This prediction proved all too correct when the world economy crashed in 2008 and we entered the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. He predicted we would have an "overheating problem with our space plane", and then the Challenger Explosion occurred because of, yes indeed, an overheating problem. He predicted "degrading US foreign policy and consistency", and under Obama the US has been far less friendly to Israel and far more to Muslim nations, which certainly qualifies as an inconsistency. He predicted the "the demise of "Homo Materia", a seeming reference to a worldwide economic collapse, and capitalism/materialism in particular, something which is occurring before our very eyes. He predicted a revival of States Rights as a major national issue, and this came to pass lately with the advent of the State Sovereignty movement. While he stated that the US Civil War would technically begin in 2004/2005, he made many statements indicating that this conflict would not turn violent until 2011 ("I keep saying her tune will change in about ten years [2011] and she'll be cleaning shotguns in her sleep" and "outright open fighting was common by 2011"). He predicted that during the civil war (i.e., between 2005 - 2015), the US would see "a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse", and today the major story in the news is about all the thousands of families getting forcefully thrown out of their homes, which is exactly what the government was trying to do at Waco. More and more families are vowing to resist foreclosures, and those Waco-type events are seeming much more likely in the months ahead. Although he maintained that the US Civil War officially started in 2004/2005, he added that the conflict would not really get going until much later : "The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012", which is a timeline very consistent with today's economic crisis and foreclosure rush. He predicted that "The West will become very unstable," something that has in fact already occurred due to the worldwide economic crash, as we have seen in the news stories covering the riots and chaos in Greece, France, and elsewhere. The West's destabilization has indeed begun, and right on Titor's schedule. He predicted that China would become very aggressive and expansionistic, and it would "forcefully annex Taiwan, Japan and Korea" before 2015, and the news has carried stories lately suggesting that China is laying the groundwork for such expansion, with its recent huge military buildup, its naval fleet expansion, and its latest move to boost its naval presence in disputed waters. Titor said that during the coming war, the greatest number of deaths would be via starvation, and the news has carried numerous stories about severe food shortages around the world over the last two years. He said that homosexuals would openly serve in the US army, a prediction that came true just recently with the repeal of "don't ask don't tell". If Titor was the real deal, then why did his prediction about the Olympics not come true? Why would Titor intentionally sprinkle his correct predictions with false predictions? He TOLD us why : "I have thought again about how to revel information that would make me more believable but I always come across the following problems: All of you become much less interesting as sheep. I can't talk to you if you're not skeptical. [...] My goal is not to be believed. [...] If you absolutely believed I was a time traveler, with no skepticism whatsoever, then we would be unable to communicate [...] The skeptics will always over rule the "believers". If that were not the case, I would not be posting at all. [...] it is very easy to remain hidden behind a veil of disbelief. [...] When the day comes for my "prediction" to be realized it will either happen or not. If it does happen, then your ability to judge your environment is crippled by your acceptance of me as a "knower of all things" and gifted with the ability to tell the future. If I am wrong, then everything I have said that might possibly have made you think about your world in a different way is suddenly discredited. I DO NOT WANT EITHER." Basically, Titor stated here that, just like Zeshua, he had to sprinkle some false predictions into his message so he could maintain a degree of "disbelief". The Olympics one is the only false one so far. John Titor himself connected the idea of election fraud with his prediction of a second US Civil War starting in 2004/2005: "For a few months now, I have been trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005. Does that seem more likely now? Actually it's quite amazing to see what's happening. I have been trying to get people to pay attention for the last few months but to see it unfold is very interesting. Before I leave, I'll try and post my report. I am curious… will anyone be upset if Florida's votes are not counted in the Electoral College because of the current 'confusion'?" He started posting in public at the exact moment in history when a very controversial election was occurring, and he predicted that a new US Civil War would begin around the time of the very next election. When he was asked exactly when that Civil War would begin, he gave two different answers on separate occasions : 2004 and 2005. This would make sense if he was identifying the coming stolen 2004 election as the official beginning of the Civil War he was talking about, because although the election was held in 2004, the unlawful occupation of the White House would not actually begin until early 2005. So depending on how you looked at it, the coup occurred either in 2004 when the election was stolen, or in 2005 when the results of that election when into effect. He not only associated the coming election with his Civil war prediction, but even went so far as to specifically and directly connect shenanigans in Presidential voting with the Civil War he predicted, pointing to the then-current shenanigans in the 2000 election and then asking if anyone thought the Civil War he was predicting for 2004/2005 was "more likely now". This is strong evidence that Titor's prediction of a new US Civil War was related to election fraud in the 2004 elections. He wrote, "For a few months now, I have been trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005. Does that seem more likely now? Actually it's quite amazing to see what's happening. I have been trying to get people to pay attention for the last few months but to see it unfold is very interesting. Before I leave, I'll try and post my report. I am curious… will anyone be upset if Florida's votes are not counted in the Electoral College because of the current 'confusion'?" Note carefully his wording here. It speaks volumes : "For a few months now, I have been trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005 [...] to see it unfold is very interesting." He speaks as if he felt he was actually watching his predicted "Civil War" unfold before his very eyes in the election mess of November-December 2000. Titor said that before 2015, China annexes Japan, Taiwan, and the Koreas. China's current military expansionism is right on schedule, balls-on consistent with Titor's prediction. Japan sees it plainly enough, as today's news reflects.
  22. She posted that prediction in early 2005, and elsewhere, she said that the economic collapse would begin in 2007 (it did) and max out in 2011. Today, we read this in Bloomberg News: "The world's monetary system is in the process of melting down. We have entered the endgame for the dollar as the dominant reserve currency." http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gold-Will-Outlive-Dollar-Once-bloomberg-1572589151.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=
  23. Zeshua wrote in 2005 : "Seven to Eleven, cards collapse, thy dollar not firm. Twelve to Fifteen, half the world burns." The recession has indeed been officially recorded as beginning in 2007, as she predicted years in advance. But it's now almost 2011, four years after the recession started, and almost six years after she made this precisely-timed prediction, and just as she predicted, the recession has not ended. It began when she said, and it has continued and seems now to be likely to make it into 2011, as she also predicted. The foreclosure crisis seems certain to push the recession along at least thru into the beginning of 2011. And despite the happy talk a few months back about the recession being over, it seems people are still in dire straits . http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_exclusive/whos-upset-over-the-economy-everybody-everywhere;_ylt=Ai7GY1p7VUd8u_Yp5hVfOxWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTR1OXI4ZzVxBGFzc2V0A3libG9nX2V4Y2x1c2l2ZS8yMDEwMTAxMi93aG9zLXVwc2V0LW92ZXItdGhlLWVjb25vbXktZXZlcnlib2R5LWV2ZXJ5d2hlcmUEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwMzBHBvcwMxMQRwdANob21lX2Nva2UEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDd2hvc3Vwc2V0b3Zl Headline: "Who's upset over the economy? Everybody, everywhere" Zeshua was also correct about the value of the dollar not being firm. When she wrote this in 2005, the price of gold was $444. In 2007 it was $695. Today it is $1350. This means that the value of the dollar relative to gold has gone down almost 50% since 2007. That means Zeshua's brief one line 2005 prediction "Seven to Eleven, cards collapse, thy dollar not firm" actually made THREE correct predictions. Are you expecting the second half of that prediction ("Twelve to Fifteen, half the world burns") to be totally off the mark?
  24. Regarding Zeshua's prediction that Sharia Law in America would hit the news headlines : "The shrill and disquieting sound of paranoiac accusations echoes throughout the land, like fingernails scraping an immense chalk board that stretches from sea to shining sea. The evolution of the argument against a planned Muslim community center in a decaying neighborhood in Lower Manhattan provides an example. First, it was considered by some to be in 'bad taste' and 'offensive' to the memories of those killed on 9/11 and their families. Then, the story escalated to charges of a 'Ground Zero Mosque' that would breed terrorists on 'hallowed ground'. Eventually, the demagoguery conjured images of Muslim hordes overtaking America and imposing Sharia Law, with the American Family Association calling for a ban of all mosques, a pastor in Florida threatening to burn Korans, and Newt Gingrich demanding a Federal law to protect us from the imminent imposition of Sharia in the US." From http://starlightnews.com/wordpress/ see also http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-goodman/post_965_b_744095.html http://www.voanews.com/english/news/Sharia-Creates-Controversy-in-US--104038379.html http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/08/angle_sharia/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room http://www.arktimes.com/StreetJazz/archives/2010/10/06/no-wonder-newt-gingrich-is-so-afraid-of-sharia-law http://www.decaturdaily.com/stories/Sharia-law-as-new-Red-Menace,68665 http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/newt-gingrich-protecting-us-from-baba-ghanoush/63247/ http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-explores-the-political-status-of-yahoo-newt-gingrich/ http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2010/sep/21/gingrich-and-rising-islamophobia/ Zeshua was right about this one, even if she got the timing wrong. Sharia Law in America is now a big story indeed.
  25. Yet another sign that Sharia Law has come to America, just as Zeshua predicted: http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2010/10/10/school_system_to_get_muslim_holiday/ School system to get Muslim holiday Cambridge to start observance in 2011-12 By Brock Parker Beginning next year, Cambridge public schools will attempt to make it easier for Muslim students to honor their highest holy days. In a move that school officials believe is the first of its kind in the state, Cambridge will close schools for one Muslim holiday each year beginning in the 2011-2012 school year.
×
×
  • Create New...