Jump to content

Titorian

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Titorian

  1. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>How old are you (24 or 62)? Why do you say 'thousand of miles from here' when you should say decades from my own time? Shouldn't you be saying ' I remember when I was at this time opposing the middle-east war...', but you don't do that. You don't talk from your 'golden-age' memories.<< You have to understand my position. That other me 1,000 miles away from here is really me- if anyone is a double of the other person it's me, if anyone dosen't belong here it's me. The other me is really me back in 2007. My personal timeline goes from 1982 to 2044 to 2006 in a straight line... the only thing that can change that is me. I don't have the proper words to describe it and it's kinda scary if you think about it... it's like watching a live play- the play will play out only if you don't interfere with its performance. See below. >>The question is, what does your history book say about 2004 US presidential election, can you give us a quote?<< Nothing out of the ordinary, actually. You folks do realize LBJ also stole an election and so did Nixon and Roosevelt and even Lincoln for that matter. Bush is not the monster you all think he is today- don't forget 90% of you approved of this war when it began. >>Iran has outlawed the American dollar and will put anyone in jail that uses it in their country after that date. They have the ominous notoriety of being the first nation in the world to do such a thing. The real issue in Iran is NOT nuclear, but rather the decision to not use the American dollar for trade and the sale of oil. On the heels of Iran's decision, North Korea has followed suit and also outlawed the use of the American dollar in their country. Finally, Malaysia the next day did the same thing.<< Green dollars have no value in a black market economy- what good are green dollars to Iran? To buy oil. This issue is much larger than countries not taking our currency. Saddam used to light his cigars with American $100 bills- I'm sure with Iran after a dozen warehouses full of American dollars they are starting to realize the same thing. That's why these are called the black wars. >>you dont mention global warming, iraq, midddle east, israel, pollution, rising sea levels<< I already did in great detail in previous posts. -Global Warming: We're trying to reverse it, lots of projects. -Iraq: They're still on the map. Many of them emigrated here in the 10's-20's. -Middle East:It's still on the map. -Isreal: It's still on the map. -Pollution: Air pollution, see global warming. Trash pollution- we don't generate as much solid trash as you think. -Rising Sea Levels: We're terraforming the Earth. >>dont suppose you could at least mention complete disasters in the political ring, no point in throwing a vote away ...or is there!!<< To what end? The closest I'll come to that is to say I never heard of Obama just as you never heard of whoever ran against Millard Fillmore. >>does the world blow up on a working day<< Do you mean "blow up" or "melt down"? >>On your past posting you indicated that the economy over a period of time will be improving but you gave us a hint that the stock market will not follow suite. So the question is will it fall in the future or not and what will the date when it will begin. After it begins will there be recover or not or will it chronically go down after that date thus a perpetual falling stock market.<< There are two ways to look at the economy- -Our economy, as in, "do we all have food on the table" -Our economy as compared to the rest of the world We are in the second phase of a global meltdown... I'm actually amazed I have to point this stuff out- look around you! Read up on 1933 to see how it turns out. As far as things at home, we all need to tighten our belts- we all don't order takeout 4 times a week, we all don't eat chemicalburgers. The Time Travel Portal has been taken down. This is a problem for me because I am supposed to start posting there sometime in 2011 (and with my current actions, find this old thread). It's being taken down indicates either I did something to make it come down, or another time traveler did. The history I come from, TTP is up until around 2011. Can anyone shed some light on this? I won't/can't stay online much longer, I am afraid causality may be catching up to me. I would like to start posting over at Kaku's forum, and I generally only post in one place at a time. Being a time traveler posting on a time traveling site I think is pushing my luck. Other weird stuff is happening too. I am in the midst of moving to another location, I'll post as soon as I am resettled. http://www.mkaku.org/forums/ I guess this topic is limited to 11 pages after all-
  2. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>Could you please tell us - with your own words - on how do you see people from this time? What about others, how they react to 'this' history<< A good way of looking at it is to go back to the early 1970's- back before they started "safety sealing" everything in the store. Back when you could pop open a bottle of Extra Strength Tylenol, take a few, then close it up again and put it back on the shelf, back to when you were free to open and reclose milk bottles in the supermarket at will. How, as a time traveler, could you explain to them that "in the future, everything will be tamper-resistant safety sealed? You don't look down on them, you just understand that these people haven't yet experienced all the things that can happen when you don't safety seal stuff, so the notion of safety sealing rat poison (to make sure no one puts rat poison in it, naturally) would rightfully sound absurd to them. >>How do you feel you to live with these people?<< Well I am currently 24 years old and a thousand miles away from here- I have distinct memories of these times. But to me, they're personal memories of my times, not the world at large. I was against the Iraq war but I didn't do anything about it. I wouldn't do the same thing today. OT- I am getting a little tired of The Daily Show pointing out how incompetent our government is- they always stop at the halfway point where it's funny, not the other half that's sad and true (and actionable). >>What do you mean with the 'Old Guard'? (Are you aware that Mr B cheated his way into the 'house' not once, but twice...)<< Old guard- big belly, pork barrelling, ten thousand dollar a plate dinners, big fat payoffs. The old guard. Make each other rich, look out for #1, play billionaire games... that sorta stuff. And I thought he had the majority vote on his re-election- I must be wrong. >>You talk about entanglement and how if you knocked on your other self's doorstep you'd decorporalize. But isn't you putting the effort into making your little "care package" a violation of your own rules, meaning- wouldn't you decorporalize the moment before you handed that briefcase to the courier to deliver?<< For starters, I "retro-financed" all the things I am buying. In other words, I have a logical explanation for where the monies came from in 2006 for the tax man, should come looking (it also helps for "universal continuity"). Secondly, all my investments are in not-yet-developed technologies and open real estate. I am buying into companies that thousands of other investors are also buying into today before the stocks hit big. It's not like suddenly appearing with 1975-issued Microsoft stock... I am "making it make sense" which is a lot harder to do. The possibility does exist that I will be unable to hand it all over, but my attorney is helping me do all of this and we have already bought the bulk of the investments. From that point of view, I should have been unable to do what I have already done. This ties into the earlier discussion about whether or not I will actually decorporealize... that this may simply not be the case- which is a very interesting concept- a universe full of atoms all existing in infinite dual states would undoubtably produce a range of interactions- kinda like our current universe! Imagine instead of the same atoms (me) existing twice in one time, we have the same atom existing in a million different places at the same time. >>You mentioned there were other before you, including some who contacted you via this board. Well where are they? This is a pretty anonymous forum, saying hi won't make you disappear.<< They said they have no desire to tell their story. Time travelers don't come back just to show off to the world that they're time travelers- they do it for various reasons. The people who contacted me had information about the Branson time machine that only a time traveler would know, so they were the real deal. I never bought into the whole "big brother" thing- there are no time cops and no one's policing spacetime. And even if there were- who's to say what they're doing is right or wrong? Life itself is a random occurance- randomness is good. Who watches the watchers? >>For that matter, how will we know if you decorporalize?<< I was thinking about telling my attorney to contact you guys "after I go". Perhaps I should. >>I have to submit that at this time your paper for this year cannot be fully relied on. That paper is YOUR (decorporalized) past not ours.<< I agree just as much as I disagree. I agree because my history of 2044 is based on a few pages of paper that outline in the most general fashion the events of these times. Kinda like reading up on say, 1966. HOWEVER... I still stand fast in saying most of what happens in daily life is meaningless, useless and forgotten shortly after it's done. How many people are going to remember Anna Nicole in five years? How many will remember in five weeks? Not many. Who can tell me the date Anna Nicole died? Who can tell me offhand the date we bombed Somalia? What was the date Princess Di died? I'll settle for the month or year on that one. When did either of the space shuttles blow up? You guys turn on the news and it's the news' job to keep you tuned to their channel no matter what. So they sensationalize news... they spice it up and make it entertaining. They take every little thing that happens and go full out on it 24 hours live. And you stare at it thinking this is history you're watching. All while the Federal Government is throwing away what little money they have left- your money. >>You will undoubtably create some ripples that may change things. As far as you being here now you are as responsible as the rest of us for our future.<< My ripples won't affect everyone- at least not now and not in a bad way. If they affect anyone, they'll affect me first and I accepted that before I went through. And realizing that if my ripples do/will/could change things, I walk softly. >>I also submit each one of us can change things and you do not have to be a time traveler to do so. This world is as much yours now as it is ours. You are responsible for what you know. For you to sit back and do nothing is as bad as us sitting back and doing nothing. THAT is the truth.<< This is more like 2044 talk. This is why real time travelers don't come through with pomp and circumstance- we're here just like you, we're not here to change the future as much as live it. The more dire a time traveler's warnings are, the more likely they're a fraud. Time travel is not the be all, end all- it's the newest gadget. >>But I submit to you who is more to blame for non-action? The one who knows what will happen or the one who can only guess?<< This is bad logic... it's "unAmerican". If everyone was doing what they were best suited for, we'd live in a wonderful Communist sociey where everyone does what they do best and everyone gets a slice of the pie. But in 2007 this is not the case- millions of Americans are settling for what's out there because the whole game is skewed against the individual- at the moment at least. You guys are so close to change! But there's always a price to pay. >>As I mentioned to Titorian in private ..If such a facility exists I would personally like to visit it.<< It looks like "The Incredible Motor Mouse Cat Toy" but a lot bigger. There's lots of one way doors and security cameras and passkeys and such... it's designed to take people away from the center where the recieving station is. The campus is worth a visit though- it's kinda like the ultimate dorm room. And the outside looks nothing like the inside- it's all underground.
  3. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>What do you mean by "you people"? You've become one of us - and by your own admission you can't go back. Moreover, according to your story, your former people have time travel and can come here if they are willing to pay the price (which is quite negotiable - also acording to your story). It's possible that "you" (plural) are blaming the wrong people. Maybe, because of time travel, it is your people who need to carry the "burden" of blame.<< Are you suggesting it is the responsibility of time travelers from the future to fix the messed up past: the present? That if the stock market crashes, a time traveler should magically appear with a truck full of gold bricks and hand them out on Wall Street? >>And remember - you only know the history of "your people" up to the day that you departed. And even that take on history is a personal opinion based on your observations and limited scope of knowledge.<< The history I am going by is the written history of the historical events of 2007. (As stated earlier), time has a way of compressing history and in the process, 99% of everything that happens becomes forgotten. Look at the history of 2006- it's enough to fill a magazine. And in 2011, they'll make a magazine-sized history book for this decade. Then "the history of 2006" will become further edited and by 2044 you can sum the year up in a page or two. THIS is my historical source, or point of view. You folks are living in the present. That means you do not know the future. That means when stuff happens, you don't know the ramifications of it. Like the stock market yesterday- everyone was worried. Why? Because they didn't know if this was the beginning of the end or just a hiccup. The only way you will know the ramifications is to wait it out... "let time pass". As far as my scope of knowledge, I claim to be of average intelligence and am as informed about the day's events as any layman. And as a layman, when I want to learn all about 2007, I consult the two pages of history written on it in 2044 and learn. One thing we definetly will have less of in 2044 is skepticism. Is global warming real or not? I'm not sure, because even though 99% of all scientists think it is, the debate is still going on, so we can go on about our lives putting more CO2 into the atmosphere without guilt. And just yesterday on the news- they were talking about what a good thing it was that the stock market dropped so much because that only means it will have to go back up again- regardless of the fact that $600 billion dollars was lost on one day. You are all willing to pretend that things happening right in front of you are not actually happening. Then you'll turn the news on and hear that another 12,000 people are getting laid off but it's all good- that means the stock will go up one point from this. I am currently 24 years old and was caught up in all of this just as you but I am not "one of you" simply because I have already lived in this time and learned lessons you folks have yet to learn. I am not saying I am better or smarter than you, I just already lived it. You can hardly deny my position.
  4. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>Wow, that 3DTV sounds awesome.<< 3DTV rocks- you really get into it. Old films are digitally enhanced and made 3D... how to explain it... like in a movie when you see closeups of people, with 3DTV it's not a closeup- they're just closer to you... the background (that's not in the original film) is added etc... I watched Star Wars 4 on TV today and I must say seeing it on TV is like watching it through a window. >>Is your younger self against the Iraq War?<< How many senior citizens today think the Vietnam War was a good war? Not many. Why? Because 30 years have passed, a lot of stuff has happened... people today think differently... people today think back to that war and realize what a waste it was. My younger self was against the war, all of you will too in 30 years. >>If he said or did anything about it and was arrested for whatever reason, and killed in prison, would you decorporealize?<< My other younger self is my past- to me, it happened a long time ago. So since I was never arrested, he won't get arrested... he CAN'T get arrested because I didn't. That means if he somehow does get arrested, I'd be very concerned. The TTP site went down last week which freaked me out because it's supposed to be up for at least three more years. The only way that site could go down is if I or another time traveler altered history which resulted in it going down. As it stands, I was a poster who stopped posting... I'm part of their buried history. My once being a poster there did not affect anything, the same applies to this site which is why I will speak a little more openly- because ultimately this site will come down too and these words will be lost- the continuity of history will go on unaltered. How do I know this? Because in 2044 "Titorian" is not "a time traveler from 2044 who went back to 2006", it's what you call a Time travel groupie... it's slang. I measure my exposure through Google searches. >>Do they build any new theme parks in the Walt Disney World resort between now and 2044?<< Yes. Another Epcot-type family place. >>You said there are more rides in the future, are there any in particular that you remember and miss going on?<< I can explain "the Disney experience" in 2044, which also explains the wave of the future for 2044. In 2044, the Disney characters are all AI and live in virtual reality. This means your kids can talk to them whenever they want- sort of like Avatars today except they're real and they follow you around. This means that when your kid goes to Disney to meet the same exact real-life Mickey Mouse they know from the net, they will meet the real Mickey Mouse in person- a robot with the same AI... Mickey Mouse already knows your kids, already knows which rides they want to go on, remembers that email your kid sent him a week ago etc. etc. (imagine Christmas). It's a firsthand experience. 3DTV allows your kids to see a holosim of Mickey Mouse but at Disney, your kids can actually meet him for real, in person. This is what people pay to see. As such, Disney dosen't change that much between now and 2044. Sure there are new rides but the overall experience is different. 3DTV is perhaps the single largest difference between today and 2044 and robot sims are the cutting edge of technology. Apart from that, sure they have new rides that take you up and down and sideways but at Disney, it's all real. Imagine walking through a ride instead of sitting in a boat or car- imagine everything around you is VR-alive. You see where this is going. >>I'm pretty much certain there'll be more Disney hotels in the future. Any favorites?<< I am currently staying at the Animal Kingdom Lodge and like this place very much- you wake up and there's giraffe in the backyard. They pay "animal keepers" to chat with guests, it has a lot of atmosphere. I was also here during Christmas and it made me feel at home. >>Do they get rid of the busses and replace them with more monorails and/or light rail?<< No- they use the transporters! LOL >>Any other changes to the resort that stand out to you.<< This is the first time I've been to this lodge from my point of view- meaning, my younger self never came here (so I never came here before). I like this place because it looks very "earthy" or organic- like part of the rainforest. It's going to sound weird but in 2044, people are closer to nature... we're all tree huggers or hippies or whatever you call them today- we conserve; we use less. We don't flash it as much. >>You seem to refer to the whole area as "Celebration", does the way the area is incorporated change?<< >>Are there any attractions that aren't there in the future anymore that you were particularly excited about seeing?<< Same answer- I am living here on vacation. In 2044, I don't live in Celebration FL, I live a thousand miles away. >>No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.<< A rolling stone gathers no moss, little sunflower. >>I'm so depressed about the plastic cars. I so wanted a hovercraft.<< Don't put down plastic cars- they make plastic cars today! I am saying a car is two seperate parts- the undercarrage and the top. The top part is a one piece plastic top that you lower down and screw into place. It's like getting an oil change today- it takes less than an hour to do. You can also rent car tops- that's quite popular- it's like the way you rent furniture today. And it's economical- it runs of free juice! Why pay $60 to fill up your gas tank? You're throwing your money away. The downside is there are no V-12 electric Mustangs. Car shapes are standardized but there is a large variety of styles- you can really "pimp out" your car. They're like cell phones today. Some cars glow in the dark etc... People don't obsess on cars as much in 2044, because car frames are made to last 20 years with engines that can last a million miles and they simply don't break down. We have simple cars that work- even the tires last 200,000 miles. They're like VCRs today. Most people don't even know what brand VCR they have, to everyone today a VCR is just a VCR. This is how we regard cars in 2044. Hope that made sense. We'll have a hovercraft after we nail down whatever the hell a graviton is, which has not yet happened. >>How does Hillary become president? It seems almost impossible. There seems to be too much going against her.<< Clinton is old news to me- it's like me asking you to tell me all about LBJ! And how is it impossible? And who- Obama? I never even heard of Obama before- Who ran against FDR during the primaries of his third term? Who remembers?!! You need more than a nice smile to run America, folks. As I said over at TTF, Clinton runs a late, massive campaign... a year from now she'll be on your TVs a dozen times a day, every day up to election day. Just wait until Clinton does Oprah. Historically, in 2044 we blame you people for the decade of terror, not President Bush. When a President starts a war with a 90% approval rating, who else are you going to blame- the President for doing what 90% of the people agreed with or the 90% of you who thought it was a good idea? Bush is not a bad guy... historically he's not another Nixon as you all would have him be. He's the last of the old guard. Clinton is different... Clinton is not a warmonger, Clinton is eager and is not an old guard Republican. Clinton's got balls. To me, Clinton is old news- she served her term 30 years ago and turned the tide inward.
  5. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Woody1987 writes: (I included this because this is a really good question) >>There is a guy called Bob, he makes a time machine, goes back a 1000 years to the year 1007. So he looks around tries out some local restaurants, takes the tours. Ok, ignore him for now, go forward 1000 years just before Bob went back in time. At this point there is a Bob in the present, just before he left and a Bob in the past. The present Bob decides as he did before to go back in time to 1007. DISASTER! He appears at the exact same time and place as he did previously, thus thier bodies merge into something.<< Bob dies long before 2007 happens again for him. Bob's timeline goes from his natural birth to 2007 to 1007 to 1107 when he dies- all as one unbroken line. If he went back to say, one day, the next day there would be two of them... this is what you mean. Well if the second Bob ran into the first Bob, then that would break his personal timeline- Bob #2's existence would become illogical and he would cease to exist. Why? Because he violated his own timeline... he did not alter the universe but himself. First person physics. The universe is alive. You're allowed to cheat the universe, but you cannot break it's laws. So if you really tried to, it's simpler for the universe to unmake you (and if need be, replace the event with a black hole) than alter the laws of physics throughout the universe because rule #1: reality really exists (and this means the laws of the universe apply everywhere, all the time). How can the universe unmake you? Since it's impossible to ever quantify the position and velocity of any object, it becomes possible to cheat the universe. So stuff like "decorporealization" really does happen- it's an aspect of entanglement. It's like math- it's numbers on paper that make sense. This is the last tenuous mini-lecture I will give on this subject- any more detailed and I start directly violating stuff. I don't know if you came here to hear me rant or if I should do it more but here goes. Imagine not you but a conglomeration of atoms called you. It's several trillion atoms all on a planet moving through space at about a million miles an hour. These atoms occupy space over time like pages in a book. Assuming time travel is possible, one would have to traverse space as much as (if not more than) time to arrive at the correct "moment in the past". For example, if you wanted to travel one year back in time, you must also physically traverse 8,766,000,000 miles through space. (John Titor's time travel covered 552 trillion miles of the universe.. truly a vast spance) This is where entanglement comes in. Assuming time travel really exists, this means your atoms will exist in a dual state (or entangled) mode- that there will be "two of every of your atoms in the same point in spacetime". This is a clear violation of the universe- an atom cannot run into itself... atoms exist logically through time. But like two supermagnets on boats in a big lake, they actually can co-exist as long as they are sufficiently distanced... for a little while at least. Two identical atoms sufficiently distanced from each other can co-exist in the same spacetime as long as they don't start affecting each other (as long as they're both neutral to each other). Like the good guy and the bad guy- each has its own agenda but only one will win out. And how do they affect each other? Simple- there's "the correct atom" and there's the "doesen't belong here" atom. If you go back in time, you become the "don't belong here" atoms. If you go forward in time, you become "the correct atom"... if you time traveled a year forward and knocked on your older self, HE would decorprealize, not you. (This, to a large extent, is why no one is really building a forward-working time machine.) The universe is alive and although you can't break the laws of the universe, you can cheat it for Planck Units. Over time this has a swiss cheese effect. Time is not a law of the universe, is it? >>What kind of cool toys do you have?<< The biggest everyday technological improvement between today and 2044 is 3DTV. Hand held tech kinda levels off when everything becomes one do all unit. Part of the 3DTV technology is holosims which are a thing onto themselves. >>Have the gasoline been replaced on cars? Are there cars based on other stuff, public/normal cars?<< Car makers still make gas guzzlers but those are more specialty cars than anything else. Electric cars are "the car" in 2044 simply because of the free juice. I have outlined cars in 2044- they're plastic and cheap, like cell phones today. And just as cell phones, you put a new face on it instead of buying a new phone. Cars last much longer and break down much less- that's something for you guys to think about. >>How are the cellphones in your time? How are computers in your time?<< Can't really put it into words... the world is one hot spot. Asking me how technology is today is like asking you how your water is. >>Is the violence still the same? Or things have gotten better? worse? Is US still the Empire?<< Far less violence overall. You're living in the paranoid 00's. The United States takes care of its own first. The one thing I am not here to do is stir up a panic. >>How is your TV different from ours?<< 3DTV. It's 3D TV. >>Hey Titorian did you recall when the sun become blue...?<< That's a profound statement. My answer is yes. >>"...that before these waves arrives you will send to the space the time capsule of John Titor... a crystal disk dated december 24 2025..." do you have any comments about?<< Never heard it before and not sure I fully understand it. Waves? What waves? Who will send the capsule and what's in it? A crystal disk? This makes no sense. >>So you're saying $10 a pound chopped meat? So this means the rich will eat steak while the rest of us eat beans, right? Are you a vegetarian? Just wondering.<< I am not a vegetarian, in 2044 people eat more vegetarian meals... they don't shove McFat burgers in their face four times a day. Some of the meat communities consume is sold through an organic supermarket owned and run by the community (like Trader Joe's today). Can't really explain it properly but I'll try... in 2044, people don't walk around with pocketfuls of cash and people rarely "pay" for anything anymore. We autopay at the supermarket- there is no cashier. A computer scans the entire shopping cart and autobills it to our credit account. When we shop at our local co-op owned supermarket, we pay with credits from the excess energy we don't consume. This is why communities are prejudicial to the elderly- because it's possible to live in a community in perpetua... "just living there" generates enough money to pay all the bills and leave a few bucks in your pocket- in the best communities, that is. When food, shelter etc. are all taken care of... when it's no longer a struggle just to keep the shirt on your back... money kinda becomes a thing, not THE thing... it becomes a tool. So yeah- some cuts of meat are $10 a pound, but then again it actually is not coming out of your pocket- it's credits set off against other credits... it's numbers. It's like the 1950's. Everyone got a job and eveyone bought a new car and a new home all at once. What sparked it all? Well, everything happening all at once- it all making sense again. A place where a man can go out and make an honest day's pay... when it makes sense again. >>What other tricks apart from time travel can we do?<< Cognito ergo sum. Re: the moon. Phase one the releasing hydrocarbons making the planet uninhabitable like Venus. This will decrease the effect of the moon on the Earth... it will calm down the seas and help reverse global warming- it's the reason they're considering it. Then they plan to filter the atmosphere with machines that are not yet invented to seperate the toxic atmosphere... to do what happened on the Earth over 100 million years to happen here in 500 years. They plan to end up with inhabitable land- room for billions more humans- billions of consumers. You guys are fighting global hunger today, we're making room for billions more humans. >>Have you been in contact with any other time travellers- the others who went through the same machine you did?<< Two have contacted me via this site since I've been here, both went before me. How else to say it- people don't come back to show off. >>Why isn't The Branson Foundation hunting you down for giving away company secrets? And you said you were implanted, right?<< My businesness is concluded with them. And yes, I was implanted. >>Why haven't we seen or heard of any other time travellers telling the same tale as you? There's what- four time travelling websites on the internet, they would have found this forum. Where are they?<< This is the swiss cheese effect and I'm surprised as well. Time is an artificial concept, right? >>Why do you always post at weird hours and why does your IP always change?<< I use the hotel's internet connection. I think slowly and have trouble sleeping. I try to write carefully, I don't want to misrep. >>Are movies and music still around in 2044?<< No. They were all wiped out when "The Great Disaster" happened. Just kidding- of course it is- look around you today! In 2044 it's 100 times more media coming at you- they have many laws limiting media exposure. >>If so, how different/same are they?<< The single greatest improvement is 3DTV. Daily life isn't much different in 2044 than it is today, it's just simpler and easier- partly because technology fills more gaps in our daily lives and partly because people have a different mindset than they do today (rant coming)... we're not "all out to get each other" as you are today. By the way- did anyone notice the US Government is missing 8 billion dollars in cash? No- you didn't- you were watching Anna Nicole. Imagine the US Treasury with all its machines running at full capacity printing countless sheets of hundred dollar bills- hundreds of thousands of bills per hour, tonnage of cash.... millions per hour, every hour for two solid weeks, 24/7. Then imagine all that money disappearing- tons of US legal tender just vanishing. (Rant done) 3DTV adds depth to television. It also allows holosims, which are 3D virtual people that can walk about in your house. Old movies can also be rendered to 3D allowing you to experience it more. 3DTV is not like Star Wars... it's more like Total Recall or two steps away from the Holodeck... it's huge. It's like going from radio to TV. Naturally games can also be played with 3DTV and you can be in the middle of the game, literally. Really cool stuff. >>What is the most popular style of music in 2044?<< Popular music LOL. Seriously- popular music is pretty much the same it is today. However, there's a million genres of music... anyone with a computer can compose music- but this is also true today. There is far more music overall in 2044- pop stars for every genre... like today. Music is music. Personally I like oldies- rock and roll.
  6. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>When exactly (or as close as you can get to it) do the stock markets crash? When does the economic depression arrive?<< How long's a Chinaman. It was a culmination of events. Many people will be forced to retire with only one million instead of ten. >>1. Are you saying it's some sort of "soft depression"?<< It does bottom out but it's a slow inexorable decline. In those times, a dollar can't get you what a dollar used to. History never happens overnight. I love the dollar stores here but in 2044 there's a far less selection of items- particularly plastic. >>2. Branson sent himself an email telling him to build a time machine, right? How is this not a violation of causality according to your definition of it?<< Time travel is a private enterprise developed by The Branson Foundation. They don't really get into specifics... it's like the Coca Cola recipe. I never considered what you said which is quite interesting, but ultimately it happened any of 100 different ways- causality is not exactly what you think it is- Kaku outlined and rewrote many principles... best way to describe it is scientists in the future think more simply and in a larger context. >>3. What are prisons like in 2044?<< You get implanted, stay home and are monitored 24 hours a day by computers. It's not pretty in the sense that that guy who lives next door to you is a murderer- say hello to the murderer kids! There are still prisons (mostly for non home-owners), but to a much lesser degree. And all prisons are self-sufficient... prisoners grow crops and tend cattle and pick strawberries. >>4. You mentioned turning time into swiss cheese. Isn't this a violation of causality?<< The universe is a weird place. >>5. What do you do all day, every day? Have you made any friends here?<< I go out and walk around. I listen to people. I watch really bad movies in the theaters. I go to Disney just to walk around. I eat continental breakfasts and early bird buffets. I feed the geese. I observe. Sometimes I play Warcraft online. I'm also in a country club and interact with people. One thing I regret with my gameplan is the hotels-part. I should have gotten a house, then people could come over to my house. I keep my residence a secret from everyone partly from embarrasment. re: cryonics. Maybe you're right and it will be figured out by 2300 and I think that would be cool. When I mean "walking zombies", I mean this is the best 2044 technology can come up with- science has advanced to the point of where a deceased person could theoretically be defrosted and brought back to life but only as a zombie, so this is how I concieve it. Maybe in another 150 years they'll figure it out. >>What about the "big rigs"? Do you still use the heavy duty trucks to haul stuff around America?<< There are still semis and tractor-trailers...we don't have tubes or anti-grav cars or anything else you imagine we should have... 2044 is very much like 2007, only we have cooler toys. But no V12 electric Mustangs that can go from 0 to 60 in four seconds. And I am a huge Pink Floyd fan. >>Where is the Branson Foundation's receiving station exactly located?<< About 50 miles from New Orleans. Pamela wrote a while back- >>I went back and looked and all I saw was your posting you made about altervues. Did I miss something else? About the altervues I really didn't have anything more to say about it. It happened to me long time ago. I posted about it and there was nothing else to really say about it. Its not really something you can really prove to anyone anyway.<< This is really weird and I even feel weird bringing it up but I am starting to notice more and more "stuff disappearing". It just happened now- I just spent the past 10 minutes scouring this site for a question someone asked me (for me to reply to) only to find out no such post exists. I mean- I remember reading it yesterday and today it's just not here. A couple other times this happened, then a day later it appears with that date as the post date, not days ago when I remember reading it... like that. It's weird. I ask myself "Did I dream that post was there? How could I have dreamed that?!" I also mentioned black spots in my eyesight... I have good eyesight but there's pinhole sized black spots in my field of vision. And other little stuff like knowing exactly what the buffet has for dinner even though I never ate there before... almost as if I ate there before then forgot I did. I re-read my old posts here only to find words are missing sometimes making the sentince make no sense. I'm used to my AISC which fills in the blanks as I type but I reread my posts before I submit them and they look okay, but when I see it the next day a word disappeared. Plus this overwhelming desire to eat spam- just kidding about that last one.
  7. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>A future eating bags of 79 cent beans? wow.....Sounds like it is only going to be a good thing for the rich. Which YOU will be in the future. The rest of us better start liking beans?<< Farms produce more greenhouse gases than cars. People eat less meat in the future, partly because of import taxes and new laws and partly because of the price of meat as a result. No 99 cent fast food chemicalburgers in 2044. >>Do you think your cancer was caused by this as well?<< I am genetically predisposed to have cancer. The only thing I can do is prolong it by detecting it sooner, like a few years from now. >>I still don't get how you can be sure of only ONE tangible reality.??<< Because there is only energy for one tangable reality. By definition, an alternate reality is required to have as much energy in it as our reality. So if we conclude infinite alternate realities really exist, then your deciding to step left or right creates an entirely new universe. But it has no energy in it- your footstep is not a Big Bang. Now alternate universes may truly exist, but there is only one reality. >>What if it is just the electrical signals and waves that go through your brain that makes it seem so?<< For this to be the case, then literally you are fooling yourself. If your mind is the center of the universe then you're God. And if you really are God, you have omnipotence. But you don't. So either you're God and you have amnesia, or you're not God. Proof of this is in the fact that you can actually learn a new thing, like how to ride a bike whereas before you didn't know how. God knows how to ride a bike, God knows everything. >>If the other universes are not tangible...what are they? ghost worlds?<< They'd be just as real as ours and quite possibly created by our actions (therefore an infinity of them), but the energy required to reach them is equal to all the energy in this universe. So you're "universe jumping machine" would first have to suck this entire universe into one black hole, then convert that energy to power the universe jumping machine. Even if such a thing were possible, who would build one? For John Titor's story to be true, it would have to have destroyed the universe he left from, only to create one and enter it: our present. And even if this is possible, he couldn't return to his timeline. Once again- who would build such a doomsday device? >>Can you explain what "the universe is a lot smaller than you think" means?<< It means that just because that star is 10 billion light years away and light speed is the fastest possible speed, it dosen't have to take 10 billion years to reach it- there's shortcuts you can use that keep the universe coherent. Like wormholes, but scientifically engineerable. >>So is this how the station first got built. It was from sending an email back in time? But what Machine received the emails? Who received them?<< The Branson Foundation. >>So you predict Hilary Clinton wins the next presidency...<< Yes, but it's old news to me. >>It sounds like you are still fighting global warming in the future.<< Global Warming is a very serious problem- something that if we don't fix we will die from. There is a balance in nature between animals and plants- this is how we continue to asperate in a closed system. This is no "let's worry about it later like we do with everything else"- this is the path to human extinction. The more carbon-based life forms on Earth, the less carbon is in the air. Plant a tree. >>I have doubts about giving the moon an atmosphere. An interesting thought I guess.<< That one is way out into the future. This is what people think about in 2044- stuff like that. >>Do you have the option of going back to 2044 if you decided you made a mistake and didn't want to live here anymore?<< Nope. One way trip. >>Do you have forward time traveling as well?<< Technically you have it now but to do that the way you mean is a lot harder to do because of causality. >>Does the military or government ever use time travel for their own purposes?<< Probably. There are conspiracy circles for that. >>What is something that would disqualify you from being a time traveler even if you had the money to do it?<< Tattoos are the #1 reason. Tattoos of bands that don't exist of dates of dearly departed loved ones etc. The $15 million dollar price tag is a hard nut to swallow and after that, never being able to return or contact anyone you know eliminates many more. Many people who came back already decoporealized... it's almost impossible to jump back and reach zero hour. I'd say of the 50 that went before me, less than half are still around. Many people jump back then do the infamous "knock on your other self and decorporealize" trick the next day, as if the laws of the universe are going to bend to their whim. >>Would decorporalization be a just punishment for criminals?<< What a horrible thing to say- every life is precious. >>Where do you see time traveling going in the next 30 years from 2044?<< They speculate the net effect of this will create a "swiss cheese" of time in this place in spacetime, but I really really can't get into that stuff. >>Is there anything you are not sure of in the time travel theories yet that your 2044 scientists are still wondering about?<< A million things. Time travel does not remake the world, it's the newest cool thing to do. It's the new ultimate thing to do. It's perfect for witness protection and I'm sure the government financed several people for just that but it's "a new gadget". >>Do you have any children or family in 2044 that you left behind? How did they feel about you leaving?<< I have a wife and a son who will be born three years from now. I definetly don't want to interfere with myself until my son is born for obvious reasons. I did not tell them about the trip- there's no way to explain it. "Off to rewrite history- dinner's in the fridge"- how can you explain that to someone? >>Don't you miss anyone from your time? Are you able to send them emails or something from here to let them know you are ok?<< No way to contact them and I don't really miss anyone. My parents are already dead- I know they're alive here but I don't want to alter the good like they had (and mine in the process). I have family too but once again- I'm here to rewrite my own history- and theirs too. >>So is this the computer that is measured in "variables" and not calculations per second?<< The problem with quantum computers is entropic. anonymous_person- Interesting stuff you wrote. Re: cryonics- it's just not possible to "wake up" after being frozen- who wants to come back as a vegetable? Re: nanites. I am well aware of them and they serve purposes, but we're not all shooting ourselves up with nanites to fight a cold- we still take asprin. I'm saying there's a value to a healthy immune system so people as as holistic as they are today if not more. And re: both points- I just don't see how it's possible to "jump start" a brain that's been in stasis for years and not get a Frankenstein. >>Nuclear weapons may work but they do not necessarily validate e=mc2.<< I was trying to make an analogy between an atomic explosion (and they theory behind it) and a time machine (and the theory behind that): when do we know a scientific theory really works? When we build a machine that can do it. >>Curious, why did you say 1974, I thought the modern cell phone was invented in 1973?<< Because I am a "Titorian"- because John Titor said 1975 was a key date in spacetime... Bill Gates, etc... I said 1974 to mean "just before 1975". >>I just have a quick comment for that JimmyEarth guy, the families of cryonicists do not pay anything.<< I was always fascinated by cryonics simply because of the liquids involved and how easy it is to make them, plus the energies involved. That's how the Space Shuttle gets into space- on air. >>...The otherwise unaccounted for time that you spend reading the posts makes you a few minutes late for your appointment with destiny<< I don't agree with that karmically because there is nothing bad about my posts. If I were here wasting your time telling predictions and dire warnings and stringing you all along just for my personal satisfaction, then I'd be wasting your time. But I'm not- I'm just here chit chatting with you folks- I'm not preaching to the crowd (although I feel I sometimes do- sorry). I also think people have a quota of "computer time" to fill and if they weren't here reading posts, they'd be over at YouTube downloading more sillyness or whatnot. I don't think there's a scientist reading this instead of attending to that "cure for cancer" vaccine he's working on. As far as my universe goes- I know I will be changing it and the people around him to six degess later everyone on the planet, but if you were from 2044 and had the cure for AIDS, but it's not discovered until 2025... would you give it to scientist today and save millions of lives? I would, knowing it would also unmake millions. I'd also push Peggy Sue out of the way of that Mack truck and risk her now growing up to become the next Hitler. Time travel breaks down to a philisophical argument at that point and John Titor touched on this issue and I feel the same way as he- as long as it's positive actions you take, you're not messing things up as much as making them a little bit better. And scientifically, if you did try and mess things up a lot, the universe would find it easier to pop you out of existence then allow a violation of E=MC2 then you'd simply stop existing. The universe is flexible to a point, then it snaps. >>I agree. He doesn't fully comprehend the ripple effect of just one person let alone everyone who reads his posts. A real time traveler can never be sure of the outcomes of his interactions just him being here would change things and alter the future and events he once knew.<< You have to see it from my perspective. From my viewpoint, the entire year 2007's history is no more than two pages in a book. History has a way of compressing time. Look at the history of 2006 then look at the history of 1956. I got into this over at the Time Travel Portal with the moderator- we bombed Somalia and called me to the table because I did not predict that historically important event. I said- what historical event? It's a good month later- does anyone remember the exact date this happened? That's my point. And also- this website does not exist in 2044. Look at paranormalis(?)- what happened there? Where did all of that information go? It's all gone. >>Titorian's cavalier attitude about the potential for him to unintentionally alter his own future history would seem to be one of the weakest elements of his story. When a TTer comes back into his own past and spouts a "single-universe-theory", he is either going to be extremely careful not to change anything he doesn't intend to, or he will randomly and unintentionally alter stuff all over the place, leaving a wake of chaos behind his every move.<< The care package my other younger self will recieve will contain a letter from me explaining who I am plus the stocks, property holdings etc. I have accumulated. These holdings were all acquired legally from the open market and bought at market price- they tangably exist. I even "back financed" where the money came from, if it ever got down to an audit. You are referring to the ripple affect that will cause? It won't- I'll be one of a million stockholders. I'm not even telling myself about the future- a guy's gonna knock on his door, hand him a briefcase and walk away. I see no wake of chaos- foremost because to you, the future hasn't happened yet. And secondly, because I'm not here to take over the world or stop it or prevent it- I'm only here to relive it. And when he opens that briefcase, he will become he reborn. Or maybe I don't understand the question?
  8. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >would you care to explain, then, how any country's economy could "do slightly better for the next 2 years, then better the next four, then very good the next three, then okay from then on" at the same time that "A depression ...hit(s) this country" ??< That quote refers to this other quote on the same board written on 12/22/06: >>Clinton is the President in 2008 for one term followed by Giuliani, who is replaced by Spencer from 2015-2024. Apart from that I cannot predict without affecting the outcome- although it has already happened, where I am now it is uncertain.<< In other words, Bush 2006-2008 "slightly better for the next 2 years" Clinton 2008-2012 "better the next four" Giuliani 2012-2015 "very good the next three" Spencer 2015-2024 "okay from then on" Get it? As far as the depression goes, it's a good thing. We won't have the money to keep up an endless war, big business won't have the billions to bilk from the people anymore... with a depression, alternatives become realities. With a depression, every dollar the government spends goes to keeping the ship afloat. And when the depression ends, we do things differently and we call this "the future". >>Say what? Buy on a high and sell on a low? Then stop your losses at a low by investing in fixed income federal notes, wait for another high, dump the fixed income notes and jump back into securities?<< I believe the original quote was "When the stock market is down, people invest in federal securities, when it's up, people buy stocks." In other words, when there's no money to be made in stocks, people don't invest in stocks and vice-versa. Why do people put their life's savings into stocks- to make 10%? Sorry I worded it poorly. >>Markets are only loosely connected to the over all health of the economy?<< They're not? >>What country are you from? I noticed you used the words: "personal effects" instead of personal items.<< I am an American. >>I simply have one small problem with your story, which in reality is a carefully improvised hoax.<< And you had no problem with Jimmy Earth's carefully improvised hoax? >>You mention that if your people could not take you back in time, you have to wait for an entire day for the "batteries" to recharge. Please tell us more about your power sources for said temporal contraption.<< "The batteries" are the power supply backup batteries in the co-op communities, not the time machine. When a jump is scheduled, the communities revert to battery backup and the raw windmill power fuels the time machine. If the jump is unsuccessful, they need to wait a day for the communities' batteries to recharge. The energy for the time machine comes from the co-op communities at a profit to them- this is how Branson became a big business utility company. >>And one more thing. How come they are expecting you whenever you travel back in time.<< I assume they email the schedule ahead of time- I never got into all the details. I was the customer, they were expecting "a passenger", not "me". Email to the past was discovered decades before time travel. Do you ask the pilot if the gas tank is full before the plane takes off? >>If you are in an underground facility, and you whisk yourself back in time, you end up pretty stiff in soil and very well underground. A horrifying way to die, I guess. First a bloody turbulent coaster, then crushed by the surrounding land. Ouch!!<< If they email blueprints back and they say they built one and they really didn't then nothing would happen- they wouldn't start recieving travelers from thin air and if you tried traveling to there, it simply wouldn't work. You land where it's most logical to land... you're cheating the universe. The key is deceleration... "spin down". This is where decorporealization comes into play- if you're spun down too much, there won't be ANY logical place for the universe to deposit you- then you simply stop existing. >>Some stories are entertaining, some are somewhat ludicrous but worthwhile while perusing through the net, but like this one, some are truly not devised properly.<< Yeah I know- time travelers are supposed to fit a mold based on fake time traveler stories and public opinion of a technology that does not yet exist, which means that when a real time traveler comes through, no one will believe him because he's not John Connor and he's not here to prevent another 9/11 by posting on a time traveling forum. >>British tycoon Sir Richard Branson today announced a $US25 million ($A32 million) prize for the scientist who comes up with a way of extracting greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.<< Branson is looking for a magic bullet. The magic bullet is fourfold: 1. Co-op communities that generate their own green energy. 2. Cars don't put out more greenhouse gases. 3. Forests. 4. Megacarbons. What do all of these have in common? They all consume carbon. The more "C" that is either trapped or not used, the more "O2" there is; the less "CO2" there will be overall. The answer is fight in front of everyone's faces, the problem today is that you can't get rich by building forests and rainforests- people would rather make 10% on stocks than fix the planet. I noticed the Time Traveling Forum is down. Can anyone help me on this? Is it down for maitenence? That site's supposed to be up for at least three more years and from my perspective this is a temporal violation which I find very troubling.
  9. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>How can the US economy do "better" at the same time that a depression hits and the stock markets crash?<< The economy and the stock markets are two seperate, yet somewhat connected things. The Federal budget and the GNP is trillions of dollars. Although most of these monies go to keeping street lights on and such, this kind of money can get a whole lot done. Politics is the process of explaining to the people why you're spending their hard earned monies where you are and our President-of-the-year has a large part in deciding where those extra monies go. The stock market is regulated by the confidence of the people in American enterprise. When the stock market is down, people invest in federal securities, when it's up, people buy stocks. But the game itself is unfair- it's skewed towards Big Business- our current President calls this "economic stimulation". And you all (should) know that when your stock dividend is fifteen cents, the CEO's bonus is in the millions. All of the pieces have been in play for quite some time in America, and what is to come is no surprise. But don't worry- there won't be people dying on the streets or roving bands of looters or a wholesale breakdown in civility. You folks just gotta realize the ten bucks you just spent on lunch is enough money to feed and entire family and just because "new and improved" just came out, "old and unimproved" still works. What's coming is change- change to the entire system, brought on my a decade of overspending. Our taxes won't go up, but they'll get less done. How much are we spending in Iraq? >>Also, does history finally conclude that Bush stole the 2000 election? The 2004 election? That he or his people were involved in the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks?<< Bush was the last of the old guard- the last legacy of Reagan. We won't be electing any more Reagan-like Presidents after Bush. Bush had nothing to do with 9/11... Osama did. And sure "Osama was one of us and then he became one of them" but the bottom line is Osama did it. Bush is guilty of taking advantage of the free enterprise that is America. We don't feel as badly about Bush as you do, in fact we admire his willingness to set such a clear example of how to not do things correctly. >>Are large numbers of American citizens rounded up and put in the Halliburton/FEMA concentration camps?<< No. >>Is martial law declared by the US government in the next 20 years?<< No. >>Does the government bring back the draft?<< No. >>Does water and/or food become scarce in the USA in the next 20 years?<< No. Did you know a 79 cent bag of dried beans can feed ten people? >>Does the economic collapse get so severe that most long-distance cross-country distribution of goods ceases?<< No. >>How high does the price of gasoline get?<< The average price is about $4.50 a gallon, but you also have to ajust for inflation. >>Wow, Peter, you just ain't listenin are you?<< I don't blame him or anyone for asking the same questions- these are large concepts and require a detailed explanation to make sense, you guys are looking for a ten word response which is difficult and easy to misconstrue. >>Does someone with the initials G.S. make any significant impact in the simulation/computer science areas?<< Not that I know of. >>The sphere sounds much like the movie "contact" with Jodie Foster. Is the sphere similiar to the sphere in that movie?<< Very. >>I think you feel the same way about your AISC as I do about my navigation system in my cell phone.<< You know when you click START and SEARCH and that little dog pops up and you type something in and it searches for you... that's the idea except he lives in cyberspace and you can access him from any computer anywhere. And when he's in cyberspace, he's finding all kinds of cool things for you.
  10. Re: Yet another time traveling claim The civil war is between the classes- "the rich" and "everyone else". But it's a "civil" war (get it?)... there are no outright Gettysburgs as much as growing resentment from the majority of the people, all while the rich get richer, everyone else gets poorer, all while the US government goes bankrupt. I know this is a dramatic example, but this is my perspective being from 2044... I know how it all turns out. I know what life in 2044 is like and looking back at today, one can only describe it a "civil war". In the future, the Federal Government runs a tight ship with a balanced budget and keeps its nose clean. In the future, people don't kill themselves just to make a buck. In the future, people are interested in their community, not the world at large... in the future we keep to ourselves. In the future, our military is half the size it is now and so are our taxes. In the future, politicians are held accountable. Life is simply simpler in the future- this is where I come from... the future. Now here I am in 2006- I've been here before, it's not the dark ages to me... I lived in this time once already. But it's weird being here... weird like when you find out some distant relative you never knew you had is coming and they're bunking with you all week... that's the feeling I have being here. You guys really are in a civil war right now- you all against yourselves. A good analogy is Walmart. If all the employees walked out, they will get what they want. And what do they want? Livable wages. And what's stopping them from getting this? Themselves- each and every one of them- for rationalizing the personal inconvenience change will cause against a steady-but-never-enough paycheck for selling themselves short. You're in a Civil War right now and every once in a while one of you snaps and a Waco-type event happens. Then it's all over the news- live 24 hours, non-stop BETWEEN COMMERCIAL BREAKS, then it goes away. Scott Peterson, Mark Barton, "The Neptune Assassin", "Son of Sam";"The Zodiac killer". The Unabomber. Timothy McVeigh. Daniel Carver, OJ Simpson, Johhny Knoxville and even a Royal Princess. Whatever keeps glued to your TV set; whatever keeps you staring at ads. At some point (and I think it already happened) it is technically possible to make just as much money being on welfare as it is to work 40 hours at Walmart. And when the coffers run bare, eventually the Federal Government will wake up and make things right again. In 2044, we develop co-operative communities. They are living things: Corporations... they exist to serve themselves. They exist to make a huge profit, and the thousands of people who control this corporation decide the best course of action. These are neighborhoods and small towns, except they're owned by the people who live on it. They generate their own electricity, they grow their own crops- they even make their own topsoil. They also own the central mall which keeps the community alive and rents space to its tenants- all for a huge profit, with stock dividends payable to the people who live there: its residents. Some of the best communities' residents make $75,000 a year in dividends for just living there- in 2044, "living there" can be an occupation. And most of the people who live in that community also work there, and every community exists to serve its people and generate a profit by offering goods and services to people outside the community: the world at large- particularly people who don't live in a co-op community. We call those people "rich people" because they choose to live in the same exact house as us but it's costing them twice as much to maintain it- they REALLY gotta work to pay the bills- double income, overtime, holidays, latchkey kids... today you call this "occupation". And we fill their gas tanks with ethanol and collect $80.00 for doing it and smile. In 2044 we love rich people because their being rich makes us all richer and we both know it. Once you people today look past the screaming, non-stop headline breaking news-of-the-moment headline, you'll start to notice history is happening right in front of you. Another successful space probe. A new way to get drinking water from sea water. A way to turn desert into fertile soil. A vaccination for a deadly disease. Less starvation. PEACE. A way to add more to the world than you're taking from it. Then you'll start paying attention to what's important again and make it better. We call this "the future". Now having said all of that look back 40 years to 2007 and look at life today and look at how everyone is playing against a stacked deck and still hoping to win and how else can you describe it but a civil war? NKS_Man- re: electric cars. Once somebody puts out a workable, cheap, reliable electric car that gets the job done, it will simply make more sense to drive an electric car. Sure it's not as fast as a gas car and maybe it's not as flashy, but it's saving you thousands of dollars a year- enough to finance the cost of the car itself. Chrysler in 2044 is a medium-sized company. The catalyst is when Japan opens US Auto's vaults and dusts off US Auto's patented electric car blueprints and actually starts making them, and whoever puts it out first wins. Now on to Pamela. >>Is it harder (more physically demanding) for a 61 year old to time travel versus a 25 year old man? Are there gravitational forces felt? Can a child time travel? Can more than one person time travel together? Can you describe in detail what happens after you enter the machine?<< The time machine is a metal ball about 5 feet across. Being inside it is like being in a car with airbags all around you deployed- you're crushed in every direction. You get into the pod's contoured, fetal position seat, lean forward and put a large hard plastic breathing tube into your mouth and close your eyes tight. There's a small compartment under the seat where you put your personal effects. Then they close the pod and inflate the airbags- you're smooshed- you can't move and then it starts spinning. You get a little light-headed, then it goes away. Then you feel a forward lurch, then the door opens and you come out. You're in the past. It's as stressful as going on a roller coaster. >>Can the techs talk to you when you are inside?<< You are "the package", the techs are busy making the machine do what it does. There is no in-flight meal, just five minutes of turbulence. >What happens when you arrive at the new time?< You arrive in what is designed to be the same place you left: the same underground complex. You spend a week "on campus" before you go- you spend a week in a place where everything is 2006, then you go to 2006 and arrive in the same-looking place and it really is 2006. They open a bottle of champagne (which personally I think is corny), refund your deposit in current currency ($50,000) and you're free to go- you have completed this financial transaction of time travel. >>Does someone open the door for you?<< Oh yeah- you're locked in. You can't get out- there is no "emergency stop button". You are cargo. The ball is incredibly smooth... it's a giant ball bearing. It's double walled and there's some sorta liquid mercury in-between that acts as a conductor. >>How do they know ahead of time that you are coming?<< Honestly I have no idea. I know when I arrive, I am the center of attention... it's not like a landing dock or anything... it's not a bus terminal... I didn't land in a place full of people from 2044. They opened the hatch, I got out and was slightly dizzy... there were a good 20 people in the room. Once I was okay, they all went away. I was escorted to my room (which is the same room I had in 2044). I left later that day. I'd say they email the information before I arrive- the time machine does not rely on any universal standard- it cheats time. >What happens if two people are arriving at the exact same time and place?< Not possible. You land where "you're logically expected to land in spacetime" and it all has to do with additude/spin/deceleration. You fool the universe. >>You said three things will happen, you will time travel, you wont or you will decorporalize.<< Yeah- you're cargo. You sign releases and whatever happens to you is your problem. >>What happens if you dont time travel? what are the causes of the failure?<< Then they didn't get "the Coca-Cola Recipe" right. They recalibrate and you have to wait another day or so for the batteries to recharge. They also successively pick different dates to reduce causal effects and make it reality. I went through in one shot. >>What happens if you decorporalize? What would cause that?<< There are "hot dates" where your being there and then has a direct causality effect (butterfly effect/grandfather paradox) which makes your logical history immediately illogical. In that case, it's simply easier for the universe to pop you out of existence than to rewrite E=MC2. Like if OJ Simpson time traveled back to the day of the double homicide- he would decorporialize. >>What does AISC! mean?<< "Artificial Intelligence Spell Check". It's a subprogram to your userid... it's your Avatar... it's "the online you". In 2044, your password is not your pet goldfish's name- this is why kids are getting themselves implanted, this is why many more Federal privacy laws will be on the books. It's your familiar, it's your butler. It follows you around, it opens online doors for you, it corrects your typos and makes sure the billing info is always right. It allows you to go food shopping and just walk out with a shopping cart full of food. It talks to other AISCs and gets stuff like eBay done for you while you sleep, it makes sure your distant relatives get birthday cards on their birthday. It's your rifle. There are many like it but your AISC is yours. You get one when you're young and you teach it and it gets smart. You type and it all comes out like Shakespere... it's "the online you". I feel naked here posting "my own words"- I miss my AISC. In 2044, AISC's are "ghosts in the machine"- they are living things that can eventually become a life form onto themselves... they become "you" after you die... they're your right arm. The can do up to 50% of the writing for you. There's lots of "AISC graveyard" sites in 2044- places full of talking dead people. That is why I write the way I write- because whatever I have written has always come out as this: perfect English diction. But I make mistakes- I make typos, which makes me look foolish... I miss my AISC.
  11. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >You are deleting them? Don't delete them. This is very strange. This is not normal. why don't you post them. Perhaps it is some kind of code and we can figure it out. I would atleast like to see an example of one to satisfy my curiousity.< I'll run the next one through an java editor, remove any java then post it here. It's nothing but random words but it's a whole email full of them. >>"3DTV is cool "<< 3DTV is VERY cool... cool to the point of there's no need to envision anything more real that apart from tangability. It's (usually) four emitters in the corners of the room which converge and cancel to form a true 3D image. This is the technology that begat holosims- "virtual people". As to the balance of questions posed- in the past I compiled them to form a single thought then conveyed them, however this leaves nagging "unresolved specific questions" in the minds of the posters. I'll try tackling them head on this time: > What are (Pamela's) characters in the movies made about John?< In a nutshell, Pamela plays the part of the believer. >>If we make so much food we burn it does that mean no one in America goes hungry anymore?<< In 2044, people still go hungry, as ashamed as I am to say. We produce so much food we don't know what to do with it so we convert it to gas- when the market dictates it's cheaper to convert to ethanol than grains, we convert it to ethanol. Stocks in 2044 are much flatter/more stable/not as volitile then they are today. >>If robots take over most of the jobs then who buys the products?<< The people do- with the dividends from their ownership of co-op communities. >Are you not afraid you might be accused of killing the winner (of the billion dollar lottery) since you know about it ahead of time?< No- it's more "a thing" like Roswell or 9/11 or even John Titor... it's a thing that conspiracy buffs will cling to. >So CERN plays a big part in developing time travel?< A thousand people play very important parts towards the development of time travel. From the 2044 perspective, Kaku is foremost. From a 2007 perspective, Pelosi is. >What if there are more time travelers than just you here?< At least 50 people went through before me- I made sure the thing worked before I went... once you're strapped in the machine and it's turned on, either of three things will happen: you'll time travel, you won't or you'll decorporalize. Those 50+ people are right here, right now although I assume for various reasons, mine is to correct someone else's future (which is my ticket) and alter my own future (which is why I did it). >How does that factor into the decorporealization theories?< It does exponentially. At some point I won't be a "time traveler" anymore, I'll be "just another time traveling claim" when causality catches up to me. >Does anything happen if you run into another timetraveler from another time period? What if they all got together in a large room...what would happen if a hundred stood side by side all from different times?< Most probably nothing, unless there's a cannibal in the room :). Now what happened if 50 of us were in a room and the 50 other us's walked in? Most probably a black hole. >How can you seriously talk about our futures being the same when you are here changing ours by interacting with us? ripples do happen.< No offense, but don't blame me for altering a future that hasn't yet happened to you. In particular regard, you die believing in Titor (according to the story); if nothing else I've given you something else to consider and in the process possibly altered you. >This is what is meant by different timelines. You are changing ours if you are who you say you are. How can you think you are not?< Yes- I plan to directly affect causailty upon my death, or in 2011 whichever comes first. Don't blame me for altering a future that hasn't yet happened to you. >I would like for you to explain more about physical timelines and ones that are not physical. Do you mean the timeline you came from has now become unphysical?< This is a tough one- a real philispohical quandry you're asking. God has a book called "Our Universe" and everything in it is everything that will happen within this universe... as such, there is only one reality. We can violate reality but only in the smallest points for the smallest fractions of time: years, not light years- we call this "time travel". This is an appropriate direct reponse to what you ask. AISC! >The timeline you are in now is changed from what it was before....simply because you are in it. I guess I do not understand your view of it. Can you explain more about it?< The universe is at 99.99999999999931415% equilibrium. That means, regardless of whatever "moment in time" you consider, it's still 99.99999% at equilibrium. My being here throws this equilibrium off, but only for an extremely short period of time: an atom lives for 10 billion years and of them, 37 of those years were spent in a dual state- big deal. This will definetly alter time and space but only for a short period of time and to an inconsequential degree- most of history is ineviable anyway. As such, as long as you don't affect directly causality and create a grandfather paradox, you CAN do such things as time travel. This is where I fit in. Trex- all of your questions point in one direction, as in, one long-winded, clarifying explanation. I'll gladly go into it again if you'll all hear me ramble- I can tell you all the story of 2007-2044 but most of it won't make sense to you now. This is like explaining the evolution of the Nanopod to someone in 1944. >>Here's my problem. why would a millionaire person who is dying of cancer go back to the past and leave all his loved ones and money behind (except for some gold bars, I think must have weighed you down somewhat on the trip)? Why go back to a time when medical management of cancer is not as advanced as his own time? Won't you end up dying even sooner?<< Immunizology makes cancer what it should be: a rare malady- either you get it and you're screwed or you might and it's preventable. I did not pay for my time traveling trip- my attorney did in exchange for information. The gold was mostly 10 oz. bars which are the size of an Ipod- the lump sum could fit in your pocket although it would pull your pants down. In 2044 they prevent cancer, they don't deal with it. The roots of this inevitability already exist, by 2015 it will be a reality. Ask a Canadian. >>technically, you could live forever<< Yes but who would want to? >by coming back in time in 2044 when you start to die, giving tons of money to younger self, living as millionaire thru life till 2044 again when you get cancer, coming back to younger self give millions again and again.< Would you do the same if you could? >TTF doesn't exist anymore. It changed to Paranormalis and then to The Paranormal Network and now it is offline altogether. I went to TTP and searched for your posts there but didn't find any, perhaps due to my own unfamiliarity with that site's mechanics. Anyway, I would appreciate it if you did repost your earlier predictions again in this thread.< http://timetravelportal.com/viewtopic.php?t=2793&start=0 I apologize to everyone- I meant TTP :0 They're all there although upon checking I just found out I am also banned from posting there- my last post was to redirect anyone here which ineviably resulted in my being banned. Causality thanks you, planetniles. Most of the questions asked here have already been answered there... I was there for a while.
  12. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>So the practise of cryonics is at least still happening then?<< Cryonics is the same in 2044 as it is today- popsicle people. You do know you're nothing more than a body and a brain and "you" are electrical signals that dissipate when you die, right? The best way to preserve "you" is to fill a ziplock bag with your hair, fingernails, skin and a used Band Aid and put it in a safe- the younger the better. >>What about nanotechnology, how far has that come by 2044?<< They have nanites- what they do with them I don't really know. But I know there's huge advances in molecular biology. As to both questions, people are more philisophical in 2044 then they are today- we don't worry about ourselves as much as you do today. I think it's partly because it's the future so things are more convenient and partly because this is the "double otts" where you're experiencing "the decade of terrorism" firsthand... this is just a passing phase like McCarthyism or lynching blacks for being black- they were all the right thing to do at the right time. No insult, but in a decade, you'll see the error in your ways but life goes on. Have I told you folks about the origin of life? I think I already did on TTF- that explains my perspective best. >>Also can we assume that the results of Gravity Probe-B will confirm Einstein's theory or will physics be turned on it's head?<< I really don't know. I could google it and take an educated guess, but my guess is as good as yours. E=MC2 was a fact on July 16, 1945. >>You mentioned that you have recieved weird spam (email)<< Most of them are emails full of random words- thousands of them and it makes no sense. I just thought it was some autobot troll, I just delete them but it's weird because I have not given out my email- maybe my ISP is doing it. My computer's fan (I think) is running a lot- anyone?? >>does the technology exist today to build a working time machine?<< I gave this one a lot of thought and well- yes and no. Does the technology exist to build a cell phone in the year 1500? It does, and I'm sure Dr. Emmitt Brown could make one in that time, but not really. Time travel took three decades to patent, I wouldn't even know where to begin. If you went back to 1974, could you invent a cell phone? The time machine also has a huge energy requirement- each community has a built-in 24 hour battery backup. When the time machine is on, most of the south is on battery (or utility) power. >>Also Titorian, you mention about not being able to interact with your past self, but what about interacting with friends or family in the past?<< I also gave this a lot of thought as to how to properly explain it. Here goes. The further back in time you go, the more causal your being there will become. If you time travelled back 100,000 years, your sneezing on someone there will have eradicated the entire Binx race (bless you). If you went back and killed Jesus or Mohammed (PBUH), several billion people today would cease to exist. The same applies with indirect interaction. This is math in 2044- it's "how directly relevant is this to me?" >I did memorize the Powerball numbers for Florida on a specific date in 2010- that will be my gift to you all for your participation in the end.< >>Didn't you say before that you can't predict random outcomes<< Yes- I cannot predict random outcomes. "That will be my gift to you all" means the circumstances surrounding the event, not winning lottery tickets- allegedly the winner was murdered, I wouldn't want the same thing to happen to you guys. It's a big thing in conspiracy circles... this is like me telling people in 1956 to go to Roswell next year to see something "out of this world". >>Hello. I'm not saying that I believe you, but could you give me an account of what happens with the situation in North Korea? I would also like to know how Japan and South Korea are doing in your time<< They're still on the maps. No World War Three. These are large concepts you're asking... they're still viable nations. >>Seeing as how you gave us a Japanese name earlier, are there any names, or at least initials, of famous East Asian people that you can remember?<< Only Japanese name I gave was Michio Kaku who is a New York resident. I don't pay much attention to the rest of the world. America is more "1950's-ish" in the 2040s... don't really know how to define it- we go about "just living our lives" more than you do today. >>I can imagine a food shortage for poorer nations because of this.<< That's some horrific stuff- people weighing gasoline over food. The way to end Global Warming is to get green. The more vegetation there is in the world, the less co2 is in the air (because life itself is CARBON-based). The way to get green is to make getting green profitable. The way to make green profitable is to make it readily available anywhere and the way to do this is with terraforming. The result of this is farms popping up all over the place providing an abundance of food and Global Warming starts reversing itself. There are some great agricultural technological advances coming... kinda like "auto-farms" run by robots. People use ethanol in 2044 but there is no issue over food availability- we're the largest food producing nation in the world which is something to be proud about- we make so much damn food we burn it. >>What about the ripple effect?<< I explained it generally above. In specific regard, I get deja-vu a lot... "a lost memory of experiencing something firsthand from my distant past but here it is happening again for real, live". My eyesight is getting worser than it should be- I worry about this because it's my eyes... I think there's more black spots in my vision than there should be. It could be because I am not used to staring at a monitor or maybe because those individual optic nerves are decorporalizing... I worry myself to sleep thinking about that. >>Does Darby play a physicsist in these Titor movies or something? LOL<< Darby plays the straight man mostly. In some versions, he's the mastermind behind it all- in one story he's the mastermind and his typos spell out his name. I don't want to alter Darby too much- he is one of the main anchors to the John Titor story. >>Can you go into further detail about CERN's discovery. What do you mean by "extra" energy when the machine is turned on? I want to know more about that and you didnt really go into it that well.<< Put it this way: they turned the machine on as expected and the energy traveled 10 seconds back in time to arrive in the same point in space, thereby causing "twice the energy" to be there "the second time around" which is our reality... "there is only one tangable reality". This caused a time loop which made it factual... it really happened. Conservation was actually thrown off by a theoretical scientific experiment. (When did we know E really equals MC squared? July 16, 1945.) As such, from the perspective of "our reality", when they turned the machine on, extra energy appeared from nowhere. They thought there was something wrong with the machine (it's a large machine trying to conduct subatomic experiments) so they spent millions recalibrating everything only to have the same result. Kaku proposed a reason as to why this was happening then 80 pages of indeciperable letter math formulas which launched a "time machine race". >>is your future better than ours? In two ways: techonlogy and spiritualism?<< Yes, but the future is always better.. I outlined above what 2044 is like- it's a lot easier place to live. Both parents don't have to work full time plus overtime just to pay the bills... life is easier- it's the 1950's all over again. But in regards to 2007, you guys need to look more into what's really important to life and not what that TV ad is telling you is important... you have too much media coming at you. But then again, I am an old man. (As a registered Republican I say: ) Clinton is "good-folk". >>Like are there less deaths, less fear, less wars? Is the economy better? Less poor people? Etc.<< Yeah- as the USA starts taking the United Nations seriously, the UN steps up and resolves a lot of issues. But the USA has to give this power up. If the President in 2044 pulled what Bush did in 2003, the USA would have been invaded by the UN as they sought to remove him from power just as he did to Saddam. Sad but true. But these things happen just so we can see firsthand why these things should never happen- we only move forward by experience. 9/11 and now Iraq are the end of a dark decade in American history- both the USA and the Middle East don't want to fight anymore- in 2044, we (the USA and Iraq) pay attention to ourselves. >>Any technological gadgets you could talk about? Are all the cellphones like the "iphone" or maybe even better?<< 3DTV is cool and so are holosims. Kids are getting chips implanted because it's the cool thing to do but us old folks are against it- I don't want a computer knowing my exact location within a millimeter every second of my life. They're not "Big Brother chips", they're like having a credit card in your head- the way clothes in department stores have those security tags on them... but it's possible to monitor someone's every movement (and don't get me started about the Penal System in 2044). >>I wish you luck in your journey, hopefully you will fix it.<< Thanks! >>A) You cannot solve the problem of atomic displacement in your nonsense. Did your atoms temporally move? That would mean that this point in time in the universe has more matter and energy than a future point in time in the universe. This is impossible, and means that matter and energy have indeed been created and destroyed in linear time, which defies Einsteinian physics.<< Yes- at this moment in time, the universe has more atoms in it than it did before I entered this timeline. Furthermore, the same identical atoms are here- both within 1,000 miles of each other. The simplest answer is the "wave particle duality" in a matter of speaking. It's like putting two gigantic supermagnets on two boats in a lake- they will eventually be drawn towards each other but if they stay sufficiently apart from each other, they can co-exist. If his atoms reached me, nothing would happen. But if my atoms touched his, mine would decorporealize before they would reach him. If I mailed him a flake of my skin, when he opened it, it would be empty. This preserves conservation, which is what makes those early CERN experiments simply weird. >>So don't go trying to claim Titor popularized the notion of moving in time.<< Not at all- just Titor was popular. I said I was a Titor fan. Sure there's lots of movies about him in 2044- there's lots of movies period. Films are like youtube today, only made by millions of people. Titor was popular because he was kind of an action hero. In 2044 there's a million cliques each with a million people into it... it's a lot more localized. PS- Darby- I did the "John Baez Crackpot Index" on my time traveler claim and I scored the same score as my SAT. What does that mean? :)
  13. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >First, there is no possible way to tell one particular atom from another. That's a basic principle of quantum physics.< Every atom has unique properties- the universe is infinitely small. >even if they did encounter their "alter-self" they would not "cancel" each other unless they were particle/antiparticle pairs.< >>when you seperate a pair of atoms then reverse the charge of one of them and the other changes regardless of distance... that's that called?<< I finally found the name of this principle: entanglement. "Imagine a dime sliced down the middle, into a heads half and a tails half. One half goes to a person who then flies to the moon, and you keep the other half here on Earth. When you look at your half, and see that it is heads, there is no need for you to talk to your moon-bound friend to know she has tails. But here's the startling difference between two halves of a dime and two quantum particles. In the moment before you look at a quantum particle, it is neither heads nor tails. Rather, it is both at once. When you look, it becomes one or the other. Your mere curiosity has changed its condition. Weirder still, a quantum particle's quirkiest talent may be its ability to be intimately linked, or entangled, with another. Even when two entangled particles are far apart, a change to one always affects the other." http://whyfiles.org/shorties/133quantum_leap/ Also check out Wikipedia- it has lots of those letter-math-formulas that make no sense to me in it. >Your little party will release a 3433.75 metagon thermonuclear gadget into the world. Good old Terra Firma will not survive.< You're exactly right- this is what zero hour is all about. If you went back in time and stayed there until the "re-present", there would be "double the you" in the universe which is a major violation of conservation. At that point, if you met your other self, a black hole would form and swallow the Earth and moon... but not the solar system. The universe would remain intact, only the Earth would no longer be in it- this is because the Earth is a 99% closed system. >>Hey. You're the one who said this is what would happen. I just filled in the numbers for you.<< Yes, according to classical physics as told by you, if I met myself, the entire planet would blow up. This is why E=MC2 cannot unify the fundamental forces after 102 years, tens of thousands of physicists and trillions of dollars- it falls short from a lack of perspective. >>You never did answer the question about Kaku's switching up on his area of expertise. So when did he leave string theory behind (the area of physics that he's been in exclusively for 37 years) and go into general relativity?<< Science abandons string theory when they realize it's nothing but numbers on paper- that it's nothing more than a sufficiently elaborate math formula that's equal because it's large enough to be equal but has no practical application apart from a good reason to learn Latin- it's junk math. I did not know physicists have areas of expertise- I thought physicists were just physicists. What's your area of expertise? I find physics fascinating, but I only have an outsider's view of it which is what you need to wrap your mind around a concept larger than E=MC2. You're too boggled down by numbers. I take it the clarification you're seeking for the 5% of what I wrote that you don't agree with as a compliment.
  14. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Risata- There are millions of people living in the USA illegally: people with no real ID or copies of other people's. Most of them are Mexican immigrants but there are over a million others. America is ultimately a country of 50 states governed by the federal government- any American is free to pick up and move to any other state and establish an identity. I can do all of that except for photo ID- I can't pass for a 24 year old! I obtained copies of my birth certificate and Social Security cards to open accounts which in turn got me debit cards which in turn got me credit cards which in turn gets me club memberships and assigned parking spaces. As long as the bills are paid, they really don't care who is charging. I only run into problems on the Federal level- like if I wanted to buy a house: the bank gets involved, they run a credit check on me and I'm busted. Even if I paid cash, that amount of money would set off alarms. $10,000 is the transaction limit before the feds get involved so I make a lot of little purchases which is why stocks are the perfect thing to invest in. Now if I got run over by a bus tomorrow, they'd look in my wallet and see my ID, my SS#, by club memberships, credit cards, debit cards, cash and my emergency contact info for my private doctor- at no point would I be a John Doe; in no case is it neccesary to take my DNA. And even if they did, there is no "federal DNA database"... they don't put your DNA in and a name pops out- even in 2044 that technology does not exist... if for no other reason than it's Big Brother you're talking about... in 2044 there are many more Federal Privacy Laws than there are now. Regardless, even if they still took my DNA (and somehow had my younger self's DNA "on file" somewhere and made the link somehow)- there's no way to get a 100% match from a DNA test from an identical 24 and 62 year old- my DNA is much more mutated than my younger self's- at best they'd conclude we were some sorta "distant relative" or something. DNA tests look at less than 1% of a person's actual DNA strands, you know... The only DNA that is identical regardless of age is spinal and cerebral DNA, and to a lesser degree fingernails and hair, and even mitrochondrial DNA ages with time. >>Furthermore, if they did happen to call your younger self, and he became aware of you period, wouldn't that cause a "butterfly effect?"<< This is a good question- it also answers many of Pamela's and Darby's. I cannot directly affect my other, younger self. If I do, I will instantly pop out of existence. If I sent my other self an email (which I am currently able to do), the moment he opened it, I would pop out of existence. Why? Because I cannot directly affect myself. This is why the older soccer ball never reached the younger soccer ball- because B cannot come before A. This opens the door to wackyness, but this is what C=ME2 is all about... it's first person physics. Ignore the universe around you. It exists; it's a given... it unquantifiable and only concentrate on one object. The goal is to control this one object above a Heisenberg threshold, not the universe at large. This means two things: control everything OUTSIDE this space and everything INSIDE this space. In other words, build a wall. What's this wall made of? Acceleration. What is acceleration? It's everything around you. Everything that exists complies with the Cosmic Background Radiation caused by the Big Bang. In other words, the Big Bang happened and everything in the universe is a result of the Big Bang. "Everything" is little packets of acceleration. They break down into two general classes: "mass" and "energy". Within mass are different states- (solid, liquid, gas), different densities and different atomic weights. Within energy is the Electromagnetic Spectrum, from radio to gamma. All told, the universe is E=MC2: it's matter and energy interacting to give us the tangable universe we exist in. The only thing classical physics cannot do is unify the four fundamental forces (and you've had 102 years to do it) and that is due to "the wrong perspective" (which is why math never proves anything- it only makes more math). But underlying this is the fact that everything, everywhere is made of acceleration (which is why there is no "absolute state" in the universe). Now the universe is E=MC2 but everything within the universe is C=ME2... everything in the universe is "a universe onto itself". Everything in the universe is a THING, which means it's possible to quantify any one THING in the universe- provided you use "the rest of the universe" as a resource to quantify "that THING"... beyond a Hensenberg threshold for a Planck Unit... this is why A bombs go off. This is where the mechanics of C=ME2 come into play- if you can quantify (or control) one field (meaning, put up a wall between this field and the rest of the universe), you can manipulate acceleration and in the process travel time and that is how the Branson time machine works: it's a ratio of electromagnetism (energy) and centrifigul forces (mass). When the correct ratio is reached (the "Coca-Cola recipe"), it's possible to send THINGS (like me) through time, provided the time you're sent to must be "more logical" than the place you're sent from- this is where the "landing base" come in... you "land in a place you're expected to land in". And also provided you have enough energy to actually send this information (The Branson Foundation is the largest energy conglomerate in the USA). This is why Branson won the "contest"- because they had the money and they had the energy. I exist in a time I shouldn't now simply because there is no logical explanation for my being here now. If you wrote out my lifetime on a timetable, it would have to "loop back" at some point for it to make sense. This is because of E=MC2- because since I exist WITHIN the universe interacting as a part of the universe that "my life's story" has to make sequential sense. But it does not because of C=ME2: because it's possible to create shells that can exist seperate from acceleration and move within them... that can travel through time with enough energy. I hope this makes sense to you all because that's how it works- you can't control the universe but you can control a part of it to the point of where it seperates from the universe only to rejoin the universe at an earlier point in time. The only drawback to this is causality. My body is made of atoms and all of those atoms currently exist somewhere else on the planet right now... my being here adds extra atoms to this planet. In the largest sense, this throws equilibrium off. So whenever one of my atoms meets its other younger, idential atom, my atom cancels itself out. Why? Because I don't belong here now. As such, to continue existing within this E=MC2 universe, none of my atoms can interact with any of their identical counterparts. Now most of the atoms in my body are renewable- as Pamela pointed out, "you're a new you" every few years apart from the spinal column and nervous system. This is why I cannot touch my other, younger self: because if I tried to do that, my atoms would cancel themselves out, I'd decorporealize like a ghost. As such, "my atoms are along for the ride" in a time they shouldn't exist in. My atoms don't mind being here- they're millions of years old- this 38 year leap is a hiccup in their life as an atom. They only run into a problem if they encounter their duplicate- in that case, that atom cancels itself out... it simply "stops existing" because in the larger sense the universe is a living thing and we're all parts of it (E=MC2), and the other atom simply goes on existing, unaltered. Sure this is entropic, but this is a very big universe we're in. I am made of seven trillion trillion trillion atoms. So everytime one of them meets its counterpart, it pops out of existence... I am made of swiss cheese. This is why I am in Disney and not anywhere near where my other self is- because America is 50 states and each state has its own city and each city has its own logistics... because it's possible to exist in the past as I am provided I am sufficiently distanced from my other self. Sure I am in some grandiose way interacting with my other self... sure the o2 in the co2 I exhale will eventually be inhaled by my other self but in actuality, this would take thousands of years which makes it impossible... provided I stay far enough away from "me". This is how I still exist regardless of the fact I don't belong here. My coming here is my retirement. I don't have many years left and I decided to spend those last days and years preventing it from ever getting to this point... I'd rather life comfortably in the past with the possibility of altering my own life than in my present where I simply wither and die- I'd like a chance to remake myself and that's why I am here. You guys are the gravy. You guys are the back story for when my other self logs on to TTF and follows this thead here- then it'll all make sense to him/me... then I'll be complete. I did memorize the Powerball numbers for Florida on a specific date in 2010- that will be my gift to you all for your participation in the end. That was an historic drawing- the first drawing for one billion dollars. There was one winning ticket holder and no winner ever claimed the prize- a crop of conspiracy circles popped up over this event- "the time it made more sense to kill a man than hand over a billion dollars". I will happily post these numbers before the drawing to see whether it's a conspiracy or not. I originally wrote: >when you seperate a pair of atoms then reverse the charge of one of them and the other changes regardless of distance... that's that called?< To which Pamela asked: >>I was hoping you knew being from 2044. I don't believe the answer is known yet in our time.<< This is a well known concept today, I just don't remember what it's called. A physicist would definetly know which is why I asked Darby for the name of it. >>Isn't there anything you can give us about it that is not currently known? I have given well over 50 predictions, some of which already passed- what else can I do? Start rambling off Super Bowls as proof? Real time travelers don't come back with dire, urgent information- they come back to relive the past and not alter it to the point of where they don't exist in it anymore. I wrote: >Considering there's only one tangable universe, where else could it go but nowhere? Another random part of the universe? Perhaps, but regardless that's somewhere I don't want to be.< And Pamela replied: >>What if your wrong?<< How can I be- there is only one reality: this one. Sure infinite, alternate universe may/do exist but the energy required to "go from one universe to another" is as big as the universe itself... it's like trying to quantify pi. Let's say for every action, a host of new universes pop up where it potentially does. Then the universe is full of an ininite number of alternate universe every second forever... at that point the question becomes "does reality really exist?" If this is the case, then all kinds of stuff would pop into our universe- aliens, time travelers, Jesus and whatever else you can imagine. At that point, if you looked out through a telescope the universe would not make sense. But the universe DOES make sense- all the way back to the Big Bang. E=MC2 removed the mystery from our universe... the whole universe makes sense. Why? Because this is tangable reality. >>If you would disappear what would happen to all of us that knew you and talked to you here?<< I don't belong here so whatever causality happens will affect me, not the universe around me. >I assumed the name "Jon Titor" to be clever, but everyone here seems to call me Titorian which suits me fine. Thanks for asking.< >>typical "Titor" smartassness<< Sure thing, Ms. Moore. anonymous_person- Cryogenics in 2044 is the same as cryogenics in 2007. What makes cryogenics sustainable is the simplicity in making liquid gasses through pressure. Once you're a popsicle, you're essentially inert. No major research was done on these poor souls- there's no money in it. Maybe in 2200 we'll figure out how to thaw someone out without turning them to mush in the process. >>Does CERN discover micro-blackholes with their new accelerator in 2007/2008?<< I gotta be honest- this is all old news to me. This is like me asking you the exact date the Vietnam War ended. Eyebrows are raised when they turn on the machine and extra energy appears and when they turn it off and it goes away- this is time travel. A few years after this happens, Kaku outlines his theory, then everyone starts building "magic machines" which are a direct application of his untested theory. Branson wins. NKS_Man writes: >>Titorian- Came across this today: Sheer Thickening Fluid<< The capsule I was in was metallic, double walled and had a liquid in the middle. It may or may not have been this stuff, I just called it "super mercury". It absorbed energy and converted it to energy, it was a closed loop; an uber-lubricant. jmpet writes: >>Hey Titorian- how's your health?<< The same it was when I left. Immunosuppression therapy rendered the cancer inert at the expense of my susceptibility to illness... a cold can kill me. I eat a healthy diet and exercise and continue living. I won't live past 2010- I am genetically predisposed to die at 65. But we'll see about that. NKS_Man writes: >>Oh boy, I get all analytical and *poof* causality.<< Causality is not as causal as you'd think- the world is a big place. Considering I shed over a billion atoms a second, we're all somewhat causal-proof. We are nothing but atoms put together to form "us", after all. What does me in is information, which is what this here now is. >>A full explanation isn't necessary. You posed the equation thus its yours to defend. Why don't you just give it your best shot?<< >>Titorian, could you please state in as much detail as possible the mechanics of/and way your time machine works to the best of your knowledge?<< I have carefully explained the principle above to the best of my ability- the "layman's version"; the high school version. This is as close as I want to get to actually explaining it- to the point of where an average person can see I'm not making this stuff up. Any more (which ,Darby, I am am unable to do) would create causality which would rewrite history even more. And even though I am here to rewite history (my own), the more I detail, the less I will be able to further detail.
  15. Re: Yet another time traveling claim >>So why don't you expand your equation c=mE^2 and show the underlying proof.<< It's Kaku's equasion, not mine. I am a layman talking to a physicist, I could never fully explain the simplest of concepts to you- I don't even know what all those letters in math formulas mean no less who came up with it first. I am really starting to believe you're here waiting for a time traveler to win you a Nobel Prize. Can you give me one absolute state in the entire universe? >>Hillary is hungry for power and I believe her lust for power will divide America apart even further then Hier Bush has.<< Hillary Clinton is not the person everyone loves to hate. Personally I do not like her but "liking someone" is not a prerequisite for being an effective President. Everyone liked Bush right after 9/11. At the same time, Bush won't be seen as a monster by history- he'll be more like "the last of the old guard"- his speech tomorrow should be a real humdinger. >>A ball is not a living object though. A balls atoms are not constantly changing or being renewed. Have you discovered where exactly the atoms go and come from when they are popping in and out of existance on an atomic scale?<< Darby will have to give you the answer on that one- when you seperate a pair of atoms then reverse the charge of one of them and the other changes regardless of distance... that's that called? >>I don't see where you mentioned it turning into energy or anything or having a hugh explosion. You just say it faded out. This does not prove it ceases to exist just that it ceases to exist here.<< Considering there's only one tangable universe, where else could it go but nowhere? Another random part of the universe? Perhaps, but regardless that's somewhere I don't want to be. >>With the black hole forming on the Earth. Are you saying if you stayed until zero hour with your otherself and created a blackhole you would destroy our Earth and Moon?<< Yes. But considering I am 62 and have terminal cancer, it's highly unlikely I'll survive the next 37 years. "Zero Hour" is a popular film in 2044 based on real science where someone does just that. You'll all have wait for the movie to see how it ends- the lead actor hasn't even been born yet! >>Risata asked the question what would happen if you died. But I will ask what will happen to you if your younger self dies tomorrow?<< I am from the future, not from a parallel universe. If the 24 year old me died tomorrow, he would have never lived to 62 to see himself go into a time machine to become me; I would not be here writing this now. The only way he could die tomorrow is by something inadvertently done by me here and now to cause his death. Were such a thing to happen, we would both cease to be alive: he'd be dead and I would disappear. >>Do you have a first name we can call you by?<< I assumed the name "Jon Titor" to be clever, but everyone here seems to call me Titorian which suits me fine. Thanks for asking.
  16. Re: Yet another time traveling claim I looked at Stephen Wolfram's website and it was very confusing to me. Then I looked at Wikipedia and was even more confused. Is he saying the universe has a tendency to put things into order and eventually that order becomes life? I agree with the basic principle, if that's what he's getting at- I already mentioned that the blueberries on Mars are a form of proto life. One thing that stood out to me on Wikipedia was "some complex computations cannot be short-cutted or 'reduced' (cf. NP-hard) , is ultimately the reason why computational models of nature must be considered, in addition to traditional mathematical models." In 2044, P=NP was solved for some time and this is consistent with Wolfram's assertion "if the program is so simple, where does the complexity come from?". Personally I have never heard of this man. I hate equasions too and started wrapping my head around what he was saying, but I also saw a host of problems people have with his conclusions. If someone can explain this for me, I'd love to hear it. Darby writes: >>So, what is d^2x/dt^2?<< I have absolutely no idea. That's why I wrote >>I am a layman talking to a physicist, I could never fully explain the simplest of concepts to you- I don't even know what all those letters in math formulas mean no less who came up with it first.<< >>I asked you to explain the reason why an equation isn't. The details of the "physics" isn't inportant, just the math.<< "Mass" and "energy" are expressions of acceleration; they're relative mathematical quotents. As far as math goes, in an infinite universe where you can "simply add more and more math until it's equal", math falls short of explaining acceleration. Can you give me one absolute state in the entire universe? Undaunted, Darby writes: >>Care to explain Cherenkov Radiation?<< According to Wikipedia, "Cherenkov radiation is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a charged particle passes through an insulator at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium." In other words, it's finite and conditional. C=ME2 is larger and more encompassing than the opposite; E=MC2 is part of C=ME2. E=MC2 is one way of looking at the universe, C=ME2 is another larger, simpler way. Pamela writes: >>I don't understand what religious beliefs have to do with it. Are you saying you don't believe the body has a spirit?<< The belief in a spirit is spiritual or religous in nature... it's ultimately a matter of faith. My beliefs are different than yours and I respect your beliefs. Yes we all have spirits but where they go when you die depends on your particular beliefs and varies greatly. Where am I going when I die? To visit an old man in his living room for a fireside chat. >>Another question I asked that I was curious about was if there were any controlled experiments to know for sure you do indeed pop out atom by atom or if it is just a current theory in your time.<< Yes. On the subatomic scale, particles popped in and out of existence randomly. In reality, we have no such thing happening to a person on film. I believe they tried something with "rolling one soccer ball into its younger self"- the older ball just faded into non-existence as it got closer, it never touched the other ball. Someone mentioned your body's cells change with time- "a new you every few years" and you're right, but important parts- the brain and spinal column, brain cells, neurons, teeth- live a lifetime. This is rather unsavory for me to talk about because it applies to me. The "I am a mass of atoms" analogy works best here- as I rewrite history, my atoms scatter. Eventually I won't be me anymore. Regarding the black hole, in overly simplified terms, it's simply easier for a black hole to form and swallow up the planet than have reality redefine itself to accomidate you. Black holes are like erasers. The Earth is a 99.9999% closed system- we don't leak much of anything into space. If a black hole formed on Earth, it would swallow the Earth and moon and maintain its orbit around the sun in our place- continuity intact. You'd apply the "living universe" analogy- at that point, the solar system would continue to operate the same, only the Earth would not be in it. A black hole is just a black hole... a black hole is not the opposite of a Big Bang. The universe has billions of black holes in it. Funny, isn't it? Black holes absorb everything but move through space. How is this possible- shouldn't black holes simply absorb this movement (acceleration) too? PS- Black holes are not closed- they leak. Risata- If I got hit by a bus, then my life story will be me traveling here to get hit by a bus, it won't affect anything. They'd ID me and see I was pretending to be someone else who lives 1,000 miles away from me (there's millions of people pretending to be other people), the other me would eventually get audited and cleared- he doesn't know I am here. And after the dust settles, my lawyer delivers a package to my other, younger self. This is my plan, but not the bus part.
  17. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Darby writes >>So you finally "get" the meaning of E = mc^2. Good for you.<< Thanks for that info. As I stated from the outset, energy and mass are different expressions of the same thing: acceleration. >>Oops! Captain Kirk, we have a problem. It appears that the left side of our "equation" is about 30 million times larger than the right side of the "equation". Care to explain?<< Sure thing, Scotty- but never to a degree where you can then "discover" this science on your own and win a Nobel Prize for it.:) Energy and mass are different expressions of the same thing: acceleration. Mass and energy are not "mass" and "energy" but quanta of acceleration. This acceleration- ALL acceleration- came from the Big Bang. An overly simplified way to look at it, the Big Bang was pure acceleration. Some of it became mass and some of it became energy. "Mass" then differentiated itself to beget 92 elements and energy differentiated to become the electromagnetic spectrum and the universe as we know it took form.Mass and energy have rules: mass can never be pure mass and energy can never be pure energy. Mass can never move at light speed and energy can never stop moving. Although mass and energy truly exist, they are nothing but quota of acceleration. A side effect of acceleration... the constant movement of everything, everywhere is time. As such, if you can control acceleration, you will control time/time travel. For more information, I wrote this out twice- on this forum and over at TTF. Now beam me up. recall15- wikileaks sounds both interesting and potentially dangerous. jmpet- Decorporealization is a word, it just has not been invented yet. Ask Darby. Designer- There is no such thing as "divergence". Although it's possible alternate realities exist, none of them have energy. Well- since they potentially exist, is it possible for one of them to have John Titor and his time machine which can "pop into this reality from his"? Yes. However the energy required for him to go "from his reality to this reality" is equal to the Big Bang, which makes it essentially impossible- the only way such a thing could possibly happen is if he's from a vastly more powerful universe and he exists on a different scale than us. Were this the case, every atom in John Titor's body would be equal to a galaxy. This possibility once again makes it impossible, especially since he said he's from an alternate timeline. As far as decorporealization goes, it's not a good thing if I alter my other self. Maybe they made it up but the moral is the same- if I alter my own history, and if there is only one reality, then I should pop out of existence- how could I not? I don't belong here, my other younger self does. But we are the same person, just in two different points in time in the same place and time. It's a paradox and bad stuff happens in the universe to fix paradoxes. My atoms are from 2044- some of those same exact atoms are somewhere else right now. At the very least, I would "de-atomize" as these twin atoms cancel each other out on the atomic level- distance is not a factor in the atomic scale. Pamela- I don't know what you mean by stange anomolies surrounding Titor, but I know I've been getting weird emails recently- weird spam. cpguy2- The time machine has room for one, but they can use the time machine more than once. I am not ignoring anyone on this forum- if anyone has a question, I will try to answer it.
  18. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Darby writes: In the equation c= 1. No units, just "one". You end up, therefore with e = m. By letting c = 1 and understanding that from special relativity we know that all inertial observers will determine that the speed of light in a vacuum is ~300,000 km/sec we can define 1 sec = 300,000 km. So energy and mass are different expressions of the same thing? Pamela- I have different religous beliefs than you do- you can say I am more gnostic. As I approached my other self, I would begin to pop out of existence one atom at a time. In theory I should never be able to reach the door.
  19. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Decorporealization. I am made of atoms that are millions of years old and collectively form the universe. As a time traveler, I am not the center of the universe, I am only in the wrong time. Everytime I alter history, I am rearranging atoms throughout the world by my actions. Some of those atoms are me. So if I rearrange things enough, I will end up scattering myself all over the planet as reality ripples to keep me in this time I don't exist in. This is why if my other self opened the door and we saw each other eye-to-eye, I would pop out of existence, or decorporealize. As long as I keep the realm of my interactions sufficiently distanced from my other self, and as long as I don't rewrite history to the point of where I am not in it in 2044, I will continue to exist. "Zero Hour" occurs when you travel back in time and stay up until the present again- then there would be two of you and if either contacted the other, they'd both decorporalize and a black hole would form. My main message to everyone is to relax. You folks have too much media coming at you- the world is not falling apart and 9/11 won't happen tomorrow. I don't mind "violating causality" by talking about the good things to come- like peace and agricultural and technological advances... things that make life easier. Or self sufficient communities that supply their own power. Or solve Global Warming- just plant a million acres of forest! Computers in 2044 are about four times as good/fast/smart as today's, mediumware fills in the gap. A million handheld devices that comes with their own memory. We also have "online computers" but you gotta pay for that. Pamela- What is stopping you from writing your own story? John Titor was a goof that became a story that became an internet sensation that became an inspiration for time travel that became an urban legend. You are a believer in the John Titor story because John spoke to you the most out of everyone and you never told the world what he told you, plus you have physical evidence and a "secret song"... in other words, you have your own story to tell. In the future he is popular because he was the first to convincingly present himself as a time traveler and inspired the push of technology to pursue real time travel. He's James Bond. Christianity will continue to plummet and other religions will get more popular. And when the fundamental forces are unified, people get a lot more religous. In 2044, you could say all the great religions are coming together to form one. The US has had its borders wide open to Mexico for legal immigration for years- we need more American tax-paying citizens. And in 2012 we open our borders to Iraq. The population will surge with an influx of new Americans- in 2044 America is a melting pot. Darby- I gave it a shot as simply as I could. Considering I am a layman talking to a physicist, I could never fully explain the simplest of concepts to you- I don't even know what all those letters in math formulas mean no less who came up with it first. And even if I could, I am not about to give you or anyone here reading this enough information to build a time machine tomorrow- that would absolutely decorporealize me. I spoke in general terms to give a high school understanding of it and the basic concept is simple to understand. Are you here waiting for a time traveler to win you a Nobel Prize? :)
  20. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Pamela- by 2044 there are several documentaries and movies about John Titor and in them all to one degree or another are you, Darby and Javier who play either the people who chatted with Titor or people who stayed and kept his story alive and in 2044 you are deceased- sorry. I don't have/can't get a driver's license and Ohio is quite a ride for me to take a cab. I'll go OT re this. 1.What did you bring back to 2007 with you? Myself, Old Navy clothes and a small cache of gold bars which I have since sold most of. 2.Why did you come to this particular time? I did not pick the exact date, my "assignment" was to deliver information to someone at the right moment in time- early December 2006. 3.Was John Titor revealed in 2038? The "John Titor Story" is very popular in 2044 but it's a story- John Titor does not pop in in 2038 and there is only one reality. 4.Who wins the Super Bowl? I'll tell you if you can tell me without looking who won the 1923 World Series without looking it up. 5.Do you have any winning lottery numbers? No- lotteries are random chance and are very causal- they are literally random. If you could go back 5 seconds over and over again to witness the flip of a coin, you could not predict its outcome. This alone makes "predicting Super Bowls" difficult. 6.Do you have any predictions to make? Nope. Just a story to tell with details. 7.What is wrong with you- "terminal health"? Cancer. 8.You altering your other self will alter the future, right? Yes. History from 2011-2044 will unfold slightly differently from my actions but I will be deceased by then. Don't blame me for changing a future that has not yet happened to you. 9.Why have you been registered to this forum for over a month? I registered here first because I used to post on TTF a long time ago/a few years from now and thought that was too causal but had problems logging onto this site- the moderator of this forum can attest to that. By the time it was cleared up, I already made first contact on TTF and didn't see the point in double posting. recall15- thanks for the WST links- that short film is playing on a TV in the remake of the movie.
  21. Re: Yet another time traveling claim "'I am not a physicist' said the layman from 2044 to the physicist of 2007." All credit goes to Michio Kaku. Here's one year's-worth of 2044 high school science for you folks. I just don't want to misrep. Darby- here is your non-anecdotal response: According to Wikipedia, "In physics, E = mc2 is an important and well-known equation, which states an equivalence between energy (E) and mass (m), in direct proportion to the square of the speed of light in a vacuum (c2)." This suggests that everything that "exists" is either "energy" or "mass" and they're both quanta relative to light speed- thus "the tangable universe". In all physicalty, this is incorrect. Energy cannot be "solid energy" and mass cannot possibly be "solid mass"- the universe has boundries and among them, mass can never move at light speed (a black hole is never "closed") and energy can never be at rest (or infinite). We currently call this discrepany between "numbers on paper" and "reality" "CBR". So yes- mass can be turned into Hiroshima, but it can never restart the Big Bang. Furthermore, "the speed of light in a vacuum" is impossible to ever accurately measure, so all measurements in the universe are at best "probable". As such, E=MC2 should be ajusted to "E=MC2 but it never really does" which makes no sense. What clears this up is acceleration... movement. Everything, everywhere, all time time all over the place everywhere is always in constant motion. Black holes leak and gamma radiation builds up to finite bursts... nothing is ever at rest ever. Here's the leap. Black holes and gamma radiation are dynamic expressions of cosmic background radiation (CBR) on a sliding scale between "mass" and "energy". It's the frequency everything in the universe adheres to: it permeates everything everywhere... every cell in your body has a tensor field complaint with CBR... it HAS TO for you to exist within the universe: it's The Big Bang defined! And with that simple realization, a simpler law of the universe came into being: first person physics, or the catch phrase: "C=ME2". C=ME2 is "E=MC2 turned inside out" and in the process comes a way to simply side-step physics itself and do the impossible. What energy and mass have in common is acceleration. "Energy" and "mass" exist somewhere on some sliding scale, we just don't know what the scale is, at best we suppose it's "gravitons" (then we go to bed happy). And since we don't truly know (since it's unprovable; falsifiable), we cannot adequately unify the four fundamental forces of existence- thus we're in 2007. Well, everything everywhere is made of acceleration, only in different "densities"- we call them "states of energy and mass" which are clearly defined and "sufficiently seperated as to be definable". Proof of this is in the apparent fact that "mass" can never be at rest (absolute zero is an impossible state) and "energy" must always remain in motion (you can't "trap light": conservation.) As such, if we can control acceleration, we inadvertantly/automatically control mass and energy and in the process, simply side-step physics and do, among other things, time travel. Why time travel? Because the most direct concequence of us "always being in motion" is the logical progression of time. "If you affect acceleration, you affect time." This is the concept that opened the door to really really building a time machine- a race which The Branson Foundation: a multi-billion dollar corporation with no practical charter won when they discovered the correct ratio between magnetism and gravity- (it's a magnetized centrifuge) which, with enough energy, is capable of blinking a person out of tangable existence "here and now" and into somewhere else in time- the key being the rate of deceleration: into another, more logical, earlier place in time: the past- where a recieving pod is waiting to recieve you. The only concequence of actually doing this is causality- since you discovered you can side-step physics and do the impossible, "the universe" must be considered a living thing for you to contuine to exist within it as a part of it. And if a clear contradiction occurs within the realm of this new branch of physics, it's simply easier for the coherent, continuitous universe to pop "the double you" out of existence than remake the Big Bang- after all, the universe is a very large, complicated and equilibriated place. ("The universe is alive".) Regarding "Why, at the quantum level, is this a 'paradox'?" There are seven "realms" that define reality, not "10 or 11 dimensions". They are: 1. Subatomic: the entire subatomic realm. " Quanta of mass and energy that make sense only for finite periods of time" 2. Atomic: atoms: our 92 logical elements plus the logic that allows more (or less). 3. Tangable: mass and energy: us; our world. 4. Cyclical: solar systems and their biometric capabiltiy 5. Orbital: galaxies 6. General: the logical progression of galaxies (us towards (read:) "the great accelerator") 7. God (indefinable) What do all (or the first six) have in common? Everything, everywhere, all time time all over the place everywhere is always in constant motion: acceleration rules. My existing here... the mere possibility of the possibility of the reality of me potentially really existing here is enough to affect causality: these fields (and reality at large) are the concequence of me really really existing within a place and time I logically shouldn't be in. In other words- Causalty- see: Grandpa. Darby- I hope this provides a sufficiently scientifically acceptable answer to you questions(s). The future is a lot more pracitcalitally philisohical than it is today- don't get me started on "religion"...
  22. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Ps- The "Great granddaddy" of time travel is a show called "The Wizard of Space and Time". If anyone has any info on this I'd love to hear it :) I see no direct reference to it today- help!
  23. Re: Yet another time traveling claim Darby- My apologies and in all humility- I have said before that I know some of you posters from my distant past and you are one of them over at TTF- you're also somewhat a "mythical hero" or celebrity in the future. I am not John Titor- I have assumed the name "Jon Titor" to be clever and to protect my identity. I am a totally different, unrelated person. Another mythical hero is Pamela "Moore" who sadly was the first to go among the core of Titor believers- I see she is an occasional poster on this forum which is great- I'd love to speak to her too- I'd love to have your autographs while we're at it! Hi Pamela! Time is on my side, yes it is! :) Regarding John Titor: when time travel becomes a practical application, a million websites pop up and suddenly, time travel is popular. Many time traveling movies have been made and among them we regard the John Titor story as the gold standard- I have personally seen dozens of Titor-like movies and documentaries. The real story of John Titor itself is part fantasy, part make believe, partly educated guesses and as a whole good entertainment. What sets John Titor apart from the rest is that he was the first to break through and successfully sell himself as a time traveler- only time revealed The John Titor story for what it is which makes great TV- in 2044 the debate is still going, only we have you "Titor believers" to thank for keeping it alive. I am not here to sell myself as much as "live amongst you"- I "broke through" and am here to follow in John Titor's footsteps only for real. My birthday is May 17th and once again in specific regard to The John Titor story- his story is for the most part accurate, but from a different perspective. Once again I defer to TTF. I'm already glad I came here instead of sinking to a lower level just to communicate! In response to your follow up questions, simply put, there are theoretical infinite alternate universes but only one tangable reality. My "getting here" involved- on the scientific level- my popping out of existence at one point and my popping into reality at another- here. I do not belong here and quite literally if I ran into my younger self I would decorporalize with a gush of wind. The science behind this is "Kaku's Time" which in layman's terms is E=MC2 in reverse- matter and energy are both equally quotents of acceleration, as such, C=ME2. This "first person physics" makes it possible to side-step or cheat physics and allow time travel. The time machine I went through operates through quanta of magnetism and gravity... at one mathematical point I simply become irrelevant to 2044 reality and more relevant to 2006 reality- then I am in 2006. I appear in 2006 in "discrete redundant quotents" to overcome Uncertainty and all of a sudden I really exist here now. I refer to "myself" as "my alternate, younger self" because we're both me which freaks me out. If I met myself, I could sit down and tell myself every mistake I made and I'd love to except for causality. The only way it makes sense is to say the universe is alive and were such a paradox to happen it would be easier for the universe to pop "me" out of existence then allow two me's to exist (and the continuity and causality that goes with it). In other words, "I" am "me" only until "my other me" realizes "I" am "me". LOL As such, I plan to violate causality after my death- at that point in time my coffin will suddenly become empty- I will cease to exist yet I will endure as my other, younger, alternate, newly knowledgable self- a new person: me endured... me all over again. As to your other question, when time travel becomes reality, a million websites pop up and most "historical" websites like TTF get lost in the shuffle. And a million different John Titor stories pop up shedding light a million different ways on the John Titor story. I was shocked to see the story of John Titor alive in only a few places here and now- I always thought everyone in 2007 was waiting for CERN to "do what it's supposed to do"- in 2044 John Titor is as popular as JD Salinger (who is still alive today BTW!). In the larger extent, the idea of time travel becomes commercialized to the point of where there's well over over a hundred TT movies- each with its own twist or take, all of which have a grain of Titor in them. The core of the story is John Titor's own words plus the core supporters Javier, Darby and Pamela. The rest is conjecture and the whole of it is good sci fi. I apologize for the spelling of this thread- I only now realized I typed "yer" instead of "yet". Oh well- no one is perfect.
×
×
  • Create New...