Jump to content

Ralph2

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Ralph2

    2009

    Dear sir, Judging from this, it is not totally unimaginable to me as to why you rarely speak. You neither understood what I was talking about, nor explained anything that could contradict me, other than your misperception of what I stated about how we (in 2032) understand time travel to work. The "second" me is not from a parallel universe. He is from the same universe, except this "second" me is history being rewritten. Similarly to a video tape being recorded over again, that is what I meant by the "second" me. Think of the history of the world as a video tape: You go back to some point prior to where it ends (the present) and start recording other material. You obviously don't won't have the same material after that point. If that does not elucidate it any further for you, please feel free to ask :) Your counter-analogy with the building is completely erroneous. I was making an ANALOGY with the picture of a car.. I was not implying that a picture of a car is the same as the car itself. Not knowing how fast a car moves in the picture proves Einstein's well known discovery that time is dependent upon velocity; viz. that without velocity, time cannot exist. You can verify that yourself through a quick search through Google. This also proves the Uncertainty Principle and that no subatomic or otherwise particle can stay motionless, that is at absolute 0. I repeat again, the car was an analogy; it was not a direct example of the non-parallel universe theory of time travel i was explaining. I think that perhaps next time you should devote about half of those words (I didn't insist on taking the time to determine how many there were, as you apparently seemed to, for no reason other than to look pompous) to constructive criticism or honest questions, instead of ridiculous attacks.
  2. Ralph2

    2009

    That thread does not have the same idea about time travel that we have in 2020-2032 (time travel's practical existence; very neat date to remember though, 2020 as the first rudimentary time machine, that is, which transported light). There are no parallel universes. The Grandfather paradox is not solved by going to an alternate universe because you might end up on your own. You might say that there is a 1/infinity chance of that happening, which in mathematical terms strictly speaking is 0 (you can easily prove this by saying 1/9=0.111... then times 9, 9/9=0.9999.. which makes 1 equal exactly 0.999... making 0.00...1 = 0), but so is that same chance for going to any other specific universe, whether it's one where you had a dog named Roger, or Trigger. In any case, in the 19th century, Cantor's work on infinity discarded that objection (prematurely), while solving Zeno's paradox. When you time travel to the past you rewrite "history". But not your history, because your history is a metaphysical remnant that your memory recorded. It's like taking a photograph of a building which is destroyed by a bomb. The building in the photograph does not also collapse. And so, when you time travel in the past and kill your grandfather the "second" you is simply never born. This is because time is not a metaphysical "remnant" of past-being. Time was discovered by Einstein himself to be dependent upon velocity, mathematically. This can easily be shown by taking a picture of a moving car. In the picture the car is moving 0/0 meters per second. But the car itself was obviously moving, so if you were to ask the position of the car in the picture 1 second later (movement m/s), your answer would be undefined because it could have been 1 m/s or 2 m/s or 15 (if it was not a Volvo :-p ). And so when you time travel back, you have effectively rearranged the structure of the universe (time) which you are free to arrange as you see fit (or not :d ). The Conservation Principle elucidated by Hawking in 1992 and confirmed later on, showed not that time travel was impossible, but that opening a wormhole back through time (permitted by relativity) would not be stable enough and would vaporize a time machine going through it immediately. The question was whether this was a law of the universe (kind of like, hydrogen and other Alkali metals' violent reactions due to 1 electron in their valence shells) or simply coincidences that could or could not be overcome for whatever reasons. In 2014, a mathematician/physicist named Amirian (in his 50's, working near Los Angeles apparently), discovered that this was not a law of nature (as intuitively it seemed), but that this was due to the unstable forces of gravity surrounding the passenger and his machine inside the wormhole, ultimately due to the black hole. The same unstable force similar to trying to keep a pencil upright on its tip. You can theoretically do it, but it is an unstable equilibrium if you do.. without any external help that is. That's where the idea came for "external help". What was needed was to find a way to keep the gravitational forces in check, so to say, without them crushing and biforcating the theoretical time machine. It was realized that this would not happen until the problem of quantum gravity was solved, that is, I don't know how far you guys are into the problem of superstring theory, but it was needed to reconcile as you know, quantum mechanics with General Relativity, since as you must know, quantum mechanics and GR are in practicality on the same level inside a black hole (a lot of gravity, microscopic effects), and that's where everything falls apart. The solution was, coincidentally, achieved by 2018, by pretty much the same scientists, as well as a few new ones, who have been working right now on the problem since time immemorial. Then it was discovered what kind of singularities and black holes did not biforcate a specific object. I.e. some biforcated spheres due to their shape and rotation, others did not. In essence, there was a specific shape the time machine had to be. Then black holes were created. And after they were easily made, they were tested with light, and then with the research on shape on animals inside specific objects, and finally people. We quickly figured out that the appearing dogs were from the future, and it did not matter whether we sent them or not. They appeared nonetheless.
  3. Ralph2

    2009

    Smart guy, degrees as well as radians are unitless. Degrees are measured by the length of the arc of a circle divided by the radius, thus making it distance/distance, i.e. meter/meter or cm/cm which makes it unitless. Radians are degrees times pi/180 which ratio itself is untiless making it unitless as well. Look it up anywhere. What do you think radians are? They are degrees rewritten in a format to be easily used with respect to the unit circle. That's why instead of dealing with specific degrees in trigonometry, you say a circle has 2pi radians. Or 90 degrees is 1/2 pi radians, or 96 degrees is 96/180 pi radians, which is way easier than dealing with the degree when mapping trig functions such as sine/cosine/tangent and their inverses. You're a clever guy, aren't you. Too bad, nothing you have said is supported by anything, whereas mine is. But whatever, i don't need to justify myself with you anyway. I mostly like to talk with the other people of this time about current politics and discoveries in science and mathematics, mostly on other boards. believe what you will, but you have debunked nothing. By the way, I have already completed my mission. I got all the evidence I needed in Abba Khel, and now back to my time :-)))
  4. Re: On Titor's civil war According to Titor, the Civil war in this country was supposed to begin a long time ago. Titor himself defined exactly when it started : 2004 - 2005. Now, when 2004 and 2005 came and went without any 1861-type civil war taking place, the air pretty much went out of the Titor story. People concluded that he had been wrong about that, and therefore that he was just bullshit thru and thru. The problem with this was that many of Titor's other predictions did seem to have come true, like the space shuttle, the Middle East war, and so on. But the big one, the civil war prediction, seemed to carry so much weight that the whole story was pretty much "case closed" for alot of people. He says: "The space shuttle mission may or may not have a problem connecting the new lab to the space station." If that means the Columbia mission to you... one has to wonder where the new lab was.. or why he didn't predict Anthrax (he alludes to it once in a completely different sense, it being used over a war in the Mid East, but nothing of the brief but nasty attacks by it), nor Sars, nor nothing, save Mad Cow Disease, which wasn't even as big as those, nor he alludes to it in any way as a brief but sharp possible epidemic, which did not kill many, but simply he talks about CJD and Mad Cow Disease for one to safeguard himself in-line with his "we watch all that we eat in our poisoned future" story. Just got a similarity in names, not situation details. The "we're in the midst of a civil war" with his regiment the 'Fighting Diamond Backs' who should be around somewhere in Florida this or next year? :D . He says: The problem with interpreting Obama's election at everyone's doorstep is that, A) It wasn't controversial like the 2000 and 2004 elections, and B) He is clearly talking about physical fighting because he mentions Western political instability leading to war, not to mention his favorite cricket team- turned rogue shotgunners, the "Fighting Diamondbacks".. He doesn't place any emphasis on the Mid East that exists in 2001-today. It's not his focus, his focus is the fall of the Western world and Russia and China and WWIII. The Mid East is where there is war after the Western governments have fallen, which is logical, as there has been wars there since Israel's inception from 1948 and even before that there have been conflicts. Not to mention he doesn't cite that as a lighting fuse, nor anything like 9/11 as the lighting fuse for the Mid East war (which he sometimes even ignores and scales it down to brief side-conflicts; logical as everyone hates Israel there.. nobody even recognizes them save Egypt due to returning to them the Sinai peninsula after it was taken in the war of 1970-73). That's because he was visiting relatives apparently, and 2000 is simply the year he started posting after the forums in Art Bell and so on; he would have posted slightly earlier, when he actually came in 1998 as the Art Bell forums show, if he were genuine, don't you think? He would have shown up months before the election in 2000 if your suggestion that he was trying to warn of the election as a precursor is true. He didn't really do all that much planning. He read a few popular science books about physics and maybe time travel, sculpted a little theoretical stuff and invented a blown-out future with his own story. The one thing that everyone keeps point to, the IBM 5100 computer, is clear that he was an insider to the IBM and computer world to know this, because at one point he posts how "we're bound to find out about the 5100 capabilities soon" but a real time traveler would not have known that we don't know about the 5100 capabilities. In other words, would you know what restaurant John F. Kennedy went to if you time traveled to 1960? Or what Tv shows he watched? The fact that he knows it's not public knowledge shows he is simply on the inside of IBM or something like that, since the only people who knew it wasn't public information in 2000 specifically, as he seems to, were computer specialists and insiders of the IBM. He couldn't have known we didn't know this in 2000, whether he was from 2036, or 2136 because it's a minute detail he would have found nowhere in his time, and be as sure as he was back in 2000 of its certainty. He would have asked "don't you guys know the 5100 can do this?" and that would have still given him away. He talks about political instability leading to a wartorn US by 2005, with the Western democracies falling by then. Did not discuss the controversial elections until it happened around Nov. 24th, which he tried to use to his advantage. He was there since Nov. 5, why not mention it earlier for authenticity's sake? But he clearly refers to physical fighting. What results came into effect in 2005? Plus, he gave 2004-2005 as the prelude to his civil war of 2005-2008 (which he later changes to 2004-2008). He obviously isn't going to say the cause of a civil war in 2005 began in 2005 directly.. Kind of like Lincoln's election in 1860 sparked the civil war in 1861, only seems natural he'd say 2004-2005. He doesn't talk about causes prior to 2004 sparking a civil war, which they would certainly exist. You can't have a civil war starting out of nowhere due to events entirely in 2004, least of all a "stolen" election. The Civil War had many little events in 1855-1859 that directly led to 1861, the causes and evidence of which existed since the 1820's, such as compromises between the North and South, and other such tension filled events (not to mention the ultimate causes such as slave trade and discussions over human rights since the 1700's). Yeah.. right.. If you think popular vote equals electoral college, then yeah.. it was stolen. You can't have a civil war from 2004/2005-2008 with fighting in 2011. Simply doesn't work. Plus he didn't indicate the conflict turned violent in 2011. He said: "By 2008, I would say the civil conflict is pretty much at everyone's doorstep. Western instability during the conflict leads to the attack in 2015." He equates the violence of post 2008 with that of 2004-2008. Soo...the stuff at everyone's doorstep is the same as the fighting in 2011, he makes no differentiation between the two periods of "war". Whether a historian is needed or not, a time traveller would have made himself more clear about this. He clearly meant the violence of Waco (as just reading the context necessitates :) ), not the moving of families, because he grouped Waco with Ruby Ridge and another event. He mentions nothing about the economy, which he would have if genuine, and the conflict consuming everyone by 2012 clearly implies fighting since 2004 where not everyone was consumed, but people weren't that deep in it. It could be interpreted as anything, most likely having to do with civil rights which is not a central issue anymore, nor did he intend for it to be anything other than a fundamental cause for allowing WWIII, but he was not talking about talk over the Patiort Act, and other such issues. He nowhere said anything started in 2011. He became a soldier then because that's as early as it happened for him, according to his story, and by 2012 it consuming everyone. He was clear the war started 2004/2005 because he would have made this elaborate differentiation you have for him. Other than the fact that you apparently don't know what a war is, the causes of a war don't mark the start of it, the fighting does. Before then, it's just politics and political differences. And his statements about "cleaning shotguns in her sleep" clearly mean fighting was commonplace by 2011, not that it started in 2011. The only stories I see on my crappy TV in Fontana are how X team lost or won. Major boring stuff. I don't think Titor could spell foreclosure rush even if he actually saw the future. Maybe that's why he didn't hint at it :-/ I doubt Obama winning President ends the world for anyone other than a few folks in the South (if that is still going on today that is ;) ). His comment that everyone knew it was over by 2008 was due to the civil war of 04-08. he nowhere mentioned overheating. He said the US and Western governments fell by 2005. That's certainly going to degrade foreign policy! Any mention to degrading foreign policy prior to 2005 would have certainly mentioned 9/11 and the wars! He only mentioned Mid East minor conflicts, not wars, in a post-wartorn Europe/US. He nowhere hinted at a demise of Homo Materia other than obvious result of WWIII. He nowhere hinted at states rights as a major national issue, just stressed knowing one's rights and preferring state and local rights over federal ones (which is an error). He predicted the Western democracies would fall, not just become unstable, which they really haven't, other than the economy if you want to count that (which it doesn't), other than their relations with Iran and North Korea (of which there is no mention). Yeah, because China really needs Taiwan, and least of all would risk international relations to invade Korea and Japan for no apparent reason other than their proximity (another sign of Titor's lack of political cognizance, which one would have in 2036, regardless of knowledge of politics, since one would know history! I mean how many of us don't know the USSR's relations with the West post-ww2?) No it hasn't, not if you don't look for them, and the number isn't any greater than before. But he meant it in the context of a war-ridden world where food would naturally be scarce due to radiation and other such.. Not to mention Titor apparently does not know that the European Union is not a unified force such as NATO or the UN, and that the European Union cannot launch an army from Germany headed East which Russia then responds to by Nuking Europe.. and then China.. for some reason China gets involved. Britain and France have nukes. They wouldn't launch armies WW2 style into Russia when they have nukes, knowing they'll get nuked by Russia. Kind of why the MAD policy saved the US and USSR from nuclear war. The European Union is an economic organization which can pass laws over the countries that are members, but ones that all might not agree with, such as Britain doesn't with some trading agreements, nor changing its currency to the Euro. The European Union can't launch an army any more than the Soccer League can. He doesn't even tell us what happens to NATO or the UN, the second of which has to be dissolved in some way in order for Russia to attack China or least of all Europe, kind of like the League of Nations was noted as a failure, the same way he would have mentioned the UN. Or the rise of other organizations. He doesn't. The bottom line is Titor got lucky by impressing a bunch of people with theoretical knowledge of (some times straight out made up, such as Kerr singularities bringing you to other universes) physics.. Or rotating "electrical" microsingularities producing a gravitational sinusoid which opens the way to another universe. First of all, the gravity "inside" the black hole is enough to transport you to another part of the universe, as one galaxy from far away space was observed through a wormhole. You can't have a gravity field in between two wormholes producing a gravitational field bigger than the one inside a single black hole, electrical or not. A black hole the size of a dot can swallow as much matter as the Rocky mountains before exploding, so there is no way you can wonder whether a gravity sinusoid (it's just a gravity field, no such phrase as sinusoid) can create a Tipler cylinder, or how one doesn't become biforcated inside a Kerr microsingularity, which is smaller than a person. Since he posted pictures in the beginning, and no one contradicting him, correctly that is, that pretty much made him what he is.
  5. Re: On Titor's civil war From John Titor's posts recorded here: www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread61544/pg1 , there is a major discrepancy (and a few others) in Titor's story..: apparently on December 30 (page 6), he says this about his theory of time travel: This is in-tune with his earlier statements in his first posts in early November that he has some "recording" unit that tracks his original "timeline" to which he can easily get back to (page 1): ...The computer units and gravity sensors "record" your trip and you are quite easily able to return to your point of origin... And on January 15 (page 6) he says: But, by the end of January (January 26, page 5), he maintains that he cannot get back to his own, original timeline: Yes, a "ZD" is thought to be impossible. However, consider that an exact entry point "may" not be necessary to get home. The important factor is the path, not the destination. Under multiple world theory, there are an infinite number of "homes" that I could return to that don't have me there. The divergence for that window is somewhere near .002377%. and later on someone says: Bingo!! Seems like something they would do a lot of psychological testing for before they sent us off. The reason he has this shift in view is because in the beginning he puts forth his answer to the time-traveling Grandfather paradox (and says that all paradoxes are impossible to solve.. no that's not true, that's not even the definition of a paradox, it's just something that seems counter-intuitive but has an explanation, such as the Twin Paradox, which he incorrectly believed involved faster than light travel) as well as his theory of time travel with multiple "time-lines" and has his little backstory, but when more people start talking about "multiverses" he sees that this would imply there would be many "hims" going everywhere, and that he couldn't possibly get to his timeline due to a very low chance it's 1 out of infinity, which mathematically speaking is 0.. apparently he forgot about his recording device (also due to his "ZD" 0 percent divergence is a myth, which is not true.. you have a chance of going back to your original "timeline") and starts to rear-guard himself subtly against being exposed about that (which no one noticed, even if he hadn't backed himself up in advance.. it's obvious throughout the shifts of emphases in his posts). Ultimately, since he realizes that he hadn't solved the Grandfather paradox because if he went back to his own timeline and killed his actual grandfather there, he's still stuck with the same problem as with the absense of the multiverse theory, and so invents the "ZD" 0 percent divergence is a myth theory. ------------- Also other little details that might help you folks in spotting fakes (this is used by scholars in determining whether ancient documents are fakes or not, if any of you all were curious): - On page 4 someone correctly asks him what he was going to do if the 2% divergence between his timeline and ours made his computer useless... his answer dodges the question near-entirely.. something he keeps doing when confronted with such questions and says: the worldlines don't exponentially diverge, blah blah blah, they're chaotic and might converge/diverge... well still doesn't answer what you'll do if "our" UNIX doesn't match your UNIX.. - when asked what kind of clothes people wear in 2036 and music they listen to, he dodges the question by saying the clothes worn are way more "practical" and that they like to dress up.. if you went back to 1970 wouldn't you tell them all about Abercrombie and Fitch, or H&M, or about Eminem, and all that? - He apparently is not a physicist per his own admission, yet at the same time he knows all the details about how time travel works, such as Tipling cylinders and Kerr singularities, as well as knows what gravity sinusoids are and what they do, yet at the same time does not know that the Twin Paradox does not involve faster than light travel (no one who knows physics can make such an "honest" mistake) and knows no mathematical equations, yet he maintains, when asked what happens if his time unit brakes, that he can probably repair the electrical stuff, yet does not know what kind of cables are used around the microsingularities (I mean that would be the most important part.. to know how to fix the microsingularities!!) He says: He seems to know all this physics within 1 year (from his appointment into the project in 2034 until graduation in early 2035, with a launch date in April 2036.. not even Stephen Hawking can pull such a learning curve off).. Similarly to pilots and tank commanders, he would not have known, nor needed to know how time travel or the time machine works, save to fix as he said electrical problems. You can't really fix a microsingularity gone haywire, no matter how much physics you learn, not to mention you can't learn that within 2 years. The honest answer is he read one too many Hawking books for popular knowledge. For example, he cites no new knowledge of post 2000 physics. Where is the Penrose or Hawking of 2020? He alludes to future discoveries, but only in two instances: 1) a Science 2001 discovery of a "Z" machine, which he simply quotes an article, and 2) the discovery at CERN which he specifies in no way, other than a vague skirting. He does not mention anything as specific as Tipling cylinders or Kerr singularities.. and his claim that this is because the math had been discovered long before 2036 or 2000 cannot back that up, because we might have the math, but how can one apply that into practicality? They had the math for Einstein's theory of special relativity as early as Maxwell, but by Einstein's own admission, nobody had put it together until he saw it. Surely there are scientists with names who put together the time machine in Titor's time. They had the math as well as the "item" of the first jet engine: in England in 1929, Italy 1931, and Germany 1933, but the first two lost interest, and the third lagged behind due to other interests. This political intertwinement with reality simply does not exist in Titor's time. Where did the government in a post-apocalyptic world get the money and support to research time travel of all things.. which would have seemed as useless as researching banana milkshakes in the middle of trying to rebuild Europe in the post-WW1 or 2 world, let alone post-WWIII. He also talks about time travel: That alone contains physics that A) We don't have, nor can be explained by Tipling cylinders or Kerr black holes, and B) would have taken just as much brilliance to be connected as it took to discover the theory which he maintains we have. The technology for the automatically timed windshield wiper existed long before Robert Kearns put it together, but he is still its inventor. And it took technology and knowledge to put it together. For example, we don't know how to inject electrons on the surface of a microsingularity. Where is the physics behind it? How does one rotate electric microsingularities? How do you keep the electrons on the event horizon? Because there is no way to keep electrons on the surface of a black hole without them either being sucked in or going out.. not that we know of, unless you have a star trek shield generator. He doesn't need to be specific, but he gives no details that a genuine person with such knowledge would, such as machines that do it (even the bare mention that they made machines and physics that did it, along with a name of a physicist would have been enough.. he can't even spell physicist correctly, he spelled it: physist). He only gives the theory, which any popular science book would. Who invented the time machine? Where was it built, Who put the theory together? All questions a genuine traveller would have answered
  6. Ralph2

    2009

    That should be square miles (we squared 60 miles in the equation) , BTW: I could have "cheated" by not showing all the math and simply used 270 degrees/360 degrees = 3/4 "Degrees" cancel and leave it unitless. But that would be skipping a step and leaving people wondering how I derived "3/4". Better to disclose than to get caught up in trivial matters like unit mismatches. I showed it as 360-90 because 90 degrees represents Mass Bay, which we excluded from the circle. Thank you for elucidating that degrees are unitless... like it makes a difference or supports your little exaggeration. By "divergence" I did not mean something like a "time divergence" as you seem to think, but a divergence of the distance between Boston and Lowell which you seem to conveniently try to achieve at all costs for whatever reason. I never said that I was interpreting my encyclopedia as "around Boston" when it said "in", but that they either made an error, or they counted the adjacent areas around Boston which are technically other towns as part of their jurisdiction and thus part of the "Boston area" kind of like LA and other organizations such as LAUSD apparently have jurisdiction over towns that are not LA (e.g. San Fernandy Valley: North Hollywood, Van Nuys, etc), such as the LAPD and so on. Hence why I prefer Fontana, though I post from computers in public libraries in "LA" (North Hollywood and my former/future university of csun), since I sold my internet and computer equipment here, and i seem to have a malfunction with my time unit.. i can't get any funding from superiors now (ill probably be pretty run over for that when/if i return), im sure they'll blame me despite whatever explanation i give them reasonable or not. In any case, I have no clue what you were rambling about in that second post of yours. 3/4 of the area of a circle with a 60 mile radius is 3/4*Pi*r*r = 3/4 * 3.141592*3600 which is 4800 square miles. 1/4 of it is 2800 sq. miles. Either way, I have no clue how this has anything to do with what was stated.
  7. Ralph2

    2009

    The context of that statement, dear sir, was I can't vouch for specific things such as was it a man or woman, or was it Boston or Lowell. I post them because it comes from you guys' future. just wait and see if all those things come true or don't. but goodbye until then, no use trying to convince anyone here. I wasn't accepting Lowell as a radius for Boston. My encyclopedia here does apparently. My encyclopedia is the thing with the rather wide path to assure success. 4000 square miles may sound like a lot, but we're not talking about area here, if you cube that it would be even more! way to try and explode the divergences here buddy. Why would I strike that as a radius? The radius is just 35 miles taking your 4000 mile (im assuming you know math: a circle with that area has a 35 mile radius). If we cube it to make a sphere, we get a 180,000 cubic mile volume. Now pray tell sir, why would you make Boston the center of a circle with Boston-Lowell as its radius except to make it look like it's a big divergence other than 35 miles? It ain't the middle of montana? Well Boston isn't the center of a landmass dear friend. you only have about 1/3 of that 4000 square mile radius.. which is not a lot, maybe seemingly to you
  8. Ralph2

    2009

    Yes, exactly what I meant, my friend :) . I was not referring for the events I told you guys about this year (2011.. just so there is no confusion :P ), but for the ones I predicted for January 2010, those were apparently scattered around, only the one with the meteor seems to have been from 2010. I would of course, do my best to give the dates for these days so as to prove I am indeed from the year 2032 (spring of 2032 is when they sent me back here). Well, that would take me even more time on my already limited Pakistani mission-bound schedule than the original idea! :) . the Index does not have a heading for "anti-gun law" anyway :/ . It only has one about guns :| . But I can look up dates and try to find anything interesting for you, if you would mention a specific date.. as close as it can be to today, so as you can verify it before.. next year comes? :) In the experiment, when we put the cat and waited a day, the reason it had disappeared the next day was because the person who had time traveled (by we, i mean the team, and by the team, it was only one person who went back, who was not me. As I mentioned, this is the first time I am going back in time), and our friend time traveled a day into the past and let the cat go. From that we understood the previous (with respect to ourselves) day, as he came back and told us what he did, had simply been rewritten by our friend's actions, and thus he rewrote the future. Collecting my materials, as usual. I am going to need a good camera, I would probably complete it and return only the next day here, if I do. :)
  9. Ralph2

    2009

    Hello my friend! :) . Happy New Year! I have no clue, apparently something in the machine messed up, but.. that's all good, it has happened before, and it's not a big deal since I can go back anytime at any time :P but my the fanmail is exhausting with praise! Let's just answer some skepticism..: Rainman, no, these little events don't have many details.. apparently the story about the Boston shooting wasn't about a shooting "IN" boston but around Boston, and they got it wrong. Check up Lowell, Massachusetts. I can't vouch for these facts here, and it's not a day-by-day encyclopedia, it just has some details about minor events that have set in motion major events. For example the bombing, apparently in Athens, sets in motion terrorism in Southern and South-Western Europe. And the person (I assumed it was a man, but it was a woman apparently: http://boston.cbslocal.com/2011/01/03/no-bail-for-accused-killers-in-lowell-new-year%E2%80%99s-shooting/ ), makes that gun law across the US (perhaps with the exception of Texas?). The Egyptian bombing was a shame, but yes, I know Egypt is not in Europe (contrary to my 11th grade English teacher, who maintained Greece was in Africa..) Yes, Mr. KerrTexas, it could have been predicted that a shooting around New Year's would occur in a major city (really doubtful Boston would be one, since it's forbidden to have glass bottles/glasses on the second floor of a restaurant, let alone someone going out with guns), but it's the law it sets in motion. Request dates for events and you will have an answer, since it seems if I pick one that seems big, it gets plastered as "guesswork" based on reading some nonsense in the newspaper.. which i haven't, or something else.. Wasn't a different, timeline, it all happens on this timeline.. just a different year apparently. The encyclopedia is not organized by a timeline, like you all seem to be thinking, such as: 2011: Jan, Feb, March, etc. this and that happens (I don't think such a book is very common, especially for world events, of which i water it down for the US). It has events which i see and pick up and gather into a timeline for.. you all fellow-skeptics :) but all of it happens in this timeline: If I go back 50 years into the past and kill my grandfather, I simply never get born, but that doesn't mean I could never time travel to kill him in the first place.. it simply means you rewrite the universe's history.. kind of like rewinding back a Disk and writing over it something else.. it simply means that time is just an extension of the universe, and once you exit the universe, you are not restricted by time. History is not history, and rewriting it does not mean rewriting your own history, but the future of the world. Though I can personally say, no one has erased any brothers or sisters you might have otherwise had.. :P
  10. Ralph2

    2009

    Hello all. well, I barely found my thread, after logging off yesterday, and coming back today, it wasn't there at all.. and when I looked for it, it was at page 3. I realize I've accidentally jumped a year into the future, I obviously haven't accomplished my mission, since I've just appeared a year later.. Apologies for the incorrect forecasts, they didn't have dates on them, and I assumed they would follow up the next year. That goes for the Iran-Israel treaty, which no one in their right mind could probably suggest to happen these days. no, not unless Israel conquers Iran and makes them do it.. (or vice versa! haha). Surely I would have talked about Haiti about January 2010, if it were the right year. But no, more discussion of my mission, no point in telling one about it, when everyone seems to think I'm not from the future. How about I tell you what will happen tomorrow and before the month is over? New Year's? January? Thursday, December 30, 2010 - Several more bodies found in Michigan explosion Friday, December 31, 2010 - Yet another bomb explodes in Europe! January, 2011 - Last American WW1 Veteran dies.. days shy of his 110th birthday, a shame (no date) January, 2011 - Obama slowly fixing economic (health bill, etc) crisis.. ultimately the issue becomes lulled, and no one really gets any credit for the governmental fix In the middle/most of January next year, we will see a rise of terrorism in Southern and Southwestern/eastern Europe (Spain, Italy, Greece etc). and for the New Year's: yeah you guessed it man dies in Boston due to accidental gunfire (big surprise there :-/ ), which will ultimately lead to gun law control, laws arresting anyone in sight in public with a firearm around New Year's and major holidays, charged as "assault with a deadly weapon" (that's what this thing says, but can that be legal to be charged like that?? :-| ) :-)) . happy new year to all of you too! :)
  11. Ralph2

    2009

    """This was Dead On Arrival, since the price of gas first reached above $4/gal when I predicted it would.... June of 2008.""" -Do you make a point of making others who don't agree with you repeat themselves? """Nope. At least not yet. But of course, one could stretch the "before December" part all the way back to February 2009, when the commuter airplane crash happened on approach to Buffalo. It killed 50 people. But that would hardly make it a "prediction of the future" since this thread was started on SEP 21, 2009!""" I honestly don't know which one it would be. -------------------------------------------- I finally asked a few clerks at the base to send me something like a short history book: -January 7, 2010: meteor damages a big factory in Russia (Chechnya) -January 23, 2010: Bomb found on plane in England -March 19, 2010: Iran makes a peace treaty with Israel, and essentially agrees to enter as Israel's ally in its conflicts World Politics: Russia and China continue to make allies throughout Asia and the Middle East in hopes of making a balance of power versus the US. The Iranian government has made "peace" with Israel only to enter a conflict with it as its ally, and then claim foul play on Israel and declare war, which of course won't go without UN/US intervention.
  12. Ralph2

    2009

    I'm very disappointed that I'm disinteresting to you :( ...I guess it's not very interesting to get ropes and photo apparats. By the way, to Pamela: I found the book you were talking about, The Time Slip, or I forgot what it was called a few weeks ago at my former (future?) university. But after the 2nd paragraph it got wayyy too boring to read, sorry :(
  13. Ralph2

    2009

    You can ask me anything about Varna, Bulgaria.
  14. Ralph2

    2009

    Oh the fanmail is exhausting with praise! Since I've never done any investigation, I can't tell you what areas it applies to. But as far as an incident taking place, the small percentage of (practically nonexistent) testimony that I might possibly need will be provided by a translator from the government. I think I already mentioned that fact. I think I also already mentioned that most places of c.high school education know English. Edit: If you're talking about trying to figure out what caused the incident, like type of bomb, etc, then yes, I would know what to look for and expect. For example, incindiery bombs do not make deep craters, because their purpose is not to make a blast but to cause a fire. Rockets and missiles leave pieces of the wreckage imbedded in the crater, whereas bombs (exploded from underneath) don't. All I need to do is try to find pieces of the wreckage (which would be Uplifting!) and if not, get specifics as to what it is. I suspect the reason I was sent so late is because of the tenuous situation in the previous year. Also, anyone who doubts this, can still check out the stuff I've mentioned in my first post: specifically the assassination of the Russian service-man, and the airplane crash, and the earthquake. I looked them up, it seems the earthquake one happened before I came to the forum.
  15. Ralph2

    2009

    Sorry you can't find it? That wasn't the only incident, it was simply the major one they always pointed out. The last straw was some similar incident a few weeks prior to the start.
×
×
  • Create New...