Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


lledbetter2266 last won the day on October 4 2012

lledbetter2266 had the most liked content!


1 Neutral

About lledbetter2266

  • Birthday 08/22/1966
  1. True, Rainman Time, you are correct. I was being far too vague in order to not appear too odd. So, I will give you a more concise explanation. 1. People here have labeled me as a hoax item. That is ok, because I know that I exist and what we have experience is real. 2. I have seen it, and been there, and so have the people I work with. We know what it is like; the entire sensory experience is as real as we can possibly expect it to be, being so identical to what we already know to be reality, as to therefore make it reality. 3. Label me a hoax, I do not care. 4. Contact me, and meet with us, and then make your judgements.
  2. Consider this for a moment if you will: What is thought ? How does conscious thought evoke physical manipulations? Not only within the brain of the host vehicle, but also at the macro-scale? Such occurrences of physical manipulations, transfer of information, etc., can certainly appear to be proven, but the question which remains unsolvable, is how? My presence here is a good example. I am disproved, and recognized as a fraud, or some type of hoax, yet, I "know" that I exist here. So how can this be? It can be argued that I am constructing the reality within my own perception of reality. This argument would be correct; however, it may also be incorrect, as it could be possible that independent observers could also be conscious entities, separate from my experience. I have no proof this is the case, but I also have no proof to the contrary condition.
  3. It is possible that some type of time travel existed, at least briefly, around 2036, when Titor may or may not have been working. As you mentioned though, there is no actual evidence of him, or his work. Otherwise, we have no knowledge of any time traveling technology in existence before 2230 that would be capable of producing any sort of results, verifiable or not. It is difficult to 'prove' a valid claim, that is true. But, as you asked, I can provide you with two forms of evidence; the equipment we carry with us, and our own biocoding which would be unmatchable at this target point. If anyone would like to meet for further study, it would be acceptable. Further, if anyone would enjoy leaving with us, I do believe that would constitute verifiable proof. We are currently navigating the country once again, per standard protocol, until we are able to 'link' with a viable 'hot spot' as you might say here. It has become apparent that nothing I have offered here has been of any value to our work, except; our own verification of an ability t0 communicate both to and fro. Otherwise no suspicions have been aroused.
  4. I noticed that you are focusing all of your attention and energy on informational time travel techniques. This works fine, but there is a lot more to it than computations. One point you made certainly caught my attention, and that is the point of verification. This aspect will probably never be resolved, because a given target, regardless of range, can never be verified. This process can be demonstrated mathematically, but I am not the one to explain it. As a result of the 'verification problem', most of our projects focus entirely upon attempts to gather not only information, but also physical artifacts, in an attempt to acquire some type of evidence that we have indeed time travelled. The process is exceptionally difficult. While we can retrieve valid physical artifacts, and recorded information, there still remains no way to prove that such is nothing more than some sort of alteration of the present, or, as some think of it, a type of parallel existence. Due to quantum law, it will never be possible to know for certain if we are experiencing actual past events, or simply a parallel version of our own 'present'. Also, if you continue to make any type of s here, you will be included in their hall of shame. At that point I would suggest creating some type of fictional expressions; if you tell them the truth, they will not believe it. If you lie, they may believe it. And then, perhaps we can continue to attempt communications at this address. Otherwise, we can not do so. And once again the dilemna arises; is anything we observe here really from 2013, or, are we deluded consciously, as a result of our lab's mechanisms of altering our own present locale and our conscious awareness of such? This question unfortunately has no absolute answer. I could get into the more complex reasoning of why this technology is even being pursued, but this is not the place to do so.
  5. KasperR, refrain from it. Here no one will know a thing about situations. You will be regarded a faux presence and ridicule will be obtained. There is no goal in this place. Contact me and we can discover the information between us of similarities. I only visit here for pleasantries now, and not for constructive reasonings of pursuation, as it is not posiblive. They will not be pursuade.
  6. Hopefully, you agree with the fraudulent nature of the photographs. It required a great deal of time to invent a female character, then compose a convincing apology for posting fraudulent work. The photos are indeed real, yet they are fraudulent in the essence that they were all taken from various web sites. Why do it? Because as a scientist and as a curious person in general, I was hoping to gain some sort of interest in the topic we here are interested in. Requisition of someone else's internet identity is not difficult, so thank you for being so quick to believe the ridiculousness of whoever lledbetter2266 really is; be the person either male of female, it really does not matter. Photos: exceptions noted, but for one: and that being the hotel room photo. Mylo, please excuse me for not providing a higher quality image of the hotel, but encoding an image such as that one into a legible format required a great deal of time and effort. That one, you will never find on the internet because it was taken, by me, in 1885, and stored on a device which was never intended to communicate with devices used here. If I could give you a higher quality image, I would, so that you could further study the ink drawing on the wall. I never studied the wall drawing, so I can not say where it came from, or who the artist was, but, if you want to know, I would suggest scanning it carefully, using software that can emulate missing information in order to produce a probable total image. Then, try to find artwork created in the late 1800's, in india ink, as I do recall the drawing appeared to be an ink drawing. Perhaps you can locate similar works, then compare findings, and narrow down the artist and the name of piece.
  7. OH my goodness! At least one of me has been exposed as a fraud. . Sorry guys, I just now found the "hall of shame" section.. Ok, so I'm exposed now. My name is Lynnette and I am from Texas, but not Red Oak or Waxahachie. I'm from Dallas. My husband left me and I was pissed off so I guess I would get a little drunk at night and post a bunch of made up stories. Usually every night I drink and then surf the internet and post a bunch of stuff. Sorry, please don't be mad. You figured it out anyway so whatever. It's like an escape or something, sorry. Don't get too mad please. I'm only 28 so I think I can get it all straightened out somehow and quit drinking and do the right thing. I have no idea who stole my email and posted flicker pictures or whatever the other stuff is you said. that was not me cuz I'm not a guy.
  8. His information given in the video is quite elementary if you listen carefully. He states absolutely nothing that was not already well-established in the 1990's. This is some sort of scam speech, in my opinion, as even in the 1990's, once again, every property he describes was already well-known. What he fails to mention, however, are the following items: a) the location of the 'threshold', or more simply, the boundary at which behaviours at the planck scale become behaviours at the macro-scale. This is crucial, but is not supplied. b) No explanation, and nothing relating to the necessary equations required to explain his ideas. In other words, he is simply talking a lot, but supplying no information. c) He speaks of superposition by elaborating on some sort of model concerning a metal in an apparent condensate format, yet, provides no new information. Condensates were well-known in the 1990's, and their relationship to quantum mechanics was also quite well established. d) He makes no mention whatsoever of photon behaviour when directed through a sodium ion condensate. This property is crucially important, as it is fact, and will be a factor in proving (eventually) the property of the universal constant. I believe in 2013 it is referred to as 'dark energy', 'ether', or something similar. Concerning John Titor: He may have existed but it is highly doubtful. There is no historical mention of his name. I had never heard of this person until visiting, at which point I studied about his work. I found it to be plausible, but highly doubtful, mainly because he suggests the idea of a fixed 'timeline', yet, said timeline did not occur. This suggests a parallel timeline, which he did not mention, therefore I may quickly deduce that he is probably a hoax.
  9. Sometimes, people from outside of your experience may come to visit, and conduct various studies. However, you would most likely never be aware of their presence, unless they intentionally desired such. I can inform you in this way: 253 years from now, there will still exist no valid evidence whatsoever, that any sort of intelligent alien life exists. There has been conducted a very high volume of work in the effort to locate and/or communicate with some type of extra-terrestrial life, with no success. Currently, there are well over 15 thousand discovered 'solar systems' containing extra-terrestrial planets (as of 2266, that I am currently aware of, there may be more or less, the number is approximate). Of the known systems, none of them contain planets considered to be 'life-friendly', as we understand the processes of 'life' at this point. I can, however, think of about five or six planets residing in outside systems that somewhat resemble Earth. But, no signals have been detected from them, and, the position within the galaxy of these systems suggests that no life could exist there, as they are not within a habitable zone, as you call it. As a result of this knowledge, and these facts, it is highly unlikely that you have been contacted by 'aliens'. As far as we know, no such beings exist, at least not within the detectable regions of our galaxy. They may certainly exist, but they would be required to exist either on the other side of the galaxy in a similar habitable zone as Earth, or, in another galaxy separate from our own. If so, there is most definitely no possibility of detecting them, at least as of 2266. The technology simply does not exist. If, however, an alien culture does exist outside of our galaxy, or, on the other side of our own galaxy, it can be suggested mathematically that such a venture to Earth would be excessively impractical, as to render such not a possibility. Many studies have been conducted concerning the possibility, including not only physical abilities, but also practicalities, as well as possible cultural suppositions. None appear valid by human thought processes. This does not mean it's impossible, just that it's highly unlikely if the alien life form thinks similarly as we do.
  10. Everything he speaks of is pure conjecture. There are no valid theories or experiments to back up any of his statements, except, perhaps, the work done in South Africa, but that particular experiment hardly concerns parallax. Take a look at physorg.com and note the recent article concerning quantum magnetism. This is real work being conducted, not conjecture, and will become at the very least, a building block of knowledge eventually leading to practical 'time travel' experimentation. The only problem: I was completely unaware of this discovery, leading me to believe that although it is certainly valid, most likely leads in the wrong direction, and therefore must be discovered again at a much later date in order to become part of the historical sequence that leads directly to the projects currently in progress as of 2266.
  11. I have no knowledge of such a person or any claims thereof. Of course, there were many 'claims' being tossed about during that era, none of which I am aware of, with the possible exception of the Titor stories. There does exist some historical evidence that Titor may have been, and I must stress, "may have been", a legitimate scientist and/or theorist/experimentalist in this particular field, mainly due to some historical evidence which suggests some possible early experiments (2030-2076), that may have yielded some valid results. However, keeping in mind that from my perspective, such historical details have been lost, and no current provable evidence of his work, or even his existence, remains. It does appear possible, however, based on his supposed work, that he and his team may well have stumbled upon at least a few key components that are required to initiate some type of manipulations. Perhaps he was aware of the universal constant at that time, but it is not known for certain. Further, if it is assumed that he (or his team) had some knowledge of the necessary requirements involved, it could be plausible that he was at least partially successful within a very limited range, but of course that can not be proven. Currently, the only known model capable of achieving any type of 'time travel' is the Torus Model, and even now, it is quite limited. Curiously, this model seem to exhibit highly defined range limits (or sharp boundaries if you prefer). The reasons for the limitations are not yet known, although several theories do exist (as of 2266). As far as I am aware, no model exists as of 2013 that allows for any type of 'time travel'. Many more discoveries and developments will be required before such a thing can be realized. So, therefore, I can state with absolute certainty, that no such 'time traveller' existed known as "Bishop". Such a claim would most certainly be false, as well as any other claims as of 2013. There just does not yet exist the practical capability. The first verifiable evidence of any type of 'time travel' was first acquired in October of 2226 when laboratory experiments achieved a highly limited type of bi-directional information transfer.. I think you could crudely refer to this process as a type of rudimentary quantum phase shifting, universal manipulation, or maybe entanglement.. But of course such terms are antiquated, so I offer the previous terms only as an initiator of the thought processes involved.
  12. It sounds as if you may be based at the Colorado complex, is this correct? My accent acquisition is simplic, but I noted a few items in your writing. . If I am incorrect, please state your complex location if you do not mind. I am curious. You can check my coord insertion specs at Base SAH mtrpa, Austin, Texas complex, utilizing the 48 database. Thanks. L.
  13. JCPO, Yes, exactly, all of these things are known, and that phi is connected to life (and everything else), the intelligent core, etc. ..but they aren't aware of the unity just yet, not here. Maybe it's best not to divulge too much information or you may appear as a hoax product. I noticed you are using your natural language, mixed with a bit of vintage English. It is obvious to me that you are engaging a project goal. May I ask of your origin? Our team originate Texas, SAH mtrpa, take project data continuum all data collect in general per the point. Provide coords if you can, maybe we can collaborate. L.
  14. I was just reviewing your reply once again. Yes, I am aware of the linguistics involved, but that is not the main point of interest .. What I am interested in, is your obvious understanding of the universal constants; in this case particularly, your knowledge and awareness of mass awareness. Please elaborate further if you don't mind. Ll.
  15. Agreed. And, may I say it is quite interesting, and of utmost necessity if others are to also understand the base concepts. L.
  • Create New...