Jump to content

Jean Blanchette

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Jean Blanchette last won the day on August 29 2012

Jean Blanchette had the most liked content!

Reputation

5 Neutral

About Jean Blanchette

  • Birthday 12/31/1978
  1. Things are in constant motion ,hence if the whole universe was in constant motion would mean that an object may not possibly ever see the same point in space 2 times in its entire orbital existence. Now if everything took a piece of space time with it, that would create quite the problem. Nothing would actually be moving. however,if you bend,fold or warp time and space to move threw it to travel to a certain period of time, and being that everything in space is on a constant move.You travel 2 days in the past, from that point of origin,our solar system traveling at 540000miles per hour is 25920000 miles away from the location you are at.Earth has not been there yet. Now to say that earth has a chunk of space time with it means it is in all locations at the same time.Not possible.It might be in the same spot 2 times if it makes it around the universe once, however they are finding out that it may be bigger then one universe.More of a multi-verse.Much like solar systems in a galaxy.So the actual chance of earth being in the same spot twice is possible, but not likely. i must disagree with the chunk of space time traveling with earth.Even though we find signs of time moving slower around bigger objects. Time is time,Moves forward always.When you break it down, the real clock is the universal clock.Which means point A to point B.We do perceive correctly in the fashion of a start to finish concept. That being said,the space time dragging you with earth is a pipe dream concept.Common sense indicates that it is not connected to an imaginary field and yes if you were to travel in time using some fold, No the planet would not have been there yet and you would be stranded in space unless you had means of travel.Even an hour would still put you 540000miles away.
  2. Well,to put it plan and simple.JT is a fake.However if you read his statements you'll find within that practical joke is a lesson people have been ignoring.He got what he wanted,public notice all over the globe pushing the same thing for any to see.The world is all screwed up, we rely on money to keep people in chains.Whom ever owns the money , owns the people.He talks of wars and computer issues.He gets the most intelligent to either try his theory or prove him wrong, hence setting up a mass think tank.Productive or not , lot's of people jumped on board.Doesn't mean he was right in any event. However from a psychological point of view.Extremely brilliant . So my theory is, he was doing an analysis.A joke / thesis for a study on reaction,The yes and no concepts.Hell I bet it took him years to come up with the concept.He had his own theories in time travel that seemed possible but not exact.He had concerns of the planets state of affairs,and he wanted to exploit the gullible.The props he came up with took a long time to make,no way he slapped them together over night.None the less,very well done.Gives added effect to his claims. Well done to the guy who plays JT.He might not of intended for some positive results from this stuff, for all we know,he was a dumb kid who watched too much Star Trek and has a craving for attention, or a psychological genius doing a thesis. But not a time traveler .
  3. I would love to think you are correct- but, the day-to-day experiences of many with the change in climate to wetter conditions indicates otherwise. There are parts of the Northern UK where there has not been a single dry day for famers this summer (reference BBC Countryfile). When I see pictures like this, it really brings it home to me File:Oldest Arctic Sea Ice is Disappearing.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Truth be told,earth is supposed to be a tropical planet.Has it ever dawned on anyone that maybe it is trying to go back to its normal state of being? We have only been tracking the weather properly for the last 150 years. So, that being the fact, we really do not know whats really going on. Because someone says the weather has never done certain things before, does not mean it hasn't. We have no concept past 150 years on the weather aside from stories or bad literature.My point being, we are tripping over an issue that should scream common sense,yet we allow crack pot scientists fo feed us bs so they recieve funding.
  4. Lol Darby as funny as that is the point is simple.Debunk or prove they would.No need for the sas.There is a split between members on such a subject.Even though I feel it would never happen if time travel is possible.But everyone has an opinion and I love to study differences in our species mentality.I'm a bit if a nerd that way.
  5. Here is a test for you.Take a glass of water and put 2 ice cubes in it.Mark where the water level is , cap the glass so no moisture can evaporate , after the ice melts , mark the water level again and see the differance.This will solve your flooding issue.Yes the is a lot if Ice on land such as the south polar areas.Ice is water expanded in its solid state.
  6. The d The democracy as we know it is not far off from a dictatorship.The best speech on the subject I have ever heard was on a comedy called the Dictator.In the end he discribes a dictatorship which oddly enough exactly what we have in place at current within democratic countries atm.Plus the president is one man and in charge.So no matter how you look at it,dictator or democracy have the same issues with government.The people are not actually in charge.The rich are.You are only as free as they make you feel.This is still a dictatorship.So in the future there probably will not be much changed aside from whom developed the most wealth will be in power.If you think i am wrong.You have more faith in the corrupt then I do.One man watching over a council with no real power aside from stopping corrupt actions but Idont think people could be trusted enough not to be bought.Get rid of money, you get rid of corruption,but once again,without means to feel successful or encouragement to make the lazy work,money is needed.So we are totally beat and stuck with an off shoot of a dictatorship
  7. The d The democracy as we know it is not far off from a dictatorship.The best speech on the subject I have ever heard was on a comedy called the Dictator.In the end he discribes a dictatorship which oddly enough exactly what we have in place at current within democratic countries atm.Plus the president is one man and in charge.So no matter how you look at it,dictator or democracy have the same issues with government.The people are not actually in charge.The rich are.You are only as free as they make you feel.This is still a dictatorship.So in the future there probably will not be much changed aside from whom developed the most wealth will be in power.If you think i am wrong.You have more faith in the corrupt then I do. One man watching over a council with no real power aside from stopping corrupt actions but Idont think people could be trusted enough not to be bought.Get rid of money, you get rid of corruption,but once again,without means to feel successful or encouragement to make the lazy work,money is needed.So we are totally beat and stuck with an off shoot of a dictatorship
  8. Actually he added in the fixes needed to run an actual democracy. But yes some what the same.The slang that gives him away to be false is "God Damn", which 3000 years from now would be an odd subject due to the fact of the massive decline in religion.So hence the term "God Damn" would be considered old English by that point and not commonly used.I could be wrong,probably not, but could be.
  9. I'm not going to get into extreme detail,but I figured it would be an interesting discussion. Possible fractures to the time line. etc.... Please , your thoughts. I am curious to know any and all takes on this subject.
  10. sorry Troll I have to disagree,there is a difference between encouragement and just being a plain dick about it.Yes math is the universal solution to a question in retrieving an answer, however , before math ,there is concept of ideas.A man whom has come up with a concept is not necessarily going to devise the math behind it.He in turn would ask for help in proving it right or wrong.Which I think is the whole point to a forum.The extremely smart can not see things from a simple mans point of view and therefore end up over looking a simple solution. A simple man can not solve an extreme math solution by looking at it.More then likely they can come up with the rough draft ideas.Hence Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek and its influence on world's culture in designing new technologies and medical exploration.Gene couldn't do the math but he could come up with the concept on many things that we have even now. Examples, Tablet, Plasma/LCD screens,The Internet, the list goes on. Ideas sprung from a simple man who could not do the math. So in closing , your comments and statement were illogical to say the least.
  11. I've only been on TTI a week or so.I have one suggestion.More science ,less trolling.
  12. ??? you don't like his hypothesis? I figured it was pretty unique.
  13. one more thing though,your right about the states of matter and how they seem to line up in almost everything , hence the human body and this planet.But our Solar system seems to be the odd ball.The state of our solar system is this, Gas , solid, gas ,liquid (in a small some what idea,not exact). Something to think about,just kinda popped in the head and all.
  14. well gotta admit,very interesting concept. You are right about the time slowing down the closer you are to the center of a black hole,however still trying to wrap my head around using the gravity pull of the object to send you back and forth.Even if artificial , would be extremely dangerous,but i honestly can't disprove the idea. Something to think about i guess :)
×
×
  • Create New...