Jump to content

Dexter

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Dexter last won the day on December 19 2012

Dexter had the most liked content!

Reputation

4 Neutral

About Dexter

  • Birthday 07/22/1997
  1. Most of the terms you use are not defined and have different meanings depending on the individual. What would give you the impression that gravity change = timeline change (relation, but no testable link)? The only conclusion that can be drawn from your experiment is that the meter reads differently (if the reading has indeed changed). There is nothing to relate a change in gravity, to world events; you would be assuming that the difference in gravity was due to a major event. There just isn't enough testable "evidence" to support what you are doing, and too many variables that are dependent on the individuals own interpretation of the situation.
  2. Just because something can be proven wrong, does not mean that it is; theories are presumptions, so they can be either correct or incorrect at the same time. Just because a theory isn't wrong, that doesn't make it right.
  3. Even so, when speaking on a relative subject, we'll say computer networking, some words tend to be used as a basic adjective even if other words were available; e.g. Infrastructure. Most of the connections are between the phrases that the two used, which could be labeled coincidence, but a coincidence is quite unlikely as the speaking styles between them are relative. The main question is: Who is the orchestrator?
  4. What you're saying is somewhat like the Donnie Darko principle of paradox, where when an object coexists in the same dimension, one of the dimensions becomes tangent or unstable, existing for only a short period of time until either it is stabilized by the object returning, or goes from existence. I don't like to believe in destiny.
  5. Wouldn't time exist if those two Spheres were cubes instead; or even then would it still be an illusion? From what I gather, you're saying that if there is not an event to cause a difference in the universe, then there is nothing to distinguish the past from the present, resulting in time being at a standstill. I can grasp that much, though I still do not understand what you mean by time slowing down before an event though.
  6. I actually didn't find Windows Eight as annoying as most have described it. Sure the Metro UI was a tad bit annoying, but I had the ability to change the UI on my own back to a classic theme. The performance was slightly improved from 7, but not really anything new. It wasn't bad, in my opinion, but it wasn't good either, just Windows 7 with some pros and cons thrown into the mix; not worth upgrading to if you already have 7.
  7. Technically not, traveling backwards in time only works as far back as a machine was activated and as long as said machine remained in an active state.
  8. Yes, I do realise that what I said was contradictory; what I said was intended to find contradiction in Mylo.X.'s theory, rather than my statement conflicting with itself. Thanks for restating argument, it was somewhat poorly phrased. :(
  9. If we follow your theory of time being fluid/river, now could've possibly never had existed; given the possibility that the past was altered to fit the current now. If that is assumed, the previous now would still have subsisted at one period in another time, when the past was in an untempered form, but does not exist anymore because the past was altered to make the previous now never exist, making the current now in place of the previous now which would have never existed.
  10. Yes, I was relating the amount owed to the worth in dollars. The fact that bothers me the most however, is that even though the U.S. government owes various nations large sums of goods, like China, the government continually aids these nations financially, and gives over 100 million worth in U.S. currency for environmental purposes purely. Soon enough, the citizens are going to be upset enough to take action.
  11. 51% of Americans pay no Federal Income tax. Welfare is not free, 49% of America is paying for 51%, and themselves. Sure the 51% not paying Federal Taxes are glad, but what about the 49% paying half or more of their gross income? Surely that demographic must be quite upset, and soon file for tax-cuts, as did the 49%. Soon enough, with enough not paying federal taxes, how does the government make money to pay for it's welfare programs? Borrow money from China? America is already Trillions of U.S. dollars in debt, that deficit will come around to bite in the arse. The fact of the matter is that the country as a whole does not have enough funds to continue on the path that it is traveling. Minimum wage going up is often misinterpreted, as it is due to inflation and a wage/price spiral. But I do agree with you somewhat, times have changed.
  12. As would I. Only I would do this so Unix type OS' would become more popular, making .exe, .msi, and other Windows file types irrelevant, resulting in Unix being more supported.
  13. Like you said, how insurrection is sometimes necessary, I do agree. Some conflicts cannot be handled by peaceful means.
  14. There is a possibility, but it is unlikely that anyone would pull that elaborate of a hoax in a city in Chile. If any place to pull it, I would try Tokyo or New York. It just doesn't seem logical, but there may be reasons.
×
×
  • Create New...