Jump to content

201ajgrant

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

201ajgrant last won the day on May 25 2013

201ajgrant had the most liked content!

Reputation

3 Neutral

About 201ajgrant

  • Birthday 01/22/1982
  1. Seriously, watch this vid from the 40min mark, if you think "islamofascists" did it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a36_CwzA0bk And, Gpa ... watch it from the start.
  2. You did so when you "corrected" me. You said that "scientists are more about UNDERSTANDING creation; than they are about it being their all". See? I can create illusions as much as you can. Capitalisation of the word "him" denotes your belief. Such a word does not hold a capital letter by itself.
  3. Stop elisioning. Start an intelligent conversation. Quote sources. Call you "scott". Are you done with ordering? Start some arguments if you are "awaiting" your ever-searched-for "intelligent conversation". I gaurantee you that I will end your appreciation of your god.
  4. I long for the days when a time traveller is some dumbfuck who doesn't know a wit about their machine, how they got here, or why they are here. In fact, I add to that list the fact that they aren't even cogniscant of being here.
  5. The resistance should have actually been the floors below; not just the central steel support structure. There was another very informative vid I saw a while back that theorised that "squibs" were both visible, and used ... can't recall the name off hand though. Another one would be to watch the first zeitgeist film, as it offers a little insight as well.
  6. That is because science is as limited as religion. I ask of you: Scientifically explain to me the presence of a thought, that does exist in one's own mind. It cannot be weighed, or measured, and its' not fully understood to be electromagnetic phenomena.
  7. ... surprised that I haven't seen Razimus up in this thread ...
  8. "The origins of this universe, and life on Earth, as discussed in the textbooks I have read, are very inaccurate. The texts – the books – that I have been given relating to the function of life forms contain information that is based on: false memories; inaccurate observation(s); missing data; unproven theories; and superstition. For example, just a few hundred years ago physicians practiced “bloodletting” as a means to release supposed “ill-humours” from the body, in an attempt to heal, or relieve, a wide variety of physical, or mental, afflictions. Although this has been corrected somewhat, many barbarisms are STILL being practiced in the name of medical science. In addition to the application of incorrect theories concerning biological engineering, many primary errors that scientists make are the result of the ignorance of the nature, and relative importance, of souls as the source of energy, and intelligence, which animate EVERY life form. The correct information, about the origins of biological entities, has been erased from our minds, as well as from the minds of our mentors. In order to help you regain your own memory, I will share with you some material concerning the origin of biological entities. You will find “evolution” mentioned in the ancient Vedic Hymns. The Vedic texts are like folktales, or common wisdoms, and superstitions, gathered throughout the systems of the universe. These were compiled into “verses” like a book of rhymes. For every statement of truth, the “verses” contain many: half-truths; reversals of truth; and fanciful imaginings – blended without qualification, or distinction. The “theory of evolution” assumes that the motivational source of energy – that animates every life form – DOES NOT EXIST. It assumes that an inanimate object, or chemical concoction, can suddenly become “alive” - or “animate” - accidentally, or spontaneously. Or, perhaps, an electrical discharge into a pool of “chemical ooze” will MAGICALLY spawn a self-animated entity. There is no evidence – whatsoever - that this is true; simply because it's not true. Dr. Frankenstein did not REALLY resurrect the dead into a marauding monster; except in the imaginations of the souls whom wrote a fictitious story one dark, and stormy, night. No Western scientists ever stop to consider: “Who?”; “What?”; “Where?”; “When?”; or “How?” this animation happens. Complete ignorance, denial, or unawareness, of the spirit as the source of the lifeforce required to animate inanimate objects, or “cellular tissue”, is the SOLE cause of failures in Western medicine. In addition, “evolution” does not occur “accidentally”. It requires a great deal of technology and energy. Very simple examples are seen in the modification of farm animals, or in the breeding of dogs. However, the notion that “human biological organisms evolved naturally from earlier ape-like forms” is incorrect. No physical evidence will EVER be uncovered to substantiate the notion that modern humanoid bodies evolved on this planet." And you STILL hold to the notion that I "know not of which I speak". The end statement ALONE makes more sense than all religious dogma in existence today - COMBINED.
  9. You left it alone, because you have no answer for it - not for the reason of your lack of comprehension of the question/statement. And I don't care if your name's Jack, or Scott, or Bill ... I won't use it. Yet ... here we are. I have no need for evidence to my claims, as much as you have no need for evidence of there being a "god". What you've espoused - amongst your non-sensical ranting there - is not atheism. Atheism through ignorance is JUST ignorance. I know FAR more athiests that hold militant views against religion than I do of those whom are simply ignorant of religion. The "lack of comprehension" is on YOUR part. Scientists that claim religion as a basis of being are NOT scientists. Religionists that seek to use scientific evidence as proof are CONVERSLY not religionists. There is NO middle ground in the "Science vs. Religion" debate. Those that *claim* otherwise are detriments to both. You have no evidence that your god exists - let alone that your god exists as has been indoctrinated ... sorry, "taught" ... to you. Yet here you are willing to argue the case for god, and the meaning of its' existence. Have you ever questioned why that is so? I have no answer for that to give to you ... save only that the mentality driving your pursuit is that of a slave.
  10. So ... obarma[sic] will be executed in 2053? lmao. by then he'll be a bajillion years old.
  11. One nagging lie is that he "predicted" that rights will be taken away ... when the patriot act [maybe not in its current form] was in the workings at around the time of the first trade center bombings. Thus it was considerably known that "they" were planning to introduce that act as a result of THOSE bombings.
  12. Since when has ANY discussion not had narrow aims? A contrary idea is folly. The monologue is clearly there - it needed no emphasis as it was its' own emphath. Since this idea is being rejected (somewhat) ... then I propose an outright banning of anyone whom suggests god is behind time travel ... since a thread negatively discussing such is against accepted protocol.
  13. He never "revealed" himself in the first place. "Yahweh" is greek/ancient sanskrit for "anonymous". How can you truly believe in a jailor that calls itself "anonymous"?
×
×
  • Create New...