Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by David

  1. David


    Veerry Pretty, but unfortunately does not support the dimensional conjecture to only 8 dimensions
  2. David


    The supposition is on based a compact Weyl Group under a toroidal group for that making an automorphisn and the 2 conjugate form of the twisted Galois cohomology , this is a non-Higgsian state of an un-broken gauge field as illustrated in the diagram. he assumed a translation of frame to the “Higgs direction” without actually the symmetry breaking of the gauge bosons and no explanation of the caloron shift among the quark states. He is given to fancy in that there is not a clear result of un-broken gauge symmetry that would need to be explained first for the E8 field and by they way, he did not include the 3 dimension that he is in in order to make 8th dimensional making this arguement in 11 dimensions not 8
  3. I am sorry that you do not possess a limited set of skills when it comes to how an automobile works, but there is a intake manifold and an exhaust manifold, they are not the same even under analogy. Barometrics better defines a fluid structure of space as a function of pressure than this term (space-time dissolution fluid of mass.) Dr Strangelove is fanciful Computer Generated gimmickry and has no bearing in this level of physics . I find it hard to see how a kaleidoscopic visual effects apply to 3-dimensional reality. I think this still would need some work on the theoretical side
  4. There is a concern that there may not be enough ‘gas’ in your car analogy to make the trip so to speak and is the (bookkeeper time scalar into a physical vector)fluid* the intake manifold, is it the exhaust I dunno. I think mass and matter are the same thing, so the oranges pulp and the juice would be the same. this would need a bit of tweaking, to make sense to me
  5. How did food get into your analogy?, the example of apples and oranges let alone make juice out of them is totally off base. There is not need to reclassify what is absolute
  6. Not quite , We are working with velocities at or close to the speed of light, so that all matter, whether they may be atomic quantum state or any macro state are governed by the same laws of all matter at this velocity ©. The fluid dynamics of free space are only seen at this speed within a 99.98% of the velocity. Question was regarding Super-Fluid space which should be synonymous with Super Fluid Vacuum , In a Super Fluid Vacuum the fundamental Quantum Mechanic are non- removable for the Background of space time so that ground state approximation are with a range to large to be considered for a length contraction l` = l/(1-(v^2/c^2)) ^(1/2) of the reference frame the velocity of the moving frame and the speed of light c are instantaneous to the relative to the Background. the E^8 =E^8 is an identity and there is no energy manifold that would be at an exponential to itself? the summation of the photon limit would as a momentum as it propagates at or around E^2
  7. Gamma, Alpha, Beta all need time my friend , you may meditate on the translation of the frames of reference of the observer to the traveler at relativistic velocities. The inference regarding your inquire is that we are working in a velocity free space in which subatomic reactions and decay rates would effect the vacuum of free space to actual apply a Newtonian transition of the travelers at the speed near the speed of light?
  8. The “liquid” of this Superfluid space theory , is the interaction mass with the background, due inequalities in between the inertial mass of the moving object and the barycentric medium formed by the background the oscillations are not at the second derivative of the acceleration which would be Newtonian and minimal at any velocities less than the speed of light. but as the object approaches the velocity c, (relativistic) the density of the virtual matter becomes equaled to that of the inertial mass and would increase the total mass less than c and would be considered as a Superfluid vacuum limit E^2 adhoc to the mean vector of p^2. under a curved space limit it would be listed in a many-body quantum reaction along the curvature and under the this condition, the invariance takes on some unique properties indeed
  9. Historical conjecture with alternate Universes is the alteration occurs along the timeline only not to the Universe. the sub-atomic processes does not allow a creation of extra matter for an alteration in the timeline and there are hierarchical predominance to the integrity of the temporal dynamic the would not be less than abelian to all dimension processes and there would be a differences of opinion regarding Epidemic modeling and Options trading in usage of future modeling
  10. There is a need to provide data that came be repeated in a actual experiment or project and neither has provided either
  11. Food of this nature for thought could result in intellectual malnutrition, Fallacy implies faulty reasoning regardless the construct of time. to pose, Future trading is a fallacy, future epidemic disease predication with in a certain percentile is a fallacy, Economist productions regarding future interest rates are a fallacy, Insurance actuary computing premiums base on future performance prediction is a fallacy, Sorry my friend there are too many tangible processes in a every day world which are based on the Future, which you would consider a fallacy, I think your food for thought needs more carbs, proteins and minerals so to speak
  12. This would only regarding travels to the PAST, there in all reality be no regrets on FUTURE events
  13. Hey, What did the past second of time say to the future second of time, WHAT TIME IS IT !!! LOL
  14. The guy is in need of anti-anxiety meds, Mallet’s work has never come to completion showing any relevant results, just a lot of promises, I thinks this cat is same but in a different alley in the same neighborhood
  15. Thanks :D, related to the discipline, there is an urban legend that CERN discovered particle synthesis, through the studies of sub-atomic matter, Quarkonium and when the NSA found out they alerted the GSA who threaten to cut the research funding unless CERN sign a mutual disclosure stating that they will never disclose the discovery!!!, Now something liked that has my mind doing Lorentz loops, LOL
  16. Novikov's self-consistency principle, states principle of self-consistency, which states that the only solutions to the laws of physics that can occur locally in the real Universe are those which are globally self-consistent. The problem is that the act of time travel does not take place in the real 3-D Universe. In order for teh machine to operate the CTC takes global metric with the 4th-dimension and the in observations of cold dark matter the self-consistency principle was proven to be inconsistent by concordance cosmology
  17. The diagram would only lend credability if John Titor actually existed to travel time, could you provide to me 1 John Titor prediction that has actually come to past?
  18. But, the action is taking place in temporal intervals, for the most recent past to the most recent future, it is factious to annouce these acts and they hold no context when discussing time travel
  19. I disagree, the blast profile show Mach stress fractures on the ground and a kinetic weapon would have a more symmetrical momentum distribution and deeper cratering
  20. My friend, what you are failing to realize is that any changes in a time line depending on the length of time that the incursion event take place in relation to the progress of the new time line, wopuld only be realized by the time traveler. for example traveler a invent a time machine and choose the past to travel to, by the act of traveling in time you would have to make an incursion of the timeline that already exist in the past, you cannot any eliminated any components of the timeline ( past, present, future) those components are organic. the future is unmanifested to the observers (us), but as theorized the whole of the time past present and the future would occur all at once in the 4th dimension, so that any linearization of time would only occur if you were a flat-lander, I that case time would be limited to a 1-dimensional LINEAR segment, but unfortunately your analogy just is not possible in 3-dimensional space in which time is constraint by a 3-D worldsheet composed of individual and intersecting timelines
  21. Flat-landers would only experience time as a 1-D Line segment of time, due to a loss of a dimension. any 3-D cross section would be outside the Flat-lander's reality
  22. the preposition is the velocity of light as it relates to E=mc^2 assuming that the function is finite and E is in joules, m is in kg or in the case of a photon 1x10^-18eV/c^2,translation of the relative frames relative to E as a function of c shows a 4-vector manifold that lends to supposition of the particle wave duality of the free space Dirac. This would state the contrary to your supposition as it relate to violation of the absolute velocity of Light. the 4- vector manifold to the photon would have maximize with a probability of as least equaled to 50% (the slit test). Light as a constant is constrained by the 4-vector matter field within the space surrounding the photon compose of virtual particles proven in Casimir field effects. As any massive object accelerates it gains mass and would slow down including photon and this is why there is a finite limit to the speed of light
  23. I appreciate your candor and honesty and it is healthy to question ideas, that how theories and eventually facts are formed, but as a word of advise, If you truly have a passion for time travel and the the practicality of the theory of time travel you would do this site justice by taking time to study on some of the theories that are available free of charge on the WWW. I would like to let you know I have 2 degrees in electrical engineering and have been a avid experimenter since 1992.
  • Create New...