Jump to content

Time02112

Members
  • Posts

    728
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Time02112

  1. Nevermind, this person "already" said that these were words of departure, so do not expect a reply, moreover if we should receive any response from this person, although unlikley as implicated from their post, it would be a contradiction.
  2. O.K. here is your "Elaboration" *Particle Phisics and it has everything to do with "walking through walls" Perhaps you should re-read my post? you see what it describes is that our technology, is catching up to enable us to manipulate structures of mass utilizing a combination of several advanced technological techniques, combining nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and particle physics, we will have the ability to displace, or manipulate the structures of mass, or their fields that create barriers that prevent one from passing through another as such, ergo "walk trough a wall indeed (perhaps) yet it may not have come about yet to be proven due to the infintile stages of delivery of these new found discoveries, it does not negate the potential of what applications may be devowed to discovery years latter, and who's to say how long this may take? for all we know, someone else with the proper resources & funds to support the research, perhaps has already done so, and in the intrest of security & proprietary protective reasons, is not yet ready to disclose their discoveries to the rest of the general public. Now,..... do you get me?
  3. RE: ' Bad ' Effects..... man truthguy:] "im beginning to ask myself if that how 'UFOs' attain those speeds they do without the raw forces of nature acting upon them. is it that they become non-existant in the same way and as such arent subjected to the forces that would seem to make those speeds impossible? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Now there's an "Attahboy"!! truthguy strikes a direct hit! Naturally because these craft have the ability to open up a portal to another dimension, during this process they become less held to the properties of this dimension, needless to say that those craft which were created from another dimension, or world, with materiels from such, they too would indeed have quite "different properities" and behave as such. p)'i4q4
  4. Achems Razor..That too has been declared as "Flawed", Modern particle physics have produced discoveries which negates that ancient misnomer. Fermi Labs, just south of Chicago, recently discovered proof of "Neutrinos" which are said to be the building blocks of all forms of matter. beyond that I have an article, and several posts which describe "Nanotechnology" and our ability to manipulate particles of matter from the atom up!... Putting two & two together, and you know have the ability to use this technology, coupled with Genetic Engineering, perhaps one day sooner than you think, we may design humans with the physical ability to walk trough walls, and fly through the air next? Generation X-Men? <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 25 July 2000).>
  5. Hey TTA, cool it, truthguy is our friend, we can trust him, besides, he came here by means of my personal invitation. (also a Tap10 Jr.memeber) you will take notice that he never revealed the true identity of this person he spoke about, with respect to their privacy. No fighting alright? be cool to TTA (Please) we must try to get along with one another here, you never know what we could learn when we put our inhabitions aside, and just listen to the message. Everyone please welcome our new member, "truthguy".....thanks for adding your comments, and the refference to my REMF Post truthguy. Incidently I was reminded of something else too TRV & CRV "Technical Remote Viewing" and "Controlled Remote Viewing" it stems from the ability to send & receive long range mental signals & images from manipulating EMF by cerebral stimulation. I have included a link to explain the details of how TRV is utilized. http://psitech.org Also another one is a book entitled "The Ultimate Time Machine" Authored By The first of our "Time" Remote Viewer #001 Mr. Joseph McMoneagle Hampton Roads Publishing, ISBN 1-571174-102-x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx p)'i4q4 p)'i4q4
  6. Time Travel & the Caduceus Coil - 01/17/98 From: Emanon Inventors Association To: Jerry Decker Subject: hi Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 05:53:51 -0800 Hi Jerry! I wrote up some material I think you might be interested in. If you feel like putting it up on your website, knock yourself out! It goes along with the original "time travel" story I sent you months ago. I believe this new material explains what really happened to my friend. It also might explain, in part, how the SUPPOSED U.S. Government's Temporal Transmission Research Project time-travel equipment functions. The T.T.R.P. is, as I mentioned, a SUPPOSED time travel research project. The following is, as Paul Harvey would way, "The Rest of the story": A little history about the caduceus coil (a.k.a. the tensor coil): Its main proponent, and inventor, Wilbert Brockhouse Smith developed this coil sometime during the 1950's (Smith died in 1961). Originally, Dr. Smith was involved in the top-secret program "Project Magnet". This project, allegedly, was a government-sponsored program to produce an aircraft which operated on the same propulsion/flight principles of U.F.O.'s. "Officially", at some point, the program was terminated. At some point, concurrently, Smith was tinkering around with new styles of coil windings. It was during this period of time when he developed the caduceus coil. The coil is said to produce electromagnetic waves which travel parallel to the coil windings. This violates electromagnetic convention as the standard rule for creating electromagnetism is that the waves are produced perpendicularly (with respect to the coil windings). Also, supposedly, a caduceus coil transmits these electromagnetic waves at super-luminal velocities (i.e., at faster-than-light speeds). It is interesting to note that, last year, a Canadian scientist was credited with sending a radio broadcast using "radio-like waves" which were travelling faster than the speed of light. Smith claimed that timepieces, which were within the caduceus coil's region of greatest magnetic field flux density, measured time at a different "rate and direction of time flow" than other timepieces which were outside of the coil's magnetic field influence. The caduceus/tensor coil (with proper frequency/voltage) supposedly creates scalar electromagnetic waves that travel at super-luminal velocities (i.e., faster-than-light speeds). As an electronics engineer, there is one thing that comes to mind regarding this. When an electromagnetic field is created, any thing within the densest portion of that field tends to take on the same potential, polarity, frequency, and velocity of that field. This applies both to life forms and inanimate objects. Some people refer to an objects, or life forms, energy as its "aura", electromagnetic field, or Kirlian field. In fact, there is a seldom known, little used, formula known as the "Johnson Effect" which can be used to ascertain the power levels of an objects, or life forms, electromagnetic field. The reason it was discarded is because it leans towards inaccuracy at frequencies above the Earth's magnetic field frequency (about 7.8 Hz). With respect to what I've mentioned, I believe Einstein's theory of relativity states that if an electromagnetic wave were to (somehow) be propagated at velocities beyond the speed of light, then that wave would move backward in time. Or, more specifically stated, that the Universe's "time" would start going backward relative to the "time" experineced by the wave (which, if a wave could have consciousness, would experience a normal, forward, progressive "time"). I believe this is what happened to my friend when he was operating his machine. By the way, he was wearing a digital watch when this happened (the first time). However, the static charge he experineced blew the digital timer circuitry inside the watch. What is really bizarre is I read a story out of the "Weekly World News" (OF ALL PLACES!) that stated the U.S. government was involved in a project called the Temporal Transmission Research Project. The story stated that they place an object inside a hollow aluminum tube and then subject the tube to a high- frequency electromagnetic field that travels faster than light. In this fashion, supposedly, the tube (and internal contents) are supposed to be able to travel into the past. We all know that aluminum is a great conductor of electricity. The interesting analogy between that story, and my friend's experience, is that his coils were hollow, were producing extremely high frequencies, and (I believe) were functioning as a caduceus (or tensor) coil. The W.W.N. story also stated that a government scientist had volunteered to go back to the year 1918, remain for 25 minutes of subjective time, then return. They go on to say that he went, but never returned. Continuing, they said that the project members then decided to look over old publicatations (from 1918) looking for clues as to what happened. After about two months of searching, they contend, they found an old microfiche copy of a now-defunct police journal which had a very strange article in it. In the article, it shows what appears to be (in a picture) a metal tube about two feet long and containing the crushed remains of a man. Also, in the picture, is what looks like a cellular phone (lying on the ground) about one to two feet away. There was a caption below the picture, but I vageuly remember what it said (I was more interested in the picture). The reason I was so interested in the picture is because of something I noticed about it. I've been working in darkrooms, and with cameras, for more than 30 years and what I saw blew me away. The picture was taken at night and shows the tube, the "cellular phone" (if that's what it was-suppose it was a "recall device" to allow the man to get back to his own time?), some police officers (in old-style uniforms), some old style police cars, and (in the background) a row of spectators. The thing that aroused my interest in the picture is that these spectators looked as if they were a good 60 - 80 feet from the camera. You see, the modern electronic flash (even the ones with the biggest xenon flash lamps) can't illuminate (in darkness) more than about 40 - 45 feet at the MAXIMUM. In the old days, the "press 25" flash bulbs (on the other hand) were able to illuminate (in darkness) well up to 80 - 85 feet or so. So, it is my contention that MOST of the picture is genuine (that is, taken in 1918). I don't know about the tube and the "cellular phone" though. I can tell you, though, if the picture is a composite (the tube and "cellular phone" being "pasted" into the picture), whoever did it was a master of "special effects/trick photography". I don't know if the Weekly World News would have THAT kind of money as those type of imagery artists are damned expensive to hire. Also, in the picture, I noticed several blades of grass that appeared IN FRONT OF not only the "cellular phone", but the metal tube as well. I believe my friend's coils were functioning as a caduceus. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vanguard Sciences/KeelyNet comments Some might snicker at quoting the Weekly World News as a source, however, every now and then the tabloids will mention something interesting that can be checked. I know, because about 4 years ago, a few paragraphs were printed in the Globe newspaper about a fellow who had figured out how to make things invisible. I called the Globe and asked for the fellows name and address. They refused to provide verbally but said their policy for followup requests must be made by mail. So, I sent them a letter with the story name, the page and issue. Within about a week, I received the name of the inventor, his phone number and address. I called and we spoke for a couple of hours. Fascinating theory that he got from Star Treks' Cloaking Device. He pursued it and now has a company listed on the web. http://paranormal.about.com/science/paranormal/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://keelynet.com/time/cadsmith.htm
  7. The tunnel effect? Two professors, not related to each other, claim that they have sent a wave with a speed faster than light. According to Raymond Chiao from the university of Berkeley, who claims to have reached a speed of 1,7c it's impossible to send some information with the signal. Gunter Nimtz of the university of Koln (Germany) says his wave travelled at 4,7c and carried Mozart 40. The question here is not if it's possible to send something with that wave, it's interesting to know that something (an electro-magnetic wave) can move faster than light. If such a signal is able to do it under certain circumstances, maybe an object or a person can too. And maybe that object or that person can travel in time... Chiao and Nimtz call it the 'tunnelling' of an electro-magnetic signal. It comes down to sending an electro-magnetic signal through a special wave conductor.
  8. I have always suspected there is a deeper underlying connection to the way energy & mass are designed, and how they respond, or have the potential to be manipulated by influencing electromagnetic fields, not just any ordinary EMF, but those with selected frequencies with specific intent for a purpose that would astound even the most astute scholars of modern science & medicine today! I still uphold my belief in this, as there is just too much evidence, and witnesses to demonstrate it's many diversified abilities to produce these astounding accomplishments. one good analogy is that of genuine "Healers" that have the uncanny ability to heal people of various inflictions, that when a selected few of these "healers" agreed to subject themselves to a barrage of tests to study this phenomena, it was latter discovered that they all had one commonality, and that was the ability to influence the body's of their patient's natural vibrational frequency, on a subatomic level. This ability, or gift, was in somehow responsible for generating unusually high amounts of electromagnetic field energy pulses emitting from their hands. their bodies had become a natural generator, by speeding up it's own vibrational pulse rate, and then using the hand like a "radionic antennae" . There are some people living among the rest of us, that are not like the rest of us, and they existed among humanities gene pool, long before the birth of Marvel Comic's "X-Men" Hmmm....make me wonder as to where one line ends, where the other begins, Art Imitating Life, or Life Imitating Art, now where have we heard that before? perhaps it is not a "Line" at all, perhaps it is more like a "ring" representative of the "Circle of Life" XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX http://www.copenlabs.com/copenmwo.htm I copy pasted the following from a link provided from "Earthgrid" (Thank You.) please pay special close attention to the reference pertaining to "EMF" properties utilized with this radionic device. Very interesting indeed. And what does this have to do with "Time~Travel"...you may ask, well you are much wiser if you do not need to ask this question, but for those of you that do not understand this association, I suggest you read more of the previous posts here, and do a little more research, Rotating electromagnetic fields, have "everything" to do with Time~Travel, and it goes much beyond that as well. The original 'Multiple Wave Oscillator' goes back to 1934. Engineer George's Lakhovsky, born in Russia and living mainly in France, created the foundations for this instrument by virtue of his work on the cell as an electrical oscillating circuit. In common with the founder of radionics, A. Abrams, Lakhovsky assumed that diseases were primarily an electrical phenomenon. Disease can only arise if the cell has changed with regard to its electrical characteristics. Abrams, with his oscilloclast, was trying to irradiate the patient with electromagnetic waves to compensate for these variations in cellular electric characteristics. Lakhovsky also designed an instrument which generated an electromagnetic alternating field between a generator and a resonator. But, unlike Abrams, he generated several sinusoidal signals of varying frequencies and overlaid them (hence the name 'Multiple Wave Oscillator'). It was then possible for the patient to be exposed to this alternating field for therapeutic purposes. Lakhovsky's MWO was an instrument with extensive indications. http://www.copenlabs.com/copenmwo.htm <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 23 July 2000).>
  9. There are some on the link provided, but what I would like to know, is if the person ,AKA (earthgrid) has ever used any of this equipment, or has any personal remote images to share with us?
  10. Thanks for "sharing" with us wandering soul, the window of opportunity is still "open" as I am confident that you are not alone in your belief, that our next level of evolution consists more of a blending, or merger of science & spirituality. Perhaps we may get over ourselves, and evolve yet, that is of course omitting condecending religions, and kooky cults, that are obsessed with a perverted charismatic view, that they are the only ones that got it right, and the rest of humanity is on a luge ride straight to some eternal firey doom. *sighs of disenchantment, & pitty for the blind who have become prisoners of their own mind, yet still clinging to hope as long as there is still a remaining glimmer of light at the other end of the tunnel.
  11. I'm Back! Thanks to the board moderator (Thank YOU!) I recevied my new password in my email today, and since have changed it to one of my own for additional security. Thank Goodness! now I will not have to come here as Time_02112. Oh, by the way my email is up for those of you who wish to write me.
  12. "Big Bang machine gets down to work ." The first spectacular images of atoms smashing together at near-light speed were released Wednesday as part of an experiment scientists say will eventually generate a state of matter that existed a millionth of a second after the Big Bang. A milestone in physics, the researchers' effort has also generated heated debate and several doomsday theories — including one that argues the experiment might release particles called 'strangelets,' which could gobble the globe. For more details, please visit the link below... http://www.msnbc.com/news/314049.asp#BODY
  13. Now we are starting to improve our Public Relations, Good Job, Attah Boy!
  14. "BIG Baddah-Boom!" (Script from the movie "The Fifth Element") I hope nobody has forgotten the experiment at CERN laboratories, in which they are re-creating a mini "Big-Bang" within a huge underground particle accelerator? The scary thing about all this, is that no one is truly aware of the potential risk of any undesirable side effects, that may arise from this experiment. It is not a question if any undesirable side effects could occur from this experiment, but rather the cost effectiveness, and the delay involved if it were postponed untill we were absolutley certain of the consequences beforehand, and that in itself perhaps would be impossible to explore the possiblities for such hazzards, unless we tested it first, in order to find out what would happen, right? Why am I reminded of our firsts experiments with nuclear testing? HMmmm... and we really did't know then what we were playing around with, but yet there are still remnents of our early follies that still linger to this day as a result of our mistakes! This sure gives new meaning to the the words written on our US Dollars "In God We Trust" <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 13 July 2000).>
  15. I have provided the link already, unless of course you wanted my "personal comment" here it goes, for what it's worth... As in my earlier comment about "ISNESS", I was trying to elaborate somthing that I have always suspected, and that is since everything consists of energy, perhaps we need not to look so much outside ourselves to find the answers. An example of that would be when you examine the 'vibrations' within crystals. That is exactly what crystals are used for in electronics. A stable time source. A certian voltage is run through them, and a stable frequency comes out the other side. Now, you can also induce this vibration. One of the more interesting experiments I have personally done with this kind of thing is sonoluminescence. Basically, this is the practice of creating light with sound waves. Odd, because light is of the electromagnetic spectrum (same as radio waves) and sound is a mechanical wave. The studies I have done on this show that it is possible that crystals COULD be used as a light source (through sonoluminescence) and therefore, an energy source. Light in itself, is a form of energy. Another example is Schrodingers Cat Theory: (used to illustrate the Indeterminacy Principle) A cat is placed inside a box with a sealed container of fast acting poison. the only thing keeping this vial of poison from opening is one radioactive atom. The half-life of this atom is 15 minutes. If the particle were to decay, the poison would be released, and the cat would instantly die. If the particle does not decay, the vial stays closed, and the cat lives. You have no external way of monitoring the cats vital signs or condition. It has been 15 minutes since you placed the cat in the box. Is it alive or dead? See, it is both alive and dead. Since you have no way of viewing the cat, it is both. The particle has decayed and it hasn't (If you need clarification on why it may not have or why half of the atom didn't decay, brush up on your chemistry, or lookup half life on the internet). A parallel example is the Double Slit Experiment. This brings us into another entire realm of Quantum Physics. The Indeterminacy Principle is used to explain why you can only know one state of a particle, and why on a chart: ABCDEFGHIJKL A quntum particle can go from point A to point J without passing through points BCDEFGH or I. & so forth. Objectionaly, perhaps a more detailed examination to look inwards at the finite universe within the most minute of particles, is where we should begin. <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 13 July 2000).>
  16. RE: Director's \"proof\" image Wecome back Jack D! we missed hearing from you.
  17. With the available recources we have today, including, but not limited to the www. it is not unfathomable to forsee the potential outcome of constructing a working Time Machine. Anything is possible when you have the discipline, dedication, and the persistence, to gather an asembly of great minds working together for a common goal, the funding to provide the necessary resources, and a few other unpredictable & unknown elements , such as in a combination of "controlled", and "uncontrolled" elements that come together to create a percise & calculated chain of events. Imagine that! the possibilities are limitless to what the human mind is capable of. So, what are we waiting for........ Time? <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 12 July 2000).>
  18. Einstein gave us a much more radical picture. According to Einstein, time was more like a river, which meandered around stars and galaxies, speeding up and slowing down as it passed around massive bodies. One second on the earth was Not one second on Mars. Clocks scattered throughout the universe beat to their own distant drummer. However, before Einstein died, he was faced with an embarrassing problem. Einstein's neighbor at Princeton, Kurt Goedel, perhaps the greatest mathematical logician of the past 500 years, found a new solution to Einstein's own equations which allowed for time travel! The "river of time" now had whirlpools in which time could wrap itself into a circle. Goedel's solution was quite ingenious: it postulated a universe filled with a rotating fluid. Anyone walking along the direction of rotation would find themselves back at the starting point, but backwards in time! In his memoirs, Einstein wrote that he was disturbed that his equations contained solutions that allowed for time travel. But he finally concluded: the universe does not rotate, it ex- pands (i.e. as in the Big Bang theory) and hence Goedel's solution could be thrown out for "physical reasons." (Apparently, if the Big Bang was rotating, then time travel would be possible throughout the universe!) Then in 1963, Roy Kerr, a New Zealand mathematician, found a solution of Einstein's equations for a rotating black hole, which had bizarre properties. The black hole would not collapse to a point (as previously thought) but into a spinning ring (of neu- trons). The ring would be circulating so rapidly that centrifugal force would keep the ring from collapsing under gravity. The ring, in turn, acts like the Looking Glass of Alice. Anyone walking through the ring would not die, but could pass through the ring into an alternate universe. Since then, hundreds of other "wormhole" solutions have been found to Einstein's equations. These wormholes connect not only two regions of space (hence the name) but also two regions of time as well. In principle, they can be used as time machines. Recently, attempts to add the quantum theory to gravity (and hence create a "theory of everything") have given us some insight into the paradox problem. In the quantum theory, we can have multiple states of any object. For example, an electron can exist simultaneously in different orbits (a fact which is responsible for giving us the laws of chemistry). Similarly, Schrodinger's famous cat can exist simultaneously in two possible states: dead and alive. So by going back in time and altering the past, we merely create a parallel universe. So we are changing someone ELSE's past by saving, say, Abraham Lincoln from being assassinated at the Ford Theater, but our Lincoln is still dead. In this way, the river of time forks into two separate rivers. http://64.33.56.95
  19. Actualy, I retract my earlier comment pertaining to the Big Bang, as being just the mere creation of one such singularity, let me elaborate....Although the 10 dimensional superstring theory has been called the most fascinating discovery in theoretical physics in the past decades, its critics have focused on its weakest point, that it is almost impossible to test. Einstein's theory of gravity, which gives us the Big Bang theory and black holes, was subjected to the most stringent test yet and passed with flying colors. In the latest (Oct.) issue of Physics Today, astronomers from Harvard, MIT, and the Haystack Observatory proudly announced that they had confirmed Einstein's theory to within an astonishing .04% accuracy by measuring the bending of radio waves from the quasar 3C279 near the edge of the visible universe. But there is some irony in this announcement. Each success only highlights a yawning gap. Even as scientists hail ever more accurate tests of Einstein's theory of warped space, Einstein himself knew that his theory broke down at the instant of the Big Bang. The theory had feet of clay. Relativity was worthless, he realized, when it came to answering the most embarrassing cosmic question in all of science: What happened before the Big Bang? Ask any cosmologist this question, and they will throw up their hands, roll their eyes, and lament, "This may be forever beyond the reach of science. We just don't know." Until now, that is. A remarkable consensus has been developing recently around what is called "quantum cosmology," where scientists believe that a merger of the quantum theory and Einstein's relativity may resolve these sticky theological questions. Theoretical physicists are rushing in where the angels fear to tread! In particular, an appealing but starting new picture is emerging in quantum cosmology which may be able to synthesize some of the great mythologies of creation. There are two dominant religious mythologies. According to Judeo-Christian belief, the universe had a definite beginning. This is the Genesis hypothesis, where the universe was hatched from a Cosmic Egg. However, according to the Hindu-Buddhist belief in Nirvana, the universe is timeless; it never had a beginning, nor will it have an end. Quantum cosmology proposes a beautiful synthesis of these seemingly hostile viewpoints. In the beginning was Nothing. No space, no matter or energy. But according to the quantum principle, even Nothing was unstable. Nothing began to decay; i.e. it began to "boil," with billions of tiny bubbles forming and expanding rapidly. Each bubble became an expanding universe. If this is true, then our universe is actually part of a much larger "multiverse" of parallel universes, which is truly timeless, like Nirvana. As Nobel laureate Steve Weinberg has said, "An important implication is that there wasn't a beginning; that there were increasingly large Big Bangs, so that the <multiverse> goes on forever - one doesn't have to grapple with the question of it before the Bang. The <multiverse> has just been here all along. I find that a very satisfying picture." Universes can literally spring into existence as a quantum fluctuation of Nothing. (This is because the positive energy found in matter is balanced against the negative energy of gravity, so the total energy of a bubble is zero. Thus, it takes no net energy to create a new universe.) As Alan Guth, originator of the inflationary theory, once said, "It's often said there is no such thing as a free lunch. But the universe itself may be a free lunch." Andre Linde of Stanford has said, "If my colleagues and I are right, we may soon be saying good-bye to the idea that our universe was a single fireball created in the Big Bang." Although this picture is appealing, it also raises more questions. Can life exist on these parallel universes? Stephen Hawking is doubtful; he believes that our universe may co-exist with other universes, but our universe is special. The probability of forming these other bubbles is vanishingly small. On the other hand, Weinberg believes most of these parallel universes are probably dead. To have stable DNA molecules, the proton must be stable for at least 3 billion years. In these dead universes, the protons might have decayed into a sea of electrons and neutrinos. Our universe may be one of the few compatible with life. This would, in fact, answer the age-old question of why the physical constants of the universe fall in a narrow band compatible with the formation of life. If the charge of the electron, the gravitational constant, etc. were changed slightly, then life would have been impossible. This is called the Anthropic Principle. As Freeman Dyson of Princeton said, "It's as if the universe knew we were coming." The strong version of this states that this proves the existence of God or an all-powerful deity. But according to quantum cosmology, perhaps there are millions of dead universes. It was an accident, therefore, that our universe had conditions compatible with the formation of stable DNA molecules. This leaves open the possibility, however, that there are parallel universes out there which are almost identical to ours, except for some fateful incident. Perhaps King George III did not lose the Colonies in one such universe. http://64.33.56.95
  20. You might try reading this book... Beyond the Big Bang: Ancient Myth and the Science of Continuous Creation by Paul A. LaViolette Park Street Press, Rochester, VT, 1995 ISBN: 0-89281-457-8 http://www.etheric.com/index.shtml It proposes the potential of advancement of ancient technology to be associated with etheric origins, much like we may be on the same path of discovery today.
  21. I think that when many people contemplate the underlying forces of the universe, perhaps they may be referring to the 'ISNESS', or rather a collective consciousness in which we are all connected to the cosmos. It is theorized that everything within the universe is, an infinite collection of energy, that which is intelligent & alive, from the enigmatic vast collection of planetary bodies, and star clusters within the galaxies that fill this void, on down to the smallest particles within every known element of matter. I would like some feedback as to your thoughts about this anyone? ------------------ "Everything you know,...is Wrong! soon we shall all discover the truth." p)'i4q4 <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 10 July 2000).>
  22. Alright!......... For the sake of argument, I believe you were implying, that a more *focused conversation pertaining to the topic of the thread is more ideal. However, sometimes it becomes necessary to post references, or provide examples to clarify what an individual is discussing, therefore additional information may be required. Be that as it may, the conversation should project a basis of *consistency, and the information provided, should remain relevant to that topic of *discussion, therefore additional outside information, should be limited to brief highlights, accompanied by "Links", thus allowing more room for *intelligent conversation. <This message has been edited by Time02112 (edited 10 July 2000).>
  23. To whom it may concern......... To whom it may conceren, bickering is not the way to learn, for continuance of such flamed outbursts causes knowledge to burn. It is time to make amends, or else this this bickering shall never end, and we may never learn what secrets lay beyond the other bend. The path is sown, let it be known, it is "Time" to travel back to the origin of this thred "Old science does not apply to the unknown.......
  24. Janus, you care to respond to this one? I suppose you are going to try to convince the rest of us, that this C. G. Jung person, was perhaps, somehow related to my 100th monkey? (LoL)
  25. Very well, I have removed my posts that appear to bear no relavence to your thread as you wish Janus. Perhaps if you were to elaborate some helpful guidelines, as to prevent any unecessary postings that would be more suitable to your expectations, we might be able to avoid such problems in the future. I know you have made many hints to suggest what you are looking for, as pertaining to comments within your thread, but since it appears that very little contribution has met your standards, perhaps you should be more specific.
×
×
  • Create New...