Jump to content

If any of you have really time traveled contact me


Quantum_Leaper
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 3 years later...
  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If any of you have actually time traveled then please contact me, because if you have then maybe there is hope to change some things in my life and to put right what once went wrong. I am serious about what I am saying. If someone here could help me then please do.

I am not sure I can help you. It has been made clear to me by others since I have been here that my journey through time is my path to walk along by myself. Untill my method of time travel becomes accepted by the scientific community and others anything else I post about my travels through time is pointless. And, there is the time machine rule that applies to my method of time travel. You can only go back to the point at which the time machine was constructed, programmed, and built. You are limited to the time line of when the time machine was constructed and when it ceases to function.

 

The way I travel in time is I use software computing tools that I wrote myself to find a range of file finger prints of computer media that might be from the future or the past called CRC codes. Also more commonly known as checksum codes. I use a range of weak CRC checksum codes that can be decrypted again by computer software that I wrote myself. All of the computer software I have has been written by me. These range of file finger prints of the future or the past that my software tools found can be audio, video, text, or any type of computer file from the future or the past. Then I run what is called a rolling checksum to decrypt and reconstruct every file within range of the CRC checksum codes my computer tools found that can be of the future or the past.

 

Then I run data mining applications to check the files to see if they are real media files then if they are real media files then I run applications that I wrote myself to check the files to see if they contain information of the future or the past. If they do contain information of the future or the past then I look at them in person to see if that information is real and not alternate reality.

 

This is comparable to the Rsync method which uses a strong checksum and a weak checksum for a weak internet connection. But I just use applications to find a range of weak crc checksum codes that might be of the future or the past. Then I use those weak checksums in a specific range, and a rolling checksum to decrypt the weak checksums again in a specific range, then I use helper applications to data mine the reconstructed files for time travel content to send data through time and space with no computer connection at all. And, to make things better I am looking at putting all my code together into one search engine to search time and space for information and media files like one searches the internet.

 

If I know what files I want to send to the past in the future then my computer tools can tell me what I need to know to search for files in the past before the future gets here. With this way of time travel I can also send files to myself in the past containing a strong checksum and a weak checksum and use the rsync method directly to reconstruct them so I can send myself movies, audio, video, emails what ever I want.

 

It has taken me a lot of time and work to develop my time machine. Currently I am very concerned about the consequences to myself of releasing my technology to the public but since I opened my mouth a long time ago and inserted my foot into it I don,t mind explaining my method of time travel to others.

 

This is time travel by way of information. My theory is that information is like energy and matter. It can,t be destroyed it only changes from one form of information to another form of information so it can be decrypted. Information can become real and un-real. When it becomes real and un-real is not important so with my method of time travel it is possible to see the future or the past right now at any time before or after it happens just by having the right software and computing power. Good luck to you.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you want someone who is actually working on building a real time travel machine that you just jump in and go thru time drop me a note

 

[email protected]

 

or visit

 

http://timenomore.tripod.com/

 

we plan on building a fully functional machine by this year end but if we dont get what is needed it wont happen anytime soon

 

cheers hope to hear from you

 

sincerly

 

Dr z

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some things are not even worth debunking.

 

Please refer us to the paper where you provide a detailed explanation of the physics by which you "recreated the Philadelphia Experiment". If you have repeated it, surely then you must be able to provide precise descriptions of the physics involved. And if you have repeated it a second (or more) time, then pray tell why have you not recorded it on video...?... from several angles?

 

Thanks,

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im going to do my own debunking by recreating the experiment and prouve the fact of how i think can be achieve

But surely, since you have a schematic of your device, you should know the physics of what it is doing, right? I mean there is the law of conservation of energy that one has to deal with....

 

my current problem is the power problem i need a huge amount of power to last for more than 15 minutes i predict that my 10 car battery will only permit me to move for 15 minute so when i start to work again i will share everything so that i may become more valid than what i am now

So, applying the conservation of energy as stated above, you ought to be able to tell us what that power is being converted into, right? I am sure there is a good deal of heat being dissipated, as in all real energy conversion processes. But leaving heat (and possible vibration) aside, please explain the physics of what the rest of that power is going towards... Let me help:

 

1) Electrical power is converted to mechanical power via the 2-phase motor.

 

2) Mechanical power from the 2 phase motor is converted to.... ?

 

Other questions: What frequency and amplitudes of power are being received by the antenna in your setup? And how and for what are they used in the "time flow circuit"?

 

Surely, since you appear to have engineered this thing, any good engineer should be able to describe each and every component from both a functional aspect and an energy input/output accounting aspect. So maybe you could do that for each and every component in your schematic? This should not be a problem because engineers are required to do this for every product which is sold.

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would someone (Kinky?) tell me why I bother with this baloney?

 

2- this power transformator had a power invertor that took 12vdc to 120vac to power the 2 phase electric motor , this motor wasnt just there to make this look good but to creat a inner singularity that would keep me safe from the outside ,this was a input from steven gibbs himself as we discuss his idea of the PX

Whoa there, cowboy. I think you had better stop right there. There is no need to go any further until you can clarify precisely what you mean by "inner singularity" and why you think a 2 phase AC motor will create one. Like I said before, a motor converts electrical energy into mechanical motion (primarily). If you think it creates any other first-order effect (i.e. something that scales linearly with the power input to the motor), I would like for you to carefully and slowly describe the physics of this effect. Doing so with math would help... and do not even bother mentioning the name of Steven Gibbs. He will not help you explain the physics to me, because he doesn't understand basic physics, must less advanced physics.

 

If we make it past this "inner singularity" we will see if anything else in your apparatus is doing anything. But this is the most important issue to address right now.

 

Good night,

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Kinky.... when I read the following, I thought that >>I<< was the one traveling on the good ship Zodiac, not you!

 

i had no exact clue of what i was doing

Really? I never would've guessed that. :confused:

 

i was putting stuff together that i tought would work , but now after almost 6 years of redefining my trial and story i had a friend hypnotize me and we went back to get a better recollection of what i did , the schematic thats on the other thread is the best and closest recollection of what i build im not designer so i could only draw this rough rendition

You're kidding me, right?

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me put in term you will understand (DUDE) what you learn in school and anywere else does not apply here if you dont want to see and learn what i have to say dont ask anymore question , ive gave the fact as they happen , if your brain cannot fathom that what you learn in school is wrong then i dont know what your doing here ,im not gonna answer anymore question to any of you until you proove yourself and btw physic 101 in university does not apply when you want to time travel leave youre past experience at the door

 

Ok

 

i give enough information and wont reveal more

 

man what hell do i care i tought i could get input and new idea on what i did but it seem im wasting my time

 

well too bad

 

have a good time if you consider thrashing someone hard work a good time

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what you learn in school and anywere else does not apply here

like a house of cards... so, you decided to take the "easy way out", eh? I presume you understand how ridiculous this statement sounds (and is), yes?

 

dont ask anymore question

Every question I asked was completely valid from a science and engineering standpoint. The fact that you could not answer them with sufficient rigor is no reason for you to get all ticked off at the person asking the questions... unless you have something to hide.

 

ive gave the fact as they happen

With no evidence. So I guess, in your world, we are just supposed to accept "claims" as interchangeable with "facts" just because someone is passionate about their claims?

 

if your brain cannot fathom that what you learn in school is wrong

Wow. This could very well be a huge newsflash to a lot of university professors out there (some like me, who have been teaching all along the principles of aerodynamics and flight, only now to be told they are wrong!). I guess I had better find another job quick! :yum:

 

then i dont know what your doing here

But the thing is, I know what I am doing here. The fact that you seem to not know what I am doing here just means you have not read many of my 4800+ posts. If you had, you would know exactly what I am doing here.

 

im not gonna answer anymore question to any of you until you proove yourself

My, what a temper! Why on earth do I have to "prove myself", when it is you (*pokes*) who is making the wild and woolly claims? I am not making any fantastic, unverifiable claims. That would be your department.

 

physic 101 in university does not apply when you want to time travel leave youre past experience at the door

Actually, it does. Because no matter what physics describe time travel (a problem you seem to be having), the existing physics we know, and love, and which "works", will have to be shown as a limiting case of any "new physics" that permits time travel.

 

i give enough information and wont reveal more

The information you have given is specious, at best.

 

man what hell do i care i tought i could get input and new idea on what i did but it seem im wasting my time

This is another variant on the old TT'ers ruse "I don't care if anyone believes me or not."

 

well too bad

 

have a good time if you consider thrashing someone hard work a good time

It is too bad for you, that is who it is too bad for. Because if you cannot answer the most basic, scientific questions as I have posed here (Conservation of Energy cannot be escaped, my friend), then imagine the "thrashing" you will receive by people who are much more serious about scientific claims than I am!

 

Like I said... why do I bother? Well, maybe because it is fun to see people like you fall apart as soon as the tough questions hit you! :P

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahahaha,,,! dude you dont know who your dealing with here,i dont usually go ut of my way like this but before you even judge someone you should learn who they are instead of bashing them right away, it seem ive landed on the forum people basher , you seem to take within your own charge to be the forum leader and when you see something you dont like or disagree with you thrash them out, out of the forum by insunuating that they dont know jack because they are not rocket engineer , wow ,its seem like you spend all your time hidden from society on this forum has made you so narrow minded that you never tought for a second that there might be more out there than your little world , dude i dont give a damn who you are i did what i did and i share my information with millions , so ive got nothing to hide not even my face (aka see my profile ) ive came to this forum as honest as ive ever been to learn and share new idea , ive been into time travel since 1999 and i was there when john titor came up the web and was on anomalies.net for awhile as well Darby might remember me very well . ive study extensivley the field of radionic and the philadelphia experiment im probably the only one who went full on testing its theory and went thru all the trouble to meet and ask anyone who had anything to do with it ,and yes john hutchinson did test the PX but he didnt take in account all the external factor , he had everything set up correctly.

 

what have you done except thrash people lately what machine are you working on , you no scientist or experimenter your just sitting behind your computer screen bashing people with different point of view ho and best of all you got your own little crew to back you up

 

here a picture that describ the usual type of people i deal with all the time when i come to situation like this

 

spacer.png

 

lol im no gonna go further more in detail since i dont owe anyone anything , even worst i seem ihavent made any friend but this wont stop me from coming here

 

im a polite individual and i respect other people point of view when shared with me but here no one even came close to give me what i was looking for

 

too bad i ll remain a silent viewer and wont post anthing here since its clearn your the forum watch dog and take it at heart to keep this forum your personal playground

 

i came to here to make friend not foes ,,too bad so sad

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here a picture that describ the usual type of people i deal with all the time when i come to situation like this

LOL...judging from "that" picture you don't get around much, do you ? Obviously, you have never been to Los Angeles, those guys in the picture would last NOT LONG in "most" areas in and around the Los Angeles Basin. LOL !

 

And I'm sure Ruthless can tell you about Mississippi, and those two guys in Texas...LOL !

 

Didn't the Hindenburg crash and burn ? :)

 

To answer your question seriously, instead of becoming upset, you might try listening and look around a little bit and realize that there are people here that "can" help you with your project.

 

You are not the "first" to be trying to build something with a similar design.

 

There are some fairly experienced people around that might have some excellent input, and when they stepped forward, you stepped back, and provided little in the way of anyone with engineering experience to work with.

 

Anybody can make a similar claim, and I don't know one person here that doesn't have a time machine sitting in their garage, back yard or laying somewhere around the house.

 

How would you like it if we told you just to wrap green and blue wires around a car , making sure the Thelman Chrono Flexi-Capacitor is in sync with the Feldakian Zip-blender and plug it in, without any specific details ? and would you "believe" anyone that said as much to you ?

 

Rainman, and a few of us were working with the rotating fields idea "years" ago, but since you are ready to run off ( demonstrating that you really don't have much "faith" in what you're doing ) as one of those who also worked on the rotating fields theory, IF you are going to become snippy, instead of "our" help, go use the search feature here at TTI and find the information yourself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see now you got some insigt and smart answer i like that , he just came out too strong to questions i got frankly no answer im not rocket jet engineer and i dont have a serious love pf current physic wich need to be rewriten , i know what i di and will try my best to proove myself since all proof are long gone but believe me, if you get the recipe correctly you will succeed and its not word that make things move its people with courage to go through with it ,im not one to back up from a good chalenge and love to try the impossbile i dont usually do think because they are easy but but because they are hard ( yes i know my grammar sucks) i answer the question so far but apprentlly no one went on my website to actually read the full story

 

there is a loti n this field that hasnt been tested thouroughlly and film so this is why i want to go thru with this , anyhow like you might have notice im not one to take criticism very kindly .

 

btw im 34 years old and married with kids just so youd know

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess i should take your word for it , since new idea re not welcome here , will see later on how it develop to bad for Dr Beckett he wont get his wish , since no one here is willing to go thru with anyhing except talking and thrashing each other , anyhow if your interessted DR Beckett give me a buzz on yahoo messenger [email protected]

 

or check my website for further info im serious in helping you

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he just came out too strong to questions

Honestly and seriously, if you think I came on too strong, then you have obviously not visited any "real science" forums where no-chit physicists deal with crackpot theories all the time! I was using "kid gloves" compared to the way you would be treated by them! Seriously!

 

i dont have a serious love pf current physic wich need to be rewriten

That right there says a lot (about you). You seem to think physics needs to be re-written? I am sure you think you are "right" but on what grounds? Moreover, isn't it just more possible that you do not understand existing physics, which could be why you think it is flawed? It is not a bad thing to admit you don't understand something.... but it is a bad thing to NOT admit you do not understand it, and then make a blanket statement that "physics needs to be re-written." What you are up against here is a HUGE, GIANT, MASSIVE amount of experimental evidence that confirms that current physics describes our reality to a very high degree of accuracy. Moreso than any competing "woo woo" theories of "free energy" and such.

 

im not one to back up from a good chalenge

I challenged you to explain an "inner singularity" and it sure does look like you backed-down from that! If you did NOT back down from that challenge, then perhaps you will rise to the occasion and attempt to at least answer my very scientific question about it?

 

i dont usually do think because they are easy but but because they are hard

John F. Kennedy - 1963 (paraphrased, regarding the goal of sending a man to the moon and returning him safely to earth before 1970)

 

i answer the question so far but apprentlly no one went on my website to actually read the full story

You have not answered all my questions. Some you ignored (see "inner singularity" above), and others you simply dodged. I could presume why you dodged them being that you do not understand enough physics to answer them... but I would rather have you directly answer me in that way. That way there is no guessing on my part.

 

btw im 34 years old and married with kids just so youd know

And I am 45 years old and have spent the last 22+ years not only developing highly complex (and intelligent) flight control systems, but also teaching freshman and sophomore aerospace engineering classes. I know an awful lot about physics. This is why I know enough to ask pertinent questions. If you wish to take this as some sort of personal offense, like I said above, then it will be MUCH WORSE if you try to take your story to a REAL physics site.

 

I have a sarcastic tone because I have seen (and destroyed) MANY more claims such as yours in the years since I have been here. And they all react just like you. Instead of answering the questions (or simply admitting you don't know how to answer them), you make me out to be the "bad guy". That is YOUR choice... and the more you whine, the more I am happy to be your "bad guy"... we call that a self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

Your choice: Answer the questions and stop being so emotional, or just keep your ad hominem attacks on me and my character (which does nothing to fulfill your goals or prove your claims!)

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no you did not came out too strong you just dont know at all you seem to go full judgement before learning about who the people are , anyhow i had a really bad day and this week wont seem to get any better , i know what i have to do and i wont back down from my claim and im glad for you to be what you are what was the last experiment you did build and did you went anywere ,

 

anyway best of luck im taking a break

 

cheers

 

Dr z

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you seem to go full judgement before learning about who the people are

But this is actually an important point about science: It is not, and should not, be at all based on personality types. Rather, it is based on data...results... and dispassionate, mathematical explanations of the physical phenomenon. In other words, a person can be scientifically correct and be either a giant ahole, or the nicest person in the world...it does not matter. And so, no matter what my personality is, the scientific answers to my scientific questions is what makes for progress, not whether or not I know someone as a person. I know that is not a popular answer, but it is the truth. Science does not have to be "politically correct", only correct.

 

anyhow i had a really bad day and this week wont seem to get any better

I am sorry to hear that, truly I am. Perhaps one way to look at this little corner of the internet is to not take things too personally. We all bat each other around from time to time (just look at how recall and I go at each other every so often). It doesn't mean I think he is any less of a person, or that I would wish terrible things upon him. We just disagree, and sometimes express that disagreement in "colorful terms". :)

 

what was the last experiment you did build and did you went anywere ,

How about a supersonic aircraft with no vertical tail? We learned a lot on that project.

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you know the secret to anti gravity how come you guys never did that,i just cant figure how someone can build such supersonic ship but cannot build a simple anti gravity ship if i would have my day with sufficient funding i would build an anti gravity within 3 months to get all the part machine here a clue ask stan deyo he has the same secret as i did and i build mine on the sam principle

 

good luck

 

anyway think what you want i have nothing to gain hee since the mess is already made

 

you only have one chance to make a good impression and you [censored] it all for me so forget it , im going back to rest i have a massive headache

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might I ask what your Doctorate degree is in?

 

do you know the secret to anti gravity how come you guys never did that,i just cant figure how someone can build such supersonic ship but cannot build a simple anti gravity ship

This is the kind of response that causes me to reply as I have. You are already refusing to answer your BS about "inner singularity", but now you wish to lay a new layer of BS on top of that? Grow up, will you? If anti-gravity is so "simple", as you claim, then again I would ask you to lay out the physical precepts such that any engineer, like myself, can understand clearly. Given you refuse to touch the "inner singularity" issue, and now this, I'd say your credibility with anyone on these forums who takes science seriously, is just about zero by now. But you have fun with your little fantasy.

 

if i would have my day with sufficient funding i would build an anti gravity within 3 months

Another sign of scammers galore! All it takes is MONEY... forget the fact that they could not describe even the most basic of the physical premises behind what they would allegedly use the money for. Dude, do you realize how many people say exactly what you say ("all I need is money"), but say it so much more smoothly than you?

 

to get all the part machine here a clue ask stan deyo he has the same secret as i did and i build mine on the sam principle

That's a new name for me... is he the latest in the ever-growing list of "anti-gravity scammers"? You really need to be careful, because if you ever do accept money from someone to do this, and you cannot deliver, you could stand trial on fraud charges.

 

anyway think what you want i have nothing to gain hee since the mess is already made

 

you only have one chance to make a good impression and you [censored] it all for me so forget it

I could really care less what you think about me, so don't let it keep you awake at night. Suffice it to say, I have done EXACTLY what I am here to do... namely, I have shown you have NOTHING and cannot even begin to explain any of the science behind your claims. Well done... you have walked right into your own debunking. When you can speak in the language of accepted science, then and only then will people (possibly) pay attention to you.

 

So again, I ask if you will tell us all what your Doctorate degree is in?

 

RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...