Jump to content

Disbelief caused time travellers go away?


deaftime
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am a new member.

 

I saw some threads and seems there is lots of disbelief when time travellers are here to say that they are real and most of you argue that there is disbelief.

 

Then you says where are they?

 

Perhaps you all scared them running away? threats and disbelief caused them hiding or secret?

 

What do you think?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps you all scared them running away?

LOL ! This sounds remarkably like that favourite excuse used by 'psychics'....that those mean and nasty sceptics send out 'negative vibes' and the spirits wont come to play.

 

I think the much more likely reason that hoaxers....sorry, time travellers.....are not so much around is that increasingly people are not so gullible as they used to be, and there's a lot more emphasis on 'proof' and some form of testing.

 

The days when anyone could just pop in and announce ' Hey - I'm a time traveller'....and a bunch of people would all go ' Oh wow ! What's it like in 2036 ?'.....are pretty much over.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you all scared them running away? threats and disbelief caused them hiding or secret?

It would seem that any potential claimant would take the time to read through several threads BEFORE making any time travel claims. That way they would know what to expect.

 

Hard to believe a traveler through time would be so easily run off by the natives 'round these parts.

 

Plus any time traveler has an advantage with knowing what any member had to say, and has the opportunity to change they're postings to avoid any down right nasty replies.

 

Ever see the movie, Next ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you all scared them running away? threats and disbelief caused them hiding or secret?

Why would a real time traveler run away and hide in secret just because they faced disbelief? That theory makes it appear that the sole purpose of time travel is to go into the past, appear on an Internet alt-sci message board and make claims of time travel in the hope that someone will Believe.

 

Time travel, real time travel, will not be discovered by a garage tinkerer. It will take the combined research of hundreds of scientists, millions of researcher-hours, billions of dollars in R&D and at least several decades, if not several centuries. With the purpose of going onto alt-sci message boards to make vague claims, play words games, get pissed off and disappear in mock fear?

 

See, I have this bridge in Brooklyn and it's for sale today only to one well qualified buyer and you just might be that buyer... ;)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the much more likely reason that hoaxers....sorry, time travellers.....are not so much around is that increasingly people are not so gullible as they used to be, and there's a lot more emphasis on 'proof' and some form of testing.

People are as gullible as ever. Politics (both sides of the fence) and religion prove this. And many people demanding proof don't have proper lab experience in order to really identify or qualify proof if it was present. And the whole thing about "belief" is seldom important anyway. Save that for the religious nuts.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time travel, real time travel, will not be discovered by a garage tinkerer. It will take the combined research of hundreds of scientists, millions of researcher-hours, billions of dollars in R&D and at least several decades, if not several centuries. With the purpose of going onto alt-sci message boards to make vague claims, play words games, get pissed off and disappear in mock fear?

And a tinkerer will never invent the phonograph or telephone or light bulb either. You're thinking too much in terms of the late 20th century. Never discount the power of a lone eccentric genius obsessed with a single dream. :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason why a lone tinkerer will not devise time travel is the huuuuge energy required to make it work.

 

OK so Tessla managed to consume large amounts of energy in his labs, but really we are talking entire orders of magnitude above that. Not the sort of energy one will get from a wall socket in the garage.

 

For all Titor's claims of some suitcase sized time travel device......even the energy required to create his alleged ' mini black holes ' requires a place like CERN or some such billion dollar lab.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the world discover this time travellor is real, the consequences could be a big threat, where many people in the world not through to accept this concept and caused lots of fear, making worse. If people on this thread still blame for disbelief, more likely to ask for evidence etc... if one thing is weird or more likely to be untrue or not discovered as evidence - if it is really small thing then everyone will reject totally and said it is a total disbelief.

 

It does not mean that the allegiation is lie, perhaps there is concept where we have lack of knowledge or they could not advise through the technology or knowledge is too high for us to understand?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason why a lone tinkerer will not devise time travel is the huuuuge energy required to make it work.

 

OK so Tessla managed to consume large amounts of energy in his labs, but really we are talking entire orders of magnitude above that. Not the sort of energy one will get from a wall socket in the garage.

 

For all Titor's claims of some suitcase sized time travel device......even the energy required to create his alleged ' mini black holes ' requires a place like CERN or some such billion dollar lab.

This is only if you assume that a hundred year old theory known as relativity is the end of time travel science. It is not. You only assume it requires huge amounts of energy because of the very abstract approximation of which you're currently aware. There are theories which encapsulate all of your current science and describe an easier way to time travel.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a tinkerer will never invent the phonograph or telephone or light bulb either. You're thinking too much in terms of the late 20th century. Never discount the power of a lone eccentric genius obsessed with a single dream.

There's a huge difference between Edison and inventing time travel. Edison didn't discover the base physics underlying his inventions. The base science was already in place via Maxwell and Croc among many others. Edison was an engineer (technically he was a "practical engineer"). He found a use for the base scientific theories already in place.

 

That's not the case with time travel. First there really isn't any base scientific theory in place. There are a host of general but unproved theories based on a multitude of solutions to general relativity indicating the possibility of time travel. But no one has the vaguest clue about how to put the theories into practice. The reason is that no one has ever completely solved Einstein's equations for general relativity, not even Einstein himself.

 

Unlike Edison, who experimented at random on dozens of items to come up with a light bulb, there's nothing to randomly experiment with when it comes to solving general relativity because the solution, at its deepest level, involves quantum mechanics. Experimenting at random on a dataset that is itself randomness personified is definitely not the course to take. The universe won't be around long enough for all those monkeys and typewriters to hammer out a spacetime geometry that satisfies the requirements for time travel.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I thought relativity & QM were incompatible in their current state. What was I thinking.

Which is why I stated that no one has the vaguest clue as to how to completely solve Einstein's equations for general relativity. We know that both GR and QM are correct, at least to an approximation. But they are incompatible because GR is a theory of gravity and QM cannot fit gravity into its equations consistent with GR. Neither theory can derive the other.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why I stated that no one has the vaguest clue as to how to completely solve Einstein's equations for general relativity.

Relativity isn't the way to go for time travel. It can work, theoretically. But it's like flying a plane with ion wind. The real answer lies in a more delicate solution from which can be derived all your modern proven theories.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I know that's vague and proves nothing. And you'd love me to share the theories if I have them. Well let's just wait and see.

When you're ready just fill in the blanks below:

 

Internet TIme Travel Theory #10,752:

 

Abstract:

 

____________________________________________

 

____________________________________________

 

____________________________________________

 

Just the abstract. If it's interesting enough then...

 

go on to the theory itself where the shortcomings of GR is completely addressed, where the new theory departs from GR, where the new theory derives what is already known to be true from GR, where it extends GR...etc.

 

I've got plenty of time. Take a day or a year. Take longer is you like.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is only if you assume that a hundred year old theory known as relativity is the end of time travel science. It is not. You only assume it requires huge amounts of energy because of the very abstract approximation of which you're currently aware. There are theories which encapsulate all of your current science and describe an easier way to time travel.

I very much doubt it. Einstein's E=MC^2 is sooo basic and fundamental that it is highly unlikely that something is going to replace that.

 

Now the point with that equation is it doesn't just link matter and energy ( i.e a little matter has a whacking great amount of energy )......but it also links energy and time. The speed of light IS effectively the 'speed of time'. That is precisely why relativistic time dilation occurs.

 

The formulae of relativity imply that movement across time requires energy ( and a lot of it ) i just the same way as movement in space does.

 

It is inconceivable that some guy is ever going to just plug a time machine into the garage wall socket.......and with a frew lousy Watts at 150 Volts somehow travel back in time 100 years.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why I stated that no one has the vaguest clue as to how to completely solve Einstein's equations for general relativity. We know that both GR and QM are correct, at least to an approximation. But they are incompatible because GR is a theory of gravity and QM cannot fit gravity into its equations consistent with GR. Neither theory can derive the other.

 

Scientists will likely have to untangle all the 'symmetry breaking' that went on within the first few seconds of the universe. 'Incompatible' is not really the right word. One is not trying to morph one into the other, but instead find a higher level symmetry that incorporates both.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's why you will not discover it.

The ball is squarely in your court. Cover the bet and post the abstract. In the abstract at least mention the objective reasoning behind why SR/GR is wrong.

 

If you can't do that much then the "theory" is classified, by definition, as crackpot. Surely you've done a thorough study of SR/GR, fully understand the meaning an implications behind the two complimentary theories and can explain where you depart from them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, supposed most time travellers did migrate to more friendly shores. I have not run away, but those running this forum moves my posts to fiction. Funny, how people who do not believe in time travel always end up running the place, that was not the case years ago.

 

I can tell you that paranormalis is now down, time travel portal was taken down, and just today my forum HDRKID.com was hacked. It is not fun doing research on time travel, Steven Gibbs tells me that he gets daily death threats over his phone. :mad:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why tell anyone that you are a time traveler? Why sign up to any forum in the first place?

 

You ask why we are chasing time travelers away. No one had done so. No time traveler will give out any information that will change history. Not even to save lives. Which answer your question. No time travels had posted on this forum yet. Or they had posted and had not admitted that they are one.

 

A time ship used a rotation ring that is either around the hull or at it bow. Which is power by a matter and anti-matter reactor, which in turn is power by a nuclear fusion reactor. The rotation ring when in use, can rotate faster then speed of light. It pushes space and time away from the ship. creating a hole in space, kind of like a black hole. Except gravity is zero in the center of the vortex. The time ship can do three things. It could travel back in time. It could travel to the future and it could just stay in the present time period. It depend on it mission. In the vortex, time has no meaning. No one ages while they are inside the vortex. They don't get younger either.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may not be on the same level of mathematics and quantum mechanics as others in here but when i rap my mind around the idea of time travel i can see that all the tools we have for studying it are bounded by parameters, every concept we come up with leads to infinite equations and every step is a new paradox to unravel, i don't think the universe has a (theory of everything)i don't think there is an equation that will explain all of it, I think at best, Artificial comprehension will be as close as we will ever get. whether it involves infinitely complex levels of physics, or something simple and bluntly obvious is irrelevant, The universe will not allow itself to be manipulated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. You can't change major events, by traveling back in time. What God had set forth to happen, will happen. No matter if you went back in time and tried to change it. It is going to still happen. But can change a person in the way they live their lives. That if that person listen to you. Otherwise, you just wasting your time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...