Jump to content

Temporal Divergence Meter


Designer2
 Share

Recommended Posts

This I hope should clear things up.

 

Let say there is a change in gravity after a flood people run around in the site.

 

People running around is a temporal event. The other setup in an alternate event

 

line is where it does not happen and guess what the gravity does not change since

 

water effects the gravity. What I am proposing is very subtle change in thinking I hope you get it.

 

If you think otherwise you are delusional right. If there is something more to it great if there isn't ....

 

What we will find is we are all linked with nature(Earth) on multiple level including gravity.

 

Thus if events change then gravity changes who knows what came first.

 

The two example test for this would be the recent Calgary flood and Katrina.

 

My conclusion is temporal divergence goes up whenever there is a Earth change thus geography in the future is

 

different which it all points to.

 

The revealing.

 

In a SPI data packet there is clock and data but if there is a one instead of a zero for data in a given clock edge we have

 

temporal divergence or data divergence. Data Divergence is equivalent to what I am taking about in the physical world.

 

My reality is modeled after hardware, software and firmware other are philosophers and most are mathematicians.

 

If we live in a programmed world LOL; then this module might be true OK. I just module reality as an SPI clock.

 

I am curious how that SPI packet of data can have divergent effects on whole system as a whole ie (Earth).

 

I hope this clears up everything.

 

In conclusion.

 

Temporal Divergence Meter.

 

Temporal = SPI Clock

 

Divergence = SPI Data 1 to 0 or 0 to 1 error.

 

Meter = Input PIN of IC

 

I guess you know where I am coming from. Now you know how I think.

 

Designer.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

While I can appreciate your frustration and sarcasm, I must point out that Designer is at least willing to test his hypothesis. As long as he follows a rigid guideline of testing, the results should guide him along the correct path.

I pointed out the problem above. It isn't testable. The object of the experiment is to "detect any changes in the time line." The experiment assumes that everyone agrees on the definition of the term "changes in the time line", that we know what the time line was supposed to have been before it was altered and thus we have the ability to know the future before it occurs. Otherwise how would the experimenter be able to determine that something is altered? It also assumes that the experimenter's memory is unaffected by these alterations elsewise the experimenter would be unaware of what the future was supposed to have been. If, however, the experimenter's memory is unaffected what made him so special? Magic? How is it that the experimenter was not affected by this time wiggle when everyone else was? (And everyone else had to be affected because that, we are supposed to assume, is the definition of "changes in the time line.") Yet, if that is the case, who will accept the experimenter's results? Six billion people have a single consistent recollection of some event. One person determines something else. Sorry, but "one in a row" is neither a winning streak nor sufficient evidence to convince anyone that VGL wiggle giggles alter time lines, streams or oceans.

 

Once again, this goes to the part of the failure of the education system that I was refering to - critical thought. Deconstructing an experimental design and looking at its parts is a process involving critical thought. Why didn't you use it before responding to the prior post?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every choice in reality is determined and tried out. With an SPI bus you can have one device feed in a ONE and another feed in a ZERO and see a difference in divergence.

 

The word Event Line would be more appropriate then Time Line since you know it's to loaded word and has many wrong preconceptions that are not based on any form of reality.

 

The idea is model able in the SPI protocol bus world and should be able to model it in reality real world because the bus is based on reality.

 

So what's a quantum computer based on anyway since entertains all possibilities outcomes therefore it is model able.

 

The same thing is also true for us since we are comprised of quantum particles.

 

Note an SPI bus is used in SD Cards if you want to know and a vary simple protocol.

 

The idea came from examining the SPI bus then trying to prove it in the real world even though it is in the real world including quantum computers theory.

 

The flood event example Katrina is the result of choosing the ONE over the ZERO that could be detected. The ZERO is the baseline of no change in the event line.

 

In a quantum computer you can't never say that a ZERO does not exist or is not possible because it is a probable outcome and is entertained.

 

Note Quantum computer already prove my theory by having two event lines simultaneously OK.

 

This is not pushing it but you can say you have two computers in each event line figuring things out right since there are two quantum states.

 

Designer.

 

What is a quantum computer? Video shows available quantum computers.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sICXOwOwS4E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed out the problem above. It isn't testable. The object of the experiment is to "detect any changes in the time line." The experiment assumes that everyone agrees on the definition of the term "changes in the time line", that we know what the time line was supposed to have been before it was altered and thus we have the ability to know the future before it occurs. Otherwise how would the experimenter be able to determine that something is altered? It also assumes that the experimenter's memory is unaffected by these alterations elsewise the experimenter would be unaware of what the future was supposed to have been. If, however, the experimenter's memory is unaffected what made him so special? Magic? How is it that the experimenter was not affected by this time wiggle when everyone else was? (And everyone else had to be affected because that, we are supposed to assume, is the definition of "changes in the time line.") Yet, if that is the case, who will accept the experimenter's results? Six billion people have a single consistent recollection of some event. One person determines something else. Sorry, but "one in a row" is neither a winning streak nor sufficient evidence to convince anyone that VGL wiggle giggles alter time lines, streams or oceans.

Once again, this goes to the part of the failure of the education system that I was refering to - critical thought. Deconstructing an experimental design and looking at its parts is a process involving critical thought. Why didn't you use it before responding to the prior post?

Don't take yourself so seriously. No one else does.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I love Gold Coast luxury apartments and the Holiday apartments Surfers Paradise when I'm on holiday.

Nothing ruins a good debate like spam.

 

It is more than this teacher can stand. I don't have patience to coddle BS like this. I call it like it is....here, at work, and at school. I refuse to be part of this "new politic" that destroys the once great USA. I REFUSE!

 

RMT

Agreed. Just be glad you aren't the one that's getting this crap force-fed to him. Every time I walk into my US History class, I have to prepare myself for one and a half hours of worshiping FDR and "Progressivism."

 

And my Chemistry class was a complete joke. The "teacher" sat behind her desk, wrote a few equations on the board, and turned us loose to complete problems we only half-learned how to do. I eventually figured out that the "A" kids in the class were the ones that walked up to her desk and FORCED her to teach them.

 

And don't even get me started on my Creative Writing class. One student wrote a story about force-feeding Mitt Romney aborted fetuses.

 

The scariest part? My high school is considered the best in South Carolina, as well as one of the best public schools in the nation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed out the problem above. It isn't testable. The object of the experiment is to "detect any changes in the time line." The experiment assumes that everyone agrees on the definition of the term "changes in the time line", that we know what the time line was supposed to have been before it was altered and thus we have the ability to know the future before it occurs. Otherwise how would the experimenter be able to determine that something is altered? It also assumes that the experimenter's memory is unaffected by these alterations elsewise the experimenter would be unaware of what the future was supposed to have been. If, however, the experimenter's memory is unaffected what made him so special? Magic? How is it that the experimenter was not affected by this time wiggle when everyone else was? (And everyone else had to be affected because that, we are supposed to assume, is the definition of "changes in the time line.") Yet, if that is the case, who will accept the experimenter's results? Six billion people have a single consistent recollection of some event. One person determines something else. Sorry, but "one in a row" is neither a winning streak nor sufficient evidence to convince anyone that VGL wiggle giggles alter time lines, streams or oceans.

Once again, this goes to the part of the failure of the education system that I was refering to - critical thought. Deconstructing an experimental design and looking at its parts is a process involving critical thought. Why didn't you use it before responding to the prior post?

I think you're going to have problems with anything anyone posts, no matter what. So why bother making an argument anyway? Your generation is part of the problem.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're going to have problems with anything anyone posts, no matter what. So why bother making an argument anyway? Your generation is part of the problem.

Yeah, that's the answer. Very well thought out retort.

 

Now, instead of cute generational quips, how about addressing the post? The post concerns experimental design, definition of terms posited within the design and how the design fails to offer a method for experimental verification of the hypothesis. This will require some modicum of critical thought on your part as well as a display of the results of our current system of public education.

 

(Now, I'm goiong to go out on a limb here and assume that you will neither address the question at hand, offer any critical thought process nor display any sense that physical science was taught to you at any stage of your academic career. Instead you'll go for the low laying fruit and toss out another thoughtless quip. Just a wild guess.)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In working it memorize the temporal divergence number in the gray matter

 

if you change time line value should not match thus the timeline changes.

 

If would be nice to know if we all constantly or periodically change

 

between time line and not knowing it on a constant basis. It is an experiment

 

if it is not true we don't jump between time line if it is true we possible

 

might jump while retaining all our memories between timeline. The experiment

 

give us valuable data wether successful or not isn't that the point of

 

science. If it does not work it will be a jumping point of new experiments

 

i.e. using a quantum computer. But if we don't get the designer result we still

 

get valuable data in the nature of reality. hint hint. Note you have to memories the

 

least significant bit and not depend on the computers memory.

 

My personal belief system is if it is thinkable and testable then you do it with no reservations

 

or judgment period let the results tell the story not us since we are all human.

 

If an experiment deals with the mind and physics is not interesting to know then problem is

 

not with me period. If a person has no vision then how do you get experiments to get data anyway.

 

As a child I was fascinated about the toilet and how it worked the water went down and then up

 

that defied gravity now its no mystery and thank god I'm not a plumber not that there is anything wrong

 

with it but I prefer designing the toilet.

 

In the end I am not giving the source material where I got the idea.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
In working it memorize the temporal divergence number in the gray matterif you change time line value should not match thus the timeline changes.

 

If would be nice to know if we all constantly or periodically change

 

between time line and not knowing it on a constant basis. It is an experiment

 

if it is not true we don't jump between time line if it is true we possible

 

might jump while retaining all our memories between timeline. The experiment

 

give us valuable data wether successful or not isn't that the point of

 

science. If it does not work it will be a jumping point of new experiments

 

i.e. using a quantum computer. But if we don't get the designer result we still

 

get valuable data in the nature of reality. hint hint. Note you have to memories the

 

least significant bit and not depend on the computers memory.

Most of the terms you use are not defined and have different meanings depending on the individual. What would give you the impression that gravity change = timeline change (relation, but no testable link)? The only conclusion that can be drawn from your experiment is that the meter reads differently (if the reading has indeed changed). There is nothing to relate a change in gravity, to world events; you would be assuming that the difference in gravity was due to a major event. There just isn't enough testable "evidence" to support what you are doing, and too many variables that are dependent on the individuals own interpretation of the situation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dexter

 

Temporal Divergence which I indicated all throughout the text was quoted by John Titor and I highlighted it in previous pages. The Temporal divergence is small. Divergences is created over time as we progress down the time line as things splinter off and change. Multiple time lines do exist on a quantum level since an experiment was done many year ago in which current was past in one direction in a loop simultaneous with a different current going in the opposite direction using the same conductor at the same time. Using John Titor as a example we know he claimed time divergence increased over time so what causes divergence event in the time line since changes as I stated earlier cause a unique event line to the future where there was nothing before thus divergence increases. The ideas of memorizing the least significant bits should be no big deal that is if there is retention of memory over the event line when a switch occurs. If this does not work; using a quantum computer to do this function would also work since technically a quantum computer is really two computer in one that exist simultaneously. The nice thing about this experiment is it easily testable over years waiting for major event to occur and thus resulting hypothetical divergence. In the end is can kill John Titors theories once a for all since many wish it; but if true?

 

Designer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If I remember correctly, there was a series of 6.0 and greater magnitude quakes leading up to the big 8.9 quake in Japan (Fukushima disaster). I hope these quakes are not a build up to a big quake.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mylo. X.

 

Another significant quake there and all the contaminated water will dump into the sea.

 

They want to do something with an ice wall there who know what that will do.

 

Here is the link.

 

BBC News - Fukushima leaks: Japan pledges $470m for 'ice wall'

 

I just found out they announced there having the Olympics in Japan; is that really a good idea?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatcha wanna bet they will chalk it up to experimental error. Just so they can hang on to theories that are not supported by facts.

 

If gravity changes in intensity, then so does the flow of time. And a change in intensity should produce a gravity wave.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Here a video that shows multiple world theory is true thus event line can have a divergent point

 

since there are real quantum computers in existence. When a new event line is born gravity particles higgs boson enter into it which was formally just a probability and thus earth quake occurs since the line become real resulting in a new trajectory into the future or what we currently call a new time line. The Temporal Divergence Meter should detect this. I believe the gravity between timeline will be different. Please watch video.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyUbWl8jPQU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

"If gravity changes in intensity, then so does the flow of time. And a change in intensity should produce a gravity wave."

 

Maybe it does. I spent time talking with Professor Gowdy about this. His was present at the testing of the "Weber Bar":

 

Weber bar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

just because it hasn't been detected yet, doesn't mean it isn't there.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ray,

You know the laws of physics. I know the laws of physics. But it appears that no one else even cares about the laws of physics else they would take some time and actually explore and learn them. .

I think it has been a long time since any Physics Models used the word "law".

 

One such reason is Ohms Law, which superconductors don't obey.

 

But yes, much ignorance out there..................

 

Finally figured out Reply is Quote, LOL

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Centrifugal force is a real force, and not fictitious as I was taught."

By Newtonian Definition, "Centrifugal force" is not a force.

 

F=MA

 

"Centrifugal force" does not require an acceleration, only a continual vector change. An example would be a spinning ball on a string.

Don't believe everything you are taught in school, unless you can confirm it to be true and real. Here is a little paper I did on centrifugal force that does show an acceleration is present after the connecting string is cut. The only thing is the direction of centrifugal force is opposite to gravitational weight. As is the direction of the mathematically derived acceleration. I did it just for fun about 20 years ago.

 

Just copy this link into your browser address bar.

 

http://paranormalis.com/attachments/bogus-centrifugal-graph-jpg.1442/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't believe everything you are taught in school, unless you can confirm it to be true and real. Here is a little paper I did on centrifugal force that does show an acceleration is present after the connecting string is cut. The only thing is the direction of centrifugal force is opposite to gravitational weight. As is the direction of the mathematically derived acceleration. I did it just for fun about 20 years ago.

Just copy this link into your browser address bar.

 

http://paranormalis.com/attachments/bogus-centrifugal-graph-jpg.1442/

Must look like I must log in to view :(

 

How would an acceleration occur when the string is cut? If we go back to F=MA, we have a velocity at the time the string is cut, we would expect wind resistance etc, to slow that bull from that time. What would be causing an increase in velocity(acceleration)?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to throw out F=MA. It is not applicable to non inertial reference frames. Centrifugal force is not an inertial force. It is the only force that opposes gravity with an effect of complete cancellation.

 

Try this link and download the image.

 

FileSnack | Easy file sharing

 

I used the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance between the moving object and the center of its previous rotation. The math doesn't lie.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to throw out F=MA. It is not applicable to non inertial reference frames. Centrifugal force is not an inertial force. It is the only force that opposes gravity with an effect of complete cancellation.

Try this link and download the image.

 

FileSnack | Easy file sharing

 

I used the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance between the moving object and the center of its previous rotation. The math doesn't lie.

DOH! "The link you are accessing has been blocked by the Barracuda Web Filter because it matches a blocked category. The name of the category is: "advertisement-pop-ups"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...