Jump to content

Hello 2014....


Temp-Agent1
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Skype is run by microsoft. And everything online is monitered in new ways here. in 2001 our net still offered anonymity ... in 2014 all anonymity is a lie. The NSA got into bed with the computer manufacturing companies. All USB ports include FM transmitters that broadcast all data on an exclusive FM frequency to the NSA.... This is all public knowledge now thanks to the snowden leaks... It was on drudge, you can google it. This is why encryption of data is useless. IF your keyboard is USB it's transmitting. If your mouse is USB it is transmitting. Everything USB is transmitting. But I digress.

 

Microsoft was comprimised by the US government years ago during the mircosoft trials. Part of the settlement to keep their software monopoly was an agreement to work with the US government. So since skype was bought out by microsoft I would not recomend using skype unless you have no qualms about being monitored.

 

 

Time travel institute spans the streams of the cosmos WOOHOO!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TA1

 

If this is something that really interests you, I would consider it. However, unlike in my time, your internet is not secure; it is in fact well known that during this time, you were constantly monitored by government authorities in what you do, say, and visit online. I have taken steps in this forum to hide my location and not reveal too much about myself - I would have to be sure that this skype program can offer similar protection.

Thanks for considering it!

 

I wouldn't be the better person to conduct this talk, since English isn't my first language nor am I a specialist in the subject. I'm a mere curious. What I had in mind was, to suggest this and one of the forum members who have more experience in the subject, could host a conversation as we all heard it live. I'm not sure if this appeals to anyone other than me. Let's just wait for someone to speak up.

 

One more question, if I may:

 

Let's say hipothetically, that you could meet one of us for a talk and remain completely anonymous while the talk was recorded. Would you agree to do it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank-you PaulaJedi. A result of the world in which I live in 2037 I suppose. You have something here - 'Text speak?'. We don't shorten our language to accommodate digital communications in the future; education is considered extremely

 

Important for the rebuilding of the western world and England in particular, and correct grammer and reading and writing skills are very important for record keeping and communication (we use traditional typing and pen & paper more than we do computers).

 

I can return to a worldline virtually identical to my own. My device is sophisticated enough to narrow down the divergence to maybe 1 or 1.5%. There might be very subtle differences in the world at large - someone in some part of the world may have a different job, or live in a different place, but the differences will likely be so small I will never notice. It is pretty much impossible to traverse time within one's own Worldline. Whenever you travel, you move dimensionally as well a chronologically. The most we can do is stay as close to our own reality as we can, keeping the divergence down to an absolute minimal.

 

As such, will the 'Me' that emerges into that 2037 Worldline be the 'Me' that left? No. But the 'Me' of that Worldline also cannot return to his exact Worldline, but one almost identical. In essence, I will be taking his place, and he will be taking mine.

 

As long as my Children and my wife are there, I'll be smiling.

 

Oh boy, your asking me the tough ones today Paula. Ok, keep in mind I am a Historian, not a physicist. However, we did cover Multiverse practice in training. Our Science tells is that our Universe is contained within an expanding bubble. In the beginning, The big bang occurred, the universe expanded rapidly -- so rapidly that an area of space once a nanometer square ended up more than a quarter-billion light years across in just a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second. This happened multiple times - we call it the Multiple Bang Theory. Thing of it as....ok, instead of one massive explosion. It's like one of those firecrackers? The ones that gives off multiple little explosions in rapid succession? The Big Bang was like that. *Bang bang bang bang*, each explosion creating a New, separate, expanding bubble, each containing it's own universe. Some of these bubbles had identical materials and developed identically over billions of years, others contained a great deal more or a great deal less material, and developed very differently.

 

So we have a giant void filled with these 'Bubble universe's' and they're all expanding. Inevitably, some bubbles bumped into each other. It's possible some produced secondary bubbles. What we do know is that they are packed close together - the bubble universes exist very dimensionally close to one another. How do we know this? The wide number of worldlines we are able to travel to, evidenced by every trip every person takes through time. Each Worldline exists in another bubble.

 

Our universe is one bubble in a sea of bubble universes. Does that make it easy to picture?

 

How did my family react? Not well. Ha ha! At first they thought I was selling something, then they thought I was flat out insane, and possibly dangerous. I had to convince them to spare a few moments to just listen, and then told them things I could not possibly have known, if I was not who I said I was. I also able to show them a small scar I have, and still have to this day, from childhood. Now that they've opened up, they say they can see clearly that it is me. They eyes, the voice, my hands. They have asked to see the displacement device. As of yet, I have not let them.

 

Ok, how is it powered? How does it manipulate gravity? Well, first let me reiterate - I am not an engineer, I did not build it. Can I operate it? Yes. Could I repair it if it became damaged? To a certain extent, although all I have is my Field training to rely on. It would depend on the extent of the damage.

 

I can tell you that what I have is a C204 Time Displacement Unit, and it was not even built in my country, it is American!

 

The source of power for the device, certainly the power that allows it to manipulate gravity distortions, are 2 microsingularities that were created and fused into the device itself. Now, the mass of each one is manipulated by injecting electrons onto the surface of their event-horizons. The electricity comes from 2 standard car batteries.

 

An incredible amount of power can be generated once the injected electrons interact with the microsingularities. It is my manipulating their mass, that the device to control and stabilise the power output, and it is this massive amount of power that allows the device to create and manipulate a gravitational field around an object/person and/or vehicle.

 

The British Government? Ok, there is a 'Government' in 2037, but it is quote different from what you think. There is no 'President' or 'Prime minister', no one man who speaks for the rest. Instead, we have The Council. (officially 'The Representative Council of of England and Wales'). The council is made up of 11 Members, from the 11 largest and most influential districts in England (The 11th member is welsh, and speaks on behalf of all of Wales. Because of Wales relatively small size and very little defensive and monetary influence, it has less of a say than the other, English representatives. Fair? No. But that's reality). Scotland is - technically - part of the UK Republic, but in practice they take the decisions of the council under advisement, and do what they want anyway. They are also split into districts and only occasionally send a representative to address the council in person.

 

So, each of the 10 districts (and the one representing wales) nominate a Speaker who will address the Council in London on their behalf. Correspondence informs each district prior to an arranged meeting of the council what is to be discussed, and then each district votes within it's community what the districts opinion of said matter will be. - The Speaker does NOT get a vote and is not allowed to attempt to sway the opinions of district citizens In any way. He is merely to convey our voices, nothing more.

 

Does that all make sense?

 

Ok, the Representative Council rules over which organisations will be permitted use of a Displacement Unit (remember, there are only so many available in England) and for how long. Each district was chosen some time ago to nominate 5 people in their community to stand as potential candidates for temporal travel, and then the organisations have a pool of 50 candidates to choose from, depending on the needs of the assignment.

 

There is a backlog groups (Historians, Researchers, Military, Archeologists) who wish to use a displacement device, and each is assed to a waiting list; the council determine who needs it most, and how long they need it for before A) it can pass to another organisation and B)It has to be put in for maintenance.

 

The Council also deals with trade with Europe, disseminating law enforcement services to districts, and nominate legal courts to oversee disputes. More importantly, it negotiates with American ships and traders for trade of different items, including the displacement technology.

 

Hope that all clarifies a few things for you all.

 

TA1

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Microsoft was comprimised by the US government years ago during the mircosoft trials. Part of the settlement to keep their software monopoly was an agreement to work with the US government. So since skype was bought out by microsoft I would not recomend using skype unless you have no qualms about being monitored.

Hey,

 

I'm aware we are being monitored. But, I am under the impression that this guy is afraid of being recognized or identified. What he's posting here is being monitored as well, but we can't track him down. (well, at least I can't).

 

I suggested skype because even though he'll be monitored by someone, he will remain anonymous to us, which I believe is his goal.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Autocorrect?' I believe it is called? Still something of a mystery to me.

If you lived during this time, wouldn't you be familiar with it?

 

In 30 years if I were suddenly presented with something like a cassette tape or a rotary phone, I'd still know how to use them despite not having seen them in a several decades.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you lived during this time, wouldn't you be familiar with it?

In 30 years if I were suddenly presented with something like a cassette tape or a rotary phone, I'd still know how to use them despite not having seen them in a several decades.

Good point. Perhaps he should also do something to explain the disparity between the below statements. 23 years difference would not seem to normally be the difference between "youth" and "ripe old age". Perhaps he could state his age. Most wouldn't consider anything over age 15 or 20 to be "youth", nor anything under 65 or 70 to be "ripe old age". But, perhaps all this can be explained away with reduced life expectancies in the future, a failing memory/ unreliable narrator, misspeaking, or some combination thereof...

 

this is a fascinating perk of my assignment; being able to interact with a society that I remember from my youth. almost like stepping back into ones memories.

 

The hair is grey, the wrinkles are deep.

 

my ripe old age

Always too little.

 

Always too much.

 

Time the Enemy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As such, will the 'Me' that emerges into that 2037 Worldline be the 'Me' that left? No. But the 'Me' of that Worldline also cannot return to his exact Worldline, but one almost identical. In essence, I will be taking his place, and he will be taking mine.

So, you don't disappear from your "home" worldline and arrive back with two copies of yourself because you switch places?

 

This differs from Titor's theory because he met himself. Just comparing.

 

Our universe is one bubble in a sea of bubble universes. Does that make it easy to picture?

Yes, that is more or less how I see it, but sometimes I compare it to a rose curve or multiple rose curves for that matter.

 

How did my family react? Not well. Ha ha! At first they thought I was selling something, then they thought I was flat out insane, and possibly dangerous. I had to convince them to spare a few moments to just listen, and then told them things I could not possibly have known, if I was not who I said I was. I also able to show them a small scar I have, and still have to this day, from childhood. Now that they've opened up, they say they can see clearly that it is me. They eyes, the voice, my hands. They have asked to see the displacement device. As of yet, I have not let them.

 

Ok, how is it powered? How does it manipulate gravity? Well, first let me reiterate - I am not an engineer, I did not build it. Can I operate it? Yes. Could I repair it if it became damaged? To a certain extent, although all I have is my Field training to rely on. It would depend on the extent of the damage.

 

I can tell you that what I have is a C204 Time Displacement Unit, and it was not even built in my country, it is American!The source of power for the device, certainly the power that allows it to manipulate gravity distortions, are 2 microsingularities that were created and fused into the device itself. Now, the mass of each one is manipulated by injecting electrons onto the surface of their event-horizons. The electricity comes from 2 standard car batteries.

So, you are using the same technology as Titor?

 

Does your team have a name? His is called the 177th Temporal Recon unit.[DOUBLEPOST=1411493152][/DOUBLEPOST]Wouldn't it be amusing if this was really Titor and he came back in disguise, first, to see how we would react?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slow down, folks.

 

Ok, more explanations are required I take it? First of all - "Autocorrect" was a feature on smartphones and such in my day, but it wasn't termed 'Autocorrect', it was simply known as the automatic dictionary. Secondly, Text-speak is unfamiliar to me. I don't recall shortening words and phrases to make digital communication faster when I was younger - no one I knew did. Was that just my naivety? I don't know. There was a lot more to be concerned about in my 2014 than worrying at the time about digital grammar.

 

Yes - from the bits I've read about John Titor - our time displacement technology is the same. At least, it has the same designation. However, C204 Time Displacement Unit is the term given to it by General Electric. That's not the name that we gave it. There of course was a C201, C202, etc, and 4 is the latest version of the technology. This is what convinces me that Titor was a genuine article; how could he otherwise have known the displacement unit designation given to the device by GE?

 

Please be aware, I have not read everything this Titor fellow posted online. He put a lot of material up here, and I have only scanned the highlights. Being from where I am, and having seen what I have seen, Titor's story does not hold the same......fascination.....for me, as it does for you.

 

I'm not an American, and the average citizen has very little contact with people from abroad in my time. There is no international news service, no CNN, no official news coming into the general populace on the state of American affairs in 2037; everything I know about America from the mid 2020's onwards comes mostly from hearsay and what I've been told by those in Trading and who have contact with the council, who have spoken directly with American Traders and contacts. As such, I have never heard of a Temporal Recon unit. Do they exist in America in 2037? Perhaps. I'm sure what passes for Government in the USA is doing *something* with the Time Displacement Technology, but what exactly they do with it is a little outside of my purview.

 

I am employed most directly by the Natural History museum (Yes, it still exists) and specifically, I work under the Temporal Research Commission, funded by the Museum, which in turn is funded by the The Representative Council of of England and Wales. I do not live in the heart of the city, and wouldn't want to. Instead I commute from just outside of London. I did not become a historian until after the Economic Collapse, when many industries fell apart and many people were forced to look to other area's for paid work. Research positions became more prestigious with the advent of time displacement technology and time travel as a reality. Since I was already a graduate, it wasn't so difficult for me to get onto a new academic course and qualify as a historical researcher.

 

So much interest in my age! Forgive my 'ripe old age' comment ha ha! My wife is always telling me I play up my 'old age' too much. I can confirm for you, I am 55. Which admittedly, is not 'old' even by your 2014 standards. What doesn't help too much is the field I work in. There are many researchers, archeologists etc that I work alongside who are a great deal younger than me, and remember very little about this time period, those that were born. It constantly makes me feel a little older than I actually am.

 

Life expectancy - technologically - should be higher than it is in 2037. However, the technology to repair a vast range of illness's and injuries is not openly available to all. Like the displacement technology, it is limited, and has to be distributed based on priority. I am lucky in that my value as a researcher at a key institute has afforded me priority healthcare in recent years. But alas, there are still those who could be much healthier and happier if we had an abundance of resources to distribute to everyone equally. I am confident, however, that as we re-establish ties with the rest of Europe and trade becomes more plentiful, our economy will strengthen, and this will change.

 

Ronnie - please read my previous posts. I did not say that your worldline was exceedingly close to my own; quite the contrary, there's a4 to 5 % divergence between our worldlines. In a previous post, I outlined some events that occurred from 2008 - 2014 on my worldline that have not occurred on yours. I could certainly tell you some things that happened in my history between 2014 - 2020 etc, but they would have little bearing on what the next few years hold for you.

 

Which is the ultimate irony isn't it? Surely if I could accurately predict a number of key events for you, and you could sit back and watch them unfold exactly as I predicted, it would erase all doubt from your mind that I am who I say I am. And thus is the unfortunate nature of time travel. You cannot travel back along your own worldline. No matter how close another worldline may be to your own, it is NOT your Worldline, there will always be *some* divergence between the two, and so you can never predict exactly what is going to occur with 100% accuracy. Look at what this Titor fellow predicted for you? And yet, you have no American Civil war, no nuclear weapons have been launched, Your world ticks along in a similar fashion to the way it has for the past 15 years.; yet he is held in high regard as a potential 'time traveller'. I would surmise that Titor's Worldline was closer to yours than my own, but he could not tell you exactly what was going to happen in the coming years, because there was still a divergence between your world and his and he knew that.

 

All I can say for sure, is that our Worldlines clearly diverged in the early 2000's. Perhaps you are beginning to see the start of what is to come, and your world will follow a path similar to my own, just at a slower pace. There is major civil unrest in America, is there not? You Are in a Global recession, aren't you? Similar, but not the same. One thing that is marching along at a very similar pace is your scientific endeavours. CERN was constructed, they are conducting the exact same experiments here as they were in my 2014. But your governments are still warring with foreign nations, they are still pushing everything they have into defence and weapons development. I ask you, if CERN and the governments that fund the project had discovered the ability to control and create Microsingularities, right now, today, in 2014 - do you think they would make that public knowledge?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Temp agent 1.

 

Greetings. Just to let you know where I stand. With respect, I do NOT believe you and have not believed any other "time-travelling" claimant that has graced this forum with their presence.

 

You, yourself, assert that there is minimal divergence between your alleged "World Line" and this World Line. This minimal divergence that you have declared, asserts that in your World Line there was no Princess Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, there was no ISIS, there was no campaign for Scottish independence YET you can convince your own family members of your validity by revealing to them events on this worldline (events that only YOUR family members from OUR worldline would know!). I won't even mention your scar. The way you conveniently use the notion of divergence in your tale, is very telling, to say the least.

 

 

  • Like 1

"We are all visitors to this time, this place..."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cosmo - one calculates divergence by speaking to a physicist or someone significantly smarter than myself! ha ha! Ok, we did attend lectures on this during training for the TRC (Temporal Research Commission). The computer units and gravity sensors on the displacement unit do record your trip, and can also be used when programming a trip to estimate the divergence of a programmed destination. This is based on the size of the gravitational field needed to conduct the trip, the amount of power needed to be generated by the electron-fusing of the microsingularities - it is referred to as the 'Diversion Field'. At the TRC, we keep a record of - sort of a scale - of diversion field destinations. Each field record is drawn up from a number of estimated World lines, in some range. For example, one field estimation chart contains world lines with the divergence from 1% to 10%, another has world lines from 10% to 20% and so on. Zero divergence, or "ZD" is believed to be technologically impossible, but it is possible to get close. We can't break that barrier, but we can achieve a displacement to a destination of 0.25 or .0.5%, in some cases.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T

 

There is no international news service,

What you're saying here is that their is no internet. No drudge, no news repeater sources... No conspiracy sites that like to rehash the news.... in essence no internet at all to discuss the daily world events.

 

NO more AP, No reuters either.

 

 

  • Like 1

Time travel institute spans the streams of the cosmos WOOHOO!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zero divergence, or "ZD" is believed to be technologically impossible, but it is possible to get close.

Then how do you develop a divergence scale if you aren't using anything as a baseline ? Seems to me that if I was a time traveler, my point of origin in space and time, would be at " Zero Divergence ".

 

 

  • Like 1

" While my book Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea is entirely a work of imagination, my conviction is that all I said in it will come to pass. " ~ Jules Verne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's a4 to 5 % divergence between our worldlines

 

I could certainly tell you some things that happened in my history between 2014 - 2020 etc, but they would have little bearing on what the next few years hold for you.

Based on your stated divergence percentage, it would seem that an accuracy rate of an estimated 95-96% would have a huge bearing on what the next years hold. I would venture to say that it would be "earth-shattering" in comparison to any who have predicted major events throughout the course of recorded history.

 

Therefore, please indulge us with maybe a dozen events to occur in the coming few years. We'll only expect 11.4 of them to be accurate. :)

 

[time for the author to ambiguate "divergence"]

 

 

Always too little.

 

Always too much.

 

Time the Enemy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greeting Mylo.

 

I thank-you for your input. It was a calculated risk to be sure. The divergence is significant enough that certain world events are different in significant area's, but certain aspects of my life are similar. Of course I had to make certain checks first. That the family in question lived in the same house, were both still alive, that the other 'Me' lived in the same place; Enough facts were similar for me to be reasonably sure that our lives when I was a child took similar paths. You must remember, our worlds didn't really diverge all that much until the early 2000's, I could be safely sure that before that time - i.e. - my childhood, my life and my counterparts on this worldline were similar enough to be almost identical; hence we had similar childhood experiences.

 

I must add - whether I am a time traveller or not, is that really what you care about? This is a website called the 'Time Travel Institute'. This is a forum called "Time Travel Claims". I have to ask myself who would frequent such a forum, if they were not in fact looking for 'claims of time travel'. Whether you believe me or not, is irrelevant, at least to me. I will find this discourse valuable in either instance. And when my assignment ends, I will return to my time, and my approximate worldline, and your belief or lack thereof in my identity will be so far from my mind as to have almost immediately vanished almost as soon as I return.

 

If you take anything from my writing here, and from the things I tell you - great. If you take nothing from it, then you haven't really lost anything, have you?

 

TA1

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greeting Mylo.

I thank-you for your input. It was a calculated risk to be sure. The divergence is significant enough that certain world events are different in significant area's, but certain aspects of my life are similar. Of course I had to make certain checks first. That the family in question lived in the same house, were both still alive, that the other 'Me' lived in the same place; Enough facts were similar for me to be reasonably sure that our lives when I was a child took similar paths. You must remember, our worlds didn't really diverge all that much until the early 2000's, I could be safely sure that before that time - i.e. - my childhood, my life and my counterparts on this worldline were similar enough to be almost identical; hence we had similar childhood experiences.

 

I must add - whether I am a time traveller or not, is that really what you care about? This is a website called the 'Time Travel Institute'. This is a forum called "Time Travel Claims". I have to ask myself who would frequent such a forum, if they were not in fact looking for 'claims of time travel'. Whether you believe me or not, is irrelevant, at least to me. I will find this discourse valuable in either instance. And when my assignment ends, I will return to my time, and my approximate worldline, and your belief or lack thereof in my identity will be so far from my mind as to have almost immediately vanished almost as soon as I return.

 

If you take anything from my writing here, and from the things I tell you - great. If you take nothing from it, then you haven't really lost anything, have you?

 

TA1

Whether they will implicitly say it or not, the main reason people come to this forum, is for proof of time travel, of which you have provided little to very little questionable evidence.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear. That's not how it works, Dizzy. That's a gross misunderstanding of the process. Look, if you want to discuss future events of my worldline, or the theory or philosophy behind time travel, then that's ok. But really - you're just proving my point as to why actual people who may arrive on this worldline from another avoid discourse with you. This isn't supposed to be an interrogation, and I really have nothing to prove. Say I do convince you, all of you, of my identity. What have I gained from the process? This doesn't benefit me. I'm happy to indulge in polite conversation or idle speculation, but abrupt or rude messages? Why come on here to be insulted? I know who I am. Surely that should be all that matters to *me*, no?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still.... Temp agent you seemed to of just repeated the lies about Rife Frequency therapy... And you know nothing about insightec or novocure.

 

Both frequency based medicines with FDA approval. And the whole no international news thing... Do you have nothing to say about the death of the internet and centuries old news media producers like AP and ruters? The daily globe? London times? Nothing?

 

And grey hair and deep set wrinkles at 55? Really?

 

Lastly their is only one place on earth that can make a singularity. Thats Cern. Their is no american version . The singularities are produced at cern and housed in magnetic bottles. I can conceive the idea to the point of understanding the theory . So when you say you don't know how the americans would do it.... It would not be an american thing. It would be an international thing. Titor did not come here for the USA... He came here to retrieve an object needed for his whole humanity ... to maintain their Internet... and from how he posted he did not seem thrilled about doing it and lamented about their having to be a better way.

 

Object retrival is about the only useful thing of worldline travel. What happened to us did not happen to you so studying our divergent world line is pointless ESPECIALLY when you choose to interact with us furthering the potential divergence.

 

So you know.... Their be some questionable things about your questions and answers[DOUBLEPOST=1411501972][/DOUBLEPOST]

 

This isn't supposed to be an interrogation,

You choose to post here making the claims. You choose to respond to our questions. You are under no force to comply. So whining is unbecoming.

 

 

  • Like 1

Time travel institute spans the streams of the cosmos WOOHOO!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear. That's not how it works, Dizzy. That's a gross misunderstanding of the process. Look, if you want to discuss future events of my worldline, or the theory or philosophy behind time travel, then that's ok. But really - you're just proving my point as to why actual people who may arrive on this worldline from another avoid discourse with you. This isn't supposed to be an interrogation, and I really have nothing to prove. Say I do convince you, all of you, of my identity. What have I gained from the process? This doesn't benefit me. I'm happy to indulge in polite conversation or idle speculation, but abrupt or rude messages? Why come on here to be insulted? I know who I am. Surely that should be all that matters to *me*, no?

Apologies, Temp-Agent1! Please take no offense from my tongue-in-cheek remarks. I've enjoyed your story very much. Surely, you can understand that an anonymous interaction such as this is a two-way street of conversation that includes questions and answers, and that a vetting process must occur in order to filter out the noise that represents most all of what is posted in a forum like this. The more credence you can give yourself here, the more interest and insight you will be likely to receive, no?

 

Anyway, please explain the processes that I seem to be misunderstanding (if you so desire). Looking forward to your future posts.

 

Cheers

 

 

  • Like 1

Always too little.

 

Always too much.

 

Time the Enemy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a website called the 'Time Travel Institute'. This is a forum called "Time Travel Claims". I have to ask myself who would frequent such a forum, if they were not in fact looking for 'claims of time travel'.

 

TA1

I have an interest in time-travel fiction. Really enjoyed the film looper, sound of my voice, 12 monkeys. Really enjoyed the Audrey Niffenegger time-travel novel and movie adaptation. I am occasionally entertained by some of the time-travel claims, almost as much as reading a time-travel novel. I mean you no offence, maybe it's just me, but there seems to be something rather lacking about your claim, compared to others (like the infamous Zeshua and Grummond).

 

 

  • Like 1

"We are all visitors to this time, this place..."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"ZD" is believed to be technologically impossible, but it is possible to get close. We can't break that barrier, but we can achieve a displacement to a destination of 0.25 or .0.5%, in

But it is not mathematically impossible, so I am confident the technology to reach zero divergence on your home timeline would be created sooner or later, IMHO.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...