Jump to content

My visionary experience with Time~Travel


Time02112
 Share

Recommended Posts

So let me just get this straight... Everyone here who's posting on a Time Travel message board, don't think that someday Time Travel will exist? In that, that Time Travel to the 21st Century will be impossible...? What are you people smoking? Time Travel means just that. Wait 50 years, nothing. It's going on now. It's the Future where it happened, and now it's the past that you go back into to change. Why is that such a difficult concept for most of you to understand?

 

Geeesh, you sound just like Scientist.

 

Proving things are difficult, but if you know a person is sincere, how does that make it any less real? It's not like their asking you to place your life in their hands, or anything truly life threatening. Just to think... But no, not even that.

 

You guys should really stop thinking so much in 3 dimensional terms and allow your selves to think of other possibilities. It exists, just be patient for the proof, it will come when your ready.

 

-Javier C.

 

<This message has been edited by TimeTravelActivist (edited 04 June 2000).>

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"Point well noted Javier."

 

After all, and i say this in response to the comment made by Janus...What do you think is the point for these discussions in the first place? geez, you rimind me of an inpatient child having a kaniption fit stomping up & down the isles of a store blurting out "But I want it now!" LoL

 

Don't take it personaly, but I think that this "Proof" that you are in search of, is somthing most of us are also in pursuit of, or I dare say it is perhaps not the lack thereof that we are focused on, as much as the need to figure out a way to duplicate the process as to replicate somthing most of us already believe in, and perhaps, others have already experienced on different platforms.

 

Read my other posts:] "Brain technology" & "They got it all wrong"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Point well noted Javier."

 

After all, and i say this in response to the comment made by Janus...What do you think is the point for these discussions in the first place? geez, you rimind me of an inpatient child having a kaniption fit stomping up & down the isles of a store blurting out "But I want it now!" LoL

 

Don't take it personaly, but I think that this "Proof" that you are in search of, is somthing most of us are also in pursuit of, or I dare say it is perhaps not the lack thereof that we are focused on, as much as the need to figure out a way to duplicate the process as to replicate somthing most of us already believe in, and perhaps, others have already experienced on different platforms.

 

Read my other posts:] "Brain technology" & "They got it all wrong"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know alot of people that have never landed on the moon but still accept the word of others that we have or do some of you believe the lunar landing was shot in a Hollywood studio. I guess sometimes proof is subjective. When an intellegent person says they saw a ghost or a yetti or time traveled, I give them the benefit of the doubt. There are more things between heaven and earth then are dreampt of in your phylosiphy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know alot of people that have never landed on the moon but still accept the word of others that we have or do some of you believe the lunar landing was shot in a Hollywood studio. I guess sometimes proof is subjective. When an intellegent person says they saw a ghost or a yetti or time traveled, I give them the benefit of the doubt. There are more things between heaven and earth then are dreampt of in your phylosiphy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me address each of the points raised against me.

 

TTA: First of all, when did anyone say that no-one here thinks time travel may at some time exist? Time travel, at least time dilation, is a proven fact, and allows us to travel one way, into the future. So travel *to* the 21st century is possible. But coming back? That's where the problem comes in. In your vision of time travel, which for the sake of clarity I'll call 'hard time travel', one could travel throughout time, without restriction. But there are other possibilities; in what I'll call the 'soft' case, of which the time-dilated wormholes is the most famous example, one could only travel back to the point of creation of the time-travel device, and no earlier. If time travel ever is developed, I personally think that this is its most likely form. In the soft case, then, the development of time travel some time in the future does not mean that our lives are being tampered with now. It's not that I (we) don't understand your ideas, it's that I don't agree.

 

Scientist blatantly rejected any new suggestions made on this board, stating some kind of superior knowledge. Personally, I try to at least keep an open mind, and present the problems with a given idea, rather than just denying its validity. If I ask for proof, it's because that's the foundation of all knowledge. Sure it's tough to prove things, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. Unfortunately, the sincerity of a stranger is not proof enough for weird, exotic phenomena.

 

Do you even know what a dimension is? If there were more spatial dimensions than three, or more temporal than one, we would be able to detect certain effects. Science would know about it. Heck, we probably would've evolved differently.

 

Time02112: The 'point' of these discussions is to foster and develop ideas and theories on the topic of time travel. Asking for proof doesn't go against that purpose. Stating 'I time traveled' with no attached ideas or reality checks does. To me, with no shreds of verifiable evidence, your above post could just as well be a science-fiction story. What does it contribute to the topic of time travel? Does it help me form any ideas or moral values on the subject? No. If you want to talk about creating time machines, or 'duplicating' the processes you say you've experienced, then by all means go ahead. But why do you tell stories that lead nowhere, and present no new information? Such idle fancy seems to me a worse violation of the ideals of this board than my plea for proof.

 

Besides, if 'hard' time travel exists, why not just send the proof back in time? There's no reason to wait, no reason to not want the proof 'right now'. (I can be very patient, so long as I think that what I'm waiting for will eventually come.)

 

As for your other posts, I've responded to them individually.

 

BTW: nice spelling job.

 

mokrie dela: You believe someone who claims to have seen a yeti, even without proof? There's proof that men landed on the moon, in the form of moon rocks brought back to NASA. If I really wanted, I could go to them, and prove that the event did occur. That's an absolute proof. But I don't believe that yetis or ghosts or time travelers from the future exist, because I have seen not one shred of proof for any of these things. Personal experience is only good enough to change one person's mind, but a solid piece of evidence can convince practically everyone.

 

There are two types of phenomena: those that are proveable, and those which are, by definition, unproveable. The existence of the moon is one of the former, and the existence of a God is one of the latter. Time travel, in the form most people talk about, is an example of a proveable thing. So let's see some proof, or work together to get some. That should be the goal of those who claim they have time traveled, and those who think it's occuring all around us.

 

Sorry for the overuse of the word 'proof' in that last bit. Couldn't think of enough good synonyms.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me address each of the points raised against me.

 

TTA: First of all, when did anyone say that no-one here thinks time travel may at some time exist? Time travel, at least time dilation, is a proven fact, and allows us to travel one way, into the future. So travel *to* the 21st century is possible. But coming back? That's where the problem comes in. In your vision of time travel, which for the sake of clarity I'll call 'hard time travel', one could travel throughout time, without restriction. But there are other possibilities; in what I'll call the 'soft' case, of which the time-dilated wormholes is the most famous example, one could only travel back to the point of creation of the time-travel device, and no earlier. If time travel ever is developed, I personally think that this is its most likely form. In the soft case, then, the development of time travel some time in the future does not mean that our lives are being tampered with now. It's not that I (we) don't understand your ideas, it's that I don't agree.

 

Scientist blatantly rejected any new suggestions made on this board, stating some kind of superior knowledge. Personally, I try to at least keep an open mind, and present the problems with a given idea, rather than just denying its validity. If I ask for proof, it's because that's the foundation of all knowledge. Sure it's tough to prove things, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. Unfortunately, the sincerity of a stranger is not proof enough for weird, exotic phenomena.

 

Do you even know what a dimension is? If there were more spatial dimensions than three, or more temporal than one, we would be able to detect certain effects. Science would know about it. Heck, we probably would've evolved differently.

 

Time02112: The 'point' of these discussions is to foster and develop ideas and theories on the topic of time travel. Asking for proof doesn't go against that purpose. Stating 'I time traveled' with no attached ideas or reality checks does. To me, with no shreds of verifiable evidence, your above post could just as well be a science-fiction story. What does it contribute to the topic of time travel? Does it help me form any ideas or moral values on the subject? No. If you want to talk about creating time machines, or 'duplicating' the processes you say you've experienced, then by all means go ahead. But why do you tell stories that lead nowhere, and present no new information? Such idle fancy seems to me a worse violation of the ideals of this board than my plea for proof.

 

Besides, if 'hard' time travel exists, why not just send the proof back in time? There's no reason to wait, no reason to not want the proof 'right now'. (I can be very patient, so long as I think that what I'm waiting for will eventually come.)

 

As for your other posts, I've responded to them individually.

 

BTW: nice spelling job.

 

mokrie dela: You believe someone who claims to have seen a yeti, even without proof? There's proof that men landed on the moon, in the form of moon rocks brought back to NASA. If I really wanted, I could go to them, and prove that the event did occur. That's an absolute proof. But I don't believe that yetis or ghosts or time travelers from the future exist, because I have seen not one shred of proof for any of these things. Personal experience is only good enough to change one person's mind, but a solid piece of evidence can convince practically everyone.

 

There are two types of phenomena: those that are proveable, and those which are, by definition, unproveable. The existence of the moon is one of the former, and the existence of a God is one of the latter. Time travel, in the form most people talk about, is an example of a proveable thing. So let's see some proof, or work together to get some. That should be the goal of those who claim they have time traveled, and those who think it's occuring all around us.

 

Sorry for the overuse of the word 'proof' in that last bit. Couldn't think of enough good synonyms.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus, please don't take me personally when I say that you leave me with the distinct impression that perhaps you might have been born with your 'Pituitary' & your 'Prostate' glands switched places by some cruel freak of nature. (LoL)I understand what it means to be "Objective" but if you ever hope to see "One single shred of evidence" as you so eloquently keep demanding in most of your replies to others posts, I do not think that your kind of objectiveness, will get you there any sooner, so my advice to you is to "Lighten Up" a little & lower your mental shields, clear your mind, see a meditation guru, or something. You are seemingly quick to judge & throw out anything that comes your way, based upon "Borrowed Ideas" of others just the same, before really testing them out for yourself.

 

If you really want "Proof" as you say, stay tuned, you just might get what you wish for,...in good "Time"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus, please don't take me personally when I say that you leave me with the distinct impression that perhaps you might have been born with your 'Pituitary' & your 'Prostate' glands switched places by some cruel freak of nature. (LoL)I understand what it means to be "Objective" but if you ever hope to see "One single shred of evidence" as you so eloquently keep demanding in most of your replies to others posts, I do not think that your kind of objectiveness, will get you there any sooner, so my advice to you is to "Lighten Up" a little & lower your mental shields, clear your mind, see a meditation guru, or something. You are seemingly quick to judge & throw out anything that comes your way, based upon "Borrowed Ideas" of others just the same, before really testing them out for yourself.

 

If you really want "Proof" as you say, stay tuned, you just might get what you wish for,...in good "Time"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus,

 

You think you have it all figured out don't you? Pretty lengthy explanation, struggling to clear your "good" name with everyone who said anything remotely opposing to your views.

 

Well, let me just say, I may not be a researcher or a scientist, but I do know that Time Travelers exists. And if you haven't seen any proof, well your not going to see any directly for at least another thousand years.

 

Did you really think that if there were Time Travelers that they would leave big foot prints behind for you to examine? Shha, please... Time Travel is their back yard, there not going to leave something behind for you to analyze.

 

"But I don't believe that yetis or ghosts or time travelers from the future exist, because I have seen not one shred of proof for any of these things."

 

Your a pretty small fellow if you think that. Here's what happened, they hid the proof. Got that... Good.

 

It was once there, but now it's gone. So proving that, is also impossible. For now that is. Understand that now?... Good.

 

So just because in your opinion Time Travel won't exist for at least sometime, and going back in time before it was created is impossible how you claimed. Then that leaves 1 other possible conclusion. Time Travel existed way back in ancient civilizations.

 

It may not be direct proof, but it's subtle if you open your mind to it. The Lost City of Atlantis, the Pyramids at Giza, the Mayan Pyramids and Alien landing strip in Peru. Easter Island, Stone Hedge, the Native American Drawings of unexplained objects, and stories of ghost (spirits), etc... And other primitive cultures who's culture seems to have been influenced in some way by unexplained forces.

 

Put 2 and 2 together. Or did you not consider looking at those places in our History as possible shards of proof left behind by Time Travelers? Now who's being illogical... Dismissing events that really took place, of cultures scattered across the globe, each having their unique encounter with Time Travelers. Tisk tisk, I thought you were smart. Why did you not consider this as proof?

 

Sincerely,

 

Javier C.

 

P.S. All this talk about proof and proving things, reminded of an old quote I once heard: "The investigation of supernatural phenomena, lies outside the realm of science. Therefore science can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus,

 

You think you have it all figured out don't you? Pretty lengthy explanation, struggling to clear your "good" name with everyone who said anything remotely opposing to your views.

 

Well, let me just say, I may not be a researcher or a scientist, but I do know that Time Travelers exists. And if you haven't seen any proof, well your not going to see any directly for at least another thousand years.

 

Did you really think that if there were Time Travelers that they would leave big foot prints behind for you to examine? Shha, please... Time Travel is their back yard, there not going to leave something behind for you to analyze.

 

"But I don't believe that yetis or ghosts or time travelers from the future exist, because I have seen not one shred of proof for any of these things."

 

Your a pretty small fellow if you think that. Here's what happened, they hid the proof. Got that... Good.

 

It was once there, but now it's gone. So proving that, is also impossible. For now that is. Understand that now?... Good.

 

So just because in your opinion Time Travel won't exist for at least sometime, and going back in time before it was created is impossible how you claimed. Then that leaves 1 other possible conclusion. Time Travel existed way back in ancient civilizations.

 

It may not be direct proof, but it's subtle if you open your mind to it. The Lost City of Atlantis, the Pyramids at Giza, the Mayan Pyramids and Alien landing strip in Peru. Easter Island, Stone Hedge, the Native American Drawings of unexplained objects, and stories of ghost (spirits), etc... And other primitive cultures who's culture seems to have been influenced in some way by unexplained forces.

 

Put 2 and 2 together. Or did you not consider looking at those places in our History as possible shards of proof left behind by Time Travelers? Now who's being illogical... Dismissing events that really took place, of cultures scattered across the globe, each having their unique encounter with Time Travelers. Tisk tisk, I thought you were smart. Why did you not consider this as proof?

 

Sincerely,

 

Javier C.

 

P.S. All this talk about proof and proving things, reminded of an old quote I once heard: "The investigation of supernatural phenomena, lies outside the realm of science. Therefore science can neither prove nor disprove the existence of God."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus said:

 

Do you even know what a dimension is? If there were more spatial dimensions than three, or more temporal than one, we would be able to detect certain effects. Science would know about it. Heck, we probably would've evolved differently.

 

On this one point I would have to disagree. Physicist are beginning to think that there are about 11 dimensions, maybe more.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus said:

 

Do you even know what a dimension is? If there were more spatial dimensions than three, or more temporal than one, we would be able to detect certain effects. Science would know about it. Heck, we probably would've evolved differently.

 

On this one point I would have to disagree. Physicist are beginning to think that there are about 11 dimensions, maybe more.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack D: The dimensions you speak of are involved in string theory, and are practically infinitesimal. I was referring to the type of dimension people think you could travel into - macroscopic dimensions. These definetly do not exist. Our Universe has only three of this type of spatial dimension.

 

TTA: If I don't address each point, then the ones I miss get brought up as arguments against me. Look at the 'Brain Technology?' thread.

 

Do you know what 'shred' means? It means a very small bit. Not "big footprints". Even information counts - you claim to have time travelled, did you see something that could be proveable? An event that will occur in the future? Something of that sort? Hard time travel opens up so much room for mistakes, that one must have happened at some point. Someone will have seen/brought back something.

 

The whole super-intelligent ancient civilization thing can be used to 'prove' just about anything. Maybe they were visited by aliens, or the Atlanteans had technology beyond our wildest dreams, or the Earth was in a harmonious energy vibration, or, for god's sake, maybe frogs briefly developed superhuman powers and caused the coincidences. Anything. There's no specific evidence there that links them to time travel. I've read the books, and it's an interesting idea, but there's not even a 'shred' there yet. Tisk tisk, I thought you would have considered that argument.

 

And finally, Time02112: I will, as you suggest, refrain from retorting to the infantile teasing you have posted...

 

But I have yet to see a testable idea come from this board. I try to come to each new idea with a fresh perspective, as you suggest. I try not to pre-judge an idea without giving it a chance. I try to present the problems with an idea, to present where it conflicts with generally accepted theories. But when I encounter a posting like yours above, I search in vain for something to say to me "This is more than just science fiction". No such thing arises. Discuss, don't preach, and I think your experiences may be better recieved. At the very least, they will be by me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack D: The dimensions you speak of are involved in string theory, and are practically infinitesimal. I was referring to the type of dimension people think you could travel into - macroscopic dimensions. These definetly do not exist. Our Universe has only three of this type of spatial dimension.

 

TTA: If I don't address each point, then the ones I miss get brought up as arguments against me. Look at the 'Brain Technology?' thread.

 

Do you know what 'shred' means? It means a very small bit. Not "big footprints". Even information counts - you claim to have time travelled, did you see something that could be proveable? An event that will occur in the future? Something of that sort? Hard time travel opens up so much room for mistakes, that one must have happened at some point. Someone will have seen/brought back something.

 

The whole super-intelligent ancient civilization thing can be used to 'prove' just about anything. Maybe they were visited by aliens, or the Atlanteans had technology beyond our wildest dreams, or the Earth was in a harmonious energy vibration, or, for god's sake, maybe frogs briefly developed superhuman powers and caused the coincidences. Anything. There's no specific evidence there that links them to time travel. I've read the books, and it's an interesting idea, but there's not even a 'shred' there yet. Tisk tisk, I thought you would have considered that argument.

 

And finally, Time02112: I will, as you suggest, refrain from retorting to the infantile teasing you have posted...

 

But I have yet to see a testable idea come from this board. I try to come to each new idea with a fresh perspective, as you suggest. I try not to pre-judge an idea without giving it a chance. I try to present the problems with an idea, to present where it conflicts with generally accepted theories. But when I encounter a posting like yours above, I search in vain for something to say to me "This is more than just science fiction". No such thing arises. Discuss, don't preach, and I think your experiences may be better recieved. At the very least, they will be by me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus, as I mentioned before, If you really want "Proof" as you say, stay tuned, you just might get what you wish for,...in good "Time"

 

Oh, by the way did I forget to mention "I Am" in the process of constructing a device that I believe might be capable of physical Time~Travel?

 

Javier has been privi to view a rough sketch, which I am planning to have placed on a "CAD" program just before construction begins.

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janus, as I mentioned before, If you really want "Proof" as you say, stay tuned, you just might get what you wish for,...in good "Time"

 

Oh, by the way did I forget to mention "I Am" in the process of constructing a device that I believe might be capable of physical Time~Travel?

 

Javier has been privi to view a rough sketch, which I am planning to have placed on a "CAD" program just before construction begins.

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many companies out there that work on numerous secret projects, be it for private enterprise, or the US GVT.

 

The Co. that I believe to have their hands deeper involved in more of these secret technological research projects with the exception of the nations dept. of energy, is a Co. called "EG&E". I would not be suprised at all to discover in the near, but not so distant future, that this company shows up on major news articles demonstrating their involvement with current Time~Travel reasearch & development, i.e. the very first official announcement of a developed

 

"Time Machine"

 

Below is a copy of the history page of "EG&E's Website...........

 

http://www.egginc.com/egg/index.htm

 

EG&G was founded by Harold E. Edgerton, Kenneth J. Germeshausen and Herbert E. Grier in 1947 as Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier, Inc. and today bears their initials. In 1931, Edgerton and Germeshausen had formed a partnership to study high-speed photographic and stroboscopic techniques and their applications. Mr. Grier joined them in 1934. During World War II the Government's Manhattan Project made use of Edgerton's discoveries to photograph atomic explosions; it was a natural evolution that the company would support the Atomic Energy Commission in its weapons research and development after the war. This work for the Commission provided the historic foundation to the Company's present-day technology base and in 1947 EG&G was incorporated.

 

Today, EG&G is a highly diversified company with over a half billion dollars in revenue and more than 4200 employees specializing in technology goods and services for a wide array of customers.

 

Over fifty years ago, when we opened for business, we focused almost exclusively on weapons system design and analysis. Then, as now, we specialized in measuring natural phenomena and tracking the performance of new, advanced systems, making it possible for our customers to achieve cost, process, and management efficiencies. EG&G serves a multitude of clients, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Treasury, Department of Transportation, Defense Logistics Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

 

We do things that make a measurable difference in the world from our worldclass asset management capabilities to the x-ray scanning systems that provide security at airports and other sites around the world. EG&G's history of innovation and excellence is the keystone of our past accomplishments and the key to the success of our future.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many companies out there that work on numerous secret projects, be it for private enterprise, or the US GVT.

 

The Co. that I believe to have their hands deeper involved in more of these secret technological research projects with the exception of the nations dept. of energy, is a Co. called "EG&E". I would not be suprised at all to discover in the near, but not so distant future, that this company shows up on major news articles demonstrating their involvement with current Time~Travel reasearch & development, i.e. the very first official announcement of a developed

 

"Time Machine"

 

Below is a copy of the history page of "EG&E's Website...........

 

http://www.egginc.com/egg/index.htm

 

EG&G was founded by Harold E. Edgerton, Kenneth J. Germeshausen and Herbert E. Grier in 1947 as Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier, Inc. and today bears their initials. In 1931, Edgerton and Germeshausen had formed a partnership to study high-speed photographic and stroboscopic techniques and their applications. Mr. Grier joined them in 1934. During World War II the Government's Manhattan Project made use of Edgerton's discoveries to photograph atomic explosions; it was a natural evolution that the company would support the Atomic Energy Commission in its weapons research and development after the war. This work for the Commission provided the historic foundation to the Company's present-day technology base and in 1947 EG&G was incorporated.

 

Today, EG&G is a highly diversified company with over a half billion dollars in revenue and more than 4200 employees specializing in technology goods and services for a wide array of customers.

 

Over fifty years ago, when we opened for business, we focused almost exclusively on weapons system design and analysis. Then, as now, we specialized in measuring natural phenomena and tracking the performance of new, advanced systems, making it possible for our customers to achieve cost, process, and management efficiencies. EG&G serves a multitude of clients, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Treasury, Department of Transportation, Defense Logistics Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

 

We do things that make a measurable difference in the world from our worldclass asset management capabilities to the x-ray scanning systems that provide security at airports and other sites around the world. EG&G's history of innovation and excellence is the keystone of our past accomplishments and the key to the success of our future.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to make a point here as to why many of us are not divulged as to the myriad of technological platforms that are being conducted in secret today. There are many issues that are a concern of "National Security" when addressing certain aspects of new technological breakthroughs within the scientific communities that have any potential military application which may pose as a potential threat if used against us by subversives & terrorists.

 

You see, as much as we all search in desperation for clues of hidden secrets, because of the potential risk involved, we cannot freely disclose them all to the general public at random without the potentiality of clandestine repercussion if these secrets were to be placed into the wrong hands.

 

Until our leaders come together in agreement & we accomplish a global platform of standardized regulations on an equal basis of power, we will always have to keep secrets form everyone when dealing with such technological breakthroughs, for fear of tilting the scales in favor of another country bent on dominating another by the use, or abuse of power that technology provides.

 

Therefore, it is in the best interest of Private Enterprise regulated by the NRC, to collaborate with the GVT's NSA.

 

If you would like to learn more about the NRC, see the website listed below.

 

http://www.nas.edu/nrc/

 

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of further knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the National Research Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The National Research Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is the chairman of the National Research Council.

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to make a point here as to why many of us are not divulged as to the myriad of technological platforms that are being conducted in secret today. There are many issues that are a concern of "National Security" when addressing certain aspects of new technological breakthroughs within the scientific communities that have any potential military application which may pose as a potential threat if used against us by subversives & terrorists.

 

You see, as much as we all search in desperation for clues of hidden secrets, because of the potential risk involved, we cannot freely disclose them all to the general public at random without the potentiality of clandestine repercussion if these secrets were to be placed into the wrong hands.

 

Until our leaders come together in agreement & we accomplish a global platform of standardized regulations on an equal basis of power, we will always have to keep secrets form everyone when dealing with such technological breakthroughs, for fear of tilting the scales in favor of another country bent on dominating another by the use, or abuse of power that technology provides.

 

Therefore, it is in the best interest of Private Enterprise regulated by the NRC, to collaborate with the GVT's NSA.

 

If you would like to learn more about the NRC, see the website listed below.

 

http://www.nas.edu/nrc/

 

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of further knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the National Research Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The National Research Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is the chairman of the National Research Council.

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

News Flash!

 

.....This just in, aparently, Princeton's "NEC Research Institute" has just announced they have succeded in breaking the light barrier, which translates to we now have developed the means capable of traversing the speed of light, and as a result of the experiment; were able to demonstrate the potential ability of "Time~Travel"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

News Flash!

 

.....This just in, aparently, Princeton's "NEC Research Institute" has just announced they have succeded in breaking the light barrier, which translates to we now have developed the means capable of traversing the speed of light, and as a result of the experiment; were able to demonstrate the potential ability of "Time~Travel"

 

------------------

 

"Everything you know,...is Wrong!

 

soon we shall all discover the truth."

 

p)'i4q4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...