saikat mukherjee Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 In physics, a wormhole is a path that links two different space-time.It is a hypothetical topological feature of space-time that would be, fundamentally, a "shortcut" through spacetime. How can be it created? . For a simple visual explanation of a wormhole, consider spacetime visualized as a two-dimensional (2D) surface. If this surface is folded along a third dimension, it allows one to picture a wormhole "bridge".A wormhole is, in theory, much like a tunnel with two ends each in separate points in spacetime, Is worm hole present in our universe? There is no observational evidence for wormholes, but on a theoretical level there are valid solutions to the equations of the theory of general relativity which contain wormholes. The first type of wormhole solution discovered was the Schwarzschild wormhole which would be present in theSchwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole, but it was found that this type of wormhole would collapse too quickly for anything to cross from one end to the other.the quantum foam hypothesis is sometimes used to suggest that tiny wormholes might appear and disappear spontaneously at the Planck scale,and stable versions of such wormholes have been suggested as dark matter candidates. Worm Hole like as a time machine. Traveling in past is not theoriticaly allowed in Specal theory of Relativity.But if some one can creates a worm hole,he may be traveling in past.If one can make it ,we can go to any other galaxy ,and return within few hours.But i dont think that,it is possible, because,if one can cmake it,he should come form future to our past time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 So can we delete the exact same post you made under TT Claims forum? RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerrTexas Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 So can we delete the exact same post you made under TT Claims forum?RMT Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerrTexas Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 But i dont think that,it is possible, because,if one can make it,he should come from future to our past time. Care to expand on why you don't think that is possible for a time traveler to come from the future to our past time via a worm hole ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saikat mukherjee Posted August 23, 2012 Author Share Posted August 23, 2012 Care to expand on why you don't think that is possible for a time traveler to come from the future to our past time via a worm hole ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saikat mukherjee Posted August 23, 2012 Author Share Posted August 23, 2012 Twin paradox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 Twin paradox The Twin Paradox of Special Relativity actually isn't a paradox at all. It only appears to be a paradox when you view the situation as observing the twins after one of them has accelerated to near the speed of light and is thereafter coasting in an unaccelerated frame. From that perspective neither twin can unambiguously state which one is traveling near the speed of light and which one's clock is ticking too slowly. But one of the twins was accelerated to that velocity. That twin felt accelerating forces. For that twin to return and compare clocks with the other s/he will twice more feel accelerating forces: on the turn-around to start the journey back and when the brakes are put on to stop back at home. The paradox no longer exists. The twin that felt the acceleration is the twin who aged more slowly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnQAnonTitor Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Correct. It isn't a paradox. The twin who traveled at the speed of light aged slower than the twin who stayed on Earth. The twins are a different age and this is a fact of Special Relativity. Traveling as slow as the slowest thing will not slow or reverse aging. Traveling around the Sun or Earth opposite it's natural rotation will also not send you back in time. Pushing the rewind button on a recorder does reverse time on the video and audio. Because we can do that in nature, time travel does exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Because we can do that in nature, time travel does exist. More platitudes. I guess you fancy yourself a convincing author of fiction, eh? RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnQAnonTitor Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 More platitudes. I guess you fancy yourself a convincing author of fiction, eh?RMT I would love to be a director or someone who gets paid to try to depict convincing fiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Transient001 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Maybe Thomas is refering to what an old friend of mine said a long time ago, that friend being Anselmo di Candia, a Benedictine Monk and Philosopher. He stated and actually proved through his Ontological Arguments that if you think of something and that something can somehow be experienced on an intellectual level, that something is possible although not presently accessible. http://kpaprzycka.swps.edu.pl/xPhilosophyIntroduction/03Anselm.pdf However, to think that something is possible or that something exists is rather dangerous. If I can make my car go up a hill that doesnt mean that I can make it go up the Mountains of Heaven. As an archetypical thinking pattern is alright, but to actually believe that is actual evidence of possibility is quite dangerous. It could lead to grave misconceptions and error. I once met a man who thought his followers were invincible and the men thought themselves invincible as well. They all believed this folly and they all marched up a hill covered in snow, very few of them returned from such treacherous journey. They believed it to be possible....but it was not accessible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Correct. It isn't a paradox. The twin who traveled at the speed of light aged slower than the twin who stayed on Earth. The twins are a different age and this is a fact of Special Relativity. Technically it isn't a fact of Special Relativity because SR is given in terms of "a uniform motion of translation" - an unaccelerated frame. General Relativity expands SR to include accelerated frames. That's why the Twin (non) Paradox exists. The initial 1905 form of SR doesn't include sufficient information when taken in its strictest terms to resolve the question of who actually aged at the slow rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnQAnonTitor Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Ontological Arguments that if you think of something and that something can somehow be experienced on an intellectual level, that something is possible although not presently accessible. Star light took a long time to reflect into our eyes. We're seeing the distant past. For this reason. Reflective water and mirrors are also a time machines. We're seeing our face in the briefest past. A photograph. We're seeing our face in the distant past. That past exists as long as the photograph does not disintegrate. A video. A holographic video recording depth. So what is next? As you said, if we can walk up a mountain we can also some day reach the stars. If we can film and preserve the past we can one day go in to the past. Can we influence the past? That would be a very sophisticated device. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Transient001 Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Interesting. As I was driving across town I was thinking what right do we have to meddle in the past or future. Time its very delicate you. Its not about going back, but about existing in a space where you weren't supposed to be. Imagine that you go back and land in a sidewalk next to a busy street. In the original time you werent there so people walked as they usually do, but when you were there someone diverted its path and got run over by a car. If you look at people, they have ruined most ecosystems except the deep ocean and that's because they can't get there. I wonder what will happen to the next frontier of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belize Science Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 A bit of misinformation in here. I'd recommend this Wormhole FAQ or this recent book on wormhole physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 I would also like to add that a wormhole is mathematical fiction. And just as real to some folks as pink flying elephants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
servantx Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Believe. It is real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
servantx Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 I would also like to add that a wormhole is mathematical fiction. And just as real to some folks as pink flying elephants. Believe. It is real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
servantx Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Technically it isn't a fact of Special Relativity because SR is given in terms of "a uniform motion of translation" - an unaccelerated frame. General Relativity expands SR to include accelerated frames. That's why the Twin (non) Paradox exists. The initial 1905 form of SR doesn't include sufficient information when taken in its strictest terms to resolve the question of who actually aged at the slow rate. Now do a twin paradox experiment with 8 set of entangled particle pairs. 8 particles in current time and 8 other entangled particles in the future. And use photon (laser) to do quantum teleportation between them and you got a byte (8 bits) of information communication system that travels through time. Quantum Physics Extraction of timelike entanglement from the quantum vacuum By S. Jay Olson, Timothy C. Ralph http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.2565v1.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts