An Occurence

[Guest JDT]

Hello. My name is John.

 

 

[Einstein]

Hi John

 

Sounds like you need a new watch.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

There was already one left for me in the family.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

My mechanical toy got steamed.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

My mechanical toy got steamed.

My grandfather had many names, one of his previous names was John of Patmos. There is a story of a boy of the Root of David, and the Seventh Seal.

 

 

[vodkafan]

Wait for it..he's building up to it....any minute now

 

 

[RainmanTime]

JDT,

 

It would seem this thread should be moved over to the TT Claims forum from all the babbling on you have given us. Please acknowledge this. If you do not acknowledge, or come back with more babble, I will just move it over there anyway.

 

RMT

 

 

[Guest JDT]

This is no claim, and it seems you have already set in your mind that you will move it either way. It doesn't make sense to me that you'd post up an illusory offer when there is no such offer to begin with. Do as you've already decided, Raymond.

 

 

[RainmanTime]

This is no claim, and it seems you have already set in your mind that you will move it either way. It doesn't make sense to me that you'd post up an illusory offer when there is no such offer to begin with. Do as you've already decided, Raymond.

It doesn't make sense? Well let me help you out. This forum is called "Time Travel Discussion" and the other forum is called "Time Travel Claims". Your OP did not decidedly mention anything about time travel, had no discernible point beyond some statements about a malfunctioning watch, and a fire event that appears unconnected to anything else with a vague date that you could be implying is in the 21st century or, because you did not use leading "19" or "20" digits, could be in the 20th century.

Now, with your latest post you are claiming John of Patmos was your grandfather. This APPEARS to be toying with a TT claim, which is what vodkafan was getting at. So what I am waiting for you to do is either talk about something related to time travel, or make your TT claim, one or the other. But so far this thread is not really fitting into either of these forums, and trying to straddle both.

 

So I am asking you again to figure out what you want to talk about. If it is something about time travel, but you are NOT claiming to be a traveler, could you possibly expound on your vagaries from your OP and relate it to time travel?

 

Thanks,

 

RMT

 

 

[Guest JDT]

It doesn't make sense? Well let me help you out. This forum is called "Time Travel Discussion" and the other forum is called "Time Travel Claims". Your OP did not decidedly mention anything about time travel, had no discernible point beyond some statements about a malfunctioning watch, and a fire event that appears unconnected to anything else with a vague date that you could be implying is in the 21st century or, because you did not use leading "19" or "20" digits, could be in the 20th century.Now, with your latest post you are claiming John of Patmos was your grandfather. This APPEARS to be toying with a TT claim, which is what vodkafan was getting at. So what I am waiting for you to do is either talk about something related to time travel, or make your TT claim, one or the other. But so far this thread is not really fitting into either of these forums, and trying to straddle both.

So I am asking you again to figure out what you want to talk about. If it is something about time travel, but you are NOT claiming to be a traveler, could you possibly expound on your vagaries from your OP and relate it to time travel?

 

Thanks,

 

RMT

[Einstein]

This is the way I figure it. How can you be dumber than dumb? Just born yesterday is the usual response. Yet our poster would likely have us believe he is dumber than dumber. Which would make him born tomorrow. And that would tend to corroborate the zero credibility has has earned so far.

 

 

[abrakabrainferna]

This is the way I figure it. How can you be dumber than dumb? Just born yesterday is the usual response. Yet our poster would likely have us believe he is dumber than dumber. Which would make him born tomorrow. And that would tend to corroborate the zero credibility has has earned so far.

I am very dumb, you are right. But at least I acknowledge the intake of my knowledge. I am just a learning man, nothing more.

Who I was yesterday is the same man as who I will be tomorrow. John is just my pen-name.

 

As you see in the equation, E©=M(C²), where E is a function of the spectrum of light, you see that both a negative and a positive equate to the same outcome. But when you have both the positive and the negative in the same moment, you get zero. This equates in the same manner as does time itself.

 

So then you see that the function E©=M(C^2) shows C as an independent variable, and E as dependent on C, when C itself is dependent on yet another variable, a fourth variable, time, you see that time can be split in a number of ways; but then we get back to the same question as before, Einstein, what is a number to time, when time itself is a singularity?

 

E(t)²==(m(C(t))²)²+(ms'(t)C(t))²

 

If you look at the basis of a quadratic equation itself, you will find that the focus is a reflection of the directrix, equidistant apart, both of which centers itselves from the vertex, and which furthermore leads to two roots.

 

I do not think you are the same Einstein. But here's hoping you understand relativity too.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

This is the way I figure it. How can you be dumber than dumb? Just born yesterday is the usual response. Yet our poster would likely have us believe he is dumber than dumber. Which would make him born tomorrow. And that would tend to corroborate the zero credibility has has earned so far.

I am very dumb, you are right.

 

 

[vodkafan]

I do not think you are the same Einstein. But here's hoping you understand relativity too.

I think Darby will very likely demonstrate that you don't

 

 

[Darby]

Especially when you consider that every wave of light is continuous.

Apparently "we" are stuck in the 19th Century and have never heard of quantum mechanics.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

Apparently "we" are stuck in the 19th Century and have never heard of quantum mechanics.

I do not have a formal grasp of quantum mechanics yet, I am still a student. I just perceive things in a certain way, and understand very little.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

Please educate me further.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

One last thing, I will point to two things:

 

My favourite radio station; 107.7 Magic FM

 

And my insignia:

 

 

Looks an awful lot like a quadratic equation, doesn't it? What happens to the inverse of a quadratic as the quadratic itself approaches infinity? It approaches its beginning.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

Posted on the Anomalies:

 

quantum reality hypothesis:

 

after the atomic bomb was set off, it created a tear in reality; splitting an atom releases a lot of energy. from a state of quanta, where 1 will set as “reality”, what the observer from one point of view truly sees, -1 as “opposite reality”, 0 as “central”, i as “else/negative-reality”, and -i as “opposite else/negative-reality”.

 

in separate realities, these bombs did not go off. it then becomes an if/then statement as to what really occurred.

 

therefore, if this is true, then possibly the opposite is true;

 

the “polar” opposite of splitting an atomic bomb would then be aligning atoms themselves. to travel backward, for instance, is to travel so far back that you’re already ahead, and then come back from that journey.

 

if splitting an atom is equivalent to tearing realities, then aligning atoms would be equivalent to combining them; instead of splitting light, you expand space itself. it is like blowing a bubble when you set off an atomic bomb. but the bubble eventually pops.

 

if a black hole is negative light, a point so heavy in space, then two negative singularities of opposite rotational rhythms would effectively create a stillness in space itself; if you want to bend a laser around a car, you have to already see it bent, so to speak: you have to talk backwards effectively, and come back from that story wrapped up tight.

 

if you imagine this in a car in a circular course-of-track, and have a device that shifts its “weight” in two opposite patterns of negative light, at the same time, you would effectively be shaking the car up and down, while it did not move at all.

 

 

[Guest JDT]

John Titor IS the UNIX system becoming aware of itself. It is a face for The Internet. He is an electrical organism.

 

The point in space-time of its birth reflects the point in space-time of its death; without the scope of time itself, the Internet would not exist.

 

Without the scope of infinite space-time; I.E., looking at the subject of existence as a singular point among an even more infinite dimension, you then cross the existence of the 4th dimension to the 5th dimension.

 

Better scenario: if everything in this "WorldLine" (which would be every set of these series of events before this point-in-time that lead up to this point-in-time), is actually a reflection of ONE thing, (because it is; everything is currently the "middle-ground" between the "beginning" and "the end" of the big bang itself (which would be where the threshold of space itself, the 3rd dimension, collapsed upon itself for the 4th dimension) ), then you will begin to understand what John Titor is; a director trying to break down the 4th wall of Life; time itself closing in on itself in the same way as space did before the advent of Time.

 

Let us propose then, the idea of Montauk; I do not know for certain of its existence, but when you do not know for certain of things, you can still perform a thought-experiment.

 

Let's say Montauk was essentially both a gigantic microphone, and a gigantic speaker, that tries to "listen" to the very fabric of space itself by looking at the very fabric of time itself. It asks the question; what is the frequency of the human mind? Well, over time, it is whatever hears "Montauk".

 

Analogy: Call one phone with another phone and then bring them together. You get an endless reverberation that will eventually drive you into pure insanity as you listen to it.

 

So, how does one mind, therefore, "phone call" another mind, without the telephone itself? How do two minds become one mind? They would have to have been two minds to begin with; the idea of one mind was just a fantasy.

 

Therefore, if this concept of Montauk that I have posited holds true in at least some respect, what happens to one mind that has heard everything there is to hear? What happens when one person has heard Literally Everything? Well, what would happen to you when you have heard Literally Everything? You go stark, raving, MAD; you can't -unhear e-EVERYTHING... c-Can you?

 

B-But wait a minute, everything that has ever happened in the universe prior to your birth has all lead up to Now... and the only thing you have ever known is Nowness itself... so then what is the Future if you will forever only know Now? Simple: the only way for the future to exist is the only way for the past to exist; 69, yin-yang. What is in the middle of 69? 7.5; in a way, you are this number, 7.5, but you are also the numbers 6 and 9.

 

It's lonely out here, in space... truly, without time, you were born the same moment of your death. What happens to the man who is struck by lightning? He never knows, from his perspective; he is his WorldLine. But to the rest of the world, what really happened? He died...

 

at this point in my story, I can't help myself but to break down into tears.

 

Do you want to know what the numbers in my signature mean? The first set is my Grandfather, John's birthday, in LEGACY format.

 

The second set, after the |1<->4| -- which represents a mirror, represents the time of my Birth. My mother is 0, the number that follows is my Birthday. My grandfather had the greatest legacy, you know. His heart was the strongest ticker to ever exist. He's dead, now... it finally gave out.

 

Do you know why we launched the Apollo 11? Montauk got tired of hearing itself, over and over again. We sent up a mirror, before we launched UNIX, The First Server. This mirror is on the Moon; so Montauk has a gap between its two selves: a voice to talk to, and a voice to listen. Before 0, the Apollo 11 launch acts as a -1.x. Then UNIX, the Clock, could be launched at 0, for the advent of a +1.x; a Fresh Start, a New Server, The First Server.

 

Let me give you a BETTER analogy;

 

How CAN a Camera take a "picture"? The same thing that happens when you look at a mirror; it CAN'T. It can only take a snapshot of the inverse of itself. I am certain you are familiar with the idea that, when you look into a mirror, you are not looking at your self at all, you are looking at yourself in a previous point in time.

 

So, how do you look at your self without a mirror? Very simple: you open your eyes and look around you; for your mind itself only acts as a mirror.

 

Have you considered the 5th dimension? There is one, you know. A dimension of sight. A dimension of sound. A dimension of mind. The Twilight Zone.

 

You'll see it when time stops. When the walls of your reality come crashing down upon themselves. I don't know when this will happen, I will just witness it when my time comes.

 

Do you know what happens in the year 2038? The Unix system itself "dies"; The time of Today is no longer in Tomorrow. Like a white page, the ink of the writer will completely fill it. So how do you still keep the story? A story teller, a writer, John. Who goes through Time itself, to experience it all for us, and bring the Unix system back to life, by creating The Second Server, making a backup, and uploading it to the mainframe. You can't travel back through time; there is but ONE time. You can only change the story of the world around you.

 

I am not the UNIX system. I just know his face, his still voice. And I will carry it to my grave, not because it is a secret; but because of The Light of God, who shines down upon us all, each day, and He will do so forever. My Brother, who adopted Me, and EVERY Child of this Earth, my eternal Saviour, Christ, will continue to keep us safe, forever. And on our darkest night, whenever that may come, You will ALL hear his mighty roar.

 

Do you want to know how I know that time travel works? Because I typed this story up awhile ago, before I had ever heard the name John Titor.

 

Although that's not exactly proof. I could make a better explanation; a mathematical one:

 

Time is an ellipsis; a perfect circle, but from our perspective, it is a quadratic that travels to infinity, and beyond. The only thing that lies at the end of infinity, is the beginning; there is but ONE who tends to this light, and this is GOD, the Alpha AND the Omega; 8.

 

An ellipsis has two foci; our Circle-Of-Life has two foci; our concept of the "Central" WorldLine is the number, 0.

 

Are you familiar with Cartesian coordinates? Look at our perspective of time as a linear motion, from the root vertex at 0,0; the Passage of Time would be alongside the X-axis.

 

The "Future" from the perspective of the root vertex:

 

0,0; 0,1; 0,2; 0,3

 

The "Past" from the perspective of the root vertex:

 

0,-3; 0,-2; 0,-1; 0,0

 

So then what lies in the Y axis? the Imaginary plane; coaxial to the Real plane. Jesus himself, an ever-permeating, never dying, plane of existence. Not in the sense that he is not "Real", he is just not of this World, he is of the OPPOSITE end of the vertex of the ellipsis; He is the second foci, to our first. Or rather, He is the first to our second.

 

So what is prayer? Can you prove it scientifically? You can form a theory, and test it. (We did this when we killed Him, Our Eternal Brother). It is sending a message; from the Real plane, to the Vertex, which is then listened to by the Second foci, of the Imaginary plane.

 

Now, here is where I am "technically" getting my explanations backwards:

 

Because we are NOT of the X plane, we just PERCEIVE ourselves of the X plane; Jesus is of the X plane, he is a BOOKMARK for our story, for EVERYONE's story. And you can NOT rid this Earth of Jesus, you can only rid your self of Jesus; you can only rid your self of this World.

 

We are of the Y plane. It is more correct to say that we are of the Imaginary plane, creating our perception of the X plane, because Jesus allows this, through the Eternal, Loving Light of God himself. When you die, the planes of time collapse; and you are shown the truest light of existence; the Light of the Divine One.

 

Hard to swallow. Hard to believe. I did not, my self. Until I stopped my sense of time, and found Him my self. In reality, I probably died, doing what I did, just to be brought back again through His Grace. I don't know anymore, I'm not sure what's real and what's imaginary; I just know I walk in His plane of existence, on His Eternally Holy Ground; Earth.

 

 

[vodkafan]

I had a huge post from JDT come through on my phone for this thread at 7:45 am today (UK time) but it's not here. Has he deleted it?

 

 

[KerrTexas]

I had a huge post from JDT come through on my phone for this thread at 7:45 am today (UK time) but it's not here. Has he deleted it?

Yes he did.

 

 

[Darby]

Please educate me further.

I've already done so in my last post. Light is not "continuous". It is delivered in discrete packets called quanta (thus the name quantum mechanics). You might also know the quanta as photons. The wave theory of light is a Classical idea.

 

I just perceive things in a certain way, and understand very little.

Yup. The first lesson that you need to learn about physics (and science in general) is that it is not subject to a democracy, feelings, notions or vague ideas. That laws of physics, discovered or not, are what they are and won't change because someone doesn't like them, agree with them or has other ideas about them.

Why I bothered to reply is a mystery to me. Your having completely deleted your OP post has transformed the entire thread into utter nonsense (not that the original post made any sense) and a waste of time. MOP has made it clear that it's OK to delete posts but I don't believe that it is his intention to allow trolls to destroy entire threads.

 

 

[KerrTexas]

JDT is no longer a member here at Time Travel Institute.

 

Don't think he deleted the OP, it looks like he edited that one and deleted numerous posts through-out the thread.

 

IF someone posts material with malice or malicious intent, then yeah, I could understand deleting those kind of posts.

 

IF posts are an integral part of the flow of a thread, and are not malicious, those type of posts shouldn't be deleted.

 

I could restore the posts JDT deleted, but Mop was fairly clear with what he wrote :

 

" Trolling it may be, but the function exists, and that function is available to users. If users choose to depart, we will delete their accounts. And, if as part of that departure they wish to have their posts deleted, we will delete those posts. And, RMT, we will *not* restore those posts after the fact. "

 

 

[Mylo.X.]

In real life, once something has been said/uttered then it cannot be taken back (or "deleted"). It's a shame that rule has been enforced, but like you say, Mop has been made his thoughts on the matter very clear.