PaulaJedi Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Die Glocke, or The Nazi bell, was a supposed German experiment that some people believe to be either a weapon or a time travel device. More information is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Glocke (Die Glocke - Wikipedia) Let's discuss it! Do you think it existed? What was its purpose? There are many theories and photos online, so I won't post them all, but feel free to take a look in Google and let's hear some theories. It seems that many believe it looks like this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spectrumisgreen Posted September 15, 2014 Share Posted September 15, 2014 Thank you posting that I like a new time travel conspiracy..... Never heard this one though, just spent an interesting half hour following the links and ended up randomly at the wikipedia link for Klaus Barbie (nothing to do with this just natural link progression - What a Bar-steward he was) Some interesting facts/theories as you say though I won't list them here just let people take there own journey through the link... Its strange that this idea has materialised relatively recently (2000) and an event in the 60's 'can/has been made' to fit it. Edit: my theory would be some form of cold fusion energy plant rather than a time machine..... but who knows what weird side effects could come from attempts at that...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted September 16, 2014 Share Posted September 16, 2014 It obviously has started as a method of flying - a vertical take off machine, that the nazists hoped to help them win the Second World War. It seems, that it was producing very strong electromagnetic fields. Here is an explanation of what the nazists bell was: I don't know however what were the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mylo.X. Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Reminds me very much of the Kecksburg (Spelling?) UFO that was sighted a couple of decades ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 During investigations into local time slip cases I have come across clear evidence of a connection between such events and earth energy, i.e. the earth's natural torsion field. There is also evidence of time slips taking place at standing stones and henges, which makes the alleged time travel properties of the Bell sound very interesting: the Bell used or generated a torsion field, and scenes of the past were allegedly seen in a concrete henge structure above the mine. Witkowski is still convinced that the Bell was a field propulsion device, and I have to admit that the evidence for that is far stronger than the time machine theory -- nevertheless, I think it is worth considering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Yes, it's clear enough that they were designing discoid craft, and Witkowski says he recognises the Bell as a power source in some of these images (I don't speak German so can't identify the parts listed). Interestingly, he has found witness reports of barrell-shaped craft flying in the vicinity of some of the Bell test sites. It is, of course, possible that even if the aim of the project was field propulsion, they may have discovered that the Bell generated time distortions as a side effect. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 you can use google translate to translate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Doesn't seem to work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 But I saved the picture and zoomed in on it -- Part 1, Glocke! Pretty convincing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 i just like the pic of kim kardashian in it... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I wondered who that was. She must be older than we think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 (edited) Who cares who the fascist bitch was? Even if we suggest, that she is 20 years old on the photo, (most probably she is 30) In the best case, if she is alive at all, she will be 2015 - 1940 = 75 + 20 = 95 years old. P.S. The photo is inscribed as 1944 lol + 4 = 99 years old. Edited April 13, 2022 by Cosmo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 P.S. The photo is inscribed as 1944 lol + 4 = 99 years old. You made an error in your math. Try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Ups.... -4 :} = 91 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 still old and wrinkled ... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Ups.... -4 :} = 91 lol Nope. Try again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 ???? It s 2015 now. the photo is taken in 1944 2015 - 1944 = 71 years passed from the moment of taking the photo. The bitch there is between 20 and 30. I take the 20 as the best option in favor of her youth. 20 years at start + 71 passed = 91 !!!! What's the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 The problem with your math is you are saying Kim Kardashian is 91 years old. She wasn't born yet at the time the photo was taken. So the photo is photo-shopped. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Kardashian (Kim Kardashian - Wikipedia) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Grove Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 This is all getting a bit silly -- pity, because it's an interesting topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 It is an interesting topic. But it's just a story. There really isn't much to go on for any verification. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 The problem with your math is you are saying Kim Kardashian is 91 years old. She wasn't born yet at the time the photo was taken. So the photo is photo-shopped.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Kardashian (Kim Kardashian - Wikipedia) Lol @Einstein They simply may look like each-other. There are so many cases of people looking remarkably similar to each - other. Both on photos, and in one and the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Lol @Einstein :)They simply may look like each-other. There are so many cases of people looking remarkably similar to each - other. Both on photos, and in one and the same time. Well I'm pretty sure that most men would love to be seen with Kim Kardashian. Of course you could claim she traveled back in time for the picture. I merely just mentioned the photo-shopped method because I've seen that picture before. And she wasn't in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seivtcho Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I don't know. With the technology today very successful fakes can be done. For this particular photo no one has mentioned Kim Kardashian. I also noticed a small difference in the shape of the ear. They may still be different females. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I don't know. With the technology today very successful fakes can be done. For this particular photo no one has mentioned Kim Kardashian. I also noticed a small difference in the shape of the ear. They may still be different females. Ruthless mentioned it was Kim Kardashian further on up in this thread. That's where I got it from. If you want, send me your picture. I can insert you in the picture instead. And the program I would use to do it is 20 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulaJedi Posted March 1, 2015 Author Share Posted March 1, 2015 Typical men. Show them a photo of a UFO, and their only concern is the woman in the photo. Sorry that's so big. Too lazy to make it smaller. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts