Jump to content

Anyone Want To Know... ???


RainmanTime
 Share

Recommended Posts

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Heh heh,

 

I think i may have fallen off the front end of the wagon. Then got run over by the wagon as i hit the floor.

Where you think you are and where you actually are are two different things. Don't ever think you are somewhere that you don't deserve to be! ;) Now keep steering the wagon, Olly. :D And wa1ex, I hope you keep giving us throttle power! Perhaps you might want to steer for awhile?

It will be a most enjoyable ride, if my instincts are correct. And please... don't spend too much TEEM on driving the wagon such that you don't enjoy the ride! Above all, you've got to enjoy yourself if you are going to Create something positive.

 

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

TEEM - Time, Energy, Effort, Money

 

wa1ex,

 

You've certainly got the right idea with the "X-Y-Z" Coordinate System. This is how system dynamics are measured... for any Physical system. This "X-Y-Z" system represents a 3-dimensional physical metric we call SPACE.

 

Now consider that there is another 3-dimensional metric for system performance that is external to ("outside of") the XYZ coordinate system of SPACE.

 

We might call this higher level, 3-dimensional metric the (Operational, Functional, and Physical) domains of the total system.

 

These system domains directly map to the Aphysical (mental) concepts of Matter, Motion, and Time.

 

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

I think I'd have to say that I'm neutral. This can be seen that I did not reply to this thread right away (not fully active), yet I did reply (not fully passive). I imagine those who take the passive path won't reply at all.

 

Yes....measures of INTENTION...an important concept we should talk about. Does everyone understand how the elements that comprise TEEM represents measures of our INTENTION? For example, if someone selects the ACTIVE method and dedicates ALL of their Time, Energy, Effort, and Money towards achieving their goal, this would be the extreme application of that person's INTENTION to achieve what they seek (in this case "secrets of the pyramids"). So any reasonable person can MEASURE just how much INTENTION they are applying to their quest, at any given point in Time. Yes? Are we in agreement on this?

Some things about this. You know, James (as in the book of James), wrote along these same lines. "Faith without works is dead." You can judge a man's true INTENTION by the fruit of his life.

As far as INTENTION goes, and I've asked this before, there seems to me that there has to be something that precedes the INTENTION. Character?

 

I don't want to get this thread off track so if this discussion doesn't belong here we don't have to pursue it. But, it seems to me that there is a lower level (or higher depending on how you look at it) process that helps shape one's INTENTION. For example, take the hypothetical scenario of a serial killer born again. There was something that motivated him to be who he was that made him a serial killer. But then there was a change. And in the truest sense, his INTENTIONS changed completely. What is that underlying thing? Our soul? Spirit?

 

RMT...you've changed your sig and I can't remember...was there something that preceded INTENTION in your model?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: TEEM - Time, Energy, Effort, Money

 

So far we have Olly and wa1ex fully engaged in our journey on "the wagon". Anyone else out there wanting to help get this wagon moving?

I would like to, RMT, but I don't think I would be of much help since some of these things are hard for me to comprehend. But it seems very interesting indeed!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

I would like to, RMT, but I don't think I would be of much help since some of these things are hard for me to comprehend. But it seems very interesting indeed!

Whats hard for you to comprehend is just as hard for a hundred others that won't make the effort to post, which ever questions you ask - trust me - you'll be asking on the behalf of most of the Passive crowd (and bith the neutral and Active!). I only made light of my and wa1ex's confusion - because really there is nothing to seriously feel or stupid about! your expressed desire that you WANT to be more then passive - already speaks volumes.

 

For example I could also describe it as "The Physical (hardware) and the Functional (software) domains come together, and their combined efforts serve to Create the final result in the Operational domain."

Once again the systems analogy has come to the rescue! Yes i totally get why you are classing them in this manner. These seems very logical to me, and i'm surpirsed i mixed them up by missing this. As its quite simple when you put it like that.

I think i'm starting to get ahead of myself though, as i'm starting to get flshes in my head about the notion (as you hinted to me beofore) of how pyramids are can be used as hidden doorways.

 

In fact while you may not realise, Your description of the Physical being 'Hardware' and the Functional being 'Software' has help me tune my mindset. The equations that you have listed are scientific base for the thoery, in this regard. And as such could not be ignored buy those passives seeking evidence

 

So this leads me on to ask another question - Intention (living in a MUCH higher domain) creates the operation by using the Hardware and the software together in order to write it?

 

If this is the case, then when it comes to time/frequency - if we wanted to get ahead of ourselves -then idealy (when we talk in terms of technology) whe would design a Physical system in the physical domain that can interact with the Funtional Domain. Then we might be able (within this domain) to use the Functional domain and rewrite the software and change the effects of the operational Domain?

 

Pyramid structures may well be a useful/major component in the system that achieves this - as its form is linked to all three domains. In its most simple form, the merkaba is one such configuration, as an example. Octahedron is another.

 

Also on a side note; (and perhaps i'm jumping the gun again - but as i say, its only a side note) if we look at the link between the North to South polarisation of these forms, We can look at two other things the Body and the Planet. Most of us here will already know about the respective 'grids' at play here, There seems to be a corrolation with them and the platonic solids (the physical hardware which generates all terrestrial and non-terrestrial bodies).

 

All of a sudden, the term - self fulfilling prophecy takes on a new meaning ;) . And perhaps this can explain why certain 'fictional' civil war advocates are being quite irresponsible.

 

The pyramidal forms that create us (lets look at the octahedron here as i mentioned it above and is also used when describing DNA) also seems to minic this North/South. The grid energy that they allow us to generate or "attract" (that may be classed as aphysical) are a link between Hardware and the software.

 

In otherwords, We are all pyramids at a fundamental level and are all connected to the Functional domain. Using our own intention to direct the hardware and software and "in part" interact with producing the operational domain.

 

Apolgies about the latter side note - Too try and pull back the stage we are at, Ray - my question is, with regards to time travel. Would we be wanting to tap into the Functional domain using certain harware in the physical domain. In order to generate the correct operational effects?

 

Excuse spelling!

 

Kind regards,

 

Olly

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: TEEM - Time, Energy, Effort, Money

 

Hello Roo,

 

I would like to, RMT, but I don't think I would be of much help since some of these things are hard for me to comprehend. But it seems very interesting indeed!

We are often amazed to find out just how helpful we can be sometimes. As a teacher I often hear students say this same thing... but then you should realize that the question that you ask (if you are having trouble comprehending something) may actually BE that bit of help that someone else needs. In fact, there are times when a student will ask me a question that turns out to HELP ME explain a concept in a different, more understandable manner.So...thanks for chiming in... and don't be afraid of asking questions. You may help more people than you think, in addition to getting an answer! :)

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Hi iridium,

 

Welcome aboard!

 

As far as INTENTION goes, and I've asked this before, there seems to me that there has to be something that precedes the INTENTION. Character?

Is there? Is it possible that you INTEND to assume a certain character in how you act? IMO, INTENTION is where the "closed loop" process of existence stops. The INTENTION to create (something, anything) is what we share with our Creator. We all INTEND to experience events in the Operational domain. We use elements from the Functional domain (processes) on elements from the Physical domain (objects). Once we experience the events we chose to create, this will then result in us deciding upon some NEW INTENTION...another way to express ourselves.
But, it seems to me that there is a lower level (or higher depending on how you look at it) process that helps shape one's INTENTION.

If there is, I have not figured it out. Is it possible that feedback from your environment helps to shape your intentions?
For example, take the hypothetical scenario of a serial killer born again. There was something that motivated him to be who he was that made him a serial killer. But then there was a change. And in the truest sense, his INTENTIONS changed completely.

You would have to ask the serial killer who turned his life around. But often psychologists will tell us that previous events that happen in our lives (especially childhood) will typically help us determine what we intend to do in life. And what events in the serial killer's life caused his change of heart (change of INTENTION)?I dunno, but if you ask me, "the buck stops with INTENTION".

 

What is that underlying thing? Our soul? Spirit?

We will eventually get to the point where we align both soul and spirit with the pyramid and its secrets. But now is not the best time while others are still ruminating on simpler topics. :)
RMT...you've changed your sig and I can't remember...was there something that preceded INTENTION in your model?

The model, going from "bottom" (lowest level) to "top" (highest level) is as follows:Massive SpaceTime - The 3-way mixture of the Physical domain where all things occur. (Matter)

Force/Moment/Momentum - The 3-way mixtures of the Functional domain which influences elements in the Physical domain as well as responds to them. (Motion)

 

Energy - The 3-way mixture of the Operational domain which any whole system (comprised of Physical and Functional elements) requires in order to create events. (Time)

 

Information - The time-independent "currency" which controls all energy expenditures and provides feedback from lower levels that the INTENTION can use to quantify its experience.

 

INTENTION - The top-dog. The One. The I AM (I INTEND). The Will to Create.

 

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Massive SpaceTime - The 3-way mixture of the Physical domain where all things occur.(Matter)

 

Force/Moment/Momentum - The 3-way mixtures of the Functional domain which influences elements in the Physical domain as well as responds to them. (Motion)

 

Energy - The 3-way mixture of the Operational domain which any whole system (comprised of Physical and Functional elements) requires in order to create events. (Time)

 

Information - The time-independent "currency" which controls all energy expenditures and provides feedback from lower levels that the INTENTION can use to quantify its experience.

 

INTENTION - The top-dog. The One. The I AM (I INTEND). The Will to Create.

The definitions certainly help out. I am all ears and lets hope that I understand it enough to even ask a ? back! But, the more definitions, the better! :)

EDIT: RMT, is there a site on all of this that I could read up on to get a better understanding or a book?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

RMT,

 

This is much more interesting than the bogus TT stories that hit this site every other week! It's the exact reason why I (and probably many others) came to this site in the first place. So, thanks for making a topic like this! I look forward to helping the wagon out as much as I can!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a TEEM Player

 

Hi again, Roo:

 

EDIT: RMT, is there a site on all of this that I could read up on to get a better understanding or a book?

Funny you should ask (coincidence?). I am just beginning discussions on the formulation of a book with some friends... some of whom you might "know". ;) Stay tuned... but until then, this is the only place you can read about this (without getting a degree in engineering and studying this stuff for 20 years!)
This is much more interesting than the bogus TT stories that hit this site every other week! It's the exact reason why I (and probably many others) came to this site in the first place. So, thanks for making a topic like this! I look forward to helping the wagon out as much as I can!

Thank YOU for the kind words, Roo. It is, in point of fact, part of my INTENTION to provide a discussion that is much more useful to people than the never-ending stream of (bad) TT hoaxers. OvrLrd has been doing his part too... you might check out his "The Key of Time" thread, as there are some links between what he is presenting and this thread (it may be difficult at times to see the links, but I guarantee they are there!). New/Improved RMT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Looks like Olly is still doing a fine job of steering the wagon! :)

 

I think i'm starting to get ahead of myself though, as i'm starting to get flshes in my head about the notion (as you hinted to me beofore) of how pyramids are can be used as hidden doorways.

Excellent. Those "flashes" of insight are part & parcel of the "payback" for following the ACTIVE method. You, and the others who chose the ACTIVE method should make sure you share these "flashes", either as questions or insights. They are part of the TEEM that will keep us going!
So this leads me on to ask another question - Intention (living in a MUCH higher domain) creates the operation by using the Hardware and the software together in order to write it?

Yes. INTENTION holds sway over all three of these domains. Staying with a subject matter that reflects what I am doing in my regular job, we can provide an example as:1)The USA (through NASA) has stated its INTENTION to replace our Space Shuttle with a new Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV).

2) From that INTENTION, we first begin by developing the Operational timelines, mission phases, and required frequencies that Operations need to be performed at in order to meet the INTENTION. This is called Operational Design (or sometimes Mission Design).

 

3) From the Operational timelines and data generated associated with meeting the INTENTION, we can now "flow" requirements to actual spacecraft design specialists (like me) who will then develop what is called a Functional Architecture. Think of it like a tree-structured organization chart where, at the top are all the PRIMARY FUNCTIONS that the spacecraft must perform. In systems engineering all Functions begin with a verb, as they indicate Motion. So some of the bigger functions our spacecraft will need to perform would be:

 

a) Propel the vehicle (into orbit, to the moon, to the space station, etc.)

 

b) Sustain human life (an important function!)

 

c) Navigate (determine the vehicle's position, attitude, velocity, acceleration, etc.)

 

d) Guide the vehicle along the INTENDED flight path.

 

e) Control the vehicle's State Vector (trajectory, attitude, velocity, acceleration).

 

These are just a handful of examples of functions. The last 3 are my area of design, called the Guidance, Navigation, and Control functions.

 

4) Once we model the functions in a hierarchy, we can then string them together to identify what the INPUTS and OUTPUTS of these functions need to be in order that the function can be performed. Once we model all of these together with the Operational timelines, we have now built a simulation that will help us study different scenarios.

 

5) Studying a great many scenarios by Functional modeling is what allows us to develop requirements for the Physical elements that will make up the system and subsystems.

 

6) Once the physical elements are built to meet our specifications, then we begin to integrate those physical pieces with the physical software written by programmers, and we begin to test each function to make sure it works properly (this is called Functional Integration & Test).

 

7) Once we are satisified that all the individual functions meet their specs, we then are ready for FIRST FLIGHT, which is the very first time that the actual Operational Timeline will be demonstrated.

 

So you see, it is a "round trip". This can also be illustrated with what is called the "System V diagram".

 

If this is the case, then when it comes to time/frequency - if we wanted to get ahead of ourselves -then idealy (when we talk in terms of technology) whe would design a Physical system in the physical domain that can interact with the Funtional Domain. Then we might be able (within this domain) to use the Functional domain and rewrite the software and change the effects of the operational Domain?

Yep. I see where you are taking us, and it is right on target. If we wish to "alter time" (with Time being the primary measure of the Operational domain) then we are going to require BOTH the Physical and the Functional domains to achieve it. So it is both a Hardware AND Software solution. ;)
Pyramid structures may well be a useful/major component in the system that achieves this - as its form is linked to all three domains. In its most simple form, the merkaba is one such configuration, as an example. Octahedron is another.

The wagon is right on schedule! :) Let's stick with the pyramid for now... We have now reached a point where we can align the elements of the pyramid with our Operational-Functional-Physical model. We begin this association by noting:ANY physical system design defintion is comprised of BOTH a Functional and Physical combination of design elements. So the Physical makes use of the Functional elements in combination as a means to achieve the Operational timeline. So now envision that the base of any pyramid (a square) is what defines the intersection of Functional and Physical design domains. Literally, these two design domains form the BASIS from which the Operational timeline can be realized. The Operational domain is then represented by the line that rises from the center of the base of the pyramid (the intersection of Functional + Physical) up to the apex of the pyramid.

The main thing to note here is that any combination of Functional+Physical need not have ONLY ONE Operational timeline. In fact, what the pyramid tells us is that we can use any Functional+Physical design combination to achieve a whole range of potential Operational applications.

 

In otherwords, We are all pyramids at a fundamental level and are all connected to the Functional domain. Using our own intention to direct the hardware and software and "in part" interact with producing the operational domain.

Yes! And in this we have reached a very important understanding of the pyramids! Each of us, as human beings, contains and is comprised of both Physical and Functional designs (we can examine them in future posts) and these designs are capable of achieving a whole bunch of different Operational timelines!This is an IMPORTANT realization that is locked-up in the form of the pyramid.

 

Would we be wanting to tap into the Functional domain using certain harware in the physical domain. In order to generate the correct operational effects?

Yes, and here is where we can tie-into other threads where we have dicussed the Merkaba. The important thing to understand about a "real" Merkaba design is not only that it should physically follow the shape of the interlocking tetrahedrons...that is the physical part... HOWEVER, it is also VERY important what sort of FUNCTIONS that this physical device will perform in order to change the Operational timeline.Gotta run... but as I say, we are moving along quite nicely!

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Hi Ray,

 

Ok, so now I understand how/why the shape of the pyramid links to the 3 domains working in unison as one system...

 

Yes, and here is where we can tie-into other threads where we have dicussed the Merkaba. The important thing to understand about a "real" Merkaba design is not only that it should physically follow the shape of the interlocking tetrahedrons...that is the physical part... HOWEVER, it is also VERY important what sort of FUNCTIONS that this physical device will perform in order to change the Operational timeline.

I am stuck in what to ask next with this, However. Only - how would we use it to intelligently (consciously) interact with the functional domain....I'm assuming that we are still talking about external technology. Now we have a physical pyramid that we can use in this domain, that is a link to the functional domain thus also the operational measure of time - how do we use it in a productive manner in order to manipulate it?

We want to access the software with our physical hardware. And i take it - in order to write/interact with its 'output' the operational effects of time

 

We are soon to be at 3c/d/e - Guidance, Navigation, and Control. But i fear we have skipped a few stages.

 

Before these 3 can be addressed at all, the full system needs to be designed. The Pyramid is all well and good. But a the moment its just sat there looking pretty.

 

First off - now we have established its link - we need to establish how to consciously tap into that link so we might control the interaction and operational results....

 

I think the wagon has stalled at the cross-roads, Ray. And chance of a jump-start?

 

What sort of area would we want to discuss in order to generate ideas in view to intelligently interact with these domains (in order to carry out the original INTENTION), now we have already achieved initial task of proving the link does exist. Or is the wrong sort of question to be asking at this point in the thread?

 

Olly

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Guide the vehicle along the INTENDED flight path

Scenario #1

Three individuals agree on one goal build a pyramid

 

Their intentions are not the Same though

 

They help and contribute until their intentions come into conflict.

 

Scenario#2

 

One Physical Body with one Intention: To run as fast as possible

 

however The Physical body does not allow it to run fast. Example: Out of Shape

 

Would this not alter my original intention?

 

Scenario#1 as it applies to building a pyramid

 

Three individuals agree to build a pyramid but one has the intention to use it

 

to worship a deity, the other to store food and treasures, the third with the intention

 

to use it to keep track of time.....the final design will be diffrent unless all three

 

had the same intention lets say: to worship a deity

 

Scenario#2 as it aplies to building a pyramid

 

Ok all three individals agree to build a pyramid that will reach the sky but

 

manpower and gravity will not let them so they settle for a medium size pyramid....

 

again the original intention was changed....

 

Now my Question: how to make all three individulas to have the same intention to achieve

 

perfection...is this even possible?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Ray, you are correct, the Tetrahedron (Tetra) and the Great Pyramid at Giza are slightly different, but Phi is still found within its innerards and in the placement of the chambers inside it...

 

Actuallly the Giza Pyramid can be viewed as a Tetrahedron in the sense that if you take a model of a see through glass tetrahedron and look through the bottom of it "on its axes", you get a cube which looks like this:

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

The Tetrahedron (Tetra) is the blueprint of creation and the genesis of all form. It is through this structure that energy patterns in the creation process organizes itself. Every natural pattern of growth or movement conforms inevitably to geometric shapes, the 5 platonic structures - the tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron (and in that order)

 

When these shapes are being formed it is also the same principle that goes into creating matter, which turns into form with the combination of atoms forming into molecules and then into cells… The first platonic solid (the Tetrahedron) comes about by the culmination of atoms, molecules into cell form…

 

spacer.png

 

Within these platonic structures the Fibonacci sequence (a numerical series found in the natural world, that has always existed) is generated by adding the previous two numbers in the list together to form the next and so on and so on. (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55...). Divide any number in the Fibonacci sequence by the one before it, for example 55/34, or 21/13, and the answer is always close to 1.61803. This is known as the Golden Ratio/Mean spiral which is reflected though nature in the form of geometry. Geometry is the very basis of our reality, and hence we live in a coherent world governed by unseen laws.

 

These five 3-dimensional forms - The tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron - are the foundation of everything in the physical world. The entire periodic table of elements - literally everything in the physical world - is based on these same five forms - but often without the greater context of the spiritual understanding that I've pointed out in my previous post above... If one is open to the connection they will quickly make the ascertation that this is the 'foundational form' of the first words that were imbedded into Genesis 1:1 by G-d during His creation process… (as I've broken the Hebrew words down in my previous mentioned post). G-d tells us this in a nut shell, and this final proof should give you the true authenticity of its author! What more can we ask of a creator than to share with us how He created?

 

There is more to be seen… In all types of crystals, natural and cultured... The cornea of our eye... The hexagonal geometry of snow flakes, pine cones, flower petals... Diamond crystals... Nautilus shells, Creatures exhibiting logarithmic spiral patterns: e.g. snails and various shell fish... Birds and flying insects, exhibiting clear Golden Mean proportions in bodies & wings... The way in which lightning forms branches... The way in which rivers branch... The geometric molecular and atomic patterns that all solid metals exhibit... The way in which a tree branches and spans out so that all its branches receive sunlight... The molecules of (DNA) - the foundation and guiding mechanism of all living organisms... The star we spin around... The galaxy we spiral within... The air we breathe, and all life forms as we know them emerge out of timeless geometric codes. Viewing and contemplating these codes allow us to gaze directly into the subtle structure of awareness, the inner workings of the universe and the Mind of G-d.

 

We live in the 3rd dimension, or the plane of manifestation. The mathematical unit of increase is an intra-dimensional doorway though which matter emerges into manifest 3-D reality (form) by a process of emanations… By first starting out as a Tetrahedron with 4 sides and than multiplying into a hexahedron and than a octahedron all the way to a dodecahedron, and lastly an icosahedron… When we re-create this moving and always expanding sequence, we have in effect - the exact movement (time) of creation in the expansion process.

 

If there is but one jester of magnificence in all of nature and creation, the Tetra would have to be it! It is remarkable by its very unremarkability and apparentness and logic. What is mysterious is how and why the human eye views the phi proportion as pleasing while it is this same proportion which forms the foundation of the material world that we are capable of seeing. Is our brain just playing tricks on us, or is G-d a jester? Because in reality, the universe is actually nothing but a timeless, formless, directionless mass of jelly that is continually being formed by this function and design…

 

Before I finish, there is something even more magnificent about this basic foundational form! And if one thinks I'm kidding, than maybe I can show you this principle in action… The 'principle' of how manifested form is created by the principles of sound/frequency…

 

spacer.png

 

http://www.harmonyera.com/1.2.research.htm (here are some live movies)…

 

Feeling a bit like Alice… how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go? ;)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Hi CAT,

 

Nicely structured post there. I think that you would have helped A LOT of people out with that, including me!!

 

To add another example quickly; Its also interesting to note that certain people (incl the Native American Indians and Balinese) Also have a saying that - The Turtle carries the world on its back. Usually displayed visually with such a picture as such, of the senario (couldn't find a decent link on a quick google search).

 

Which is quite odd until you notice what the pattern on a turles shell actually is!! Interesting that they already knew all this even in ancient times.

 

So now that this thread has already covered the main theory behind reality engineering and the current 'evidence' of this worlds link to the 'world beyond'. How do we now look at it all with a view to interacting with the outward design (operational domain), instead of just looking at its magnificance and being subject to its effects.

 

CATs post was good timing - as the closing of his post showed (with an excellent example), resonance is behind the form. This must mean that the resonance is information sent down from the software (the FUNCTIONAL domain).

 

Any got any ideas on this, to start the ball rolling?

 

kind regards,

 

Olly

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

wa1ex's is the easiest to answer:

 

Now my Question: how to make all three individulas to have the same intention to achieve

 

perfection...is this even possible?

I think you are approaching it from the wrong direction, wa1ex. It is not about "making" people's intentions match. Rather, the lesson of creation is in establishing your own intention, and then seeking out people with LIKE intention who also wish to express that intention in physical form. Again, using the space exploration example, the president and his administration was simply the force that stated an intention to return to the Moon and send man to Mars. NASA adopted that intention and internalized it amongst themselves. Now us private contractor companies are also adopting the same intention...and we are all working together to manifest that national intention. From here we progress to developing a common Operational vision and design, then to Functional, and finally to Physical. At some point in our future we SHALL manifest this intention when man first sets foot on Mars. New/Improved RMT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Hi Olly,

 

Just a few bumps in the road we are passing over. :)

 

I'm assuming that we are still talking about external technology.

Need it only be external technology? What about the fact that this technology is also INTERNAL to ourselves?I find it amazing (although I shouldn't) that BOTH wa1ex's AND CAT's post also address this issue of internalization of the triplex model (with much applause for CAT's excellent sharings!). Can you see how we are all really "in sync" and heading towards a common direction... even though we might not see it... it is manifesting before our eyes! Witness the POWER OF INTENTION...multipled! And also think about the quote that begins "when two or more are gathered in My name..." ;)

 

What sort of area would we want to discuss in order to generate ideas in view to intelligently interact with these domains (in order to carry out the original INTENTION), now we have already achieved initial task of proving the link does exist. Or is the wrong sort of question to be asking at this point in the thread?

There is no "wrong" in this act of Creation, Olly. :) But what do you say we stick with the internalization aspect of it, for now? Because it should be obvious from these last few posts that it is the INTERNALIZATION of INTENTION that is the first crucial step before anything can be created through the Operational-Functional-Physical process... right?

Let's take a look at the architecture of the human body... a device we all share in common. Can we find a link between the internal architectural elements of the human form and our "secrets of the pyramids" model? I think we can:

 

The human head - The Operational center of processing of the human species. There is no doubt that the primary metric of the brain is TIME. IOW, our head represents an "Operational triangle", with the brain at the apex of this triangle, and it is the brain that formulates the concept of TIME (passage of events, tracked by Matter in Motion). This is also where we form our INTENTION.

 

The human chest - The Functional center of processing of the human species. There is no doubt that the human heart is all about MOTION that keeps the human body alive. We can further expand beyond the heart to see how our internal organs represent the "Engine of Functional Transformation". When we model functions in science, there are three elements to this model which must show up for a complete function: (1) The INPUTS, (2) The Transform PERFORMANCE, and (3) The OUTPUTS. So our heart, lungs, and other internal organs are focused on receiving INPUTS in the form of Energy (air, water, food). These inputs are then TRANSFORMED into another form of Energy (biochemical) that is used by the rest of our body to perform its Functions at the direction of our Operational processing center. And the organs will also TRANSFORM the waste products such that they can be emitted as OUTPUTS (solid/liquid waste, perspiration, heat).

 

The human gonads - The center of our Physical reproduction! Little more needs to be said about this, except to point out that one of the most powerful INTENTIONS that we humans have is to procreate... and to (hopefully) raise our offspring to not only carry-on in our intentions, but to formulate their own intentions and carry out their own creations.

 

Notice how the same model we have discussed as an "external" model for the pyramids is also "embedded" within our own physical structure! Perhaps EMBEDDING of one form within another might be a good direction for us to explore next? There is certainly a lot that systems theory and systems engineering have to say on this topic! :yum:

 

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

Perhaps EMBEDDING of one form within another might be a good direction for us to explore next? There is certainly a lot that systems theory and systems engineering have to say on this topic!

Ray,

You got any clues as to where you are hoping to go here?

 

Are you talking about this system creating new 'bodies', or literally two forms working as one, going up the platonic selection....?

 

I have two different avenues to go - but i think that you are talking about something else.

 

Kind regards,

 

Olly

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

 

(major applause for wa1ex's sharing!)

 

The Above Link is the Findings of the similarity of King's Solomons Temple Architecture and The Human Body. Example The "Holiest of Holiests" place in the temple resembles the Head in the human body (The Mind)

Nice. It looks to me like wa1ex wishes to steer the wagon for awhile!? ;) So, if I may be so bold as to ask you wa1ex, how do you think the concept of our 3-D model, expressed as the internal architecture of the physical human body, might also extend to the architecture of the mind which is embedded within the human body?

New/Improved RMT

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...