Jump to content

A question even Einstein couldn't answer


Crono
 Share

Recommended Posts

RE: A question even Einstein couldn't answer

 

This makes since I will have to see if I can adapt my theory in light of the new eqaution above; I don't think I will for the result should still add up the same. I will double check to make sure so before sending the theory.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RE: A question even Einstein couldn't answer

 

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Before this topic deviates from the grandfather thing entirely, I think I have a solution: here goes...

 

1. The hero time-travels back into the past, and shoots his own grandfather.

 

2. As in the 'many-universes' theory, you create two different parallel time-lines; one where you exist and your grand-father's alive, and another where you don't exist and neither does your grandfather?

 

You can't visit the one where you don't exist, so you can't kill you grandfather! Whaddya think of it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

RE: A question even Einstein couldn't answer

 

The biggest difference that I see between string theory and my own is that if one were to place the theory on a two dimensional graph that the theories would all graphed as interactions accurring in the positive x, y axis in all the dimensions except the ones with negative time components. All the dimensions with positive times would be graphed on the positive side of the x, y axis and all the ones with negative times would be graphed as actions on the negative side of the x, y axis. There is nothing wrong with this it's just one way to interprit the actions accuring. However my graph shows any action with a greater then four dimensions as being graphed on the negative side of the x, y axis for I have concluded that all of these extra dimensions exist at the area beyond the center mass of the four dimensional masses of our universe. I have further discovered by thermal dynamics that not all of these dimensions have to be negative they can exist as positive like with negative electons positive protons and a postive time. I have further concluded that any mass that is zero temperature in this dimension that is compressed to that a zero will become a positive temperature and positive mass in the other dimension. Further more I am lead to believe that at least one of the factors that determines whether a particle or energy is positive or negative is its temperature. Of course this is already known in physics I think. I mean that if you could cool a mass to a negative temperature that the mass may become negative. Of course it is like trying to accelerate a mass to the speed of light one can never quite reach zero kelvin. Although I believe that one can by giving a field a negative compression relative to the density of space time. By making a field less dence then the spacetime continuum one causes that field to have a temperature less then kelvin since one generates negative friction that acts as anti-thermal photons which are thermal photons that mediate temperatures less then kelvin in the form of anti photons or photons?. Anybody no if this is plausible. If not then please correct me. I have yet to recieve a critique that has not enlightened me.

 

sincerely,

 

Edwin G. Schasteen

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: A question even Einstein couldn't answer

 

I don't think there is a paradox in any of these situations. Although time is not absolute, our lives are. We are born, we live, then we die. Even with timetravel backwards, this order we experience will never change. Killing our grandpa would be AFTER our birth even in the past because we carry our own time reference frames within us. If one realizes that you must CREATE matter to time travel backwards, then you realize that the matter that now makes up your time travelling self is independent of the actions or events of the reference frame you now visit. :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: A question even Einstein couldn't answer

 

I totally agree with victor,

 

Since traveling back in time will accur by warping space and time until time which continues to travel forward intersects with a time in its past to merge into that time would be to recreate a series of events. What defines the present is a fifth dimensional line which marks the barrier whether imaginary, mathematically absolute, or a physical force or mechanism. When on travels back by warping space and time one creates a loop and the fifth dimensional line travels back and the past events and present events add up to what accurs in our future. The sum of events in our past plus the event in our future add up to a number. If we goe back the sum of events in our new present plus the sum of the events in the future add up to the same ultimate outcome. If one takes any finite quantity and add a number of events to complete all the possible outcomes on that finite all those events will add up to the same outcome which is a wave oscillation that has the same resonance,energy and phase of the finite object which is the medium through which the wave propogates. Also it will have the same shape as that object. In this case is the universe in the past and present. All the events that accurr in this medium will form an wave with the density of the universe.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...