TimeNot_0 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 I just really think for some of you people that it would be better to read a book about it, and imagine it fully while reading the book - say like on the thinking behind where the reasoning comes from - say like with General Relativity. I myself am reading "Relativity" by Albert Einstein. If you were riding on a wave of light (since light is the fastest thing in this Universe) then at the same time, time has not slowed down one bit even then, anything approaching ( which also would be another wave of light) still will be moving at the speed of light. This means that "you" will appear to be standing still (while moving at the speed of light) - RELATIVE - to the other wave of light. This is "Relativity" and reading a book about it is the thought that happens when people like Albert Einstein came up (or did come up) with his famous formula. It involves philosophy, phychology, and many other subject all brought together to think what Space and Time are all about. If not a book, then I sure there are websites where one can read about these subjects. ( Not radical websites - but real websites discussing the real thought behind the never-ending theories.) This is why "Humans are somewhat always Doomed and may well be Doomed till the end of Time!" It is an inherent property of existence. Otherwise, time would not exist anymore, since time would become meaningless to someone who is always alive and living. (But that is highly unlikely far into the future. All the enemies, all the heartaches, all the drama, all the friends, all the opposite and agreeable possible theories. It becomes "infinite" then. And no one physically in this Universe, can end "Entrophy" or the gradual running down that occurs. :yum: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmpet Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 The vast majority of scientific ideas are (a) wrong and (b) useless. 99.8 percent of ideas put forth by scientists are wrong and will never be included in the body of scientific fact, and what of that 0.2 percent of ideas that turn out to be correct? The great majority of them are relatively useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 i dont mean to sound rude or talk about myself good, but ive read alot of letters that einstein wrote to proffesors and friends, and i always admired him for his way of thinking, and his open-mindedness. i always thought that i think like him. i never really read his scientific papers, only his ideas in plain english. i plan on going back to school one day and learning it all, then i will read his scientific stuff, because i cant even understand it right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 time=ec why is that stuck in my head? im not saying its right, i just cant figure out why i think about it so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmpet Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Einstein was an Aspie and many of his characteristics are textbook Aspie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
satown Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 Think of light as an energy current of time, nothing has really been written about it so in some cases you are right but also wrong. The best way to understand it go to a pool of water and move it around, that is how energy travels and light is a certain type of energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paladius Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 to shed light on the original post.... the speed of light varies based on your reference point in time/space. One poster stated that time never stops. That is incorrect. Time is whole, an entity. True, we move through it, but it also can stop from your reference point. Otherwise time travel to the past would be non-plausible, since in order for a forward moving entity to reverse, it must first slowdown and eventully stop before going backwards. Time is cyclicle. There is no beginning and no end. It is not a line, but a singularity point from a distance, and spherical shape in 3D (instantaneous point in time) and a vector line in the 4th dimension. That is the typical understanding of time. Time can be broken down into parts (or frequencies). An analogy would be how sunlight when passed through a rain cloud sheds off specific scpectrum frequencies by passing through different amounts of medium. Red and IR is always at the top of rainbow, violet and UV at the bottom (passed through more medium). A prism will divide light the same way (red passed through tip of glass, blue through middle of glass). When time is broken down, the associated energies are 4th dimensional and not easily measureable with scientific instruments. The best way to measure these is often the human brain. The perception of time has the abilty to interact with time. Time with gravity. Gravity w/ magnetics, magnetics with electrical, electrical with heat (enthalpy), heat with light, light with mass, and mass with perception. Again, cyclical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angleochoas Posted February 11, 2009 Share Posted February 11, 2009 *** DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR *** I know what that was...We have to be careful what we project with negativity... It tends to hit 'light' like a mirror. Metaphorically speaking of course No ill will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts