Freud Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Did he finally get on the meds he so desperately needed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Mop banned him for persistent nonsensical and off-topic posting. Ever since then RMT has been running amok. Creedo was the only one that could keep him in check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freud Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 OMG that's [censored] hiLARious! I was pushing for that for years! How about chronohistorian? Whatever happened to that fleshbag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricCarr1 Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 Creedo must of went back to the planet he was from or just simply got admitted to the asylum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 Mop banned him for persistent nonsensical and off-topic posting. Ever since then RMT has been running amok. Creedo was the only one that could keep him in check. Yep. Who knows, maybe he will sneak back in someday under another name. If we see someone giving RMT heck we will know who to suspect.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I went back and read some of his post. Some of it was hard for me to understand but he seemed to know what he was talking about. He did not let the Rainman bother him any. It seems he was well liked. Even the Cigman wrote words about him. Creedo I did not know you but farwell man. Speaking of creedo has anyone seen Ruthless lately. I think he was RMT's latest victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 Well I wrote Ruthless at his personal email address since no one is going to answer my question here about what happened to him. Hopfully he will reply and hopfully he did not get banned too. We will see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 Stop the smear campaign, reactor. Do you see ruthless on the "ban list"? "Latest victim"? Really! And you are the one who claimed to not get emotional? I'd say that is a pretty emotional response. Do you practice your science the same way? (Lack of evidence allows you to suggest a conclusion). RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 Well I read some of your post. I skiped the emotional stuff. No, I will look at the ban list. Im still learning. Thanks, Reactor out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 Well if he was talking about the ban list here. Ban List It is out of date because TimeLord was banned by RMT here. He was using 4 letter words and not being very nice so I can say I see why he banned him. Where RMT banned TimeLord And his name is the reason I bring this up because no where is TimeLords name on the list. That is if I am looking in the right place for the banned list. So, if this is correct it leads me to believe he banned Ruthless when he felt Ruthless threatened him. Which I would say is not true he was just trying to show how he thought RMT was treating him. Just trying to check the facts. And since the banned list was brought up here then here is where I posted. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 And his name is the reason I bring this up because no where is TimeLords name on the list. That is if I am looking in the right place for the banned list. So, if this is correct it leads me to believe he banned Ruthless when he felt Ruthless threatened him. Again: You are using lack of evidence to come to a conclusion. That is not a good scientific approach. This is another good lesson for why this is the case.TimeLord's name is not on the ban list because he was NOT permanently banned. I banned him temporarily until Raul had the chance to make the decision about cursing. When Raul made his decision TimeLord was unbanned, hence why his name never appeared on the list. Here is the evidence from Raul that his decision was made on this issue: http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=57278&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Mop&Match=Username&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=28487&Search=true#Post57278 So again I caution you that using a lack of evidence to come to a conclusion can lead to a wrong conclusion. Ruthless has not been banned, as he has done nothing to warrant it. Just because we had a tiff does not mean I abuse my Admin power. Can we drop this now, or will you continue? RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanigo2 Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 But then again by Rauls own admission... and I quote.. MopAdministrator member Reged: 09/15/99 Posts: 183 Re: Offensive Behavior on the Forums [re: Mop] 08/26/08 11:09 PM (98.232.208.101) Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply I've thought about it and decided that profanity will be permitted on these forums. But prolific posting of profanity will be considered abusive and will result in banning. Raul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not quite sure how all this fits together in the time frame of timelords ban--but non the less I thought It was allowed/ except in the case of excessive use. If I stepped up into "grabbing the dog by the ears" here...I am open to rebuttal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 Kanigo, I am not quite sure how all this fits together in the time frame of timelords ban--but non the less I thought It was allowed/ except in the case of excessive use. If I stepped up into "grabbing the dog by the ears" here...I am open to rebuttal. Go and research the temporal sequence of events. You will find they occurred in this order:1) TimeLord uses the f-bomb. 2) He is warned. Twice. 3) He is banned. No list entry because I needed to report it to Raul for his decision. 4) Raul decides and posts his decision in the referenced post. He informed me that he unbanned TimeLord. Hence, no need to add him to the list. Now some nutjob could claim that the "timeline was modified", but the evidence here shows this is how it went down. Anyone is free to inquire with Raul if they do not trust me. RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 So again I caution you that using a lack of evidence to come to a conclusion can lead to a wrong conclusion. Ruthless has not been banned, as he has done nothing to warrant it. Just because we had a tiff does not mean I abuse my Admin power. This was all I was asking. I just wanted to know. On the continue part as you were asking that is exactly why I could make a list of people leaving because of conversations continuing into no mans land between you and them. But no, I was just asking about Ruthless. Thanks for answering it for me. On DarkLord I understand and I read the post. I just did not see his name on the list. Even if someone is banned temp I believe there name should be on the list until they are no longer banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanigo2 Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 I figured as much RMT... All I knew was that Raul has posted that--- some of these things I just don't get into when the nonsense start running wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recall15 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 quid custode ipso custodes??? 1) TimeLord uses the f-bomb. 2) He is warned. Twice. 3) He is banned. No list entry because I needed to report it to Raul for his decision. 4) Raul decides and posts his decision in the referenced post. He informed me that he unbanned TimeLord. Hence, no need to add him to the list. Hey RayForget to say that he put a link to your website tree of life... no link to avoid ban! LOLLOL!!! quoted: Einstein enthusiast Reged: 12/01/03 Posts: 379 Loc: Novato, California Re: Final Warning from 2026 For All Humanity! URGE new [re: PamelaM217] 08/17/08 08:43 PM (71.116.74.147) Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Pamela I found this link on Rainman. -edit linko- end quoted... So that History Judge... Quoted: RainmanTime Carpal Tunnel Reged: 12/23/03 Posts: 4475 Loc: LAX, CA, USA Re: Final Warning from 2026 For All Humanity! URGE new [re: Einstein] 08/17/08 09:35 PM (71.108.51.43) Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply I will leave this thread unlocked long enough for the following (if the users should wish to take such actions): 1) If Einstein wishes to rethink his decision to link my personal page in the open forum, he will be permitted to make such an edit. This is out of courtesy. I could, of course, delete it myself. But that would only bring more accusations against me. 2) If Pamela wishes to answer my direct question, which could ensure her comment is not misconstrued, then she can do so. She can also remove the statement which I can infer to be a threat to me, if she so chooses. If these changes are not made, then I reserve the right to lock this thread after conferring with Raul. RMT "The Future is Unwritten." Joe Strummer 1952-2002. RIP. The question here is: 'quid custode ipso custodes' [/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Re: quid custode ipso custodes??? recall, Hey Ray Forget to say that he put a link to your website tree of life... no link to avoid ban! LOLLOL!!! quoted: Ummmmm.....huh? :confused:Could you please try to write a sentence or two I can understand. I know English is not your native language, but surely you can do better than this. Like you could start by explaining why you are referring to a post by Einstein, when my comments were about TimeLord. I don't understand what you are saying. Please, and thanks. RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 From time to time someone does use foul language here and nothing is said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My_Time Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 All, Why is this thread in 'Time travel claims'? Seems like you all need an historical disagreements forum! :yum: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Re: quid custode ipso custodes??? RMT: Later after thinking about what you said you did not ban anyone that does not mean that mop did not ban anyone. So, it occurred to me that the people we did discussed could of been banned. And, I still don,t think that list you referred me to is up to date. Not heard from Ruthless yet. It may very well be his Internet got shut off and I am giving RMT heck for nothing. Who knows. You asked if I wanted to continue it is like this for me. If I have something to post I post. If I don,t then I wont post. For me there is nothing to continue or nothing to stop. My observation about people talking to you and then disappearing still stands. It is the reason I joined this thread. I was agreeing to you running amok. I was not trying to personally attack you or smear you I am stating the facts. No one checks you at the door. No one pulls you back. I tried to stop it when you and Ruthless had your tiff but I saw that you don,t heed the group. If you take anything away from what I said at all then it would be this. Listen to others and heed their advice from time to time if it is a group opinion. If you are not there as moderator then you should act in line with the group. It it is a group opinion then I think you need to listen to it. I do how ever get pulled back by others in the group when I get out of line but you run un-checked. Not even Darby says anything to you but he will say something to someone else very quickly. Yes, I dragged him into this. Sorry Darby. I might be in for it now. That is ok. I am use to Darby giving me a piece of his mind. That is my view here backing up what was said to you running amok. Anyway I don,t have too much else to say. In reply do I wish to continue anything else I do say on this subject would be repeating myself from what I said here and in other threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reactor1967 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 All, Why is this thread in 'Time travel claims'? I don,t know. It should really be moved to off topic. I don't know why it is here. It was so everyone one jumped in. But no it is in the wrong place. Off topic is where this belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanigo2 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 I think Recall is just poking ya in the eye with a stick RMT. It is kinda a' bash Ray thread...----all in fun though. Has turned into a historical rant/Off Topic post ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Re: quid custode ipso custodes??? reactor, You asked if I wanted to continue it is like this for me. If I have something to post I post. If I don,t then I wont post. For me there is nothing to continue or nothing to stop. My observation about people talking to you and then disappearing still stands. It is the reason I joined this thread. I was agreeing to you running amok. I was not trying to personally attack you or smear you I am stating the facts. No one checks you at the door. No one pulls you back. I tried to stop it when you and Ruthless had your tiff but I saw that you don,t heed the group. If you take anything away from what I said at all then it would be this. Listen to others and heed their advice from time to time if it is a group opinion. If you are not there as moderator then you should act in line with the group. It it is a group opinion then I think you need to listen to it. I do how ever get pulled back by others in the group when I get out of line but you run un-checked. Not even Darby says anything to you but he will say something to someone else very quickly. Yes, I dragged him into this. Sorry Darby. I might be in for it now. That is ok. I am use to Darby giving me a piece of his mind. That is my view here backing up what was said to you running amok. How about trying this: Endeavor to separate in your mind my actions as a Mod from my actions as a regular contributor to this forum. I can appreciate that you may not like my personal style. That can be said of many people, both here and IRL. But in this thread you have questioned and insinuated about my actions as a Mod, suggesting that I may ban people just because I argue with them. I have given you all the evidence you need to show such an implication is warrantless. Moreover, I feel my actions as Mod have been quite above-board. Please show me one case where I abused my Mod powers. And if you have a problem, you can always go to Raul. As far as I know, Raul has never told me I have overstepped my bounds.As to my personal style and the allegation of "running amok". First, it is separate and distinct from my actions as Mod (agreed?). Second, many may not understand my style. I can assure you that those who know me IRL that are on this board understand my style, and fully realize where my passion comes from. Other may disagree with my style, and that is certainly their right. There are things I disagree with about your style, I have pointed them out to you, you noted them, and you continue to do them because they are part of your style. See how it goes both ways? I appreciate the feedback, but that does not mean I have to change and/or compromise my own principals just because someone may not agree with them or like them. IRL, I am a teacher and mentor of engineering. And one aspect of my real life that carries over here is my tendency to strongly challenge how and upon what evidence people come to conclusions. In my business, to NOT challenge such processes can lead to people dying in a firey ball of flame which creates a smoking hole. Around here, the plethora of outright hoaxers and cornspiracy theorists who try to get other people to believe things based on very flimsy evidence can be a danger to others who might not know better. If I choose to challenge them, even in my own, personal "edgy" way, then that is my prerogative. You are more than willing to point out anywhere that I may violate TTI Terms Of Service, but I doubt you will find any/many. I will ask Raul to move this to Off Topic. RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainmanTime Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 I think Recall is just poking ya in the eye with a stick RMT. It is kinda a' bash Ray thread...----all in fun though. I hear ya. And I don't really mind all that much, because I can give as good as I get. ;)RMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recall15 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Re: quid custode ipso custodes??? Then you "temper with" the Thread.... so Eistein said: -Beg more in answer to the remove of the link... then you banned in order to wait for MOP! to decide the situation... Again: quid custode ipso custodes??? Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt?????????? Restore the Thread... Non curo. Si metrum non habet, non est poema. :devil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanigo2 Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Re: quid custode ipso custodes??? I do believe the link is still there from Einstein recall. I went back and looked... I didn't click the link though. But we were all there when it happened.. Even I didn't like it. I thought it was uncalled for, But here would be the right thread if Einstein wants to come back and make a new point..LOL :devil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts