How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at home.

[reactor1967]

Here is a youtube post of a 15 year old boy who built a nuclear reactor at home in his garage. Though I can,t prove it I am pretty sure he visited my web sight. All you have to do is google homemade nuclear reactor to find my sight. Here is the video he produced of his reactor. I would of loved to of seen more details but he showed enough. This proves my point to Darby that most equipment to do this can be found. This is the more harmless type of reactors. It becomes more dangerous as more power is fed to the unit.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSg2neElOTw

 

Here is another one.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-0Jf-zuG4s&feature=related

 

and another one.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iSDnANGAFs&feature=related

 

Basicly with a fusion reactor you rip off the electrons and accelerate the ions toward the center into each other creating fusion. This is done with two electrods negative and positive seperated from each other. There are other methods for creating fusion with a plasma.

 

Here is another fusion reactor suppose to improve on the above design.

 

Need an electron gun. Here you go.

 

Here is a vidoe showing more how a polywell fusor works.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmp1cg3-WDY

 

How to build a homemade breader reactor.

 

 

[Darby]

Though I can,t prove it I am pretty sure he visited my web sight.

Or he knows what a neutron generator is and he built a small one. Vacuum, high voltage, hydrogen or deuterium/tritium (you can get tritium from a green glow "EXIT" sign at the hardware store). He didn't have to look at your site to get any information about H-H or D-T neutron generators.Neutron generators are common items. There isn't any secret here. They've been built since the late 1940's.

 

 

[reactor1967]

Or he knows what a neutron generator is and he built a small one. Vacuum, high voltage, hydrogen or deuterium/tritium (you can get tritium from a green glow "EXIT" sign at the hardware store). He didn't have to look at your site to get any information about H-H or D-T neutron generators.

Neutron generators are common items. There isn't any secret here. They've been built since the late 1940's.

No he didn,t have to but still Im sure he did. And a lot of this stuff is not secret. During the early days though I had a hard time finding information and still do sometimes. Sometimes I find places where nuclear information has been blocked out intentionally because of people like me wanting it and will if giving the change make it public. Ive seen elements on the perodic tables of various places being edited so people can,t get too much info. I use to look at my visting logs every day but now I rarely do so. I,ve been up and running for 9 years now.

[reactor1967]

How a hydrogen bomb works.

 

Here is the hydrogen bomb concept but you have to create fusion to make it work. Would not a fusion reactor work for this? Hmmmmm..... Don,t try this at home boys and girls. Besides you would have to enrich some Uranium or something.

 

Need to make some homemade radiation to go with that homemade nuclear reactor. Here you go.

 

Making X-Rays at the house.

 

 

[reactor1967]

Need a fuel cycle. Here is one I like.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium_fuel_cycle

 

The thorium fuel cycle is a nuclear fuel cycle that uses the naturally abundant isotope of thorium, 232Th, as fertile material, and the artificial uranium isotope, 233U, as fissile fuel for a nuclear reactor. However, unlike natural uranium, natural thorium contains only trace amounts of fissile material (such as 231Th) that are insufficient to initiate a nuclear chain reaction. Thus, some fissile material must be mixed with natural thorium in order to initiate the fuel cycle. In a thorium-fueled reactor, 232Th will absorb slow neutrons to produce 233U, which is similar to the process in uranium-fueled reactors whereby fertile 238U absorbs neutrons to form fissile 239Pu. Depending on the design of the reactor and fuel cycle, the 233U generated is either utilized in situ or chemically separated from the used nuclear fuel and used in new nuclear fuel.

A thorium fuel cycle offers several potential advantages over a uranium fuel cycle, including greater resource abundance, superior physical and nuclear properties of fuel, enhanced proliferation resistance, and reduced plutonium and actinide production.

 

Concerns about the limits of worldwide uranium resources motivated initial interest in the thorium fuel cycle[1]. It was envisioned that as uranium reserves were depleted, thorium would supplement uranium as a fertile material. However, for most countries uranium was relatively abundant, and research in thorium fuel cycles waned. A notable exception is the Republic of India which is developing a three stage thorium fuel cycle. Recently there has been renewed interest in thorium-based fuels for improving proliferation resistance and waste characteristics of used nuclear fuel[2]

 

Thorium fuels have been used in several power and research reactors. One of the earliest efforts to use a thorium fuel cycle took place at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s. An experimental Molten Salt Reactor technology to study the feasibility of such an approach, using thorium(IV) fluoride salt kept hot enough to be liquid, thus eliminating the need for fabricating fuel elements. This effort culminated in the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment that used 232Th as the fertile material and 233U as the fissile fuel. Due to a lack of funding, the MSR program was discontinued in 1976.

[reactor1967]

More information about a polywell fusor.

 

More information about a polywell fusor.

 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=polywell+fusion&search_type=&aq=0&oq=polywell+fu

 

 

[Darby]

Ive seen elements on the perodic tables of various places being edited so people can,t get too much info.

What? Yikes...The Periodic Table is the Periodic Table. There actually is a system in place for the table. If you have a modicum of an education in physics you can fill in blanks with the exception of the few elements, mostly superheavy elements. A good high school student could do it.

 

There's no secret about the table.

 

 

[reactor1967]

What? Yikes...

The Periodic Table is the Periodic Table. There actually is a system in place for the table. If you have a modicum of an education in physics you can fill in blanks with the exception of the few elements, mostly superheavy elements. A good high school student could do it.

 

There's no secret about the table.

No there shouldn't be any secrets. I would have to go back and try to remember which elements I was looking for and the sites that had those blocked. But I do remember coming across elements where information about them was limited. There is a way to generate the chart like you said but when you want to go deeper into the uses for those elements and how to use them some elements depending on the websight you are on will not give you very much information and will tell you that information is restricted.----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Making x-rays is also something that people do for fun because they like taking pictures. So, my post about x-rays is nothing special. Problem is when people with the wrong intentions try to put all this stuff together into some kind of weapon of mass destruction. Though we have not seen a nuclear attack on the USA yet experts say it is still possible.

 

 

[reactor1967]

Focus fusion reactor

 

Using a plasma-fusion reactor to generate electricty.

 

More about it here. This is from my websight. I did not want to repost all of it here.

 

http://reactor1967.fortunecity.com/focusfusion.html

 

A place to learn more about it. It is where I started from.

 

http://focusfusion.org/

 

 

[reactor1967]

Here is a youtube post of a 15 year old boy who built a nuclear reactor at home in his garage. Though I can,t prove it I am pretty sure he visited my web sight. All you have to do is google homemade nuclear reactor to find my sight. Here is the video he produced of his reactor. I would of loved to of seen more details but he showed enough. This proves my point to Darby that most equipment to do this can be found. This is the more harmless type of reactors. It becomes more dangerous as more power is fed to the unit.

Maybe there is hope for the The Sword of Allah to find its way to the people of Islam.

[Angleochoas]

There's some things better left to regulations than anything even attempted, no matter how ridiculous or plausible.

 

It's one thing to hack at computer components for self-eductation - it's another thing altogether to even think to play with something potentially health infringing, IE. radiation etc.

 

I quite doubt the home application of something so obscure, but even if possible - would be stupider than playing with mercury or lead.

 

 

[reactor1967]

There's some things better left to regulations than anything even attempted, no matter how ridiculous or plausible.

It's one thing to hack at computer components for self-eductation - it's another thing altogether to even think to play with something potentially health infringing, IE. radiation etc.

 

I quite doubt the home application of something so obscure, but even if possible - would be stupider than playing with mercury or lead.

It is my belief that anything is possible. The people of Islam have the wise to lead them and they would not be "stupider". The would use it wisely for self defense and to strike down their enemies.

[KerrTexas]

It is my belief that anything is possible. The people of Islam have the wise to lead them and they would not be "stupider". The would use it wisely for self defense and to strike down their enemies.

Would "you" ?

[TimeLord]

It is my belief that anything is possible. The people of Islam have the wise to lead them and they would not be "stupider". The would use it wisely for self defense and to strike down their enemies.

What's this? Jihadist on the forum?

[Angleochoas]

In all fairness, I think we should be referring to people in a theological context in this regard as 'radicals', we do get along just fine with some countries such as Jordan, Egypt, Dubai, etc.

 

No need in mass stereotyping

 

As for the 'wise men' to lead them quote, I don't think anything malicious like that is 'wise'.

 

If he's speaking in terms of Iran, I'm not educated enough to really make a confident informed opinion, but there's lots of variable there. I do know enough that we don't need a nuclear armed Iran however. If two countries are sanctioned enough, and they break the rules all the time according to such, what's to stop them from trading between themselves?

 

With Russia playing old cold war games, would they ever act as a 'cloak' to facilitate this?

 

'Like I said, very complex stuff and I for one will let the real intelligence handle that.

 

No cheer-leader pom-poms for Iran here, that's pretty ridiculous on an extreme scale.

 

 

[reactor1967]

What's this? Jihadist on the forum?

Calling names now. This is why Islam must have the same weapons as everyone else. With out them Islam is disrespected even in its own house and on its own land. If a armed man broke into your house and disrespected you then you would want to be armed to fight the man and his disrespect. Why would any other weapon be different or any other person even of a different culture not be entitled to the same rights as you and your country? If one country has nuclear weapons then all countries should have nuclear weapons. It can not be any other way.

[Angleochoas]

As noted above, Islam is doing just fine in let's say Dubai.

 

If a country is not a superpower, and does not invent their own technology or ideas, how does that give any inherent right or entitlement?

 

Seems a bit hypocritical to say that a person does not have a right to freedom (democracy) - but yet the suppressors of this 'freedom' have a right to 'freedom of information'? (meaning technological advances not originated on their own).

 

A bit ludicrous.

 

Are you actually advocating giving 'free tours' of our best advances to radicals?

 

How can that possibly make sense? If not only for desperation of a ridiculous conversation.

 

Regardless of politics, to logically look at something like Iraq, one can understand why Israel took out their Nuke facilities when Saddam exhibited actions of not only procuring technology, but testing, and using it in condemned ways on humans. There's alot more variable certainly, without a doubt - but in retrospect that to me, shows an outcome that in hindsight proved positive from a purely subjective view.

 

(Analyzation and effective action for greater good).

 

It's such an oxymoronic conversation anyway. The whole premise of these 'jihadists' is supposedly spiritual - if that's the case, what historical religious figure ever needed nukes in a war?

 

I have equal regard for all religions in the world as they pertain to the individual and their families as long as it provides firm moral grounding and not something reminiscent of 'killer cool-aid archetypes.

 

Alot of parallels can be drawn between the mentalities of the average radical jihadist and the Jonestown Massacre, at least imo.

 

 

[RainmanTime]

Calling names now.

You seem to interpret "Jihadist" as being called a name. Yet there are plenty of people of Islamic beliefs who accept it as a title, and proudly. You can't have it both ways (as much as I know you want to).

 

This is why Islam must have the same weapons as everyone else.

Religion and politics is a very bad mix. Most of the rest of the world (and even some parts of the Islamic world) knows this very well from history (and no, not just Islamic history).

 

With out them Islam is disrespected even in its own house and on its own land.

Respect is earned by how you relate to all your fellow men. Not only those who you share beliefs with. When people start demanding respect, or claiming they deserve respect, that usually indicates fanaticism. Again, respect is earned. You don't get it for free.

 

If a armed man broke into your house and disrespected you then you would want to be armed to fight the man and his disrespect

Bad analogy. In some countries it is even illegal to own arms. In the USA, people who commit and are convicted of felonies are not permitted to own arms. You seem to wish your analogy to be a universal given, but it is anything but.

 

Why would any other weapon be different or any other person even of a different culture not be entitled to the same rights as you and your country?

Simple:1) Weapons of Mass Destruction are different from personal weapons. Very different. And the entire civilized world realizes this. Why doesn't Iran? (We know why)

 

2) Some people are not entitled to weapons (ones who have demonstrated violence towards innocents) are not permitted to own or possess arms. The same should be true for rogue nations who show no willingness to abide by majority agreements.

 

If one country has nuclear weapons then all countries should have nuclear weapons. It can not be any other way.

Very poor argument. That is equivalent to saying "if one person can own a gun then all people should own guns." Clearly there are people who do not demonstrate the self-restraint to only use guns in self-defense. I do not think that allowing mass-murderers to own guns is a good, or even a valid, idea.RMT

 

 

[KerrTexas]

Calling names now.

"""What's this? Jihadist on the forum?

 

"""

 

I didn't notice that there was any name calling. There were a couple of question's, not any statement's of fact.

 

 

[reactor1967]

 

 

You said respect has to be earned. It will be a long time before the USA earns the respect of other countries because of its shameful behavior.

 

 

[KerrTexas]

What happened, Buckey, did you get banned from the AOL Chat Rooms ?

 

 

[Rainman2]

What happened, Buckey, did you get banned from the AOL Chat Rooms ?

"That is not to say that it proves Zeshua is a time-traveler or time-communicator or whatever, but it at least demonstrates that Zeshua is in possession of some sort of "supernatural" foreknowledge. " Peter Novak

Well as for AOL I just logged in there and had no problem at all so you are wrong about AOL. As for any other forum getting banned is only online death it is not mortal death. Truth is I can still access any forum any time I want banned or not. Good shot but no potato. Your such a wanna be it will be a long time before you are ever your own person. Try to be yourself and stop trying to act like other people. It does not look good on you. I guess I am the one to talk considering my user name is now very much like someone else here. But, I am not impersonating. There is a difference.

[GOD]

Well as for AOL I just logged in there and had no problem at all so you are wrong about AOL. As for any other forum getting banned is only online death it is not mortal death. Truth is I can still access any forum any time I want banned or not. Good shot but no potato. Your such a wanna be it will be a long time before you are ever your own person. Try to be yourself and stop trying to act like other people. It does not look good on you. I guess I am the one to talk considering my user name is now very much like someone else here. But, I am not impersonating. There is a difference.

Im Buck Rogers. I am here to prove I can get in. I was banned for posting in testing. I will be around but you won,t know me. I think this place is stocked with rainmans students. That why there is always a bunch of idiots running around here. He brings new ones in every semester. Going under cover.

Sorry to hear that Buck. I have heard some bad things about the people here on some of the other time travel forums which I cant post here because they might ban me too. I thought your posting down there was more of a history lesson than anything else and I enjoyed reading it. There was a time when people prided themselves on being well read but now days everything is goverment controled and censored. Which is kinda of funny since government contractors are mod here. I also enjoyed your survival stuff and I see one of the other readers did too. I also figured you were just trying to rack up post and catch up. But others have a need to control people. What they say, think, or there actions. Which is my next statement. What I noticed is that you made enemies here from one of your comments that I read and they decided to make an example of you. As you know most of the users here don,t post and the ones that do don,t stick round very long or don,t come back very often. Tbis is basicly a mill. Grind them in and grind them out. Really not much time travel stuff. And they repeat themselves a lot too. They probably share in the revenue generated off the advertising and gift shop is the only reason I can understand why they are here. They run off anyone that tries to call themselves a time traveler. Anyway sorry to hear it. I guess I well have to read these students post instead of your stuff. Or maybe not.

[KerrTexas]

What you will see repeated quite often here are the words "responsibility" and "intention".

 

Instead of pointing the finger of blame elsewhere, can you try to explain what might Buck might have done "himself" , to bring about specific results ?

 

When someone registers in "any" forum, using "confirmed proxies", then intention becomes subject to scrutiny.

 

As far as what happens to the time travel claimants, once again the results are brought onto themselves. IF their premise is flawed, then their claim won't stand, but will crumble like a house of cards.

 

And this is the fault of whom ?

 

IF you are really interested in what Buck posted and can't find it "here" anymore, simply google the same material that is available "elsehwere".

 

Interesting to note that you are using proxies to post here in TTI. I could say that "you" are Buck ! That you used the Buck screen name as a "sock-puppet" for less than honest intentions.

 

At least some of us don't need to hide behind proxy servers, and are up-front and honest with what we write...whether anyone likes it or not.

 

 

[God_of_Time]

What you will see repeated quite often here are the words "responsibility" and "intention".

Instead of pointing the finger of blame elsewhere, can you try to explain what might Buck might have done "himself" , to bring about specific results ?

 

When someone registers in "any" forum, using "confirmed proxies", then intention becomes subject to scrutiny.

 

As far as what happens to the time travel claimants, once again the results are brought onto themselves. IF their premise is flawed, then their claim won't stand, but will crumble like a house of cards.

 

And this is the fault of whom ?

 

IF you are really interested in what Buck posted and can't find it "here" anymore, simply google the same material that is available "elsehwere".

 

Interesting to note that you are using proxies to post here in TTI. I could say that "you" are Buck ! That you used the Buck screen name as a "sock-puppet" for less than honest intentions.

 

At least some of us don't need to hide behind proxy servers, and are up-front and honest with what we write...whether anyone likes it or not.

Now days it is good to have a proxy so as not to give away your private information for others to use against you. As for hiding not only on forums but in internet chat rooms that is a common and acceptable thing to do. It is normal. When online no one in there right mind is going to not hide and bear all for some nut to come along and take advantage of that. Besides, this site is filled with so many people making up stories how would someone else be any different? Does not this site claim to be fictional? If it is fictional then its users are fictional too. At least in what they say and do online. Just read the claim section that will become apparent. I don,t think it really matters if someone is hiding or not. I see they are still trying to find that Titor person. He is almost the entire focus of this websight being here. It is ironic is it not. This site is almost a contradiction in and of itself. It is its own paradox. The mod here claims to not believe in time travel but yet he tries so hard to disprove it. That is a contradiction. In theory it is possible but causility itself defeats it. Another contradiction.