gregoricalogic Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Hello I want to explain a superimposed hypothesis understanding of max thermal metaphorical space by means of reversal of energies to equip ions in a way to procure energies. Stated here will not have emphasis towards nominal energies of the time but indeed supersede your realm of motion hereto. Imagine if you will the surge of ionic prototypical energies as you know. Take your source flow of motion in consideration of any combustive fuel so to speak and take away any previous knowledge of transport ea-their to or from. The gravitational negative properties of Earth magnetism manipulated to reverse proportion of with aid of extreme source of energy contained within collaborates effective natural motion propulsion free energy therein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 15, 2011 Share Posted July 15, 2011 Greg, I read your post - not once but three times. What in God's name is a "max thermal metaphorical space"? Metaphorical? And "The gravitational negative properties of Earth magnetism manipulated to reverse proportion of with aid of extreme source of energy contained within collaborates effective natural motion propulsion free energy therein" is simply a string of random words. It's not even a sentence. Tell me that you didn't go to an online physics and math glossary and randomly toss terms at your post - 'cause that's what appears to be the case. How about you lose the made up pseudo-science and pseudo-math sounding terms and replace them with common English. You obviously can do what you want to do but if you want discussion and some modicum of understanding on the part of the readers stating your position in a language that the majority of us can understand is a good beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 I will try. If you contain some mercury in a sealed round "bubble" (hope you can understand this) must have a whole bunch of magnets rotating around this mercury at very high power, given your Earth's gravity, free energy, and etc., a disc shaped craft can manipulate speed, time and dimensions. Can you understand any better darby??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Actually if my history is correct this was put on paper in modern times in 1916. Free energy is my explanation of a flow of energy all around you. You can't see this yet but you could almost reach out and grab it in front of you. Don't go with the flow of the "know", take a chance at the "unknown", it is all around us. Many doors lie ahead just waiting to be opened, just know that gravity has it's advantages and disadvantages, just use the unknown of ANTI gravity to explore a new possibility of speed and inter-dimensional travel that can twist modern sciences grasp on REALITY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Actually if my history is correct this was put on paper in modern times in 1916. What paper would that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Greg, Let's break your post down and see if it makes any sense: If you contain some mercury in a sealed round "bubble" (hope you can understand this) A hollow sphere filled with mercury? must have a whole bunch of magnets rotating around this mercury Surrounded by rotating magnets (or are the magnets rotating around the sphere)? at very high power The magnets have powerful magnet fields or their angular momentum is powerful due to their mass, radius and rate of spin? given your Earth's gravity That is a given - all massive bodies have an associated gravitational field free energy This is not a given - what the heck is free energy? and etc Etcetera? Maybe some details need to be filled in here. Etectera is slightly vague. a disc shaped craft A flying saucer can manipulate speed, time and dimensions So can I. So can you. We can all manipulate speed (gas pedal - brake pedal), time (go fast, stand by a ball of lead or mercury or any other mass...may not be much but it is a manipulation), dimensions (go left, go right, go forward, go backwards, go up, go down...in addition to manipulating time).What do you mean by "dimensions". In science and math a dimension is a degree of freedom (DOF) expressed as one axis on a graph of one or more axes and by a variable in a math equation. Time is a dimension, speed (or better, velocity) is normally a four dimensional expression that includes the time dimension - unit change in location (x,y,z) per unit change of time (t). Because velocity is a vector quantity you also derive the direction of the change in location, and then you graph it. Can you understand any better darby??? Absolutely not other than to parse the fragments of the sentence. Does it make any scientific sense? No.As I said, why don't you lose the made up jargon and just say in plain, simple English what it is you want to say. Really, it would go much faster if I understood what it is you are attempting to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 just use the unknown of ANTI gravity to explore a new possibility of speed and inter-dimensional travel Let's assume for the sake of the discussion that anti-gravity is real in the macro world (the world where quantum effects are nil on the large scale).Anti-gravity would not have magical properties. It would just be gravity with a change in sign. Anti-gravity won't allow any special form of transportation that gravity doesn't allow for. What is the advantage of anti-gravity for space travel? Gravity is attractive so anti-gravity is repulsive. What massive body is it that you want to repel? Why do you want to go extremely fast to get from here to there? I'm assuming that the "new possibility of speed" means approaching the speed of light. I understand that there is a short term advantage for the crew to have their ship travel near the speed of light but there's a huge downside. The crew has to live with the relativistic effects of such high velocities. The trip might be very quick for them as they travel 1000 light years to another part of the Milky Way and back but here on Earth they will be gone for 2000 years. What's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easdraagl Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Gregoricalogic, everything you say seems to be vague scientific babblings. Perhaps you could sew them into a cohesive thought if you went back to the beginning and described in great detail what exactly you are talking about. Give a background, site sources, and tell us what the purpose of your posting is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easdraagl Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Oh, and why did you call the post "no" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gpa Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 I wonder if Greg was under the influence of "something" and he came across an article like this one and superconductivity is what he's trying to discuss? Or it may just be a nonsense post. It is certainly confusing. http://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=388 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 why do you even try anymore? they are just playing games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 ruthless, I agree that we have people who purposely post nonsense "just because". I really don't believe that Greg is one of those people. Based on all of his posts since he joined the forum I'm convinced that he believes what he posts, wants to share his thoughts and get some feedback. The real problem is that he posts in a form that he probably never uses when he's just having a casual conversation, whether in person, texting, on the phone or in an email. He ends up using language in his posts that isn't understandable to the reader. I'm encouraging him to post in terms that he might use in those conversations so we can get a better handle on his ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted July 20, 2011 Author Share Posted July 20, 2011 Some of you are right and some of you are wrong, with a little bit of conversation, we can all get along. You don't know me nor do I know you, given the chance we are all far from few. Now let's imagine that for as far as you can remember, I come back to put things together? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 20, 2011 Share Posted July 20, 2011 ruthless, On the other hand you might be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruthless Posted July 20, 2011 Share Posted July 20, 2011 yeah, not everyone here is a crackpot. you are definitely a wise fellow, and i commend you for your patience with some, including myself at times. i was just wondering why you keep trying, because i want to understand. to me, alot of these people just spout fantasy-type b.s. and, in my opinion, think this is some kind of fantasy site. they also speak in a, "i'm the bees knees!" type manner. its no secret that i look up to you, and i have learned alot from you. i was thinking that i might be enlightened by your motives. ive been here for, what, 5 years or so now? i posted more than most, and i contributed as much as i could, always trying to promote any new idea that i could ponder up. i have seen so many bright minds come and go, and most of them were ran off by the nonsense that occurs here. they just got tired of people not seeing what they percieve as the bigger picture. sorry for the long post. you know i care alot about this site, and i always wished it could be bigger and more important to the world than what it is. i can percieve many ways of looking at it, but my final conclusion is always that its a losing battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted July 20, 2011 Author Share Posted July 20, 2011 Just wanted to say that in the truth of the matter regarding my post, I really believe in what I say here. I did not find this forum by accident. Actually when I signed up, I was glad to find a forum with common interest and theories like mine. I guess that when Darb comes back always debunking or seeing some sort of "trick" I am trying to pull out of my ass, I get a little disturbed. I remember my last post on parallel universes or dreams and I know it may have come across as a bogus theory or concept, I really was positive about my ideas. The purpose of this forum, I thought, was to share this stuff with the other members and talk about it. It was then when you picked at everything I said and discredited my idea's and thought, I figured why even share anything here. We are all obviously interested in the same "stuff", but again we must realize there are some nuts out there claiming to have traveled in time, come back to retrieve some sort of scientific artifact or whatever. I myself do not claim to be a time traveler but just a normal guy with some elaborate theories and concepts. Although all of my majors back in my college days were unrelated to science or physics, I have a real hard core drive to study this stuff mainly from past circumstances or occurrences that happened to me personally that I can't explain or understand? I just wanted to clear this up so my intentions here are understood. Some of the crap I state here does kind of sound like I pulled it off a website or bizarre babbling of some sort but what I am trying to do is just document this stuff as I dream it? Thank you for listening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted July 20, 2011 Author Share Posted July 20, 2011 Now here is where thing's get interesting, I heard a story the other day and since then I have been trying to do some research. A guard was working at a nuclear type facility in Europe. I think it could have been in Germany. At some point in this guard's shift he glimpsed at someone rounding a corner. He ran out and went around the building. As he got to one side of the building he was able to catch a glimpse of a person getting ready to go around the other corner. The guard went into some sort of panic and could not believe that he saw what he had saw. The guard described to upper management with a perfect description of a WWII era German soldier wearing SS gear doing some sort of "snooping" around the facility. As the guard rounded the other corner the soldier paniced and vanished. I was wondering if anyone else has heard about this and if you could share any facts with me. The theory goes that it was believed that the Germans were experimenting with time travel and had sent a scout to check out this facility in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easdraagl Posted July 20, 2011 Share Posted July 20, 2011 I did some googling, and I think I know what you are talking about. There was a secret Nazi project called "Die Glocke" (The Bell) that is speculated to have been many different things, a time machine being one of them. Did they ever complete it? What was it for? No one knows. Here is a link to one particularily informative website: http://bell.greyfalcon.us/ Typing in Die Glocke combined with time travel and other stuff gets you a lot more websites like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gpa Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Or maybe this is what Greg is describing? http://www.history.com/shows/ancient-aliens/videos/playlists/season-1-web-exclusives#ancient-aliens-foo-fighters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 alot of these people just spout fantasy-type b.s. and, in my opinion, think this is some kind of fantasy site. This is a fantasy alt-sci site - Raul makes that very clear on the pages that are not the forum. But if it wasn't entertaining and at times even educational I wouldn't have invested 11 years of my time on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Greg, I guess that when Darb comes back always debunking or seeing some sort of "trick" I am trying to pull out of my ass, I get a little disturbed. Where did you get that from this: I agree that we have people who purposely post nonsense "just because". I really don't believe that Greg is one of those people. Based on all of his posts since he joined the forum I'm convinced that he believes what he posts, wants to share his thoughts and get some feedback. The real problem is that he posts in a form that he probably never uses when he's just having a casual conversation, whether in person, texting, on the phone or in an email. He ends up using language in his posts that isn't understandable to the reader. I'm encouraging him to post in terms that he might use in those conversations so we can get a better handle on his ideas. In your last post you may have been annoyed at me but you suddenly, and I thank you for it, started to post in plain English that we can all understand. I got the message load and clear even if I don't understand why.You call it debunking. What do you think that a real scientist goes through during the peer review process? The peer reviewers take the paper apart sentence by sentence looking for holes in the theory, looking for vague language that is not readily understandable, looking for statements that are not supported, looking for conclusions based on false premises, looking for math errors, etc. Of course scientists occassionally get pissed off at the reviewers because they've spent so much time putting their paper together only to get "knit-picked". In the end, however, the paper ends up being cleaned up and ready for publication (or its rejected). Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorne had a 25 year long ongoing peer review, with Thorne as the reviewer, concerning Hawking Radiation and whether or not there is information loss as a black hole evaporates. Thorne was there to debate Hawking every time Hawking spoke on the topic to fellow cosmologists. Is was friendly but is was unrelenting criticism from Thorne. Try enduring that sort of "debunking" for a quarter of a century from a friend. It's the same here, though not quite as serious. All that I'm asking you is to go back and look at your initial post on the thread - read it, as best you can, as if it was new information to you and posted by someone else. Then ask yourself if people can actually understand the message absent being inside your brain where all of the other information concerning the topic is stored, i.e. all they know are the words on the page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregoricalogic Posted December 17, 2011 Author Share Posted December 17, 2011 I found this the other day and thought you would like it? NAZI TIME MACHINE One of the world's leading experts on Nazi Germany says Hitler mastered time itself, sending 'time warriors' centuries into the future to conquer a world that is yet to be! Dr. Kurt Fischer told a symposium in Mysen, Norway, that evidence accumulated over the past 64 years has convinced him that the Nazis developed a crude but working time machine before the fall of Germany in 1945. He says parts of the machine and tattered blueprints were recovered from a bombed-out bunker in Berlin by Allied forces. And he suspects that Hitler, long obsessed with paranormal science, might have used the device to propel himself into the future and back on numerous occasions. 'Volumes have been written about the Nazis' heavy water experiments and Hitler's obsession with perfecting the atom bomb,' said Dr. Fischer. 'But the cutting edge of Nazi technology was concerned with nothing less than the mastery of time and space itself. 'There is evidence to suggest that they did, in fact, open a portal. It couldn't help them alter the course of World War II. But there is a very real possibility that it gave them a chance to win an even greater victory – the control and domination of our future.' Fischer provided ample documentation for his broader theories during his presentation in Norway. In a dramatic videotaped interview, secret Nazi physicist Erich Kreiner – now deceased – confirmed that he was one of 28 scientists who conducted the time-travel experiments. He refused to name his colleagues and appeared to be addled or intentionally evasive when asked to discuss specifics. But he did say the Nazi goal was to send 5,000 elite troops to Germany in the year 2145, which was then 200 years into the future. 'There was some measure of success,' he said, adding that several technicians were sent decades into the future and returned to their own time before Germany fell to the Allies. 'I don't know if there is a connection. But German police reported that a man in Nazi uniform appeared at a power plant near Dresden last August and later vanished from a heavily guarded cell,' said Dr. Fischer. 'Was that man a Nazi time traveler? Unfortunately, we'll never know for sure.' Components of the purported time machine that were recovered from the Berlin bunker have long since been lost, he added. But detailed descriptions contained in Allied inventory reports suggest that it was no bigger than a filing cabinet and was designed to generate light and ultra-high frequency sound waves. 'It's a chilling prospect, but the greatest threat to our future may not be an enemy that exists today,' said Dr. Fischer. 'It might be the Nazis – and a world controlled by a madman.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts