Jump to content

Covid: Trump said "This was artificially induced"


PaulaJedi
 Share

Recommended Posts

This was artificially induced.

 

Trump said this a few days ago during a news conference and it didn't click. Here is the transcript, but I'm sure you can find the video somewhere.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-18/

 

Was this him telling us something or was it just an on the fly comment?

 

Thoughts?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

IMHO,

 

We are at war with China, but for some reason the GOV does not wish to tell people that. All of the circumstantial evidence adds up to this conclusion to me. China decided they would cave to Trump's trade war, on paper, but then kicked off this information (DNA=information) warfare at the same time.

 

RMT

 

We definitely are at war with China, a cold and biological war. Trump always said he doesn’t like to reveal his moves to the enemy, but he drops us hints ALL the time. MSM calls us nuts, but that is actually good because then he can speak to us without them interfering. Let them be dumb.

 

Started with SARS, did it not?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

He was talking about the virus during a Covid press conference. Why is pretty obvious. We're in a cold war with China.

Thanks for clairifying your position of what (the virus) was artificially induced, any insight on the "Why"

 

Which brings up another question - how do you artificially "induce" (Seems an odd word) a "virus" ?

 

Induce has a ring of moving something by stimulation - apply an external force, or to cause the formation (or response) of something.

 

How do you "artificially induce" a non living thing of DNA/RNA?

 

With you making the implication of "were at war" - are there other tools which could be used to artificially induce such a biological response?

 

Could what we call this virus actually be the artificially induced response, and if so what caused that, and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for clairifying your position of what (the virus) was artificially induced, any insight on the "Why"

 

Trump said it, not me. I already answered “why”. War. Not all wars are fought on a battleground.

 

Which brings up another question - how do you artificially "induce" (Seems an odd word) a "virus" ?

 

We can only speculate. I bet you can come up with some ways. I would imagine if someone made a virus in a lab and introduced it into a meat market, that would qualify because it would not be natural.

 

How do you "artificially induce" a non living thing of DNA/RNA?

 

Maybe you have some ideas since this is a discussion forum. I would consider any way of being exposed on purpose and not in a totally natural way would be “artifical”.

 

Injecting meat with a syringe?

Aliens releasing it from a jar?

People from the future accidentally infecting us?

 

The problem is that it began right smack next to the Wuhan lab. Big red flag.

 

With you making the implication of "were at war" - are there other tools which could be used to artificially induce such a biological response?

 

Everyone in America knows we are in a cold war with China. Some think they have even released the “murder hornet”, but I cannot refute or support that because I have not studied it. I’ll make a separate post about that later.

 

Could what we call this virus actually be the artificially induced response, and if so what caused that, and why?

 

Oh, so you think the virus is the response. That implies someone else made the first move. Well, our economic sanctions weren’t biological, but were a definite hard hitting move. Of course, we could also be at war with aliens or time travelers. I just have not seen any proof. Share some with us if you like. It would make interesting conversation.

 

Indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for clairifying your position of what (the virus) was artificially induced, any insight on the "Why"

 

Which brings up another question - how do you artificially "induce" (Seems an odd word) a "virus" ?

 

Induce has a ring of moving something by stimulation - apply an external force, or to cause the formation (or response) of something.

 

How do you "artificially induce" a non living thing of DNA/RNA?

 

With you making the implication of "were at war" - are there other tools which could be used to artificially induce such a biological response?

 

Could what we call this virus actually be the artificially induced response, and if so what caused that, and why?

 

Why do you think that China would conduct a psyop in a war?

 

There is an article that was published in 1890 entitled, "Can Diseases of Man Be Artificially Induced in Animals?" So the use of that particular terminology is not new.

 

Potentially being a psyop conducted by the Chinese government / military, "artificially induced" is appropriately applicable to the creation of, spread of, and the responses to COVID 19. ( as per the definitions quoted dictionary for the words "artificial" and "induce" ; not your ring of ... )

 

The mention of DNA/RNA wasn't in reference to a living thing. The reference was about the information contained within DNA/RNA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think that China would conduct a psyop in a war?

......

The mention of DNA/RNA wasn't in reference to a living thing. The reference was about the information contained within DNA/RNA.

 

I want to clarify - I never stated that I believed China would (or wouldn't) conduct a Psyop in a war, and I have no opinion on whether this is a war at all, and even if so - who would be leading it.

 

My mention of a DNA/RNA is to highlight a virus is not a living thing - and on it's own - does not have an active ability to target anyone or anything with predjudice and or, any true degree of accuracy. I imagine it to have no more personality than a mannequin - lifeless without a host.

 

Rather - my question - still is why?

 

Viruses have been around a long time; it astounds me that anyone thinks they can be controlled/engineered/eliminated effectively at all, and in turn, used at will.

 

Maybe a clarification of this question is - are there other means to "induce" a response that (can be / or is being) characterized as what we currently believe**** is a response to a virus - and If so why would one do this??

 

Suspend disbelief - Ignore the "virus" for now - what else would cause this and why???

 

Thanks in advance for insight to what is simply a curiosity to me.

 

**** edited word - from know to believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, so you think the virus is the response. That implies someone else made the first move. Well, our economic sanctions weren’t biological, but were a definite hard hitting move. Of course, we could also be at war with aliens or time travelers. I just have not seen any proof. Share some with us if you like. It would make interesting conversation.

 

Response - sort of.... Frankly I'm not sure.

 

As a guideline I try and only operate on what I know (which is limited) and try and rule out obvious "Problem Reaction Solution" as a narrative setting rather than information.

 

I'm trying to ascertain whether it is plausible a cover(t) "virus" would help many countries avoid attention, or whether it's equally plausible this is a war of nations and not a war between nations - if its a war at all.

 

Thanks in advance for insight to what is simply a curiosity to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ti

Response - sort of.... Frankly I'm not sure.

 

As a guideline I try and only operate on what I know (which is limited) and try and rule out obvious "Problem Reaction Solution" as a narrative setting rather than information.

 

I'm trying to ascertain whether it is plausible a cover(t) "virus" would help many countries avoid attention, or whether it's equally plausible this is a war of nations and not a war between nations - if its a war at all.

 

Thanks in advance for insight to what is simply a curiosity to me.

 

Are you Oliver Williams?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need time for posts to marinate. I am sorry you didn't get the answers you wanted. But we are here to discuss, so feel free to do so.

 

No worries and no apology is necessary....

 

Answers rarely come easy - that is what makes both the though behind it, and expression of it valuable.

 

I'm looking forward to added discussion as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries and no apology is necessary....

 

Answers rarely come easy - that is what makes both the though behind it, and expression of it valuable.

 

I'm looking forward to added discussion as well.

 

Hang in there. I will be marinating this topic for a while and also, we haven't had an official re-opening, yet. Things will get busier soon.

 

"Why" is both a simple and complicated question. Why use a virus as a weapon? It's sneaky and very difficult to trace. It can take down an economy and ruin a civilization. The people perpetrating this virus can receive a vaccine in advance, assuming it was carefully planned.

Nuclear weapons destroy the planet and the attack would most likely be returned.

 

Putting politics aside, I've always wondered if viruses were Earth's way of cleaning up the planet. After all, humans are basically parasites.

Earth does a great job of healing herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viruses have been around a long time; it astounds me that anyone thinks they can be controlled/engineered/eliminated effectively at all, and in turn, used at will.

 

Seriously? I am betting you had a hard time typing that while you were laughing. You don't actually believe what you are claiming, do you?

 

https://www.nap.edu/read/5708/chapter/2

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_virus

 

It almost makes me think you wrote that specifically to wake me from my slumber. I am in the middle of grading senior projects for the end of spring semester right now, so yes I am busy. But not too busy to challenge silly statements.

 

RMT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? I am betting you had a hard time typing that while you were laughing. You don't actually believe what you are claiming, do you?

 

https://www.nap.edu/read/5708/chapter/2

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_virus

 

It almost makes me think you wrote that specifically to wake me from my slumber. I am in the middle of grading senior projects for the end of spring semester right now, so yes I am busy. But not too busy to challenge silly statements.

 

RMT

 

makes my point and not laughing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_virus#Safety_concerns_and_regulation

Bio-hazard research limitations

The National Institute of Health declared a research funding moratorium on select Gain-of-Function virus research in January 2015.[55] Questions about a potential escape of a modified virus from a biosafety lab and the utility of dual-use-technology, dual use research of concern (DURC), prompted the NIH funding policy revision.[56][57]

 

GMO lentivirus incident

A scientist claims she was infected by a genetically modified virus while working for Pfizer. In her federal lawsuit she says she has been intermittently paralyzed by the Pfizer-designed virus. "McClain, of Deep River, suspects she was inadvertently exposed, through work by a former Pfizer colleague in 2002 or 2003, to an engineered form of the lentivirus, a virus similar to the one that can lead to acquired immune deficiency syndrome, or AIDS."[58] The court found that McClain failed to demonstrate that her illness was caused by exposure to the lentivirus,[59] but also that Pfizer violated whistleblower protection laws.[60]

 

I consider wisdom as the ability to ignore what can be accomplished in favor of deciding whether it should be.

 

I wish there was something for scientists equivalent to financial world "Past success does not guarantee future performance."

 

Maybe "Safe in a controlled petri dish does not guarantee safe in the uncontrollable real world?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang in there. I will be marinating this topic for a while and also, we haven't had an official re-opening, yet. Things will get busier soon.

 

"Why" is both a simple and complicated question. Why use a virus as a weapon? It's sneaky and very difficult to trace. It can take down an economy and ruin a civilization. The people perpetrating this virus can receive a vaccine in advance, assuming it was carefully planned.

Nuclear weapons destroy the planet and the attack would most likely be returned.

 

Putting politics aside, I've always wondered if viruses were Earth's way of cleaning up the planet. After all, humans are basically parasites.

Earth does a great job of healing herself.

 

Thanks - I appreciate your take on this. similar to the "cleaning up" - my original though was more akin to a refinement or advancement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a clarification of this question is - are there other means to "induce" a response that (can be / or is being) characterized as what we currently believe**** is a response to a virus - and If so why would one do this??

 

Suspend disbelief - Ignore the "virus" for now - what else would cause this and why???

 

Thanks in advance for insight to what is simply a curiosity to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else would cause this and why?

 

Chemtrails?

Poisoned food?

Fake placebo effect?

God?

The masters controlling the simulation?

Aliens?

Mother Earth?

Particles from meteorites?

Stardust?

Solar Flares?

Reaction to screwing with the timeline?

Psychic powers?

 

It could all be fake as well and the so called virus is just the flu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...