Jump to content

Dont believe


<em>Guest</em>
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm, interesting thread. I for one, think speed is not the answer, but molecular breakdown.

 

All things "breakdown" at a molecular level. Given enough time something will deteriorate, will it not? What if we could match (or extrapolate) the speed at which something will decompose or something did decompose?

 

Something will decompose=future

 

Something did decompose=past

 

If a device could be made that could match the molecular timing at which an object decomposed, I feel one could determine a time where this or any object existed intact or at a juncture one could get to.

 

Suppose you sit in your machine and determine the breakdown "speed" of an object near you. You extrapolate back and match the objects molecular breakdown and move in time to its origin. You could reverse that option travel into the future to where the object would have been if it had not "broke down".

 

Naturally objects such as stone or rock have a slower molecular breakdown and exist longer. People once no longer alive breakdown faster! But every item has some kind of molecular speed at which it exists and transfers its energy into something else. Match its "vibrational" structure and move with it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually in referrence to the molecular suggestions, we would be examining potential methods to break down the molecular components of the body, and reasemble it into the buble via a means of quantum injections that are sent in packets vey much like the data that is being transmitted to deliver this message over the internet.

 

This quantum bubble, would be shielded to withstand any outside influences from interacting with the contents (the traveller) and be connected by a series of broadband quantum Time~Streams which contain all the information connected to the orginating world-Line from whence it departed, as to ensure zero divergence, thus enabling the traveller to return to their original worldline from any given point in Time of their coordinated destination.

 

(CCS-Q-S) = "Closed Curcuit,-Quantum-Time Stream"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Everyone,

 

As Time02112 the CC-Q-TS or Closed Circuit Quantum Time Stream is comparable to the inductive verses capacitive electrical devices. An inductors resistance is 1/2(pi)*Res Freq*L, where L is the inductance in henries. Thus the resistance for an inductor increases to infinity as the resistance increases to infinity. An inductor is a closed circuit system which means that the electricity is conducted through a short(some sort of conductive medium). Now the resistance of a capacitor is 2(pi)*res freq*C, where the C is Capacitance in Farads. Now a capacitor is like an inductor accept for one small difference. A Capacitor is electrically connected through an open Gap of vaccuum or a resistive medium. So the capacitor is electrically "open" because the electrical current arcs from the cathode to the anode through either an electro-lite or through just plain air. The resistance of a capacitor increases to infinity as the frequency decreases towards zero.

 

We have considered to ways to create a time machine. The first is to manipulate time in the past and present into a temperal circuit using time and the mass of our ship to become a conductor of tachyons. Now the ship conducts the tachyons but the ship interconnects to time is such ways as to emulate either a capacitor(The ship connects to the present while in the past through a direct energy conection by attaching a electrical cord that remains in the present as the ship travels into the past so that one end of the cord is conected to a grounding clamp here in the present and the other is connected to the end of the ship somwhere in the past.).

 

This is an inductive temperal system and the resistance of the time machine.

 

This is the closed circuit time machine.

 

The other system is the capacitive one where the system is completely seperated from the present so that the time machine entirely leaves it's previous world line so that it can not be affected by the present through the fourth dimension. The capacitive system can be created by unclamping the grounding wire and reeling it into the ship so that nothing connects the ship to present.

 

Zero divergance is created by enabing a direct path back to this dimension by the inductive system because the grounding cable serves as a constant connection between the ship and the present dimension. It is like tying a string to a tree while going into a cave so that you don't get lost.

 

All you have to do is follow the string back to get out of the cave.

 

Regards,

 

Edwin G. Schasteen What do you think?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it anything like tying a string to your tooth and a door, then slaming it shut?

 

What if your machine ends up in 4.5 Billion BC and has 12 hundred pounds of killer bacteria on it when you reel it back in?

 

I won't be my fault thats for sure. Just looking at a 'BIOHAZARD' sign is enough to scare me white.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lare

 

Explain me this. How many possible parallel universe are there according to your calculation, if you are a real phycist.

 

Let's say I went to past and kill Hitler and Mr. x will take the role of Hitler. you will go back and kill mr x so there will be another Mr y and so on. obviously today there are more people in this world than in WWII so if each one of the candidates should bekilled to stop WWII other wise it can't be stopped.

 

Let's talk about parallel universe then. according to your theory there should be equal or more amount of parallel universes for each person who will go back to past. If I go to the past and kill Mr. X's father, Mr X will not esist in this parallel universe so it will be different than this universe. A parallel universe supposed to look like this universe, if not Mr.x's father will not exist on that universe.

 

So tither way it is not possible, at least not the way you are explaining it will be.

 

I will explain it more next time.

 

HY

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a pretty long thread based upon a very short first message, perpetuated by arguments brought about in the replies.

 

First off: To what purpose?

 

Sure, the few people who follow this and other threads will get a sense of the overall arguments and be swayed by them. But people like me, who aren't going to spend a lot of time on every thread, will miss common arguments because we don't look for interesting discussions on uninteresting topics.

 

So I was wondering if somebody could post an informative topic subject and then the others can discuss on that. Afterwards, perhaps the moderator can take them and get the line posted as a FAQ or something on www.timetravelinstitute.com

 

Sounds like the arguments go round and round...

 

Second: Common ground

 

People talking about time travel talk are talking about different things. Can anybody ever give in to a question and say something like "Yes, time travel as you perceive it is impossible. However, current theory suggests that time travel like THIS is possible..."

 

Hank

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Mr Magoo,

 

Good point about the bacteria. I was going to make the external skin of any craft out of high temperature super conducting ceramic. The high temperatures needed to sustain the superconductivity of the special ceramic tiles of the craft will kill any bacteria on the surface of the craft. I just hope that we don't send it back 4.5 billion years and end up killing all the earths human, and/or our distant relatives chimpanzees, great, great, great................................great............Grand-pair amebia.

 

Regards,

 

Edwin G. Schasteen

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wouahahaha! What a mess!

 

Everybody is talking about something different in here?!! Conversations and questions are crossing each others! That's cool, it's energy, it's interest and it's a mess, mouahahah!

 

I'm not the first who posted something just about the meaning of the participation in this thread, the last to bring up the question was Yankee...

 

DAVIPER: I means by "parralel universe" (have you seen that one in South Park?!), a way to explain that; soon as time-travel is achievable, all modifications in time would make parralel "stories", in that case, there's no question about paradoxes (like the grand'pa paradox by exemple) because as soon as you change something (in the past) you create a different "world" than the one you were previously in. So, if you go kill your grandfather(...) you won't disapear, you'll stay alive, in a parralel world, and you grand-dad will still be alive in a "parallel" world that you won't have acces until you "unkill" him...

 

Got it clearer? Sounds funny does it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not putting GOOD samples instead of the killing. Anything you do before or after have results, but we still don't know in which condition. The more we think of possibilities the more we contradict. Let's better figure out the way to "prove" it. The same job we're doing now. We're not scientists, but capable of solutions by suggesting, so it'll be more "instructional". Don't you agree it'll be helpful for those doing the work?!! Let's see who's the smartest one. Let's compete!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...