Jump to content

Time


Tobin
 Share

Recommended Posts

I believe anything is possible. I also believe that we, as humans, are thinking to small. One thing that scientists don't do is think outside the box. We have limited ourselves to what we can explain.

 

If you think about it, everything we know to be true could be the exact opposite on another world. The factors are amazing when you think about them. A simple change in axis could change the way gravity works. Also, other planets may be smaller or bigger which means the gravity and air (depending on aptmosphere) could be different.

 

There are so many things out there that we cannot explain because we are assuming how it works off thoeries. This will not do. Too many people take thoeries as fact and leave it at that. We all have thoeries, but they could all be wrong.

 

I've thought long and hard about the possibilities of time travel and how it could happen. I've also thought that it's possible that the UFO's that we see, could possibly be our future race coming back to see us and study their past. You never know. The best thing we could do right now is open up our minds to ALL of the possibilities. Remembering that nothing is impossible and everything is possible.

 

There's an old saying, "Whatever go's up, must come down". Even I know that is not true. Hubble went up, and I don't see it down. One thrust and hubble is floating forever. What I am getting at here is that sayings such as that, can be proven wrong simply by thinking bigger. "Whatever go's up, must come down", is something that was said before we had space travel. Once we had space travel, we knew that not to be true.

 

Is it that we need help to see the big picture? Don't limit what you think about to thoeries and fact, open your mind to your own thoeries and explorations. Don't believe everything someone says based on the fact that they have a Ph. D. I even know that everyone is tought differently, by different teachers and in different ways. Everyone has their own way of doing things and if we try to follow those people, we get lost. Think for yourself.

 

Time Travel:

 

possibility: Black Hole. The thoery states that we would be torn apart by entering one. How do they know that? Calculations? Maybe they are just express highways through the universe. We just don't know. I'll go in and see. How's that?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not sure. I mean, if all the numbers tell me I'm going to be crushed into oblivion, I certaintly wouldn't want to be the first to try it out.

 

I do understand what you're saying though. It's likely that alot of our current theories are going to be proven wrong eventually, if the past is any indication.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is perhaps much more than meets the i.e. "Public Eye" as for what's really going on in those underground labs, all nicely tucked away from the press, or Acadamia, after all, most of what is to become commonly accepted by any oficiated statements to the media, or what later becomes accepted by scientific communities, is generally channeled through the academic structure, and latter published in academic journals & liturature, while gaining attention through various otlets of the media.

 

Perhaps this might explain as to why many research that has already gained many results to provide evidence in support of Time~Travel, or other concepts, it lacks the common elements of exposure through the channels that give it clarity of recognization & worldwide acceptance as being no longer something of whimsical fantasies belonging to overated sci-fi fans.

 

here is just one example...

 

THE DISCOVERY OF ELEMENT 115 PAVES THE WAY TO UNDERSTANDING GRAVITIC

 

CONTROL http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/element115.html

 

Element 115, the key to understanding how the ultra-secret "Black

 

World" has created aircraft capable of manipulating gravity and

 

space/time, has been identified, and the recent discovery of element

 

118, which decayed into element 114, further helps identify the

 

possibilities.

 

The most important attribute of this heavier, stable element is that

 

the gravity A wave is so abundant that it actually extends past the

 

perimeter of the atom. These heavier, stable elements literally have

 

their own gravity A field around them, in addition to the gravity B

 

field that is native to all matter.

 

The Key To Gravity-Control Systems

 

No naturally occurring atoms on earth have enough protons and

 

neutrons for the cumulative gravity A wave to extend past the

 

perimeter of the atom so you can access it. Now even though the

 

distance that the gravity A wave extends past the perimeter of the

 

atom is infinitesimal, it is accessible and it has amplitude, wave

 

length, and frequency, just like any other wave in the

 

electromagnetic spectrum. Once you can access the gravity A wave, you

 

can amplify it just like we amplify other electromagnetic waves.

 

And in like manner, the gravity A wave is amplified and then focused

 

on the desired destination to cause the space/time distortion

 

required for practical space travel.

 

This amplified gravity A wave is so powerful that the only naturally

 

occurring source of gravity that could cause space/time to distort

 

this much would be a black hole.

 

We're amplifying a wave that barely extends past the perimeter of an

 

atom until it's large enough to distort vast amounts of space/time.

 

Transmutation

 

We synthesize heavier, unstable elements by using more stable

 

elements as targets in a particle accelerator. We then bombard the

 

target element with various atomic and sub-atomic particles. By doing

 

this, we actually force neutrons into the nucleus of the atom and in

 

some cases merge two dissimilar nuclei together. At this point,

 

transmutation occurs, making the target element a different, heavier

 

element.

 

As an example, in the early 80's, the lab for heavy ion research in

 

Darmshtot, Germany synthesized some element 109 by bombarding Bismuth

 

203 with Iron 59. And to show you how difficult it is to do this,

 

they had to bombard the target element for a week to synthesize 1

 

atom of element 109. And on that subject, this same lab has projected

 

that in the future they should be able to bombard Curium 248 with

 

with Calcium 48 to yield element 116 which will then decay through a

 

series of nuclides which are unknown to them, but are well known to

 

the scientists at S4 located within the complex of the Groom

 

Lake "Area 51" installation.

 

The length of time which an element exists before it decays

 

determines its stability. Atoms of some elements decay faster than

 

atoms of other elements, so the faster an element decays, the more

 

unstable that element is considered to be. When an atom decays, it

 

releases or radiates sub-atomic particles and energy, which is the

 

radiation that a Geiger counter detects.

 

Alien Craft

 

The reactor found in the alien craft at S4, as widely mentioned by

 

physicist Robert Lazar is primarily based on a superheavy element

 

with an atomic number of 115. Element 115 will be designated

 

as "Ununpentium" according to IUPAC guidelines. Its periodic

 

designation and electron configuration appear in the diagram at the

 

top of the page.

 

The collision of lead and krypton leads to the new elements.

 

BBC News Online Science Editor Dr David Whitehouse

 

Two new "superheavy" elements have been made by bombarding lead atoms

 

with energy-packed krypton atoms at the rate of two trillion per

 

second.

 

After 11 days, the scientists working at the Lawrence Berkeley

 

National Laboratory, US, had produced just three atoms of element

 

118. These contained 118 protons and 175 neutrons each in their

 

nucleii.

 

The new elements decayed almost instantly to element 116, which

 

itself was short-lived. But, for that brief moment, they were the

 

only three atoms of these elements ever to have existed on Earth.

 

Ken Gregorich, the nuclear chemist who led the discovery team,

 

said: "Our unexpected success in producing these superheavy elements

 

opens up a whole world of possibilities using similar reactions: new

 

elements and isotopes."

 

US Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, commented: "This stunning

 

discovery opens the door to further insights into the structure of

 

the atomic nucleus."

 

Unstable combination

 

Atoms consist of a central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of

 

electrons. The nucleus consists of protons and neutrons.

 

But not all combinations of neutrons and protons are stable. In

 

nature, no element heavier than uranium, with 92 protons and 146

 

neutrons, can normally be found.

 

Scientists can make heavier ones by colliding two large nuclei

 

together and hoping that they will form a new, heavier nucleus for a

 

short time.

 

One of the most significant aspects of the new elements is that their

 

decay sequence is consistent with theories that predict an "island of

 

stability" for atoms containing approximately 114 protons and 184

 

neutrons.

 

"We jumped over a sea of instability onto an island of stability that

 

theories have been predicting since the 1970s," said nuclear

 

physicist Victor Ninov. He is the first author of a paper on the

 

discovery submitted to Physical Review Letters journal.

 

Atomic structure

 

Synthetic elements are often short-lived, but provide scientists with

 

valuable insights into the structure of atomic nuclei. They also

 

offer opportunities to study the chemical properties of the elements

 

heavier than uranium.

 

I-Yang Lee, scientific director of the atom smasher at Lawrence

 

Berkeley National Laboratory, said "From the discovery of these two

 

new superheavy elements, it is now clear that the island of stability

 

can be reached.

 

"Additionally, similar reactions can be used to produce other

 

elements and isotopes, providing a rich new region for the study of

 

nuclear properties."

 

Fast work

 

Element 118 takes less than a thousandth of a second to decay by

 

emitting an alpha particle. This leaves behind an isotope of element

 

116 which contains 116 protons and 173 neutrons.

 

This daughter is also radioactive, alpha-decaying to an isotope of

 

element 114.

 

The chain of successive alpha decays continues until at least element

 

106.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Time on our side"

 

From:] New Scientist Magazine Website... http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19991030/letters7.html

 

Julian Barbour isn't the only one who thinks time is an illusion (16

 

October, p 29). He has distinguished predecessors.

 

(Julian Barbour is an independent theoretical physicist who lives

 

near Oxford.)

 

BOOK:]

 

Julian Barbour's The End of Time is published by Weidenfeld &

 

Nicolson.

 

"Time" Our minisite produced in collaboration with the National

 

Physical Laboratory, the UK's National Standards Laboratory.

 

Website:] http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/time/time.html

 

Parmenides (540 BC) said: "The true world is one of permanence.

 

Change is also an illusion."

 

Plato said: "Time is a mental impression to which nothing in the real

 

world corresponds."

 

Einstein said: "For us physicists the distinction between past,

 

present and future signifies only an obstinate illusion."

 

The above were supplied to me a few years ago--after a discussion in

 

which I proposed that time was illusory--by Peter Landsberg of the

 

University of Southampton maths department, who wrote The Enigma of

 

Time (Adam Hilger, 1982). As we seem to be having difficulty

 

understanding this concept more than 2500 years after it was first

 

noted, I decided to study photonic crystals instead.

 

GREG PARKER

 

University of Southampton

 

I am fascinated to learn from Barbour's article that we may "soon" be

 

able to prove the non-existence of time. It would be good to know

 

roughly "when" this might happen, so I can work as much overtime as

 

possible while the concept is still valid.

 

PÅL VIDAR NYDAHL

 

[email protected]

 

next letter

 

From New Scientist, 30 October 1999

 

Additional Sources...

 

The Quantum Inquisition °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19991030/thequantum.html

 

Entangled photons could provide deep insights into our world that

 

nobody, not even physicists, expected. Michael Brooks spoke to the

 

chief inquisitor AFTER BATTLING THE STRANGENESS of time and space...

 

TIME

 

The Serpent in the Garden of Sentience... http://members.aol.com/chaque/time/time.htm

 

(More to come latter.)......

 

---"12"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...